Jacquenot Et Al

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Jacquenot Et Al

    1/3

    Jacquenot et al.[6] introduced 2D multi-objective placement method for complex

    geometry components !heir proposed relaxed placement technique is based on the

    hybridation of a genetic algorithm and a separation algorithm" and it allo#s to solve

    placement problem #ith several types of placement constraints !hey claimed that #ith

    appropriate parameters of genetic algorithms" high quality solutions can be obtained

    $onsecutive #or% by them involves a study on the influence of initial population and

    parameters in the genetic algorithm

    &opper and !urton [2] introduced t#o hybrid genetic algorithms for solving 2D rectangle

    pac%ing problem !he first algorithm uses the heuristic technique called 'ottom-(eft

    )'(* routine" #here the components are moved to the bottom and as far as possible to the

    left side of the bin !he major disadvantage of the '(-routine is the creation of empty

    areas in the layout" #hen larger items bloc% the movement of successive one +n order to

    overcome this dra#bac%" the '( algorithm has been modified as 'ottom-(eft-,ill )'(,*

    placement algorithm

    !his algorithm allo#s placing each item at the lo#est available position of the object

    ince" the generation of the layout #ith the '(, algorithm is based on the allocation of

    the lo#est sufficiently large region in the partial layout rather than on a series of bottom-

    left moves" it is capable of filling existing .gaps. +n order to achieve high quality layouts

    in an industrial placement problem" the improved '(, heuristic is recommended over a

    sufficient number of iterations

    'e%rar and /acem [01] have considered t#o-dimensional strip pac%ing problem under

    the guillotine constraint !he pac%ing problem described is a set of rectangular items on

    one strip of #idth and infinite height !he items pac%ed #ithout overlapping must be

    extracted by a series of cuts that go from one edge to the opposite edge guillotine

    constraint !he main contribution consists in the elaboration of ne# tight lo#er and upper

    bounds +n order to solve this problem" a dichotomic algorithm is proposed that useslo#er bound" an upper bound" and a feasibility test algorithm !he upper bounds are based

    on ne# rules for solving the problem under the above constraint !he lo#er bounds are

    based on a linear formulation using a set of various valid inequalities #ith a connection to

    scheduling on parallel machines uch bounds #ere very useful to build an efficient

    dichotomic method" #hich are compared to an existing branch-and-bound method

    $omputational results obtained sho# that the dichotomic algorithm" using the ne#

    bounds gives good results compared to existing methods

  • 7/23/2019 Jacquenot Et Al

    2/3

    Do#sland and Do#sland [03] revie#ed the researches carried out on modelling and

    solution of layout problems in t#o and three dimensions and the research carried out on

    exact and heuristic solution approaches !hey have reported several #or%s on pac%ing

    problems such as t#o-dimensional rectangular pac%ing" pallet loading" strip bin pac%ing"

    t#o dimensional bin pac%ing" three dimensional pac%ing and non-rectangular pac%ing

    4oreover" they have recommended that there is still plenty of scope for the researcher

    into pac%ing problems in spite of the extent of existing methodology

    $hen and &uanga [06] developed a t#o-level search algorithm to solve t#o-dimensional

    rectangle-pac%ing problem +n this algorithm" the rectangles are placed ina container one

    by one and each rectangle is pac%ed at a position by a corner-occupying action !his

    action touches t#o items #ithout overlapping the other already pac%ed rectangles 5t thefirst level of the algorithm" a simple algorithm called 5" selects and pac%s one rectangle

    according to the highest degree first rule at every iteration of pac%ing 5t the second level"

    5is itself used to evaluate the benefit of a $andidate $orner-7ccupying 5ction ($$75*

    more globally $omputational results obtained in this paper sho#s that the resulted

    pac%ing algorithm called 50produces high-density solutions #ithin short running times

    Jain and 8ea [0] present a technique for applying genetic algorithms )85* on t#o-

    dimensional pac%ing problems !his approach is applicable to not only convex shaped

    objects" but can also accommodate any type of concave and complex shaped objects

    including objects #ith holes +n this approach" a ne# concept of a t#o-dimensional

    genetic chromosome is introduced !he total layout space is divided into a finite number

    of cells for mapping it into this 2D genetic algorithm chromosome !he mutation and

    crossover operators have been modified and are applied in conjunction #ith connectivity

    analysis for the objects to reduce the creation of faulty generations 5 ne# feature has

    been added to the 8enetic 5lgorithms in the form of a ne# operator called compactioneveral examples of 85-based layout are presented

    /ier%os9 and (uc9a% [0:] presented a hybrid evolutionary algorithm for the t#o-

    dimensional non-guillotine pac%ing problem !he problem consists of pac%ing many

    rectangular pieces into a single rectangular sheet in order to maximi9e the total area of the

    pieces pac%ed 4oreover" there is a constraint on the maximum number of times that a

    piece may be used in a pac%ing pattern !hree mutation operators and t#o types of quality

    functions are used in the algorithm !he best solution obtained by the evolutionary

    algorithm is used as the initial solution in a tree search improvement procedure !his

  • 7/23/2019 Jacquenot Et Al

    3/3

    approach is tested on a set of benchmar% problems ta%en from the literature and compared

    #ith the results published by other authors