Upload
ramakrishnan-ramachandran
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/23/2019 Jacquenot Et Al
1/3
Jacquenot et al.[6] introduced 2D multi-objective placement method for complex
geometry components !heir proposed relaxed placement technique is based on the
hybridation of a genetic algorithm and a separation algorithm" and it allo#s to solve
placement problem #ith several types of placement constraints !hey claimed that #ith
appropriate parameters of genetic algorithms" high quality solutions can be obtained
$onsecutive #or% by them involves a study on the influence of initial population and
parameters in the genetic algorithm
&opper and !urton [2] introduced t#o hybrid genetic algorithms for solving 2D rectangle
pac%ing problem !he first algorithm uses the heuristic technique called 'ottom-(eft
)'(* routine" #here the components are moved to the bottom and as far as possible to the
left side of the bin !he major disadvantage of the '(-routine is the creation of empty
areas in the layout" #hen larger items bloc% the movement of successive one +n order to
overcome this dra#bac%" the '( algorithm has been modified as 'ottom-(eft-,ill )'(,*
placement algorithm
!his algorithm allo#s placing each item at the lo#est available position of the object
ince" the generation of the layout #ith the '(, algorithm is based on the allocation of
the lo#est sufficiently large region in the partial layout rather than on a series of bottom-
left moves" it is capable of filling existing .gaps. +n order to achieve high quality layouts
in an industrial placement problem" the improved '(, heuristic is recommended over a
sufficient number of iterations
'e%rar and /acem [01] have considered t#o-dimensional strip pac%ing problem under
the guillotine constraint !he pac%ing problem described is a set of rectangular items on
one strip of #idth and infinite height !he items pac%ed #ithout overlapping must be
extracted by a series of cuts that go from one edge to the opposite edge guillotine
constraint !he main contribution consists in the elaboration of ne# tight lo#er and upper
bounds +n order to solve this problem" a dichotomic algorithm is proposed that useslo#er bound" an upper bound" and a feasibility test algorithm !he upper bounds are based
on ne# rules for solving the problem under the above constraint !he lo#er bounds are
based on a linear formulation using a set of various valid inequalities #ith a connection to
scheduling on parallel machines uch bounds #ere very useful to build an efficient
dichotomic method" #hich are compared to an existing branch-and-bound method
$omputational results obtained sho# that the dichotomic algorithm" using the ne#
bounds gives good results compared to existing methods
7/23/2019 Jacquenot Et Al
2/3
Do#sland and Do#sland [03] revie#ed the researches carried out on modelling and
solution of layout problems in t#o and three dimensions and the research carried out on
exact and heuristic solution approaches !hey have reported several #or%s on pac%ing
problems such as t#o-dimensional rectangular pac%ing" pallet loading" strip bin pac%ing"
t#o dimensional bin pac%ing" three dimensional pac%ing and non-rectangular pac%ing
4oreover" they have recommended that there is still plenty of scope for the researcher
into pac%ing problems in spite of the extent of existing methodology
$hen and &uanga [06] developed a t#o-level search algorithm to solve t#o-dimensional
rectangle-pac%ing problem +n this algorithm" the rectangles are placed ina container one
by one and each rectangle is pac%ed at a position by a corner-occupying action !his
action touches t#o items #ithout overlapping the other already pac%ed rectangles 5t thefirst level of the algorithm" a simple algorithm called 5" selects and pac%s one rectangle
according to the highest degree first rule at every iteration of pac%ing 5t the second level"
5is itself used to evaluate the benefit of a $andidate $orner-7ccupying 5ction ($$75*
more globally $omputational results obtained in this paper sho#s that the resulted
pac%ing algorithm called 50produces high-density solutions #ithin short running times
Jain and 8ea [0] present a technique for applying genetic algorithms )85* on t#o-
dimensional pac%ing problems !his approach is applicable to not only convex shaped
objects" but can also accommodate any type of concave and complex shaped objects
including objects #ith holes +n this approach" a ne# concept of a t#o-dimensional
genetic chromosome is introduced !he total layout space is divided into a finite number
of cells for mapping it into this 2D genetic algorithm chromosome !he mutation and
crossover operators have been modified and are applied in conjunction #ith connectivity
analysis for the objects to reduce the creation of faulty generations 5 ne# feature has
been added to the 8enetic 5lgorithms in the form of a ne# operator called compactioneveral examples of 85-based layout are presented
/ier%os9 and (uc9a% [0:] presented a hybrid evolutionary algorithm for the t#o-
dimensional non-guillotine pac%ing problem !he problem consists of pac%ing many
rectangular pieces into a single rectangular sheet in order to maximi9e the total area of the
pieces pac%ed 4oreover" there is a constraint on the maximum number of times that a
piece may be used in a pac%ing pattern !hree mutation operators and t#o types of quality
functions are used in the algorithm !he best solution obtained by the evolutionary
algorithm is used as the initial solution in a tree search improvement procedure !his
7/23/2019 Jacquenot Et Al
3/3
approach is tested on a set of benchmar% problems ta%en from the literature and compared
#ith the results published by other authors