Upload
ferdinand-ward
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
GM Renewable & Energy Efficiency GM Renewable & Energy Efficiency “Successes & Strategies"“Successes & Strategies"
September 16, 2009September 16, 2009
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
GM’s Renewable Energy Overview• Benefits
– Grow renewable energy portfolio on a global basis to support GM Environmental Principles– All projects must meet economic sustainability criteria, GM management will only approve
projects that bring economic benefit to GM– Include diversity of Renewable Sources
• Landfill Gas/Biomass• Solar• Wind • Small Hydro
• Strategy– Demonstrates Environmental Stewardship of GM in a Sustainable Manner– Reduces energy costs, acts as future hedge against increased costs or shortages– Provides positive image– GM’s renewable program driven to redefine the technology and economics of completing
renewable projects– Technology demonstration and project economic model have benefited others
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
GMNA Current Renewable Portfolio• LFG
– 2nd Largest Corporate User of LFG for Thermal Energy
• Solar – First public solar power project in US over 1mW, GM Rancho Cucamonga SPO
facility (outside of govt. private, or research related activities) July 2006– Commissioned 2nd roughly 1mW solar installation at the Fontana SPO facility on
12/17/07– Commissioned world’s largest solar roof top array at GM’s Zaragoza, Spain
Assembly Plant. Total size of the array is nearly 12mW
• Global Expansion– Reviewing other opportunities globally to expand the use of solar at GM facilities
through the Global BPD Initiative 04-14
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
= Landfill Gas
= Hydro
= Solar (Photovoltaic)
= Biomass
Installations - In Place
Flint, MIFlint, MIFlint, MIFlint, MI
Grand Blanc, MIGrand Blanc, MIGrand Blanc, MIGrand Blanc, MI
Fort Wayne, INFort Wayne, INFort Wayne, INFort Wayne, IN
Rancho Cucamonga, CARancho Cucamonga, CARancho Cucamonga, CARancho Cucamonga, CA
Fontana, CAFontana, CAFontana, CAFontana, CA
MexicoMexicoMexicoMexico
Shreveport, LAShreveport, LAShreveport, LAShreveport, LA
Toledo, OHToledo, OHToledo, OHToledo, OH
Lake Orion, MILake Orion, MILake Orion, MILake Orion, MI
Zaragoza, SpainZaragoza, SpainZaragoza, SpainZaragoza, Spain
GM Renewable InstallationsGM Renewable Installations
BrazilBrazilBrazilBrazil
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
Facilities EnergyGMNA Renewable Energy Portfolio and Cost Savings
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Ren
ewab
le E
ner
gy
as %
of
To
tal
.
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Cu
mm
ula
tive
Sav
ing
s $
(mil)
.
PT Toledo LFG
GMVM Orion LFG
GMVM Ft Wayne LFG
Flint SPO GP +Shreveport LFG
GMVM OKC LFG
Fontana Solar + Shreveport LFG Exp &
Reduction @ Oklahoma
% Renewable
Cumulative CostSavings $(mil)
Actuals thru 1-2-2008
GMM Hydro+Cucamonga Solar
Future Project Projections
GMNA >2.5% Renewable Energy
Zaragoza, Spain Photovoltaic at 12 MW
Facilities EnergyGMNA Renewable Energy Portfolio & Cost
Savings
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
• GM has significant Solar Portfolio– 1 MW – SPO Cucamonga, CA – 2006– 1 MW – SPO Fontana, CA – Dec 2007– 12 MW – Zaragoza, Spain – Sept 2008
• Achieved Leadership in Solar Renewable Energy• Solar Opportunity Growing
Solar Portfolio
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
Business
Sunny Side Up
Photograph by Jill Connelly for The New York Times By CLAUDIA H. DEUTSCH Published: October 21, 2006
General Motors liked the idea of using the sun to power its buildings. But until recently, one immutable economic fact held G.M. back: The upfront costs were simply too high to justify the ultimate payoff.
A property manager examines the photovoltaic cells on the roof of a General Motors warehouse in Cucamonga, Calif. The cells have the capacity to generate as much as 1.5 million kilowatt hours of electricity a year.
Positive PR
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
• Energy Sufficiency & Best Practices
• EMS Energy OnStar
• ESPI Program– Expense Type Projects
– Multiple Locations
– Single Supplier for Development, Engineering & Implementation
• Project Types– Paint shop optimization – Building ventilation– Process - Utility optimization thru integration
Energy Efficiency Improvements
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
Plant Initiative Implemented Savings $
Moraine Oven Optimization Initiatives January, 2007 800,600
Pontiac Oven Optimization Initiatives January, 2007 1,817,000
"B 2 B" (Capital Project)
Cascade Building Air to Booth ASH Units at: Oshawa, LDT and LGR
September, 2007 2,800,000
Ft. Wayne Oven Optimization Initiatives
Cascade Observe Exhaust to Clear Coat ASH'sDecember, 2007 1,702,300
WilmingtonDowndraft Reduction Prep & Observe - Cascade Building Air to One (1) Mod - By-Pass Washer #1, Dry-off & Sealer Ovens
December, 2007 200,000
Arlington Robot Bell Compressed Air Control Shut Down,
Idle Durr Abatement EquipmentDecember, 2007 250,000
2007 Estimated Savings ** 8,824,900
**Savings will be Achieved during the 12 Months immediately following completion of each project
2007 Annual Savings – ESPI Paint Process Projects
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
Capital ESPI
– Similar to ESPI, except that major components of these projects are capital
– Similar in implementation process-PRM
– Carried in project forecast and WFG project targets whereas ESPI projects are not as they are funded from budget
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
CESPI-Bedford Melt Project
– Melt initiative focused on improving melting process inside the fence.
– A capital project funded by WFG replaced five existing furnaces with one modern, flexible, energy efficient furnace and total savings are being tracked at $5.3 million per year level.
– Since start of the furnace in April 2007, energy savings are at $2.6 million per year.
– Project also achieved a $1.8 million per year savings in productive materials as the furnace can use waste aluminum chips as input material.
Joint All COS Staff MeetingGeneral Motors
CESPI-Bedford Melt Project9/10/2007
Starting Project Goal Actual Change Change %
of GoalProjected Savings
Annual Savings Actual
Natural Gas Usage (mcf/yr)
859,200 624,820 596,000 263200 112.30% $2,590,000 $2,626,736
Melting Personnel
36 31.5 29 7 155.56% $540,000 $840,000
Melt Materials (#/day Chips)
100,000 175,000 168,604 68604 91.47% $1,990,000 $1,820,293
$5,120,000 $5,287,029
$4,520,000Approved Project Funding