Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Work programme on data and indicators:
ODYSSEE data base (WP2)
B Lapillonne
K Pollier
Enerdata
W Eichhammer, Joachim Schleich,
Kick-off meeting of the project
“Monitoring of EU and national energy
efficiency targets” (ODYSSEE-MURE 2010)
Madrid, 21/22 June 2010
2
Content of WP2: Top-down energy efficiency indicators and energy savings (ODYSSEE)
Task 2.1: Updating of the indicator database
Task 2.2: Training on top-down indicators
Task 2.3: Development of new indicators
3
Workprogramme : Task 2.1. Updating of the indicator database
Sub Task 2.1.1. Improvement of data template
Sub Task 2.1.2. Updating
Sub Task 2.1.3. Improvement of data and harmonization
of definition and calculation
4
Sub-Task 2.1.1 Improvement of data template (1/3)
Objectives : facilitate the work of national teams and reinforce control of
inputs data to detect inconsistencies and errors
Organisation of the new data template (red=new):
one sheet by sector (instead all data in one long sheet) including:
primary data, indicators and data controls
data from international sources (Eurostat for energy consumption,
DG Transport for data on transport traffic, EEA for CO2 emissions)
4 sheets dedicated to ODEX including sources and qualification of
the data used (qualification of data sources and uncertainty)
one ESD sheet to calculate savings for the ESD monitoring
(available in January 2011)
5
New template: organization of data by sector
6
Sub-Task 2.1.1 Improvement of data template: controls (2/3)
Check of the consistency between data;
Check of the variation from one year to another;
Automatic comparison with Eurostat /DG Transport data to see
possible differences in case of significant divergences, explanation
of the magnitude of differences to be undertaken with national teams;
Control of the order of magnitude by including reference values for
indicators (EU average);
Use of graphs to check disruption in data series.
7
New template: automatic control of data consistency
Consistency
check
Data
harmonized
Main
indicators
calculated
1
2
3
8
New template: automatic control on the last years updated
9
New template: automatic comparison with Eurostat
Indicative color if differences is higher/lower than 10%
10
New template: main indicators calculated and visualization through graphs
The user can choose a predefined indicator and visualize the trends through graphs !
11
Sub-Task 2.1.1 Improvement of data template: ESD sheet(3/3)
ESD sheet dedicated to calculate savings for the ESD monitoring , as an
assistance to national teams who want to make use of ODYSSEE data
for ESD top-down reporting (available in January 2011)
pre-formatted sheet filled in with required “ESD data” by sector*
with the qualification of ESD data in terms of sources and uncertainty
(based on ODYSSEE criteria)
with an indication of the % of ESD data supplied on top of the sheet
a calculation in the datasheet of energy savings (in ktoe and/or GWh)
by sub sector and end-use according to ESD methodology.
*The share of consumption under ETS will be estimated though a share from inventories if
data non available at national level.
12
Sub-Task 2.1.2 Updating (1)
ODYSSEE database needs to be well updated to be more useful
and credible (in May 2010, the Odyssee database was updated until
2007 (t-3 compared to now) )
3 updates of the Odyssee database will be planned with the following
objectives:
o first updating for 2008 by September 2010 and macro data for 2009
(marked with a special color) (with possibility of revisions by
December 2010)
o second updating in June 2011 (2009 data) and macro data for 2010
o third updating in June 2012 (2010 data) and macro data for 2011
Level of updating of key indicators
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
EL
FR
HR
AT
DE IT
UK
SE
ES
NL
EU
27
DK
NO IE FI
HU LV
PL SI
CZ
PT
RO
SK
BE
MT
EE
CY LT
BG
LU
Nu
mb
er
of
ind
icato
rs
Before 2006
Up to 2006
Up to 2007
At the beginning of the project (june 2010)
14
Sub-Task 2.1.2 Updating (2)
Data comments to be adressed to teams after each update to point out
data problems to continue improving both the data coverage and the
quality of updating.
New: A summary of major data revision will also be prepared for each
country and will be posted on the website
Data for non-European OECD countries (Canada, USA, Japan, Australia)
will be processed to be integrated in an harmonized way in the ODYSSEE
database.
Enerdata will be in charge of the updating for the EU as a whole. It will
make use of the data available at EUROSTAT: a document will be prepared
to explain for each sector and main data the source of data or mode of
estimate of EU wide data
15
Sub-Task 2.1.3 . Improvement of data and harmonization of definition and calculation
Assistance to countries to estimate energy consumption by end-use for
households and by vehicle type in transport. The methodology to be used
will be proposed by Enerdata and will rely on the methods presently used
in countries that provide such data.
