8/11/2019 Karl Popper Debate Rubric
1/2
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
Class Debate : Karl Popper Debate
Teacher Name: Mrs. Dunn-Reier
Student Name: ________________________________________
CATEGORY 4 3 2 1
Respect for
Other Team
All statements, body
language, and
responses were
respectful and werein appropriate
language.
Statements and
responses were
respectful and used
appropriatelanguage, but once
or twice body
language was not.
Most statements
and responses were
respectful and in
appropriatelanguage, but there
was one sarcastic
remark.
Statements,
responses and/or
body language were
consistently notrespectful.
Information All informationpresented in the
debate was clear,
accurate and
thorough and met
time requirements.
Most information
presented in the
debate was clear,
accurate and
thorough and nearly
met time
requirements (30
seconds
under/over).
Most information
presented in the
debate was clear
and accurate, but
was not usually
thorough nor did it
meet time
requirements (60-90
seconds
under/over).
Information had
several inaccuracies
OR was usually not
clear OR fell far
short of time
requirements (91+
second short).
Rebuttal All counter-arguments were
accurate, relevant
and strong.
Most counter-
arguments were
accurate, relevant,
and strong.
Most counter-
arguments were
accurate and
relevant, but several
were weak.
Counter-arguments
were not accurate
and/or relevant
Use of
Facts/Statistics
Every major point
was well supported
with several relevant
facts, statistics
and/or examples.
Sources were
consistently citedduring the speech.
Every major point
was adequately
supported with
relevant facts,
statistics and/or
examples. Sources
were usually citedduring the speech.
Every major point
was supported with
facts, statistics
and/or examples,
but the relevance of
some was
questionable.Sources were only
cited occasionally
during the speech.
Every point was not
supported. Sources
were not cited.
Presentation
Style
Speaker consistently
used gestures, eye
contact, tone of
voice and a level of
Speaker usually
used gestures, eye
contact, tone of
voice and a level of
Speaker sometimes
used gestures, eye
contact, tone of
voice and a level of
Speaker
demonstrated a
presentation style
that did not keep the
Your Rubric - Print View
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=PrintRubric&
of 2 5/2/10 7:28
8/11/2019 Karl Popper Debate Rubric
2/2
enthusiasm in a way
that kept the
attention of the
audience. Speaker
engaged audience in
a conversational
style while still
maintaining
formality.
enthusiasm in a way
that kept the
attention of the
audience. Speaker
attempted to speak
off of a note/phrase
outline but needed
more practice OR
did not maintainformality
throughout.
enthusiasm in a way
that kept the
attention of the
audience. Student
needed more
practice. Student
read to the audience
more than spoke to
them. Depended onwritten manuscript.
attention of the
audience.
Organization All arguments wereclearly tied to an
idea (premise) and
organized in a tight,
logical fashion.
Most arguments
were clearly tied to
an idea (premise)
and organized in a
tight, logical fashion.
All arguments were
clearly tied to an
idea (premise) but
the organization
was sometimes not
clear or logical.
Arguments were not
clearly tied to an
idea (premise).
Understanding of
Topic
The speaker clearly
understood the topic
in-depth and
presented theirinformation forcefully
and convincingly.
The speaker clearly
undestood the topic
in-depth and
presented theirinformation with
ease.
The speaker
seemed to
understand the main
points of the topicand presented those
with ease.
The speaker did not
show an adequate
understanding of the
topic.
Copyright 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education
ConsortiaALTEC
To view information about the Privacy Policies and the Terms of
Use, please go to the following web
address:http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=TermsOfUse
Your Rubric - Print View
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=PrintRubric&
of 2 5/2/10 7:28
