Upload
jen-gilmore
View
224
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Jen Gilmore is a student in the Master of Architecture program at the Knowlton School of Architecture
Citation preview
JEN GILMOREdesign portfolio 2012
AWARDS AND EXHIBITIONS
2011 StudioAward,The Sharsky Institute of Culinary Studies AdvancedArchitecturalDesignStudio TheOhioStateUniversity
2011 ArchitectsWork8atSyracuseUniversity Designteamandconstructionmanager GraduatestudentcurationoftheworkofDOGMA
2009 SecondPlace,Sacred Space JuriedStudentArchitectureExhibition DanforthGallery,UniversityofMaineatAugusta
2009 ThirdPlace,Mollicite Animalis JuriedStudentArchitectureExhibition DanforthGallery,UniversityofMaineatAugusta
2008 FirstPlace Jeld-WenStudentDoorDesignContest
2003 SecondPlaceBestNewProduct,Lampscapes NewEnglandProductsTradeShow
EDUCATION
2011 – (2013) The Ohio State University Master of Architecture I
2010 – 2011 Syracuse University First year of Master of Architecture program
2007 – 2009 University of Maine at Augusta Design studios in BA in Architecture program
1992 – 1996 Bard College at Simon’s Rock Bachelor of Arts in Arts & Aesthetics, magna cum laude Hutchins Scholar
EMPLOYMENT
2012 – present Graduate Assistant, Knowlton School of Architecture Woodshop coordinator 2004 – 2010 Owner/Operator, Women Do It Better Home renovations and custom cabinetry
2000 – 2004 Creator/Designer, Lampscapes Paper-mache lamps; art and wholesale shows
1999 – 2003 Carpentry and Masonry Assistant, Stone Design New construction and renovations
bendBOXminMAX ONE STORY 1370 SQ FTGKH
BOXES
CONVENTIONAL FRAMING/MINIMAL FOOTPRINT
bendBOXminMAX ONE STORY 1370 SQ FTGKH
BOXES
CONVENTIONAL FRAMING/MINIMAL FOOTPRINT
bendBOXminMAX ONE STORY 1370 SQ FTGKH
BORING OPEN FOR GREENSPACE OPEN FOR VIEWSHEDS
CONTAINERS
KITCHEN
SECOND STORY BATH
BATH/CIRCULATIONPREFABRICATION
ENTRANCE
Developed for a HfH site in Springfield, Ohio, this project is a prototype for affordable housing. Shipping containers have been utilized as a compressive element, into which necessary systems and circulation have been packed. Boxes, their elemental counterparts, are flexible expansive spaces into which the containers open.
We propose that an international graffiti and mural arts competition be held in conjuction with the construction of a series of bendBOX homes throughout Springfield. Not only would each home be enriched this public art project would act as a catalyst in Springfield, bringing positive regional and international attention to this rust belt city.
bendBOXHABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2012
models by: JEN GILMOREdeveloped by: JEN GILMORE, ERIC HADDENHAM, MORTEZA KARIMI
bendBOXminMAX ONE STORY 1370 SQ FTGKH
MATERIALITY
CONTAINER SUPPORT & “LILYPADS”
ECOCLAD - BOX SIDING
BATHROOM
ROOF
CONTAINER INTERIOR
BOX INTERIOR
NORTH BOX FLOOR FRAMING2SCALE: 1/4”=1’-0”
2” X 4” FRAMING 24” O.C.2” X 6” FRAMING 24” O.C.2” X 10“ JOISTS 24” O.C.
2” X 10“ BEAMJOIST HANGER
GF
S
R
R
S3
RR
S
S
S
S
C
S
R
R
R R R
R
R
S S
S
GF
GF
GF
S3
S
4
S
GF
SS
S
S3
S3
S3
S3
S
SS
S
R
RR
SOUTH BOX ROOF FRAMING3SCALE: 1/4”=1’-0”
SECOND FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN4SCALE: 1/4”=1’-0”
FIRST FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN5SCALE: 1/4”=1’-0”
PLUMBING DIAGRAM6WASTE & SUPPLY
Shower/tub
ShowerLav
Lav
Kitchen Sink
WC
Laundry
Hose Bib
WC
3” vent
3” vent
2” X 6” FRAMING 24” O.C.2” X 10“ JOISTS 24” O.C.
