Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lecture 3
KatyCraig 2021
Recall
Deftfield A set F is a field if it has two
operations addition and multiplicationwhich satisfy the following properties forall elements a b CEFAI at btc at b t C associativityAZ at b b ta commutativityIA3 there exists an element in F
called 0 sit for all aEF at a a identityAU for each a c F there exists an
element called a C Fast at a 0 inverse
M1 alba ab c associativityM2 ab ba commutativityMS F an element in f called 1
St 1 10 and Va EF a f a identityM 4 for each AEF at 0 there exists an
element called ta EF s t a ta L inverse
distributiveDL allot c abt ac Iaf
Def ordered field A field F is an ordered
field if it has an ordering relation E
so that for all a b c EF
Ot either a E b or be a totality1021 if a c b and bea then a bantisymmetric03 if a Eb and bec then a E c transitivity1041 if a
c b then ate Ebtc addition05 if AE b and C 20 then a CE b e multiplication
On an ordered field wemay define
notions
of maximum Iminimum bounded above below
and supremumlingimum
Deff maximum minimum For SEF Max s is the
largest element of S and mines is the smallest
element of S M is an upperbound
gsDefboundedabove below For.SEif F Me F s t H se S s E m then S is boldaboveif F me F s t V s E S s z m then S is bold below
m is a lower bound ofsIf S is bold above and below then it is bold
Def supremumlinfimums For SEF the supremumofSs the least upper bound of S and the infinumgsis the
qfqatest.to er bEu.nd of S
i e if G so so is a lower bound 5 that is so Es Vs ES
so is 2 any other lowerbound
Ex If 5 Ca b we will soon prove that
infls min s a
sup s b though the set has no maximum
Re makC gumming
Wheneverthey exist max G ES and mints ESOnthe other hand supls and inf G don't
necessarily belong to S EF for Fan offended
Any finite set 5 se Sz Ss Sid always hasa minimum and maximum
aExerciseGi ven an ordered field F and S E F
If Max S exists then sup Lst mailsIf min S exists then infls min s
Because of this the supremumlingimumis a generalization of the notion ofmaximum minimum
Def Creal numbers the set of realnumboisis the ordered field containing Q withtheproperty that
every nonempty subsetSER
that is bold above has a supremum
The Least Upper BoundProperty ofreal Numbers
We'll study two major theorems for RArc Eropotty and Qisdense.in R
MAJOR RESULT 1
Them Archimedean Property If a b E IR
satisfy a 0 and boo then there exists NEIN
so that na bTspoon bathtub
Rem ak Even if a isreally small
andb is huge some integer multiple of a isbigger than b
Given enough time one can emptya
large bathtub with a small spoon
we will prove by contradiction
Scratchwork
D ta b O F n HN s t na b
P Fa b O s t V nel N na E b
Pf Assume for the sake of contradictionthat F a be IR with a O b O S t
for all new na Ebµa Za Ba 4A
Define 5 na NEIN so b is an upperbound for S Since S is a nonempty subset
of R that is bounded above by olefin ofRS has a supremum Define so sup S
Since a 0 we have so a Soc SotaSince so sup
s there exists no C INS t So a no a so thot Da
Since thot1 a ES this contradicts the
fact that so is an upper bound of S O
As a consequence ofthe Archimedean
Property we have a few useful lemmas
Lemme For anya EIR there exists NEIN s t asn
Pf If at 0 then the result holds for relIf a58th'T then since 15 9 by AP
0there exists me IN s t I n a
Lemmaj For any a.be Racts there exists NEIN
so that at the b
ftp.attnI 1 3Mental image a b
spoonbathtub
Pf Let y b a O and I 0 By APthere exists me IN Stmy
IyI
b a In at In b O
Jemima If x.ge R satisfy Kxy then
FMEZso that y mix
myMental image
C I I 3
Y there shouldbe an integersomewhere in here
Pf By the first Iemma there exists me INs t n
y Define 5 jez y jenThen S is nonempty and finite so
m min S exists By defn of m MEZ
yarn and m leg Thereforeyam Etty X O
Now we will apply the previous lemmasto proveMAJOR THEOREM 21
The CQ is dense in IR If a bHR with acb
there exists r C Q satisfying a r b
r C Q
Mental imageL l l l 7
a EIR BEIR
This is similar to the result we proved on thefirst day that between any two rationalmembers there is a ratiberT
PffBy the lemma F nel NS.t.attncbnatl Cbn Isbn an By theother lemma there exists in E Z so
that ane m bn a In Lb O
We now have all the tools we need to
rigorously prove our previous claimsabout the minimum Imaximumlingimumlsupremum of subsets of R For example
Prep For a b E IR a b the set 5 Ca bdoes not have a maximum and sup s b
2 1,93F st we show that S does not have a
maximum Assume for the sake ofcontradiction that max G MoSince Moes F Mo b
By densityofIQ
in IR F r E Q s t Moc r e b so r ESThis contradicts that Mo was the
largest element in S
Now we show supG b By defin of Sb is an upper bound SuppsoomsEa Mo isanother upper bound of S If Mo Lbthen by densityof IQ in IR F r E Q s t
Mo L r L b s o r E S which is a contradictionThus Moz b so b is the least upper bound O
Goingforward we will use to and to
simplify our notation for Suprema and infima
Ex 1a ta x EIR ac x x EIR a xd to
Def Unbounded above below Suppose SECR isnonemp
If S is not bounded above write supG too
If S is not bounded below write infa
Remark Given anonempty
SEIR
Bydefn of supremum and R
S has a supremum S is bounded above
supG ER
SimilarlyS doesn't have a supremum S is not bonnadggle
supGto
Using this notation even though not
every sethas a supremum for any
nonempty SEIR sup G has meaning