13
Jeff…your logo here? Scientific Advisory Group Scientific Advisory Group Meeting Meeting May 7, 2004 May 7, 2004

Jeff…your logo here?

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Scientific Advisory Group Meeting May 7, 2004. Jeff…your logo here?. Access to Technical Education Through Sign Language Interpreting: Issues and Answers. What are the interactions of of student characteristics, interpreter characteristics, and settings? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Jeff…your logo here?

Jeff…your logo here?

Scientific Advisory Group MeetingScientific Advisory Group Meeting

May 7, 2004May 7, 2004

Page 2: Jeff…your logo here?

Access to Technical Education Through Sign Language Interpreting:

Issues and Answers

• What are the interactions of of student characteristics, interpreter characteristics, and settings?– Do student preferences and skills matter?– Does interpreting level the playing field?

Page 3: Jeff…your logo here?

Do Student Preferences and Skills Matter?

No.

Page 4: Jeff…your logo here?

Predictors of Comprehension(Signed and Written Tests)

• Generally not:– ASL skill– English skill– Interpreting match– Reading ability– Academic qualifications (including RIT vs. NTID)– Hearing aids and implants– Degree of hearing loss– Deaf vs. hearing parents– Age began signing– No “question by hearing status interaction”

Page 5: Jeff…your logo here?

• Not for comprehension (of college students, in

single lectures, without other support services) with STEM or non-STEM content

• Longer-term (course, semester, program)?– Student and interpreter comfort?

– Motivation?

– Variability (within and across students)?

Do Student Preferences and Skills Matter?

Page 6: Jeff…your logo here?

Does Interpreting Level the Playing Field?

No.

Page 7: Jeff…your logo here?

Predictors of Comprehension(Signed and Written Tests)

• Generally not:– ASL skill– English skill– Interpreting match– Reading ability– Academic qualifications (including RIT vs. NTID)– Hearing aids and implants– Degree of hearing loss– Deaf vs. hearing parents– Age began signing– No “question by hearing status interaction”

Page 8: Jeff…your logo here?

Does Interpreting Level the Playing Field?

• It’s not about interpreting or student sign skills• Likely indicates poor K-12 preparation (including

interpreting)– May be a function of “mediated instruction”

• Emphasizes the importance of other support services (tutoring, notes, etc.)

• Reflects the challenges of mainstream education– And we don’t know about direct instruction

Page 9: Jeff…your logo here?

Eliminating Communication and Technological Barriers to STEM

Education

• What are the benefits and challenges to deaf students of visual materials in the classroom?

• How do characteristics of students, interpreters, instructors, and settings interact?

Page 10: Jeff…your logo here?

Eliminating Communication and Technological Barriers to STEM

Education

• Where did all this come from?

Page 11: Jeff…your logo here?

Eliminating Communication and Technological Barriers to STEM

Education

• Year 1– Methodology– Benefits accruing to deaf students and skilled signers

Page 12: Jeff…your logo here?

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1P

ropo

rtio

n C

orre

ct

Newbie Skilled Hearing

Skill Group

Experiment 1 - Live vs. Memorex

LiveMemorex

Page 13: Jeff…your logo here?

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Newbie Skilled Hearing

Pro

po

rtio

n C

orr

ect

Live

Memorex

Experiment 1 – Live vs. Memorex