Upload
hoangthuan
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
48,000 homes
98,000 residents
50 years old in 2017 26,000 units
requiring gas
service
Stock Investment
New Forest, Dover,
Lincoln
Special Projects
The tap on the shoulder...
If the HCA called you today, would you be able to answer
the following questions:
• What is your current gas safety check compliance rate?
• If you have non-compliant systems, how many are one month (or more)
overdue?
• Are all of your overdue systems either in your referral or legal process?
• What evidence can you provide to show you’ve made all reasonable effort
to gain access?
• Can you prove that your data you hold on your gas safety compliance is
accurate and complete?
• Can you prove that your process for ensuring systems remain gas
compliant is fit-for-purpose?
The story of The Hyde Group...
• New Gas contracts procured went live on 28 October 2013.
• Based on a British Gas 3 star, all inclusive style contract
• 10 year partnering contracts
• Three contractors
• Hyde responsible for managing the programme, taking the calls,
arranging the appointments, scheduling the works...
The journey so far for Hyde...
The challenge, by January 2014;
• Contract mobilisation had proved difficult
• We had a higher than acceptable volume of overdue gas
safety checks
• Different systems were providing different compliance
figures
• Our gas consultant had miscalculated the number of
overdue gas checks
• Opportunities to carry out the checks were being missed
• Contractors finding it difficult to cope with peaks in the
service programme
• We were not confident in the data or process
Our gas recovery project
What we found...
• Data conflicts between our system and the contactor’s system
• Despite having a 10 month programme, systems were already
non-compliant by the time the contractor referred them back to
us
• Administrators spending much of their time conducting forensic
searches to recover missing LGSRs
• Resources stretched to the limit trying to arrange access for
overdue systems
• We were missing opportunities to gain access
• The cost of administering the scheme was significant
The cost of gas compliance for Hyde...
• Gas Manager and three Contract Managers
• Eight Compliance Admin Staff
• Customer services and Responsive Admin Staff
• Resident Services Staff
• Performance and Operations staff
• In-house Legal services staff
• Tracking systems (KSI) and administration (IT support)
• 10 month service programme (6 checks every 5 years)
• Warning Letter and phone Calls (min of three), SMS messages (min of one)
• Court Action, Solicitors Letters
• Legal costs
Total cost estimate: £1M per annum (average of £40
per property on top of the cost of the safety check!)
The gas recovery plan
• Data integrity reconciliation
• Redesign the work-flow from end to end
• Smooth out and simplify the process
• Put those best able to deal with the risk in charge
• Set out the referral process
• Fit interval timers
• Rewrite no access letters (nudge; what about a little shaming?)
Principle 1: The client owns the data
• We own the truth (it is our version of the truth that matters)!
• We cannot outsource our responsibilities!
• Our compliance monitoring system is our one version of the truth
› We report from our system only
› If it’s not in our system it doesn’t count
› no other (contractor or consultant) system matters
The gas compliance process redesign – the
five principles
The gas compliance process redesign – the
five principles
Principle 2: The contractor owns the service
programme
• Contractors are best placed to schedule their own resources
• Contractors are best placed to manage the rolling service programme
› We give them all the property addresses
› It’s the contractor’s obligation to keep us compliant or refer back to us
well before the anniversary date
The gas compliance process redesign – the
five principles
Principle 3: No LGSR, no payment!
• Landlord Gas Safety Records are the ‘currency’ of the contract
› Incentivise the right behaviour
› Absolute clarity of purpose
• Suggestion: What about charging the contractor for non-
compliance? e.g. £40 for every referral back to the client, or £25
per week for every non-compliant system.
The gas compliance process redesign – the
five principles
Principle 4: Time passing triggers action!
• The referral process is triggered by a date (e.g. 30 days left to
due date) rather than a no-access event
› No waiting for the contractor to refer it back to the client after
two no-access events
› Automatically referred back to client at 30 days prior to
anniversary date
› The client manages the referral process
The gas compliance process redesign – the
five principles
Principle 5: The process must be fail-safe; either the system’s compliant or in the legal process!
• The process is front-ended rather than reacting to failure
› No ambiguity – either compliant or in the legal process by the
due date – No exceptions!
› Clear responsibilities
› Streamlined process
› Staff in control in new process checking and counting the
LGSRs in
› No longer a need for forensic searching for lost LGSRs
Lessons learnt
We recognise;
• Ultimately the landlord is responsible – you cannot outsource
this responsibility
• Poor data quality quickly erodes trust in the system – Good
gatekeeping is essential (not necessarily automated)
• There is a tension between being compliance and achieving
VFM
• Performance is improved by simplifying and smoothing out the
workflow - not by adding in more controls
• An adult-adult client-contractor relationship is more productive
(rather than a parent-child relationship)
• Play to the strengths of each partner and ensure each team
know what they are responsible for.
Thank you
Jake Le Page
Senior Project Manager (Stock Investment)