NORTH BOX ROOF FRAMING1SCALE: 1/4”=1’-0”
2” X 12“ BEAM
2” X 10“ BEAMJOIST HANGER
4” X 6” POST HIDDEN IN WALLbe
ndBO
X
ISSUE DATE:
PROTOTYPE HOUSE
A.6
MARCH 9, 2012
DRAWN BY:
DRAWING SCALE:AS NOTED
GKH
SYSTEMSDIAGRAMS
GIL
MO
RE,
KAR
IMI,
HAD
DEN
HAM
1428 CLIFTON AVENUESPRINGFIELD, OH 45505
DESIGNDEVELOPMENT
LETTER
NUMBER
A
B
SIZE
SIZE
4'0" X 4'0"
2'0" X 2'0"
2'6" X 6’8"
2'11" X 6’8"
2'6" X 7’2”
11’5" X 7’2”
12’2’ X 8’0”
3’0” X 6’8”
3’0” X 6’8”
3’0” X 6’8”
6’10" X 7’2”
C
WINDOW SCHEDULE
D
E
F
G
H
101
102
103
DOOR SCHEDULE
100
TYPE
TYPE
SLIDER
FIXED
FIXED
FIXED
FIXED
FIXED
FIXED
FIXED
INTERIOR
INTERIOR
EXTERIOR
MATERIAL
MATERIAL
VINYL
VINYL
WOOD
WOOD
GLASS
QTY
QTY
6
7
2
1
2
1
1
1
4
7
3
HARDWARE
HARDWARE
TBD
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
TBD
TBD
TBD
NOTES
NOTES
INSULATED GLASS
INSULATED GLASS
INSULATED GLASS
INSULATED GLASS
INSULATED GLASS
INSULATED GLASS
INSULATED GLASS
INSULATED GLASS
HOLLOW CORE PRE-HUNG
BIFOLD DOOR FLUSH
PRE-HUNG
6’0” X 6’8”EXTERIOR GLASS 1 TBD SLIDING GLASS PATIO
CAFEGALLERY
MARKET
GYMAUDITORIUM
QUIET SPACE
PLAY
CAFETERIAKITCHEN
DANCE STUDIO
PLAY
FIXED PROGRAMMINGFLEXIBLE PROGRAMMING
CHILDREN’S ENVIRONMENT & COMMUNITY CENTERSYRACUSE NY 2011
This project explores the relationship between the larger community and a subset of it in order to addesses their differing needs.
This is done by three primary means:
APPROACH FROM BUS STOP
Location of site
The site was chosen to maximize access from the surrounding community. Analysis revealed a convergence of bus routes in proximity to the site (further analysis revealed that a new bus terminal was soon to begin construction). The further presence of the train line provides opportunity for expansion of access.
Creation of program on the ground plane
The center is a place to go, not just to go through. This encour-ages further activity surrounding the site.
Interiority of the daycare
A daycare creates a smaller community out of the larger. This project creates an environment for that community to inhabit. The inward focus and variation of indoor/outdoor and compres-sion/release both nurtures and encourages exploration. The designed programmatic flexibilty of the environment allows for and encourages change and development.
PRIVATE
PUBLIC
OCCUPIABLEOUTDOOR SPACE
The project lays claim to the axial lot that runs from the new bus terminal to the rail line and creek. The project advocates the creation of a light rail/amtrak stop to the west of the site, connecting local and regional transportation.
The raised bar that contains the bulk of the program maintains the ground plane and con-nection between the bus station rail center, as well as to local housing and to the Onondaga Creekwalk.
