Upload
allmine133
View
7
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Mathematics A Level
Citation preview
Solutions to H1 Mathematics (8864) J2 Preliminary Examination 2013
1(a) 2 2 3 0kx x k
0k and 2
2 4( )(3 ) 0k k
2
2
2
4 12 0
1 3 0
3 1 0
3 1 3 1 0
k
k
k
k k
1
3k or
1
3k
1
3k
1(b) 33
2e 1
e
x
x
Let 3e xy
2
3 3
21
2 0
( 2)( 1) 0
2 or 1
e 2 or e 1 (reject)
3 ln 2
1ln 2
3
x x
yy
y y
y y
y y
x
x
2. 3 22 3 3 8x x x
3 22 3 8 3 0x x x
1
3
1
3
k
x
y
-3 1 1
2
O
2
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
13 or 1
2x x
Hence, solve 3 22(ln ) 3(ln ) 8ln 3 0x x x
3 22(ln ) 3(ln ) 3 8lnx x x
Replace x by ln x ,
1
3 2
1ln 3 or ln 1
2
0 e or e e
x x
x x
3. Area:
2
2
12 10
2
12 10
2
5 1
4
x xy
xy x
y xx
Cost 15 2 2 20
5 130 30 20
4
150 2530
2
150 60 25
2
P x y x
x x xx
xx
xx
For cost to be minimum, d
0d
P
x
2
d 150 60 25
d 2
P
x x
=0
2
2
150 60 25
2
300
60 25
x
x
2 60
12 5
60 60, ( . .)
12 5 12 5
x
x N A
3
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
2
2 3
d 3000
d
P
x x when
60
12 5x
Cost is minimum when 60
12 5x
.
150 60 25 60min
2 12 560
12 5
P
$204 (nearest dollar)
4(a)
3
1f ( )
(1 2 )x
x
1
3 2 2
3
1 (1 2 ) 1f ( )d d (1 2 ) d
1 1 2(1 2 ) ( 2)2
xx x x x x C C
xx
30
0
1d 1.5
(1 2 )
11.5
1 2
11 1.5
1 2
12.5
1 2
1 25
1 2 4
41 2
25
21 (or 0.42)
50
c
c
xx
x
c
c
c
c
c
4
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
4(b)
Points of intersection (1.4721, 2.6656) and (3.6635, 4.5597)
(1.47, 2.67), (3.66, 4.56)
3.6635 2 0.5
1.47215 3 2 1 d 2.0141 2.01xx x
5(i)
14 4 2 1
2 1
ay a x
x
d
d
y
x
2
2
22 2 1
2 1
aa x
x
At P, 3x , 2
d 2 2
d (2 3 1) 5
y a
x
2 2
25 5
5 [AG]
a
a
(ii) At P, 3, 3x y , gradient of normal is
5
2
53 ( 3)
2
5 110
2 2
y x
y x
(iii) When y = 0,
50 4
2 1x
52 1
4x
2
5 3y x
0.52 1xy
1y
5
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
9
8x
9,0
8Q
(iii) 5 110
2 2y x
When1
0, 102
x y
98
98
3
3
5Required Area Area of trapezium 4 d
2 1
1 1 510 3 3 4 ln 2 1
2 2 2
xx
x x
81 5 9 5 512 ln 5 ln
4 2 2 2 4
51 5ln 5 ln 5 ln 4
4 2
51 5ln 4
4 2
(iii) Alternative:
5 110
2 2y x
When1
0, 102
x y
98
98
3 3
0
3 3
2
0
Required Area
5 1 510 d 4 d
2 2 2 1
5 1 510 4 ln 2 1
4 2 2
x x xx
x x x x
25 5 9 5 53 10.5 3 0 12 ln 5 ln
4 2 2 2 4
51 5ln 5 ln 5 ln 4
4 2
51 5ln 4
4 2
6
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
6(i) Select every 10th
(10% means every one out of 10
orpopulation size
10sample size 0.1
Nk
N ) electrical component from a
production line, starting from say the 5th
component, where the
number 5 is randomly determined from the first 10 components
produced. i.e choose the 5th
, 15th
, 25th, until 10% of the
components are selected.
(ii) Choosing the sample using systematic sampling ensures that the
sample chosen is evenly spread out and consists of components
from different batches compared to choosing components from the
first batch of sample.
7 (i)
(ii) P(Samuel wins a prize)
= P(B) + P(RB) + P(RRB)
= 1 24 1 24 23 1
25 25 24 25 24 23
= 3
25 (or 0.12)
(iii)
P took more than 1 ball Samuel won a prize
P took more than 1 ball AND won a prize
P won a prize
P RB or RRB
3
25
24 1 24 23 1
25 24 25 24 23
3
25
2 (or 0.667 to 3 s.f.)
