Upload
monica-collins
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2
Presenters
Raymond Applebaum • Immediate Past Chair of Peel Advisory
Working Group on Older Adults’ Housingand Executive Director, Peel Senior Link
Glen O’Brecht • Director of Property Management
Peel Living
3
Peel Advisory Working GroupOn Older Adults’ Housing
INTRODUCTION
• Origin of Advisory Working Group
• Who/What is it?
• Highlights
4
ORIGIN
• Housing Needs and Options of Older Adults in Peel – 2000
• Purpose
current/future needs of older adults
methodology for assessment of need
5
Focus of Recommendations
• Six Categories (30 recommendations)
partnershipsmeeting need for affordable housingplanning and designsupport services and housingcommunication and educationresearch and monitoring
6
Advisory Working Group
• First recommendation
• 28 members, multi-disciplinary, community-based
• TOR approved by Council, June, 2000
• Report to Regional Council
• Chaired by service organization
• Secretariat/research support – Housing & Property Department
7
Advisory Working Group
• Mandate
Develop/promote ways to meet current/future housing needs of older adults
Assist Region to implement 30 study recommendations
8
HIGHLIGHTS
• Strategic workplan – approved by Council• Best practices report• Bus tour of innovative housing options outside Peel• Think Tank with local planning and building
departments• New linkages• Housing preferences survey• Forum for Developers and Builders• Briefings/Quarterly Reports - 6 Regional
Councillors and Municipal Support
9
GTA Population, 1961 - 2031
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 2031
Po
pu
lati
on
Toronto
Durham
York
Peel
Halton
GTA
10
Peel Population Pyramids1996, 2001 1991, 2001
6420246
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-74
75+
Fem
ale
2001
Mal
e 20
01Fe
mal
e 19
96M
ale
1996
6420246
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-74
75+
Fem
ale
2001
Mal
e 20
01Fe
mal
e 19
91M
ale
1991
11
Percent of Peel’s Population 55 Years or Older, 1991, 1996, 2001
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
Peel Mississauga Brampton Caledon
Perc
en
t
1991
1996
2001
12
Peel’s Population Distribution of Adults 55 Years or Older
0
20
40
60
80
100
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4 th Qtr
East
West
North
approximately approximately approximately 98,000 161,000 443,000
1991 2001 2031
13
Forecast of Population 55 Years or Older, 2001 - 2031
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pop
ulat
ion
Peel
Mississauga
Brampton
Caledon
14
In Ontario:
• One in four seniors aged 65+ lives alone
• Seniors aged 65+ will outnumber children younger than 15 by 2026
15
Study Key Messages
• Demographic trends
• Need for diversity in housing
• Opportunities for innovation
• Opportunities for partnership
17
Study Research Methodology
• Survey to 6,000
• 1,301 responses (response rate of 22 %)
• Plus 8 focus groups (98 participants) (including Chinese and Punjabi focus groups)
18
• Study is one of the most comprehensive research projects in Ontario that examines housing needs of older adults.
www.region.peel.on.ca/housing/older2.htm
19
SURVEY FINDINGSCHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDENTS
Age
• 55-64 - 46%
• 65-74 - 34%
• 75 years + -20%
Gender - equal
20
PLANS TO MOVE IN FUTUREWHEN PLANNING TO MOVE
44% - in 10 years or more 36% - within next 9 years 27% - within next 5 years
13% - within next 2 years 26% - do not know 31% - do not plan to move
21
PLANS TO MOVE IN FUTURE5 MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS
1. Proximity to doctors and hospitals
2. Affordability
3. Proximity to shopping facilities
4. Proximity to close friends and family
5. Proximity to public transportation
ALSO
-Accessibility is very important.
-Over 1/2 of respondents want to remain in the same municipality.
