JCM Project Development by JFE - iges.or.jp · - Reject of proposal by a competent authority, opposition from existing stakeholders, lack of budget, gap between proposal and needs,

July 2018

DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY

JCM Project Development by JFE

JFE Group Structure

2 2 Copyright 2018 © JFE Engineering Corporation All Rights Reserved


JFE Holdings, Inc. (est. 2002)

5

44,400

Net Sales(million $)

Employees 27,200

JFE Steel

6,800


Employees 19,100

JFE Shoji Trade

9,300


Employees 3,900

Japan Marine United

Est. 1912 Est. 1951

Equity-method affiliate

(FY2017)

JFE Engineering

JFE’s Business to Ensure Sustainable Society



Source : JFE Group CSR Report 2017

JFE’s Business to Ensure Sustainable Society



Source : JFE Group CSR Report 2017

Global Network of JFE Engineering



America

Europe Duisburg (Germany) Rome (Italy)

Long Beach (USA)

Middle East Al Khobar (Saudi Arabia)

Tokyo / Yokohama (Headquarters)

CEO Mr. Oshita

Singapore Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) Jakarta (Indonesia) Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh (Vietnam) Bangkok (Thailand) Yangon (Myanmar) Manila (Philippines) Delhi, Pune, Mumbai (India) Shanghai, Beijing (China)

Asia & Oceania

Major Projects by JFE Engineering in India DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY

Freight Railway Bridge between Delhi and Mumbai

ONGC Gas Separation Plant in Uran

VIZAG Steel Waste Heat Recovery

BTG System

TATA Motors Pune Dual Fuel Engine

GAIL HBJ Gas Pipeline


Smart Infrastructure for Global Environment

Copyright 2018 © JFE Engineering Corporation All Rights Reserved


7

Waste-to-Energy

Biogas (Sludge Treatment) Geothermal Power Plant

Waste Heat Recovery

7

JFE offers the world leading technology

JCM Project Development



8 8

Myanmar Introduction of Waste to Energy Plant in Yangon City FS(2014), Model Project(2015)

Indonesia Power Generation by Waste-heat Recovery in Cement Industry PS(2013), Model Project(2014)

Vietnam Waste Heat Recovery Power Generation at Cement Factory in Quang Ninh Province FS(2015)


<Project 1> Power Generation by Waste-heat Recovery in Cement Industry

9 Copyright 2018 © JFE Engineering Corporation All Rights Reserved

- Registered Project ID013,10 Jul. 2018

Project Summary DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY

Counterpart PT Semen Indonesia

Site Tuban Plant, East Jawa

Power Generation 28MW

Expected GHG

Reductions 149,063 tCO2/year

Tuban City

Site


Surabaya City

Current Project Implementation

11


No.1 SP Boiler

No.1 AQC Boiler

Air Cooled Condenser


Expected operational lifetime : 9 years

14 Mar 18

Estimated emission reductions in each year 99,375 (in 2018) 149,063 (in 2019) 149,063 (in 2020) ・・・

Request of registration

30 Apr 18 Starting date of project operation

10 Jul 18 Registration of project

Project Scheme DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY

Contract Formation on JCM JCM Agreement

JCM Subsidy from Japan

International Consortium

Japanese Government Indonesian Government

GHG Reductions

Construction Operation Maintenance MRV

Engineering Equipment Supply

Semen Indonesia’s Budget


https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%95%E3%82%A1%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB:Flag_of_Japan.svg

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/Flag_of_Indonesia.svg

Overview of WHR System DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY

Raw Mill Stack

EP Clinker Cooler

EP

Stack Rotary Kiln

Suspension Preheater

Cement Production Process

Coal-fired Power Plant

Electricity

SP Boiler AQC Boiler

Turbine Generator

Hot Exhaust Gas

Hot Exhaust Gas

Steam

Steam

Electricity Reduction of grid power supply =

Reduction of CO2

20%

80%

20%


Eligibility Criteria - Approved Methodology ID_AM001


Criterion 1 The project utilizes waste heat from a cement production facility by waste heat recovery (WHR) system to generate electricity

Criterion 2 WHR system consists of a Suspension Preheater boiler (SP boiler) and/or Air Quenching Cooler boiler (AQC boiler), turbine generator and cooling tower

Criterion 3 WHR system utilizes only waste heat and does not utilize fossil fuels as a heat source to generate steam for power generation

Criterion 4 WHR system has not been introduced to a corresponding cement kiln of the project prior to its implementation

Criterion 5 The cement factory where the project is implemented is connected to a grid system and the theoretical maximum electricity output of the WHR system, which is calculated by multiplying maximum electricity output of the WHR system by the maximum hours per year (24*365=8,760 hours), is not greater than the total amount of the electricity imported to the cement factory from the grid system: > During the previous year before the validation, if the validation of the project is conducted before the operation of the project, or > During the previous year before the operation of the project, if the validation of the project is conducted after the operation of the project

Criterion 6 The WHR system is designed to be connected only to an internal power grid of the cement factory.