Public programming has been added to the underbelly of the bar, establishing a magnet of activity within the surrounding community. The underbelly provides both fixed programming and flexible community space. The incorporation of a climate controlled farmer’s and art market serves both families of the child care facility, the local community, and the greater Syracuse community by way of the transit station. While the underbelly expands to the greater community, the bar above has an inward central focus, to provide a varied environment for children that can establish a sense of commu-nity for the children and families and staff that populate the center.
The overlapping openings in the bar provide both light, air, and inhabitable outdoor space, while serving as a magnet of activity. Flexible activity space surrounds the openings.TRAIN LINE
BUS STATION`
ONONDAGA CREEK
2628
64 66
562
24`
46
54
10
R
BUS TRANSFER
HUB ONCENTER
ONONDAGA COUNTY WAR
MEMORIAL EVERSON MUSEUM OF ART
SYRACUSE, NY
PROCESS MODELS
auditorium
kitchen
classrooms
cafeteria
changing rooms
central space
dance studio
restrooms
The project was further explored using Maxscript, wire parameters, and solar analysis in 3DS Max.
The project required contraction in the upper bar and expansion on the ground plane. Openings in the bar provide a central focus as well as serving as a source of light and air into the interior. Shade analysis was used to find the best arrangement of these openings.
I sought to maintain the mass of the exterior of the bar, while allowing light into the far reaches. Wire parameters were used with multiple control points to limit light based on program. Laser cutting was used to test the resutant opening pattern. While developing this patterning a further innovation was to extend the patterning outward. On the side facing the bus station the openings go inward. The other sides extend to the surrounding neighborhoods.
F
E
D
C
B
A
G
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
X
F
E
D
G
GC
GB
GA
C
X
Y
Z
1
2
3
4
6
7
5
A
3
8
10
8
9
6
7
3
2
10
10
10
10
2
6
1
1 LOBBY2 CONCERT HALL3 OUTDOOR STAGE/ RECEPTION AREA4 REHEARSAL SPACE5 GIFTSHOP6 RESTROOMS7 BOOKSHOP8 RESTAURANT9 KITCHEN10 OFFICES11 MECHANICAL
511
4
1
ONONDAGA CONCERT HALLSYRACUSE NY 2011
By engaging the dual barrier condition that exists on the site between Armory Square and the Near Westside this project creates a shared public space that belongs to neither. This is done by bringing the ground plane of the existing “island” of space down to the level of Onondaga Creek, which is currently serving as a barrier. This allows for reformation of the railroad berm, opening up the newly created creek engagement - and the Near Westside - to Armory Square.
The project is anchored into the railroad berm by pulling the structure of the project into the berm. The primary structure houses a concert hall. Spanning from the railroad berm over the creek the concert hall acts as an additional barrier that has been engaged by the site in the form of the extension of the Onandaga Creekwalk and passage to what will remain of the parking on site. The form of the concert hall continues the multiplicity of existing and created ground planes. The plane of the top of the railroad berm is pulled down to hover over the creek, providing an outdoor public concert stage and gathering space.
WESTSIDENEARARMORY
SQUARE
SYRACUSEUNIVERSITY
ONONDAGA LAKE
WESTSIDENEAR
ARMORYSQUARE
sized members
rounded
AXIAL
MOMENT
Run separate topopt for each condtion, to be combined to form 3 dimensional structure
Jen Gilmore
F
E
original project
.22 volume fraction
2 performance
loads
13526 0 -1 13263 0 -1 10065 0 -1 12490 0 -1 10055 0 -1 7927 0 -1 5801 0 -1 18814 0 -1 18843 0 -1 12591 0 -3 6239 0 -1 6194 0 -1 2833 0 -1 6061 0 -1
boundary supports
41 1 1 96 1 1 2301 1 1 2350 1 1 10492 1 1
Jen Gilmore Structures I 2011
SAP
before morph
The Onondaga Concert Hall was projectively developed utilizing topography optimization software of Dr. Jamie Guest of Johns Hopkins University. A section was op-timized based on load and boundary conditions (with member size then computed with SAP2000) to create architecture of a different scale: playground equipment.
