18
Positive Youth Development and High- Yield, Nature-Based, Outdoor Experiences: Family Perceptions and Family Inclusive Opportunities Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program College of Health, Education, and Human Development Clemson University

Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

  • Upload
    danyl

  • View
    30

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Positive Youth Development and High-Yield, Nature-Based, Outdoor Experiences: Family Perceptions and Family Inclusive Opportunities. Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program College of Health, Education, and Human Development Clemson University. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Positive Youth Development and High-Yield, Nature-Based, Outdoor Experiences:

Family Perceptions and Family Inclusive Opportunities

Katie M. ShawYouth Development Leadership Graduate Program

College of Health, Education, and Human Development

Clemson University

Page 2: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Introduction• High-Yield, Nature-Based, Outdoor

Experiences– Sense of place• Basic Needs and Self Determination Theory

– Resiliency Training• Families are essential component to

youth development Outdoor

Experiences Important

Family Important

Lack of Connection

Page 3: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Problem• Youth partaking in fewer HYNBOE and

efforts to promote participation lack family inclusiveness

• Programs remove youth from proximal environment to promote PYD– Deter: • Optimal development • Internal motivation

Constraints to Family

Participation in HYNBOE

Reliance on Engineered Entertainme

nt

Less Engagement

in Natural World

Page 4: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Purpose

• Resulting data will help ascertain– Thematic overlap in parental perceptions – Potential programming needs and transferable efforts

within the field that address parental perceptions

Qualitative Evaluation

Parent Perceptions

Constraints

Benefits

Outdoor Organization

s

Family Inclusive Efforts

Page 5: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Guiding Questions1) What are parents' perceived benefits of participation in high-yield,

nature-based, outdoor experiences?

2) What are parents' perceived barriers or constraints to participation in high-yield, nature-based, outdoor experiences?

3) Do barriers or constraints to partaking in high-yield, nature-based, outdoor experiences preclude the benefits gained from participation?

4) Do outdoor organizations aim to make the benefits of participation as identified by parents attainable through family inclusive, high-yield, nature-based, outdoor programming?

5) Do outdoor organizations aim to overcome barriers or constraints as identified by parents to make participation in family inclusive, high-yield, nature-based, outdoor experiences possible?

Page 6: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Literature Review• High-Yield Activities (Sibthorp &

Morgan, 2011)

HYNBOE

Cognitive & Behavior

Competency Keen

Awareness & Sensory

Skills

Learning Performanc

e

Motivation

InitiativeContributing to Self, Family,

Community, & Society

Empathy

Strong Sense of Identity

Strong Relationshi

ps with Adults &

Peers

Moral Character

Page 7: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Literature Review

• National Kids Survey (Cordell, Green, Larson, Stephens, Fly, & Schexnayder,

2011)– 63%, >80%, 50% – Types of outdoor activities cause concern• Louv's (2008) Nature Deficit Disorder

– Engineered entertainment outdoors • Constraints Theory (Crawford, Jackson, & Godbey,

1991)

Page 8: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Literature Review

• Needs Attention: – Integration of families and communities

in outdoor program design and implementation

– Constraints: Safety and Feasibility – Benefits: Gap in Literature

Page 9: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

• Qualitative Investigation: – Grounded Theory

• Population & Sample: – Parents – Outdoor Organizations

Methodology

Page 10: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Methodology• Data Collection: – Parent

• Semi Structured Interview – Organization

• Document Review• Instrumentation: – Researcher– Script– Audio-Recorder– Form

Page 11: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Methodology• Parent Data Analysis: Inductive Process– Open Coding (Bogdan & Biklen, 1992, as cited in Creswell, 2009)– Axial Coding of Constraints Constraint

Theory Model– Selective Coding of Benefits Broader

Themes –Member Checking– Tabulation

Page 12: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Methodology• Outdoor Organization Data Analysis:

Inductive Process–Member Checking – Tabulation– Coding and Thematic Identification– Compare & Contrast • Current Efforts with Identified Needs

Page 13: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Limitations & Delimitations

• Thematic Saturation• Language and Scheduling• Census• One School • One Parent

Page 14: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

Implications• Promote PYD – Better Descriptors: • Perceived benefits and constraints to

participation in HYNBOE• Family-inclusive needs, opportunities, and

transferable practices in the regional community

Page 15: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

References Beightol, J., Jevertson, J., Gray, S., Carter, S., & Gass, M. (2009). The Effect of an Experiential, Adventure-Based "Anti-Bullying

Initiative" on Levels of Resilience: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal Of Experiential Education, 31(3), 420-424. Brennan, M. A. (2008). Conceptualizing resiliency: an interactional perspective for community and youth development. Child

Care in Practice, 14(1), 55-64.Brown, J. (2008). We don't need your help, but will you please fix our children. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 29(2), 61-69.

Cheng-Sian Chang, Tzung-Shi Chen, & Wei-Hsiang Hsu. (2010). The study on integrating WebQuest with mobil learning for environmental education. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1228-1239.

Collins, K., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Jiao, Q. (2007). A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(3), 267-294.

