19
Using Big Science to Manage Vernal Pool Grasslands Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy

Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Using Big Science to Manage Vernal Pool Grasslands

Jaymee MartyThe Nature Conservancy

Page 2: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Cosumnes River

Page 3: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
Page 4: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

We own it, now what?

• Change Current Management – Seasonal Grazing (Oct – June): change to no

grazing in wet season• Rotational grazing MUST be better• Political reasons

– Add fire to control weeds• Science based?

– No replicated studies on either subject– Keep guessing or set up robust monitoring

Page 5: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Valley SpringsFormation

LagunaFormation

Page 6: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Grazing Treatment Layout

Ungrazed

Dry season grazed

Continuously grazed

Wet season grazed

Page 7: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
Page 8: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Native species richness in ungrazedpools: doing fine?

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Pool Edge Upland

Nat

ive

s 2001

2002

2003

Page 9: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Change in native richness positive in grazed poolsnegative in ungrazed pools

(Marty 2005)

-2.50

-2.00

-1.50

-1.00

-0.50

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

pool edge upland

Cha

nge

in s

(03

- 01)

CG

DG

UG

WG

n.s. ***

n.s., not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001

Page 10: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

7665

78

115

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

cg dg ug wg

Max

imum

pon

ding

per

iod

(# d

ays)

Average maximum ponding period 50 days less in ungrazed poolsvs. continuously grazed pools

a

b bb

Page 11: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

HYPOTHESIS: Fire occurred historically in the system,

so it must be good

Page 12: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Valensin Ranch (Riverbank)

Jepson Prairie Preserve(Northern Claypan)

Vina Plains Preserve (Tuscan)

Howard Ranch (Valley Springs)

Page 13: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

5 pools

5 pools

5 pools

5 pools

Page 14: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

One year post burn results

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

edge pool upland

% c

over

exo

tic a

nnua

l gra

sses

burnedunburned

n.s

*

**

Exotic annual GRASS cover declines in burned plots at 2003 burned sites

Page 15: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Exotic annual FORB cover increases in burned plots at 2003 burned s

05

101520253035404550

edge pool upland

% c

over

exo

tic a

nnua

l for

bs

burnedunburned

n.s

n.s

***

Page 16: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

edge pool upland

% c

over

nat

ives

burnedunburned

Burning increases native cover and richness at Jepson Prairie(and Valensin Ranch)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

edge pool upland

Nat

ive

spec

ies

rich

ness

burnedunburned

+

**

***

n.s.

**

***

Page 17: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

No effect of burning on native diversity at Vina and Cosumnes Foothills sites

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

edge pool upland

Nat

ive

s

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

edge pool uplandN

ativ

e s

burned

unburned

n.s.

n.s. n.s.

n.s. n.s.

n.s.

Page 18: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

• Don’t change management regime unless you have a very

compelling science-based reason to do so

• Sometimes politics get in the way

• When you do make a change, MONITOR

• ALWAYS include a control

• Know why you’re monitoring and keep it simple

• Stats heads may know numbers, but may not

understand biology or monitoring efficiency

• Analyze your data!

What have we learned?

Page 19: Jaymee Marty The Nature Conservancy...Change in native richness positive in grazed pools negative in ungrazed pools (Marty 2005)-2.50-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

HelpersCRP Interns and staffVolunteer naturalistsCRP Hard Corp crewSac Co. Sheriff work crewsCDF

Generous funding support:Osher foundationAnderson Grassland Research fundThe McCammantsPartnership FoundationThe Bechtel Foundation