sized members
rounded
AXIAL
MOMENT
Run separate topopt for each condtion, to be combined to form 3 dimensional structure
Jen Gilmore
F
E
original project
.22 volume fraction
2 performance
loads
13526 0 -1 13263 0 -1 10065 0 -1 12490 0 -1 10055 0 -1 7927 0 -1 5801 0 -1 18814 0 -1 18843 0 -1 12591 0 -3 6239 0 -1 6194 0 -1 2833 0 -1 6061 0 -1
boundary supports
41 1 1 96 1 1 2301 1 1 2350 1 1 10492 1 1
Jen Gilmore Structures I 2011
SAP
before morph
ORGANIZATIONAL SPURS
PROGRAM
CIRCULATION
KITCHENS AS ARCHITECTURAL JEWELS
THE SHARSKY INSTITUTE OF CULINARY STUDIESCINCINNATI OH 2011
CAMPUS PLAN
SECTION
MODEL
SECTION
DIAGRAMMATIC OVERLAY
RESTAURANT
KITCHENS AND CLASSROOMS
AUDITORIUM AND ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC SPUR
VISITING FACULTY HOUSINGDORMITORY AND GYMNASIUM
ARMORY SQUARE ARTSPACETHEATER/GALLERY/CAFE
SYRACUSE NY 2010
Through material and formal analysis of the existing site condition a framework of delaminated planes was produced. This became a created ruin of the site. Into this ruin boxes of overlapping program areas were placed.
This process built upon a more abstract exploration into the nature of “wall” and “box.” From that exploration a process of deriving a jig with which to design around was devised.
In the Armory Square Artspace the use of the jig partnered with the sentiment of Enric Miralles:
“With respect to the place, one must first discover the lines it contains and make them visible... to produce documents that make the different overlapping periods of a place explicit, by making use of its ruins.”
WALL & BOX JIG
MODEL VARIATIONS BUILT FROM WALL & BOX JIG
ARTSPACE JIG AND PROCESS DIAGRAMS
ARMORY SQUARE ARTSPACETHEATER/GALLERY/CAFE
28
28
28
6
6
6
6 6
TEMPLE
TEMPLE
PALACE WALL (back)
GATE
TEMPLE
SHRINE
rural settlement
PALACE RETREAT
5
5
5
5
5
5 5
5
5
5
TEMPLE
TEMPLE
PALACE WALL (back)
GATE
TEMPLE
SHRINE
rural settlement
PALACE RETREAT
Panna Meena
TURNS
28 6 19
RAMPS
7 4 5
MINOR TYPOLOGIES
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
21
TEMPLE
TEMPLE
PALACE WALL (back)
GATE
TEMPLE
SHRINE
rural settlement
PALACE RETREAT
23
23
23
23
23
23
TEMPLE
TEMPLE
PALACE WALL (back)
GATE
TEMPLE
SHRINE
rural settlement
PALACE RETREAT
Panna Meena
PARALLEL, SOLID
CURVES
MINOR TYPOLOGIES
23 11
21 24
INDIA 2011
EXTERIOR STEP TYPOLOGIESSURROUNDING THE STEPWELLS OF RAJASTAN AND GUJARAT
This study is a preliminary classification of step typologies in northwestern India in relation to four stepwells. India has been descibed as having the best and most varied resolution of the stair in the world. The stepwells studied, constructed between 1000 and 1700 AD, are excellent examples of this, as are the less monumental instances found in India’s streets. The study investigates the following questions:
Is there a correlation between the step type of a well and those that surround it?
Do the step typologies vary based on proximity to the well?
Are there regional typology variations?
Are variations based on differences in caste/occupation/religion/means of transportation?
Do the step variations have a pragmatic or symbolic basis?
Do the different types create/reflect program in the street? How do the different types affect the character of the street?
Where is the ownership threshold of each type? Does this vary regionally?
