Upload
ceqaplanner
View
260
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ESP 179- Winter 2012
EIRsJanuary 17, 2012
Instructor: Trevor Macenski
Prepare Initial Study
Prepare/DistributeNotice of Preparation (30 days)
Scoping Meeting
Prepare Draft EIR
Public and Agency Reviewof Draft EIR (45 days)
Public Meeting on Draft EIR (optional)
Prepare Final EIR Including Response to Comments
Review of Responses byCommenting Agencies
File Notice of Determination
Public Hearings/Decision
= Opportunities for Public/Agency Input
Overview: CEQA EIR Process
Notice of Preparation (NOP) review for 30 days
Scoping meeting is required for qualifying projects
Public scoping meeting is not required, but is commonplace
Notice of Completion (NOC) and Notice of Availability (NOA) to start minimum 45-day Draft EIR public review
Public hearing on Draft EIR is discretionary
EIR Process Highlights
Proposed responses to comments sent to responding public agencies at least 10 days before certification
Public hearing is not required by CEQA, but often held for other project review reasons
EIR certification, project approval, CEQA findings, MMRP, statement of overriding considerations (if needed)
File Notice of Determination (NOD)
EIR Process Highlights
Project EIR
Subsequent EIR
Supplement to an EIR
Master EIR and Focused EIR
Program EIR
Others (Staged, Redevelopment, Base Reuse, General Plan)
Addendum to an EIR
Environmental Impact Reports
Include: Description, location, and a discussion of the probable environmental effects.
EIR can be initiated while waiting for comments from responsible agencies.
Responsible agencies and public have 30 days to review and comment on an NOP.
Their concerns need to be addressed in the EIR.
EIR cannot be released for public review until 30 days after
distribution of the NOP.
Notice of Preparation (NOP)
Send to State Clearinghouse, Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies and involved Federal Agencies
Send to jurisdictions, individuals and groups with an interest in the project
Use certified mail or other method to confirm delivery
30 days run from date of receipt (not postage date)
NOP Procedures
Required for statewide, regional and area wide projects as defined in CCR §15206
Not a public scoping meeting (no public notice requirements unless person requests notice, but good to invite interested public)
Notice to Responsible, Trustee Agencies and persons requesting notice (PRC §21083.9; CCR §15082 )
Scoping Meeting
Table of contents Summary Project description Environmental setting Consideration and discussion of
impacts Significance Thresholds Significant effects Mitigation measures Alternatives Cumulative impacts Significant irreversible changes Growth inducing impacts Effects found not to be significant Organizations and persons
consulted
Format may vary
Each element must be covered
State where each is discussed
Contents of an EIR
Table of contents
Summary brief summary of proposed action
each significant effect and mitigation
alternatives comparison
areas of controversy
issues to be resolved
Contents of an EIR (cont.)
Project Description regional map with location
precise location/boundaries on a map
statement of objectives
project characteristics
intended uses of the EIR agencies using EIR
list of permits and approvals
list of environmental review/consultation needs
Contents of an EIR (cont.)
Environmental SettingDescription of physical environmental conditions
at the time of the NOP, or when environmental analysis is commenced, if no NOP
Baseline for environmental analysis, which is normally the setting at time of NOP
Regional setting and rare or unique resources
Contents of an EIR (cont.)
Significant environmental effects thresholds of significance
direct and indirect, short- and long-term, all phases
effect of bringing people/development to an area
Significant effects that cannot be avoided
Irreversible environmental changes
Growth-inducing impacts foster economic or population growth
remove obstacles to population growth
Contents of an EIR (cont.)
Alternatives offer environmental advantage
Avoid or lessen at least one significant impact
Feasible alternatives
“capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors.”
A range of reasonable alternatives
Environmentally superior alternative
Can identify alternatives found to be infeasible
Contents of an EIR (cont.)
Effects found not to be significant
Organizations and persons consulted
List of preparers
In Final EIR: comments on draft EIR,
list of commenters,
responses to environmental points raised
revisions to EIR text (embedded in responses, in an errata chapter, or track changes in full text discretionary)
Contents of an EIR (cont.)
Air quality Biology Hydrology/Water quality Climate Change/GHG Energy Geology/Soils Community Character Land Use & Planning Public Services
Cultural Resources Traffic Recreation Agriculture Seismic safety Noise Aesthetics Hazardous materials
Typical EIR Impact Analysis Issues
Shall focus on alternatives to the project or its locations which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the proposed project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives
Project Alternatives
Rule of Reason
Mandatory - No Project Alternative
Typical Alternatives:Reduced size/intensity
Revised design to mitigate impacts
Alternative locations
How Many Alternatives?
Public Notice of Availability (NOA)Mailed to those previously requesting notice
and,
General circulation newspaper or,
Posting in the project area or,
Direct mailing to owners/occupants of contiguous parcels
Notice of Availability
Text revisions to Draft EIR Responses to comments
Must be good-faith, reasoned analysis Must respond to significant environmental points Discuss any alternatives suggested during public review
No separate review period for Final EIR Written response to commenting public agencies
At least 10 days prior to certification Explain rationale behind responses (use
substantial evidence, refer to Draft EIR coverage)
Final EIR
…where comments from responsible experts or sister agencies disclose new or conflicting data or opinions that cause concern that the agency may not have fully evaluated the project and its alternatives, these comments may not simply be ignored. There must be good faith, reasoned analysis in response.
Court Case: The People vs. County of Kern
Brief description of project
LocationAddress where
environmental document is available
Period during which comments will be received
Notice of hearings(if one is scheduled)
Notice of Completion (NOC)
Consider and Certify EIR
Approve ProjectMake Findings
Adopt Mitigation, Monitoring Program
Adopt Statement of Overriding Considerations (if necessary)
Decision Process
Findings needed for approval of Project
Only 3 possible findings:
(a)(1) Changes or alterations have been required that avoid or substantially lessen significant effects
(a)(2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency, and such changes have been adopted or can and should be adopted by that agency
(a)(3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make mitigation/alternatives infeasible
(CCR § 15091)
Findings for a Decision
Finding must be made for each significant effect Suggested format
Impact: Finding: Facts:
Facts explain rationale behind the finding MMRP need not be in EIR, but adopted with project
approval Mitigation measures become conditions of approval
Hints for Findings
Statement needed for approval of project with remaining significant effects Reasons to approve a project where significant impacts
are not avoided or substantially lessened
Supported by substantial evidence in the record
Reasons can be economic, legal, social, technological or other, including region-wide or statewide environmental benefits (2010 revisions)
(CCR § 15093)
Statement of Overriding Considerations
Within 5 working days after project approvalPosted with the county clerk for at least 30
daysFiled with State Clearinghouse for at least
30 daysDFG Fee required at time of filingStarts 30 day Statute of Limitations (180
days if not filed and posted)Required for ND/MND and EIR
(CCR §15094)
Notice of Determination (NOD)
Project description Location Date of approval Determination whether will have a
significant effect on the environment
That ND/MND or EIR was prepared/certified pursuant to CEQA
Whether mitigation measures are a condition and whether Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted
Address of where ND/MND or EIR and certification can be examined
Notice of Determination (NOD)
To file a NOD w/ County Clerk or State Clearinghouse
EIR and ND/MND: (adjusted annually) County clerk fee $50 (no fee for Clearinghouse)
“No effect on fish and wildlife” avoids the fee, but narrowly defined Contact regional DFG office
New regulations clarifying the process are expected
Project is not vested or final until fee is paid
Fish and Game Filing FeesFGC § 711.4
Questions?
Thank You