22
FEATURES OF PREFERRED DWELLING
Strong preference for living space on 1 floor
– Single detached dwelling (44%)– Low-rise apartment (19%)– High-rise (12%)– Row house/townhouse (8%)– Semi-detached (3%)
*Working group promotes public awareness of housing options
23
HOME OWNERSHIP
• Majority (59%) want to own
PURCHASE PRICE:
• 1/3 want to pay less than $190,000
• under 1/3 want to pay between $190,000 and $250,000
• over 1/3 want to pay more than $250,000
• Largest group of respondents want to pay $200,000 or $250,000
51.7%
32.4%
14.3%
1.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
A regular mixed age community or building
A retirement community geared to older adults w ho are active
A community for older adults that offers some assistance
Other
Preferred Community Types of Peel Respondents
25
Figure 30: Percentage of Respondents Interested in Housing Option
38.4%32.4%
26.1%
14.8% 12.2%8.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Yes, I am interestedMaybe - but would like to learn more about it firstTotal of "Yes" and" Maybe"
26
VIEWS ON HOUSING OPTIONSTHEMES FROM FOCUS GROUPS
• modest, no frills condos
• single level living space
• manufactured homes
• desire more information
27
South Asian housing needs
• Peel study Chinese and Punjabi focus groups mostly new immigrants
• Another new study of established, middle and upper income South Asian people show some different & additional needs– Less need to live with others of same culture,
prayer room, extra rooms for family who may move in, large pantry in kitchen, pie-shaped lots preferred, designed for socializing, open concept design preferred except for kitchen which should be enclosed and well-ventilated.
28
Example: Convertible Housing
• BC Home 2000• Home 2000 can
convert from a 4-bedroom, single family home to a code-compliant duplex.
• See CMHC representatives for more info
29
A Multi-family home in Springdale, Brampton
• one main entrance • both floors have living
room, dining room, kitchen, bedroom and full bathroom
• suits 2 families • older adults may prefer
first floor
31
Two distinct “larger” groups
• Baby Boomers aged 45-64
• Seniors 65 plus
These groups can also be divided into sub-groups.
Also consider geography, culture, income etc.
32
Baby Boomers
In general, highly value:
• Youth – Peter Pan generation
• Freedom
• Integration
• Individuality
• Health & exercise
• Comfort and space
33
Seniors
In general, highly value:• Company of people their own age• Security• Sense of Community• Lifestyle• Vacation-like• Health & exercise• Access to essential services
34
Boomers vs. Seniors
• Both Prefer:
pedestrian-friendly, close to walking trails, pet-friendly, designed for socializing, not too far from children and grandchildren, close access to services, no stairs, patient sales people who give detailed info, sense of community (friends).
35
Boomers
• no look-alike cookie-cutter housing
• especially the front of house and entrance
• lots of options
• mixed housing
36
Seniors
• More open to older adult communities• Will spend more time at home and with
neighbours so social space and pedestrian features even more important
• Wheelchair friendly • Consider a kid friendly space for grandchildren • Pets are more than pets - companions• #1 reason why seniors choose one home over
another is community
37
Key messages
• The 50 plus market is the future of house building.
• If builders and developers are not developing for the boomers and seniors, they are missing significant financial opportunities.
38
Peel’s future of 55+ residentsPopulation will more than quadruple
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
10 0
1s t
Q t r
3 r d
Q t r
E as t
Wes t
N or t h
1991 2031approximately approximately
98,000 443,000
39
RECOMMENDATIONS
These recommendations were formed and approved by the Peel
Advisory Working Group on Older Adults’ Housing, and were
developed based on knowledge, information, and findings
documented by the AWG.
That the Government of Ontario:
Increase the number and scope of rent supplements in Ontario to address the immediate and projected shortfall of available affordable housing for seniors.
40
Provide funding for community support services (including but not limited to Supportive Housing) and other measures, including increased allowances for capital reserves, that would enable tenants of seniors’ non-profits to age in place where this is a preferable care option to institutionalization.
41
Shorten the timeline for the Province ofOntario to match the Federal AffordableHousing contribution for communities withexpressed interest and capacity to proceed.
Initiate a joint planning and funding mechanism between relevant Ministries to ensure the approval of capital/building projects, simultaneously with operational funding for community support services.
42
Initiate a multi-year funding approach for capital and operational reviews and approvals.
Provide municipalities with the financial support, and incentives to build or renovate existing opportunities to address affordable housing options for seniors, e.g. development charges replacement funds, provisions for flexibility within the Municipal Planning Act, as well as provide municipalities with access & retrieval of seniors’ data from Statistics Canada for local decision making, and innovations such as homesharing.
43
Circulate AWG report to key decision makers (civil servant and politicians) in relevant Ontario/Federal Ministries, Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association (ONPHA), Service Managers, and post on the Ontario Seniors’ Secretariat, and Municipal Affairs and Housing websites.