Cordell, K., Green, G., Larson, L., Stephens, R., Fly, M., & Schexnayder, S. (2011). Kids are Going Outdoors?. Parks & Recreation, 46(10), 40-41.

Crawford, D.W., Jackson, E.L., Godbey, G.C. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13, 309-320.Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approach, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage Publications.Doug, E. & Chick, G. (2005). Culture constraints on leisure through cross-cultural research. Canadian Association for Leisure

Studies. Retrieved from http://lin.ca/Uploads/cclr11/CCLR11-30.pdf Evenson, K. R., Murray, D. M., Birnbaum, A. S., & Cohen, D. A. (2010). Examination of perceived neighborhood characteristics

and transportation on changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior: The Trial of Activity in Adolescent Girls. Health & Place, 16(5), 977-985. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.002

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine DeGruyter.

Glasser, W. ( 2001). Choice theory in the classroom. New York, New York: HarperCollins Inc. Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W., & Xiangyou Sharon, S. (2010). Assessing Hierarchical Leisure Constraints Theory after Two

Decades. Journal Of Leisure Research, 42(1), 111-134.Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology,

15, 169-182.

Page 16: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

References Kimbro, R., & Schachter, A. (2011). Neighborhood poverty and maternal fears of children's outdoor play. Family Relations, 60(4),

461-475. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00660.xKimbrough, S. (2007). Research Update: Promoting Self-Efficacy Through Play. Parks & Recreation, 42(10), 24-29. Kriesberg, D. (2003). The Gift of the OUTDOORS. New York State Conservationist, 58(1), 22. Louv, R. (2008). Last Child in the Wood: Saving our children form nature-deficit disorder. New York, Ney York: Algonquin. Mainella, F. P., Agate, J. R., & Clark, B. S. (2011). Outdoor-based play and reconnection to nature: A neglected pathway to positive

youth development. New Directions For Youth Development, 2011(130), 89-104. 10.1002/yd.399Nyaupane, G. P., Morais, D. B., & Graefe A. (2002). A comparison of leisure constraints among three outdoor recreation

activities: whitewater rafting, canoeing, and overnight horseback riding. Proceedings of the 2002 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. 152-157. Retrieved from http://nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_ne302/gtr_ne302_152.pdf.

Oliver, M., Witten, K., Kearns, R. A., Mavoa, S., Badland, H. M., Carroll, P., & ... Ergler, C. (2011). Kids in the city study: research design and methodology. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 587-598. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-587

Padilla-Walker, L. M., Hardy, S. A., & Christensen, K. J. (2011). Adolescent Hope as a Mediator Between Parent-Child Connectedness and Adolescent Outcomes. Journal Of Early Adolescence, 31(6), 853-879. 10.1177/0272431610376249

Place, G. (2004). Youth Recreation Leads to Adult Conversation. Parks & Recreation, 39(2), 29-38.Quality Time. (2011). Working Mother, 34(4), 76-78. Shellman, A., & Ewert, A. (2010). A multi-method approach to understanding empowerment processes and outcomes of

adventure education program experiences. Journal Of Experiential Education, 32(3), 275-279. Sibthorp, J. (2010). A Letter From the Editor: Positioning Outdoor and Adventure Programs Within Positive Youth Development.

Journal Of Experiential Education, 33(2), 106. 853-879. 10.1177/0272431610376249 Sibthorp, J., & Morgan, C. (2011). Adventure-based programming: Exemplary youth development practice. New Directions For

Youth Development, 2011(130), 105-119. 10.1002/yd.400State of Connecticut. (2012). No Child Left Inside. Retrieved March 25, 2012 from http://www.ct.gov/ncli/cwp/view.asp?

a=4005&q=471158&ncliNav_GID=2004Success Oriented Achievement Realized. (2012). Retrieved March 26, 2012 from http://www.soarnc.org/about.htmlTaylor, A., Wiley, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow.

Environment & Behavior, 30(1), 3.

Page 17: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program

References Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). COPING WITH ADD. Environment & Behavior, 33(1), 54. Texas Parks and Wildlife. (2012). Texas Outdoor Family. Retrieved March 25, 2011 from

http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/outdoor-learning/texas-outdoor-family/ Weir, L. A., Etelson, D., & Brand, D. A. (2006). Parents' perceptions of neighborhood safety and children's

physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 212-217. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.024Wendy, K. (n.d). Groups aim to 'plant seeds' with kids. USA Today. Wittkowski, A. A., Zumla, A. A., Glendenning, S. S., & Fox, J. E. (2011). The experience of postnatal

depression in South Asian mothers living in Great Britain: a qualitative study. Journal Of Reproductive & Infant Psychology, 29(5) 480-492. doi:10.1080/02646838.2011.639014

You, S., & Nguyen, J. T. (2011). Parents' involvement in adolescents' schooling: a multidimensional conceptualisation and mediational model. Educational Psychology, 31(5), 547-558. 10.1080/01443410.2011.577734

Page 18: Katie M. Shaw Youth Development Leadership Graduate Program