Upload
clementine-edwards
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Joseph Kolly, Ph.D., Grease Group ChairmanJoseph Kolly, Ph.D., Grease Group Chairman
Investigation of Lubricating GreaseInvestigation of Lubricating Grease
Role of Lubrication in Accelerated Wear of the Acme NutRole of Lubrication in Accelerated Wear of the Acme Nut
• Leading up to the time of the accident, Alaska Airlines used two brands of lubricating grease on its jackscrew assemblies:
– Mobilgrease 28– Aeroshell 33
• Leading up to the time of the accident, Alaska Airlines used two brands of lubricating grease on its jackscrew assemblies:
– Mobilgrease 28– Aeroshell 33
Role of Lubrication in Accelerated Wear of the Acme NutRole of Lubrication in Accelerated Wear of the Acme Nut
• Leading up to the time of the accident,
• Alaska Airlines used two brands of lubricating
grease on its jackscrew assemblies:
– Mobilgrease 28
– Aeroshell 33
• Long history of satisfactory performance using
Mobilgrease 28.
• Leading up to the time of the accident,
• Alaska Airlines used two brands of lubricating
grease on its jackscrew assemblies:
– Mobilgrease 28
– Aeroshell 33
• Long history of satisfactory performance using
Mobilgrease 28.
Flight 261 Grease Sample AnalysisFlight 261 Grease Sample Analysis
Highly degraded grease sample from accident airplane’s jackscrew.
Highly degraded grease sample from accident airplane’s jackscrew.
1 mm1 mm
Fresh grease shown for comparison.
Fresh grease shown for comparison.
Wear particle laden grease.Wear particle laden grease. Magnified wear particles.Magnified wear particles.
• Particles consistent with sliding wear (normal wear mode).• No evidence of corrosive wear or abrasive wear.• Particles consistent with sliding wear (normal wear mode).• No evidence of corrosive wear or abrasive wear.
Flight 261 Grease Sample AnalysisFlight 261 Grease Sample Analysis
Side by side, comparative testing
of the two greases was performed under
all pertinent conditions related to jackscrew operations.
Could Switch to Aeroshell 33 Have Resulted in Accelerated Wear?
Could Switch to Aeroshell 33 Have Resulted in Accelerated Wear?
Grease Testing
Wear Testing
ExposureTesting
Test ProgramTest Program
Performed by:NAVAIR Aerospace Materials DivisionPerformed by:NAVAIR Aerospace Materials Division
Grease Testing
Wear Testing
ExposureTesting
Standardized Grease TestingStandardized Grease Testing
Findings:• Mixing of Aeroshell 33 and Mobilgrease 28 did
not significantly deteriorate their properties.
Mo
bil
gre
ase
28M
ob
ilg
reas
e 28
Aer
osh
ell
33A
ero
shel
l 33
MixturesMixtures
Performed by:
• NAVAIR Aerospace Materials Division• Science Applications International
Corporation (SAIC)
Performed by:
• NAVAIR Aerospace Materials Division• Science Applications International
Corporation (SAIC)
Grease Testing
Wear Testing
ExposureTesting
AluminumBronze
Mobilgrease 28Aeroshell 3350/50 blend
WaterDe-icing fluidAnti-icing fluid
75º F150º F212º F
24 hours2 weeks
Grease TypesGrease Types
TemperaturesTemperatures DurationsDurations
ContaminantsContaminants
Exposure TestingExposure Testing
Findings: • Aeroshell 33 does not corrode aluminum bronze.• Staining caused by anti-wear additives (not harmful).
Findings: • Aeroshell 33 does not corrode aluminum bronze.• Staining caused by anti-wear additives (not harmful).
Test SpecimenTest Specimen
Exposed to airExposed to air
Exposed to greaseExposed to grease
Exposure TestingExposure Testing
Performed by:
•Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
•Battelle Memorial Institute
Performed by:
•Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
•Battelle Memorial Institute
Grease Testing
Wear Testing
ExposureTesting
Block–on–Ring Block–on–Ring
StationaryBlock
StationaryBlock
RotatingRing
RotatingRing
GreaseGrease
ForceForce
1. Materials same (fabricated from actual
parts)
2. Pressure similar (wide range)
3. Speed similar
4. Motion similar (sliding, reciprocating)
5. Contact Geometry similar (finite area)
1. Materials same (fabricated from actual
parts)
2. Pressure similar (wide range)
3. Speed similar
4. Motion similar (sliding, reciprocating)
5. Contact Geometry similar (finite area)
Comparison of Block-on-Ring Characteristics to Actual J/S Operation
Comparison of Block-on-Ring Characteristics to Actual J/S Operation
Test Conditions of the Block-on-Ring Experiments
Test Conditions of the Block-on-Ring Experiments
• Low, Medium, High, and Very High Average Pressures
• Neat greases and mixtures
• Water, salt water, and de-icing fluid contamination
• Aged grease with wear debris
• Sub-freezing temperatures
• Low, Medium, High, and Very High Average Pressures
• Neat greases and mixtures
• Water, salt water, and de-icing fluid contamination
• Aged grease with wear debris
• Sub-freezing temperatures
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Ae
rosh
ell 3
3
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Aero
shell
33
Used
Aer
oshe
ll33
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
Dry
water added salt water
addedde-icingadded
Pure Greases
Wea
r ra
te F
acto
r (m
m3 /
N·m
) x
106
Wear Rate of Aluminum Bronze
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Ae
rosh
ell 3
3
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Aero
shell
33
Used
Aer
oshe
ll33
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
Dry
water added salt water
addedde-icingadded
Pure Greases
Wea
r ra
te F
acto
r (m
m3 /
N·m
) x
106
Severe wear(accident airplane)
Wear Rate of Aluminum Bronze
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Ae
rosh
ell 3
3
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Aero
shell
33
Used
Aer
oshe
ll33
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
Dry
water added salt water
addedde-icingadded
Pure Greases
Wea
r ra
te F
acto
r (m
m3 /
N·m
) x
106
Severe wear(accident airplane)
Contaminated Greases
Wear Rate of Aluminum Bronze
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Ae
rosh
ell 3
3
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Aero
shell
33
Used
Aer
oshe
ll33
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
Dry
water added salt water
addedde-icingadded
Pure Greases
Wea
r ra
te F
acto
r (m
m3 /
N·m
) x
106
Severe wear(accident airplane)
Contaminated GreasesUsedGrease
Wear Rate of Aluminum Bronze
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Ae
rosh
ell 3
3
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Aero
shell
33
Used
Aer
oshe
ll33
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
Dry
water added salt water
addedde-icingadded
Pure Greases
Wea
r ra
te F
acto
r (m
m3 /
N·m
) x
106
Severe wear(accident airplane)
Contaminated GreasesUsedGrease –20° F
Wear Rate of Aluminum Bronze
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Ae
rosh
ell 3
3
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
50/5
0 M
ix
Aero
shell
33
Aero
shell
33
Used
Aer
oshe
ll33
Aero
shell
33
Mob
ilgre
ase
28
Dry
water added salt water
addedde-icingadded
Pure Greases
Wea
r ra
te F
acto
r (m
m3 /
N·m
) x
106
Severe wear(accident airplane)
Contaminated GreasesUsedGrease –20° F Dry
Wear Rate of Aluminum Bronze
• No evidence that the use of Aeroshell 33 would have caused accelerated wear.
• The only factor that could explain the severe and accelerated wear is a lack of lubrication.
Conclusions Regarding Severe Wear of Acme NutConclusions Regarding
Severe Wear of Acme Nut