Harmonization of definition or boundaries for energy efficiency
indicators. The focus will be given to 5 sectors:
1. Total road transport
2. Biofuels
3. Road transport of goods),
4. Industry (total vs non ETS)
5. Electricity for services
16
Sub-Task 2.1.3 . Harmonization of definition (1/3)
1. Road transport : distinction between:
“total energy consumption”, as given in Eurostat statistics,
“domestic consumption of road transport” cleaned from “border
sales” and foreign vehicles used in ODEX.
2. Road transport : control for biofuels:
Statistics on fuel consumption have two possible origins that
create confusion:
oMotor fuels sales (gasoline, diesel) where gasoline or diesel
consumption data implicitly includes biofuels
oEnergy balance where gasoline, diesel refers only to the oil
product of motor fuels (i.e. without biofuels)
Need to check that biofuels are well included in the data or
indicators by vehicle type (e.g. cars), which was not always the case
in the past.
17
Sub-Task 2.1.3 Harmonization of definition (2/3)
3. Road transport of goods :
need of harmonization of definition and boundaries for the energy
consumption, traffic and stock of vehicles, to better explain trends
of the specific consumption per ton-km (case of foreign vehicles,
transit, traffic abroad by domestic vehicles), vehicles concerned (>
3t or >6t or all categories).;
distinction between heavy trucks and light duty vehicles
4. Industry: separation of the consumption of ETS establishment by
sector through exchange of experience on how the countries are
tackling this issue and to either propose a method or to select the
best existing practice.
18
Sub-Task 2.1.3 . Harmonization of definition (3/3)
5. Services (electricity uses):
Sector with the fastest energy demand growth
Sector for which it is difficult to assess energy efficiency progress
due to lack of data.
Need to better break down the electricity consumption:
o by branch so as to have more comparable sectors of activity
o and end –use.
19
Task 2.2. Training on data and indicators
Training is important as the national experts involved in the evaluation of
energy consumption trends and in the top-down monitoring of energy
savings are changing in some countries
Training covering the following 3 topics:
o Calculation of energy savings, calculation with ODEX, difference
between various methods and indicators
o Data issues and estimates : how to improve the data coverage,
especially for consumption by end-use in buildings and by mode in
transport
o Interpretation of energy consumption/ energy intensity
variations: role of energy savings, structural changes, lifestyles…
20
Task 2.2. Training agenda
Review by sector:
Data needed: organisation of data file, different type of data, most
important data to be updated rapidly , existing data controls, usual
data problems,
Estimation of additional data
Indicators available in the data sheet: interpretation
ODEX calculation
ESD energy savings calculations
Training based on concrete examples and case studies
Training materials including on ODYSSEE web site
21
Task 2.3. New indicators
New indicators and methodologies will be developed in 5 areas:
1. Rapid estimation of indicators for year t-1 through short–term
indicators;
2. Improvement of the calculation of energy savings for end-uses
where they are underestimated or cannot be calculated because of
hidden structural changes;
3. Calculation of energy savings in primary energy terms, taking into
account losses for electricity and heat generation ;
4. Quantification of uncertainty of indicators and savings.
5. Interpretation of the variation of the primary energy intensity into
different explanatory factors.
22
SubTask 2.3.1 Short term indicators (1/2)
Need for decision maker to have the most recent views on energy
efficiency development.
However, top-down indicators rely on energy and economic statistics
which are produced with some delays:
o Typically, basic data for year t (e.g. 2008) are produced at mid- year
t+1 (e.g. mid 2009).
o More detailed data, such as energy consumption by end-use or sub-
sector may require 6 months to one year more and will be typically
available at year t+2 (e.g. 2010).
23
SubTask 2.3.1 Short term indicators (2/2)
Task and timing:
oDevelopment of the methodology and the test on forecasting capability
will begin directly at the start of the project, as to provide preliminary
figures on energy savings: values for 2010 by spring 2011, for the first
NEEAP evaluation.
oExtrapolation made by:
Econometric methods for energy use indicator (e.g.
kWh/appliance or /m2)
And extrapolation/modeling for diffusion indicators
o. A list of “fast” data/indicators (e.g. GDP, diffusion indicator) will be set
up to identify the data needed in this extrapolation.
oResponsibility: Enerdata
24
SubTask 2.3.2 Correction of energy savings from structural changes (1/2)
Objective : Propose a methodology to clean the consumption (mainly
electricity in households or services) from structural changes not yet
corrected to measure savings when the indicators show an increasing
trends:
in services for example, this increasing trends can be due to more
equipment per employee such trends cannot be considered as
reduction in energy efficiency but are due to structural changes.
This correction will mainly concern countries without sufficiently
disaggregated data by end uses or sub sector:
25
SubTask 2.3.2 Correction of energy savings from structural changes (2/2)
A shortlist of the most important data types to be gathered will be defined
based on the importance of removing structural effects, and thus improving
the quality of the overall saving figures.
The calculations will be first tested on a reference country where the data
needed exist.