Panna MeenaAMER, RAJASTHAN
29
29
28
28
28
27
8
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
21
17
15
10
88
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5 5
5
5
5
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Amer
Personal Observa ons
Group Observa ons
Historical
Loosely formed streets
Not many people observed on the street. Water gathering was primary purpose of those seen on street.
No markets present surrounding baori.
“Maintained” historic district. Layers of historic habita� on present. Baori appears, by way of construc� on technique and material, to be of same period as fortress walls, which pass ap-proximately 200 yards from the baori.
Buildings have been recently constructed in proximity to baori.
Amer is notable for number of temples present.
Inhabited primarily by government offi cials.
Amer Fort built between 1590 and 1614 by Raja Man Singh I.
Panna Meena Baori built circa 1600
Panna MeenaAMER, RAJASTHAN
29
29
28
28
28
27
8
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
21
17
15
10
88
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5 5
5
5
5
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Amer
Personal Observa ons
Group Observa ons
Historical
Loosely formed streets
Not many people observed on the street. Water gathering was primary purpose of those seen on street.
No markets present surrounding baori.
“Maintained” historic district. Layers of historic habita� on present. Baori appears, by way of construc� on technique and material, to be of same period as fortress walls, which pass ap-proximately 200 yards from the baori.
Buildings have been recently constructed in proximity to baori.
Amer is notable for number of temples present.
Inhabited primarily by government offi cials.
Amer Fort built between 1590 and 1614 by Raja Man Singh I.
Panna Meena Baori built circa 1600
Panna MeenaAMER, RAJASTHAN
29
29
28
28
28
27
8
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
21
17
15
10
88
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5 5
5
5
5
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Amer
Personal Observa ons
Group Observa ons
Historical
Loosely formed streets
Not many people observed on the street. Water gathering was primary purpose of those seen on street.
No markets present surrounding baori.
“Maintained” historic district. Layers of historic habita� on present. Baori appears, by way of construc� on technique and material, to be of same period as fortress walls, which pass ap-proximately 200 yards from the baori.
Buildings have been recently constructed in proximity to baori.
Amer is notable for number of temples present.
Inhabited primarily by government offi cials.
Amer Fort built between 1590 and 1614 by Raja Man Singh I.
Panna Meena Baori built circa 1600
Panna MeenaAMER, RAJASTHAN
29
29
28
28
28
27
8
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
21
17
15
10
88
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5 5
5
5
5
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Amer
Personal Observa ons
Group Observa ons
Historical
Loosely formed streets
Not many people observed on the street. Water gathering was primary purpose of those seen on street.
No markets present surrounding baori.
“Maintained” historic district. Layers of historic habita� on present. Baori appears, by way of construc� on technique and material, to be of same period as fortress walls, which pass ap-proximately 200 yards from the baori.
Buildings have been recently constructed in proximity to baori.
Amer is notable for number of temples present.
Inhabited primarily by government offi cials.
Amer Fort built between 1590 and 1614 by Raja Man Singh I.
Panna Meena Baori built circa 1600
10
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TEMPLE
TEMPLE
PALACE WALL (back)
GATE
TEMPLE
SHRINE
rural settlement
PALACE RETREAT
Panna MeenaPERPENDICULAR, SOLID
1 3 10
Panna MeenaPARALLEL, SOLID, DOUBLE
29
29
27
8
22
22
88
8
8
8
8
8
8
TEMPLE
TEMPLE
PALACE WALL (back)
GATE
TEMPLE
SHRINE
rural settlement
PALACE RETREAT
8 26 27 22 29
WOMEN DO IT BETTER
HOME RENOVATIONS 2007
CUSTOM CABINETRY 2008
TILEWORK 1999
LAMPSCAPES
STICK BOX 2002
BIOPHILA 2010
TREEHOUSE 2011
HOME RENOVATIONS 2007
CUSTOM CABINETRY 2008
TILEWORK 1999
JEN GILMOREdesign portfolio 2012