j.1744-1633.2010.00493.x

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 j.1744-1633.2010.00493.x

    1/1

    Laparoscopic excision of infected urachal cyst: Illustrationof techniqueash_493 77

    Dennis Chung-Kei Ng, Kevin Kwok-Kay Yau* and Michael Ka-Wah LiDepartment of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China

    The urachus is a fibrous cord structure connecting the

    urinary bladder dome and the umbilicus.1 Persistent

    urachal anomalies are rare conditions which com-

    monly present as infection. Conventional treatment

    is excision of the umbilicus together with the entire

    tract with or without a cuff of the urinary bladder.23

    Complete excision will result in a large laparotomy

    wound and related short-term disadvantage. With

    the advance of the laparoscopic technique, more

    and more patients have undergone laparoscopic

    excisions.46 We herein report a case and illustrate the

    laparoscopic technique in the accompanying video.

    A 22-year-old man presented to us with a 3-day

    history of umbilical pain and fever and was not

    responding to antibiotic treatment prescribed by a

    private doctor. On physical examination, his umbilicus

    was inflamed with some pus-like discharge. Contrast

    computed tomography (CT) scan was carried out and

    findings were suggestive of infected urachus. Laparo-scopic excision of the infected urachus was sug-

    gested to the patient and he agreed to the operation.

    The operation was carried out under general ana-

    esthesia and the patient was placed in the supine

    position. A urinary catheter was inserted. One

    1011-mm camera port was inserted in the right side

    of the patients abdomen at the level of the umbilicus

    by an open technique. Two 5-mm working ports were

    then inserted under laparoscopic guidance. All ports

    were placed at the right side of the abdomen. Thirty-

    degree laparoscopy was used so that it gave a clear

    view of the posterior surface of the anterior abdominalwall. An ultrasonic dissector was used to dissect the

    peritoneum around the infected urachal cyst. Further

    dissection was carried out along the preperitoneal

    plane so that the entire median umbilical ligament was

    dissected out. We traced down along the tract until the

    dome of the urinary bladder was reached. The urinary

    bladder was then distended with 300-mL methylene

    blue solution. Double clipping of the tract was applied

    just proximal to the dome of the urinary bladder. The

    whole tract was fully mobilized up to the umbilical

    attachment. Trans-umbilical elliptical skin incision was

    carried out and the tract separated from the umbilicus.

    The entire tract was then retrieved through the umbili-

    cal wound with a specimen bag. The umbilical fascia

    was closed with interrupted PDS-1 sutures and the

    umbilicus was reconstructed with interrupted 3-0

    nylon. Other port sites and skin wounds were closed

    with subcuticular sutures. The patient recovered well

    and was discharged the next day after operation.

    Video image

    Additional video images may be found in the online

    version of this article.

    Visit http://cshk.org/surgical_practice/multi-media_article/May_2010_issue_MM4_video.htmPlease note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content

    or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the

    authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be

    directed to the corresponding author of the article.

    References

    1. Gearhart JP. Exstrophy, epispadias, and other bladder

    anomalies. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ

    (eds). Campbells Urology, 8th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saun-

    ders, 2002; 213696.

    2. Blichert-Toft M, Nielson OV. Diseases of the urachus simulat-ing intra-abdominal disorders.Am. J. Surg.1971;122: 1278.

    3. Berman SM, Tolia BM, Laor E et al. Urachal remnants in

    adults. Urology1988; 31: 1721.

    4. Chiarenza SF, Scarpa MG, DAgostino S et al. Laparoscopic

    excision of urachal cyst in pediatric age: report of three cases

    and review of the literature. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg.

    Tech. A 2009; 19 (Suppl 1): S1836.

    5. Castillo OA, Vitagliano G, Olivares R et al. Complete excision

    of urachal cyst by laparoscopic means: a new approach to an

    uncommon disorder. Arch. Esp. Urol. 2007; 60: 60711.

    6. Siegel JF, Winfield HN, Valderrama E et al. Laparoscopic

    excision of urachal cyst.J. Urol. 1994; 151: 16313.*Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

    Email: [email protected]

    Received 14 January 2010; accepted 15 January 2010.

    Surgical Practicedoi:10.1111/j.1744-1633.2010.00493.x Multi-Media Article

    Surgical Practice(2010) 14, 77 2010 The Authors

    Journal compilation 2010 College of Surgeons of Hong Kong