Then the methodology will be applied to a limited number of countries with
a relative good data coverage and for which the structural effect is
important.
Responsibility: ECN
26
SubTask 2.3.3 Calculation of energy savings of final energy consumers in primary terms (1/2)
Final energy savings are calculated in ODYSSEE in final energy terms,
accounting electricity on the basis of its calorific value (i.e. 1 kWh=3600 kJ or
0.086 kgoe).
This means that replacing fossil fuels with electricity will show energy
savings as electricity is more efficient than fossil fuels at the level of final
consumers.
However depending how electricity is produced this substitution may
actually increase the primary energy consumption, which means that there
is no saving any more.
27
SubTask 2.3.3 Calculation of energy savings of final energy consumers in primary terms (2/2)
The ESD has left the possibility to member countries to choose how to
convert electricity into energy units and some countries have chosen to
use a conversion in primary terms (i.e. 1 kWh=10 500 kJ or 0.25 kgoe).
The project will implement a calculation of final energy savings in both
final and primary energy terms. Several possibilities will be considered as
to which coefficient to select for the conversion:
EU default value (e.g. 0.25 as proposed by ESD)
National average for power generation
National average for thermal power generation (as proxy fro a
marginal value)
Constant or fixed value?
Responsibility: Enerdata
28
Sub-task 2.3.4 Quantification of uncertainty in savings (1/2)
Goal:• ESD emphasizes the trade-off between efforts and the quality of
the savings figures
• analysis of the uncertainty can show how to improve the reliability of the saving figures the most with minimum effort on the inputs
• indicative margins to guide a more optimal calculation process
• building on earlier work on characterization of ODYSSEE input data in terms of data sources (from A to C) and uncertainty qualification ( from 1 to 3)
29
Sub-task 2.3.4 Quantification of uncertainty in savings (1/2)
Task:• Set-up of general procedure to analyse uncertainty
• Transformation of input characteristics into uncertainty margins
• Calculation of margins for savings for 3 pilot countries: The Netherlands, Austria and France
• Report on the approach and country results, including advice on better inputs contributing the most to more reliable saving figures
• Responsibility: ECN
30
Sub-task 2.3.5 Interpretation of the variation of the primary energy intensity
Goal:• Relate primary consumption and primary intensity variations to
various explanatory factors
• To be mainly used in WP 4 and presented in WP4
31
Change in ODYSSEE indicators and data (1/4): new data/data changes
Change of classifications of Eurostat (Nace rev 2):
countries are shifting progressively to the revised NACE
Change: the old and new NACE codes will be indicated
Harmonisation of emissions with official inventories (e.g. road transport)
Presently emissions from EEA used in ODYSSEE for main sectors ,
but not by sub-sector or transport modes
Change: all emissions available in EEA inventories to be used
systematically and only what is not available will be calculated in
ODYSSEE and be made consistent with EEA inventories (e.g. sum of
emission of road vehicles with total emissions from road transport);
Addition of data required to calculate ESD energy savings in services not
yet in ODYSSEE : activity by sub sector in services (e.g. number of beds
for hospitals, number of person-nights for hotels …)
32
Change in ODYSSEE indicators and data (2/4): diffusion indicators
Indicators of diffusion in ODYSSEE
Households sales of efficient /label A lamps
% of label A or A++ in new sales of electrical appliance (GfK)
installed area of solar collector (EurObserver)
Installed capacity of solar PV in buildings (IEA PVPS)
Share of new dwellings with label A
Share/number of dwellings with triple glazing
Transport % of passenger transport by public modes (calculation)
% of transport of goods by rail and water (calculation)
km/year by public modes (calculation)
% new cars < 120 gCO2 (EU monitoring)
Share of alternative fuels in consumption (e.g. biofuels, LPG,
CNG)
Share of hybrid / electric cars
Industry Share of industrial CHP (Eurostat)
Share of efficient electric motors (IE2 and IE3)
33
Change in ODYSSEE indicators and data: ODEX (3/4)
Reference year: fixed base year as in ESD?:
Presently moving reference year to avoid to be dependant on the
characteristics of one year;
This method raises some problems in case of extreme variations
as shown by Caiman Cahill from University College Cork
ESD has chose implicitly a fixed reference year (2007)
it is proposed to keep the moving reference year and to better
analyse the pros and cons of both methods
Integration in industry ODEX of “other branches”, of mining and
construction
34
Change in ODYSSEE indicators and data: ODEX (4/4)
Air transport and ODEX transport :
ODEX transport presently includes total air transport
ESD excludes air transport
it is proposed to calculate 2 ODEX transport with and without air
transport
In addition, IEA has changed its definition of final energy
consumption which now excludes international air transport, however
Eurostat will not change its definition of the final energy consumption
because of the various targets set on the consumption ODYSSEE
will follow the definition of Eurostat);