KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 1 Jean-Claude BRIENT LLR – Ecole Polytechnique LLR – Ecole Polytechnique CALICE status and Plans

KEK meeting – September 2006

J.-C. Brient (LLR) 1

Jean-Claude BRIENTJean-Claude BRIENT LLR – Ecole PolytechniqueLLR – Ecole Polytechnique

CALICE status and Plans



~200 phys./engineers 38+1 laboratories 11 countries +1 !! 3 regions

Approved PRC-DESY n°02-01Approved PRC-DESY n°02-01Presented at PAC-FNALPresented at PAC-FNAL

http://polywww.in2p3.fr/flc/calice.html

CIEMAT Madrid is in discussion for joining(meeting 25/26 September at LAL-Orsay)



UK Birmingham, Cambridge, Imperial CL, Manchester, University CL, Royal Holloway UL, Rutherford AL

USA Argonne NL, Boston , Univ. Chicago, Texas Univ.Arlington, North Illinois Univ., Univ. Iowa St,

Close contact with Fermilab

Korea Kangnung NU. , Seoul NU., Ewha Univ., Sungkyunkwan U., Yonsei U.

Czech Rep Univ. Charles-Prague, IOP-ASCR

India BARC-Mumbai

Russia ITEP, IHEP-Protvino, LPI, Moscow SU , MEPHI

France LAL-Orsay, LAPP-Annecy, LPSC-Grenoble, LLR- Ecole Poly. , LPC-Clermont , IPNL-Lyon

+ contacts with labs+ contacts with labs China China (Tsinghua) Brazil Brazil (San Paulo) CERN ,CERN , Italy Italy (Pavia, Pisa) , ETC… ETC…

Who and Where Who and Where

Labos ECALLabos HCAL

Canada McGill Univ. , Univ. Of Regina

Germany DESY , Univ. Hambourg

Belarus Minsk Univ.

JapanJapan KOBE Univ., SHINSHU Univ.

Spain CIEMAT-Madrid in discussionCIEMAT-Madrid in discussion



ECALECAL : : Sampling calorimeterSolution 1 : Solution 1 : tungstentungsten (density) - siliconsilicon (pixel size ~ Molière radius)

Solution 2 : Solution 2 : tungsten - MPPC and scintillator tile/strip

Pixels size <1cm² and about 20-30 readout layers (15 to 250 Millions channels)

The proposed solutions The proposed solutions

HCALHCAL Solution 1 : Solution 1 : Sampling calorimeter tungsten/Stainless steeltungsten/Stainless steel (density) –digital readout digital readout (pixel size)

Solution 2 : Solution 2 : Sampling calorimeter tungsten/Stainless steeltungsten/Stainless steel (density) – scintillator tile scintillator tile (small size)

Pixel size 1cm² and about 50 readout layers (~50 Millions channels)

Pixels size 16cm² and about 50 readout layers readout by silicon PM !!



A first generation prototypes, which allows to debug the concept and technologies 2001 - 2005

A second generation prototypes, much closer to the final detector 2006 - 2009

Ready for LOI, Proposal etc… in 2010 !!

Our plans Our plans



First generation prototypes First generation prototypes

ECAL ready and in use at test beam

Tile HCAL using SiPM from Russia readyand in use at test beam

Digital HCAL in plan ( waiting for funding !!!)



ECALECAL DETECTORS MATRIX DETECTORS MATRIX

Korea

Czech Russia

Brazil (Unicamp-Sao Paulo)

BARC - India

ANDAND

Hamamatsu not in the list !! (already some contact , but only with Hamamatsu-France)



TCMTTCMT



Cells in red : Signal > 20% of Mip Cells in red : Signal > 50% of Mip



Events at 20 degresEvents at 20 degres

Beam enery GeVBeam enery GeVAn

gu

lar

resolu

tion

m

rad

An

gu

lar

resolu

tion

m

rad



June 2006 , Installation at CERN H6 test beam area June 2006 , Installation at CERN H6 test beam area



ECAL(W-Si)

Tile HCAL(scint. Tiles–SiPM)

Tail Catcher(scint.strip-SiPM)









GOAL

angles 0 deg 20 deg 30 deg 45 deg per

(k Evt.) (k Evt.) (k Evt.) (k Evt.) angle

total 2843 742 2688 2375 900

energy:

(GeV)

