Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    1/21

    Chen Kane and Miles PomperJames Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies

    May 21, 2013Korean Economic Institute

    1

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    2/21

    South Korea hopes to become a major exporterof nuclear plants

    It has a proven success in building its domestic

    nuclear industry If South Korea draws the right lessons from its

    UAE experience it could record similar successin the future

    2

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    3/21

    Domestic: 23 operating reactors 5 nuclear units are currently

    under construction 4 more units are planned to

    be completed between 2018and 2021

    International: UAE: $20.4 billion contract to

    build 4 nuclear power plants

    Jordan: Constructing Jordansfirst research reactor ($130million )

    Providing training programsto nuclear newcomer states(Egypt, Kenya, Mongolia,Indonesia etc.)

    Source: Walter KIM, KINS, Nov. 2012

    3

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    4/21

    Consortium led by KEPCO selected by UAE to build fourAPR-1400s in Barakah in 2009 Other companies in the consortium: KHNP, KOPEC E&C,

    KNF, KPS, Doosan, Westinghouse, Hyundai and Samsung The consortium will design and build the four units, supply

    the initial fuel loads, and provide the UAE with technicalsupport, training, and education

    The first plant is scheduled to become operational in 2017 andthe three subsequent reactors completed by 2020

    Source: Kepco, Investor Presentation, Feb. 2012 4

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    5/21

    KAERI and Daewoo signed$130 million agreement with

    Jordan for its first researchreactor 3.5 years worth of fuel provided

    by ROK.

    ROK to provide $70 million softloan for additional fuel andstudy

    ROK plans to train Jordaniannuclear engineers andtechnicians at JUST

    Expected to be online and

    operational by 2015.

    Source: Khalifeh AbuSaleem, January 29, 2013

    5

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    6/21

    Political factors

    Technical factors

    Business model

    Financial factors

    Cultural factors

    6

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    7/21

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    8/21

    ROK leader in reactorreliability KEPCO renowned for having

    highest capacity factor

    Lowest unplannedshutdown

    ROKs ability to initiate andcomplete projects quickly Reduces construction and

    financing costs

    Shortens time until electricitywould be available

    Source: Nagatomi, Matsu and Murakami,IEEJ, July 2010,

    Comparison of average outage time andthe operational cycle periods

    (1990-2008)

    8

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    9/21

    Experienced the consortium has worked togetherfor years on the domestic Korean nuclear powerprogram

    Adaptable ROK was willing to adapt certainlegal aspects of their bids to UAE preferences

    Construction and operation risks where all borneby KEPCO Puts responsibility on one organization, reduces the

    litigation risks in case of delays or performance problemsand increases the incentives for the contractor to meet theproject delivery objectives

    Commitment to extensive training, humanresources development and education

    9

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    10/21

    The South Korea bid was significantly lowerthan the other bids

    Financing package offered by ROK:

    Fixed price 23-year deal

    Low interest rates of 1.75-2.6, with full governmentguarantees on project risks

    Includes investments, direct loans, and external debtguarantees, preferred loans for domestic suppliers

    60 year contract for equipment replacement

    and potential equity interest 10

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    11/21

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    12/21

    UAE choose ROK because:

    Distinct competitive advantage in terms of low cost,high credibility, and high performance

    Active political support from government andpresident

    Attractive financing

    US technology provided at a low cost and with close

    cooperation (tied UAE to US-key security benefactor)

    12

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    13/21

    MKE set a goal in 2010 to capture 20% of the worldmarket in the next 2 decades (80 reactors/ fourunits per year/$400 billion).

    Scaled back following Fukushima, global financialcrisis, shortages of qualified personnel.

    More realistic expectation: ten nuclear plants by 2030

    ROK has signed nuclear cooperation agreements

    with 27 states

    Hopes to secure additional contracts (India,Vietnam, Poland, Saudi Arabia, South Africa,China and the United States)

    13

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    14/21

    Finance

    US reliance

    Safety

    Personnel

    14

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    15/21

    Reactor price, financing, ROK profit margin ROK not expected to be as generous with

    future customers UAE financial offering -the golden case that will not

    happen again

    Potential customers will seek to receive same deal

    Suppliers like Russia, China driving prices

    down (e.g. Russia and potentially France/Japan in Turkey) BOO model would be riskier

    15

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    16/21

    ROKs links to the United States bothpolitically and commercially

    ROK vulnerable to disruption in relations withUS

    Bilateral civil nuclear agreement extension buys time but some issues remain: Politically: U.S. government still likely to have a

    strong say over ROK nuclear power plant exports Technically: There are technologies that South Korea

    has not mastered/ technologies that are patented byU.S. companies.

    16

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    17/21

    Legally:

    APR-1400 is based on a Westinghouse design meansU.S. approval is required for re-export under sections123 and 131 of the Atomic Energy Act

    Westinghouse would likely need to seek Part 810Authorization before it and its employees can conductnuclear-related business abroad

    Re-export of major U.S.-origin nuclear reactor

    components may requires the ratification of a nuclearcooperation agreement between the U.S. and theimporting country

    17

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    18/21

    In nuclear agreement talks, ROK wants US advancedconsent for reprocessing (pyroprocessing); US doesntwant to grant permission

    How much effect on exports?

    Pyroprocessing:--supply service to manage othercountries spent fuel? Political opposition is likely to be even higher to accepting

    foreign spent fuel for reprocessing

    Enrichment (reap both direct profits from selling

    enrichment services and perceived additional profitsfrom offering a full-service) Difficult to compete with established enrichment suppliers

    Existing suppliers have not expressed a willingness to transfertechnologies to the ROK

    Front end/Enrichment market is a much smaller and complexmarket than nuclear reactor market 18

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    19/21

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    20/21

    ME particularly attractive market for ROK

    Experience and prominence in running andoperating mega projects in the region

    ROK experience to adapt APR-1400 to specificsecurity and geographic characteristics, training,quality assurance, and grid upgrade support

    UAE deal led to more contracts, long-term profit:

    Follow-on contracts being discussed

    Hints that ROK would be supplier of future reactors

    20

  • 7/30/2019 Kane Pomperroknuclearexportsfinal052013map

    21/21

    Long-term nuclear cooperation agreement with US Pyroprocessing and enrichment less important than finding a

    win-win solution with US to boost ROK exports

    Strengthening competitive advantages Nuclear energy for desalination, training

    Invest in construction of additional centrifuge capacity atexisting enrichment plants or equity

    Consider SMR and KAERIs SMART reactors for export tosmall countries

    Concentrate on countries that can afford nuclearenergy, especially ME in exchange for greater fossilenergy security

    Quick and decisive action regarding safety

    Cutting profit margins can be compensated in futuredeals and other realms bigger picture 21