3
23 22
P only one of them wins a prize = 3 0.27878425 25
R
B
R
B
R
B 24
25
1
25
23
24
1
24
22
23
1
23
7
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
8 (i)
P A B2 2P A B
3 P B 3
P A B P A P B P A B
1 P A' B' P A P B P A B
81 2 P A B
15
53P A B 1
15
p p
p p p
p
2
2
2
P A B 2
P B 3
531
215
3
53 21
15 3
53 15 10
10 53 15 0
p
p
pp
p p
p p
p p
210 53 15 0p p
3 or 5 (NA since 0 1)
10p p p
P exactly one of A and B occurs
P A B P A B
8 3 53 31 1
15 10 15 10
39
50
9(i)
Let X be the no. of seeds that germinates (out of 12).
(12,0.65)X B
P( 7) 1 P( 6) 1 0.212735 0.78726 0.787 (to 3 s.f.)X X
(ii) Let X be the no. of seeds that germinates (out of 12).
(12,0.65)X B
8
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
P(4 9)
P( 9) P( 3)
X
X X
= 0.8471 0.005698
= 0.84310
0.843 (to 3 s.f.)
(ii) Alternative:
P(4 9)
P( 4) P( 5) P( 6) P( 7) P( 8) P( 9)
X
X X X X X X
= 0.84310
0.843 (to 3 s.f.)
Let Y be the no. of packets of seeds with fewer than 7 seeds that
germinates (out of 25 packets).
(25,0.212735)Y B
P( 3) 0.18982 0.190 (to 3 s.f.)Y
Let W be the no. of seeds that will germinate (out of 120 seeds).
(120,0.65)W B
Since 120n is large,
120(0.65) 78 5, 120(0.35) 42 5np nq
(120(0.65),120(0.65)(0.35)) approximately
(78,27.3) approximately
W N
W N
. .P( 90) P( 90.5) 0.0083699 0.00837 (to 3 s.f.)c cW W
10 (i) Let X = mass of jam in a jar
2N ,6.5
1P 320
1000
320 1P
6.5 1000
X m
X
mZ
9
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
3203.0902
6.5
320 20.0863
m
m
340.0863 340.09 m Least m = 340.09 (Shown)
(ii) Let Y = mass of an empty jar
2
2
2 2
N 160,4
N 340.09,6.5
N 340.09 160,6.5 4 N 500.09,58.25
P 505 0.26001 0.260 (to 3 s.f.)
Y
X
X Y
X Y
(iii) Let J = X +Y . So .
P 498 0.85556 0.856J (iv) Let C = mass of an empty large carton.
Let D = mass of an empty small carton.
Let L = mass of a large carton of jam,
ie. L =C + J1 + J2 + ...+ J12
Let S = mass of a small carton of jam,
ie. 1 2 6...S D J J J
P -10 < L - 2S
10
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
11 (i) Unbiased estimate of the population mean
= 12 105
12 12 14.150
xx
n
Unbiased estimate of the population variance
2
22 1
1
x cs x c
n n
21 1052250
49 50
=
2029.5
49 = 41.4 (3 s.f.)
(ii) Let X be the percentage of fat content in burgers
0H : 12
1H : 12
Since n is large, by Central Limit Theorem,
2029.5
N 12,2450
X
approximately.
Test statistic 2029.52450
12(0,1)
XZ N
approximately
= 0.02
From GC, z = 2029.52450
14.1 12= 2.307 (5 sf)
p-value = P( 2.307)Z =0.0105 (3 sf)
Since p-value = 0.0105 (3 sf) < 0.02, we reject 0H at 2% level
of significance and conclude there is sufficient evidence to refute
the companys claim.
(iii) 2% level of significance means there is a probability of 0.02 of
wrongly concluding that the mean fat content is more than 12 %
(rejecting Ho) when in fact it is 12%.
(iv) It is not necessary to assume a the percentage fat content have a
normal distribution for the test to be valid, since sample size is
large, the Central Limit Theorem applies.
0H : 12
1H : 12
Since n is large, by Central Limit Theorem,
26.5
N 12,50
X
approximately.
Test statistic 26.5
50
12(0,1)
XZ N
approximately
Claim is untrue reject Ho Reject Ho at 5% level of significance
11
8864/J2 Prelim 2013
[using GC: invNorm(0.95) = 1.64485]
26.550
1.64485
121.64485
13.5
z
F
F
Least possible value of F is 13.5
12(i)
(ii) r = 0.993
The value of r is close to 1. There is strong negative linear correlation between the amount of catalyst and the time taken for
the chemical reaction. This means that the time taken for the
chemical reaction decreases as the amount of catalyst present
increases.
(iii) t = 119.4385 40.5813x
(iv) t on x line is used since x is controlled and t is random.
60 = 119.4385 40.5813 x
x =1.4647 1.46 grams The estimate is reliable because t = 60 is within the data range
hence this is an interpolation and r is close to 1, indicating a strong negative correlation between the amount of catalyst and
time taken for the reaction.
0
5%
1.64485
95%
t
x
,x t = (1, 78.9)