45 933 250 753 551 250

40 347 280 311 150

30 685 270 550 531 250

20 380 110 330 208 100

15 201 181 244 50

10 297 112 594 530 100

Statistics of the CERN test beam





Test with electronTest with electron (may be small energy hadron) (may be small energy hadron) test of running with the test of running with the VFE chip INSIDE the detectorVFE chip INSIDE the detector Test beam with AHCAL+ECAL for debuggingTest beam with AHCAL+ECAL for debugging and … single layer test (new design) …

Test with HadronTest with Hadron CERN ?? Summer 2007 CERN ?? Summer 2007 MTBF Fall 2007 MTBF Fall 2007

Use Use EUDET EUDET funding for the funding for the construction of ½ ECAL module construction of ½ ECAL module with all news developments + Possible with all news developments + Possible Digital HCAL moduleDigital HCAL module

Next stepsNext steps

2008 – 2010 Second generation prototypes in test beam FNAL ?

may be the right time for an alternative ECAL with MPPC and scintillator strips ?



Second generation prototypes Second generation prototypes

Tile HCAL , ECAL in design , R&D in progress

Digital HCAL in plan ( waiting for funding !!!) (LAL, LLR, LAPP, IPNL, IHEP-Protvino, and CIEMAT ??)

KEK meeting – September 2006J.-C. Brient (LLR)

Concept : to be the most representative of the final detector module :

– A alveolar composite/tungsten structure with :- same W sampling- 3 columns of cells to have representative cells in the middle of the structure (with thin composite sheets )- Identical global dimensions (1.5m long) and shape (trapezoidal)- fastening system ECAL/HCAL (include in the design of composite structure)

– 15 Detector slabs with FE chips integrated- 1 long and complete slab (L=1.5m)- 14 short slabs to obtain a complete tower of detection (typ. L=30 cm?) anddesign of compact outlet.

Fastening system

3×15 cells

Alveolar StructureC/W

Complete Tower

Long detector slab (1)

Short detector slabs (14)

Second generation ECAL prototypeSecond generation ECAL prototype



Tested at industrial level

Better for mechanical behavior Better for mechanical behavior Better Molière radius Better for indust. assembling Better for indust. assembling DAQ based on FPGA DAQ based on FPGA better for VFE better for VFE etc…etc…

Example of R&D Example of R&D

for the for the ECAL Detector Slab ECAL Detector Slab



VFE ASIC

DataADC

1G/100Mb Ethernet PHY

BOOT CONFIG

FE-FPGAData FormatZero SuppressProtocol/SerDes

FPGA Config/Clock Extract

SlabSlab

FEFPGA

PHYVFEASIC

Data

Clock+Config+Control

VFEASIC

VFEASIC

VFEASIC

Conf/Clock

Clock

Bunch/Train Timing

Config Data

Clk

detector readout detector readout

Example of R&D Example of R&D

ECAL, AHCAL, DHCALECAL, AHCAL, DHCALA common approachA common approach



Tail Catcher

ECAL

HCALHCAL

Electronics Racks

Beam

Possible setup at FNAL MTBF



Conclusion Conclusion

Due to the lack of funding and Manpower , sharing is a necessity and therefore CALICE is just CALICE is just MANDATORY !!MANDATORY !! It is a NO-LOOSER collaboration (at the time of decision, everybody will be already in the good boat)

the progress is important (test beam) and the road map is well established Negative point LARGE labs are still missing in the collaboration (CERN, FNAL, KEK , LBL )

Due to the lack of funding and Manpower , sharing is a necessity and therefore CALICE is just CALICE is just MANDATORY !!MANDATORY !! It is a NO-LOOSER collaboration (at the time of decision, everybody will be already in the good boat)

the progress is important (test beam) and the road map is well established Negative point LARGE labs are still missing in the collaboration (CERN, FNAL, KEK , LBL )



A major lab is mandatory to organise and manage the workA major lab is mandatory to organise and manage the workon the silicon wafers for the ECAl W-Si on the silicon wafers for the ECAl W-Si

> Discuss with large producers like Hamamatsu !!> Discuss with large producers like Hamamatsu !!

> Define the protocol of the data quality control> Define the protocol of the data quality control (existing expertise and engineering structure and people)(existing expertise and engineering structure and people)

> Manage the sharing between smaller labs > Manage the sharing between smaller labs

> … > …

Documents

KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 1 Jean-Claude BRIENT LLR – Ecole Polytechnique LLR – Ecole Polytechnique CALICE status and Plans