Calculation of Reference Emissions DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY


A B C D E(A*B*C*D)

Quantity of Electricity Generation

Generation Capacity

(MW)

Operating day per

year (days/y)

Time (hrs/day）

Operating Rate

Electricity (MWh)

Dry Season 28 164.5 24 1 110,544 Rainy Season 22 164.5 24 1 86,856

The quantity of electricity consumption

3.69 365 24 1 32,324

The quantity of net electricity generation by the WHR system which replaced grid electricity import 165,076

REp = EGp * EFgrid ＝ 165,076 MWh/y * 0.903 tCO2 e/MWh ＝ 149,063 tCO2e/y

Potential Replication of WHR Technology DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY


Cement Production Waste Heat from

Exhaust Gas

Environmentally Friendly Power

Generation

JFE’s WHR Technology

Benefits

No Additional Fuel Required

Savings on Production Costs

CO2 Emission Reduction

Electricity Reserve for the Community

Reduced Consumption from Grid-Connected Power Plants

Electricity Generation Using Only Waste Heat

Available Electricity for the Communities

Apx. 20% substituted with Electricity by WHR


<Project 2> Introduction of Waste to Energy Plant in Yangon City


- Approved Methodology MM_AM001

Project Summary DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY

Counterpart Yangon City Development Committee

Site Mingalardon area, Yangon City, MYANMAR

Technology Waste to Energy(WTE) Incinerator : 60ton/day

Generator : 0.7MW GHG Emission

Reduction 4,700t-CO2/year

First WTE Project with JCM First WTE Project in Myanmar

Copyright 2018 © JFE Engineering Corporation All Rights Reserved Facility Opening Ceremony on April 7th

18

Project Scheme DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY


Contract Formation on JCM JCM Agreement

International Consortium

Myanmar Government

Yangon City Development Committee

GHG Reductions

Operation Maintenance Monitoring Reporting

September 16, 2015

Yangon City’s Budget JCM Subsidy from Japan

Japanese Government

JFE Engineering Corporation

Engineering Procurement Construction SV for commissioning

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%95%E3%82%A1%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB:Flag_of_Myanmar.svg

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%95%E3%82%A1%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB:Flag_of_Japan.svg

Why WTE ? ⇒ Multi Benefit for Environment ! DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY

Direct Disposal

Greenhouse Effect

To Landfill

Odor

Power Generation

(in volume)

Ash 1/30

1/21 CH4

WTE Plant

Waste


Superiority of JFE Hyper Stoker DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY


Eligibility Criteria - Approved Methodology MM_AM001


Criterion 1 The project newly installs an incinerator, waste heat recovery boiler, exhaust gas treatment equipment and turbine generator.

Criterion 2 The project incinerates fresh municipal solid waste and generates electricity from steam produced in a boiler which uses heat of incineration.

Criterion 3 The project facility is constructed within the municipality where waste to be incinerated by the project is generated.

Criterion 4 The fraction of energy generated by auxiliary fossil fuels in a construction design document is planned to be not more than 50% of the total energy generated in the incinerator during normal operation.

Criterion 5 Electricity generated is exported to a grid or used for displacing captive fossil fuel fired power generator.

Criterion 6 Emissions of NO2 and CO at the stack of incinerator are designed to be less than or equal to the following levels : NO2 (230mg/m3@11%O2) and CO (42mg/m3@11%O2).


Expected GHG Emission Reductions DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY


The calculation is based on the condition of 60t of waste treated per day and operation of 310days per year, 24 hours per day (operating ratio: 85%).

The emission factor refers to the latest CDM project in Myanmar (0.8tCO2/MWh).

4,732 tCO2/ year (2,358tCO2 accounts for the energy-originated CO2)

2 Phase Timeline toward Paradigm Shift DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY


Small Scale WTE As a Model Project

Larger Scale WTE

Capacity Building, Regulation Setting, Training of WTE Operation, Finance Arranging, etc.

Complete Integrated Waste Management

Why WTE fail in many countries ? DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY


Source : Created based on “Financing issue for a development of recycling and waste treatment facility”, Nov. 3rd 2016, Shiko Hayashi, IGES

Planning (pre-FS)

Design (FS) Build Operation

/Maintenance

Stop at Planning Stage - Weak policy enforcement, public opposition, no financial source, no supporting regulations, etc.

Stop at Designing Stage - Reject of proposal by a competent authority, opposition from existing stakeholders, lack of budget, gap between proposal and needs, etc.

Stop at PQ/Tender Stage - Unsuccessful PQ/tender due to conflict of price (tipping fee, etc.), etc.

Stop at Operation Stage - Insufficient performance of facility, critical change of waste management policy, bankruptcy of operation company, etc.

PQ Tender

For Smooth, Safe and Long-term Operation DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY


To make plans of regular maintenance and a major renovation and to be secure these expenses

To make plans of receiving waste during maintenance periods

Source : JEFMA - Japan Environmental Facilities Manufacturers Association

Thank you http://www.jfe-eng.co.jp/en/

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/41/Flag_of_India.svg

Documents

JCM Project Development by JFE - iges.or.jp · - Reject of proposal by a competent authority, opposition from existing stakeholders, lack of budget, gap between proposal and needs,