27
J. Rainey’s E- Portfolio Math 6301-College Geometry Dr. N. Patterson 12/7/2006

J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

  • Upload
    bowie

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio. Math 6301-College Geometry Dr. N. Patterson 12/7/2006. Table of Contents. Letter to Reader Mathematical Autobiography Proof-book Project Skemp Article Reflection Collection of “Best Work”. Dear Reader, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Math 6301-College Geometry

Dr. N. Patterson

12/7/2006

Page 2: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Table of Contents

Letter to Reader Mathematical Autobiography Proof-book Project Skemp Article Reflection Collection of “Best Work”

Page 3: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Dear Reader,

I hope this E-Portfolio gives reader’s insight into my teaching philosophy and how I write proofs. I would like to think that I am always evolving as a teacher and as a proof writer. It’s my sincere hope that this growth is evident in my works. My goal is to convey proofs in a succinct, logical and rigorous manner that’s easy to grasp. I tend to believe that the two-column proof is the easiest format to follow. I have tried to choose proofs that are challenging enough for the college geometry student, but not too intimidating for the high school geometry student to try.

It is also important to note that technology has played a major part in my analysis of different theorems. The use of Geometer’s Skethpad has changed not only the way I analyze theorems, but also the way I teach. Therefore, I hope this E-Portfolio inspires math teachers to learn more about Geometer’s Skethpad and incorporate this technology into their teaching.

Sincerely,

Jena M. Rainey

Page 4: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Proof-Book Project

Proof 1 Proof 2 Proof 3 Proof 4 Proof 5 Proof 6

Proof 7 Proof 8 Proof 9 Proof 10 Proof 11 Proof 12

Page 5: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Collection of “Best Work”

Best Work #1 Best Work #2 Best Work #3 Best Work #4

Page 6: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Question One. Part (b)Prove that BCD is isosceles.

Review Question for Test One

Page 7: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

T

A

O

B

P

Review Question for Test one

Question Two:O is the center of the circle.P, A, and B are points on the circle.AT and BT are tangents.Prove that AT = OB.

SOLUTION:

If two lines are perpendicular to the same line, then they are parallel to one another. Since m∠P = ½ m∠BOA, we know that m∠BOA = 90 because m∠P = 45 (Given). Hence OB⊥OA and AT⊥OA because a line tangent to a circle is ⊥to the radius and thus OB IIAT. Also note, TB⊥OB , because TB is tangent to the circle. Moreover, OA⊥OB because m∠BOA = 90. Thus, TB II OA. Hence OATB is a parallelogram and AT = OB by Th.6.3 which states that if a quadrilateral is a parallelogram, then its opposite sides are congruent.

Page 8: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

D

B

E

C

AReview Question for Test One

Question Three:ABC is a tangent to the circle at B. DB = DE.Prove that DB bisects ∠EBC

SOLUTION:

My strategy is to show that m∠EBD=m∠DBC. Since ED=BD (Given) ∆EBD is an isosceles triangle and by the Base Angle Th., m∠DEB = m∠EBD. By the Inscribed Angle Th., m∠DEB = ½ m(arcBD). We also know that if a tangent and a chord intersect at a point on a circle, the measure of each angle formed is one-half the measure of its intercepted arc. Hence, m∠DBC = ½ m(arcBD). Thus, we can deduce m∠DEB = m∠DBC by substitution/transitive property. By further substitution, m∠EBD = m∠DBC.

Page 9: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Review Question for Test One

Question Four:AB // DE, and DE = CE.Prove that AB = BC.

DC

A

B

E

SOLUTION:

My strategy is to show that ∆BAC and ∆ DEC are similar equiangular triangles using properties of parallel lines.

∠B ≌ ∠EDC and ∠A ≌ ∠DEC by the Corresponding Angles Postulate. Hence, ∆BAC ∽∆DEC by AA Similarity. Therefore, AB/DE =BC/DC = AC/CE. Since DE=CE (Given), we know the AB=AC and thus ∠ABC = ∠DEC. But also note, ∠ACB ≌ ∠DEC because ∆DEC is also isosceles. Hence, ∆DEC is an equilateral triangle because if a triangle is equiangular, it’s equilateral. Therefore we can also deduce that ∆ABC is equiangular by definition of similar triangles and thus equilateral. Hence, AB≌BC.

Page 10: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Review Question for Test One

Question Six:A, B, and C are points on a circle. CD is a tangent to the circle at point C.FAB and EAC are line segments.EF = EA.Prove that ∠EFA = ∠BCD

C D

B

A

E

F

SOLUTION:

∆FEA is an isosceles triangle since EF≌EA. By the Base Angle Th., ∠EFA ≌ ∠ EAF. By the Vertical Angle Th., ∠EAF ≌ ∠CAB. By the Inscribed Angle Th., m∠CAB = ½ m(arc CB). We know that if a tangent and a chord intersect at a point on a circle, the measure of each angle formed is one-half the measure of its intercepted arc. Hence, m∠BCD = ½ m(arcCB). Therefore,

m∠BCD = m∠CAB = m∠EAF = m∠EFA by transitive property/substitution.

Page 11: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

G

F

A

D

C

E

B

PAGE 51, #41 Prove that the Cevians joining the vertices of a triangle with the points of tangency of the incircle are concurrent. This is the Gergonne point of the triangle.

SOLUTION:We know that two tangents from a point to a circle are congruent, therefore we can deduce CE=CD, BE=BF, and AF=AD

Also note the following:

Thus, by the converse of Ceva’s Theorem the three segments are concurrent.

CE/EB=BF/FA=AD/DC = 1

Page 12: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

HW: Prove that quadrilateral formed by segments connecting midpoints of anotherquadrilateral is a parallelogram.

Proof:

Consider the quadrilateral ABCD (illustrated above) with midpoints of sides E, F, G, and H. Next construct diagonals AC and BD and observe that EF joins the midpoints of two sides oftriangle ABC. Therefore, EF is parallel to AC by the Midsegment Therem (segmentconnecting the midpoints of two sides of a triangle is parallel to the third side). Similarly, GHjoins the midpoints of two sides of triangle ADC, and so GH is parallel to AC. Hence EF isparallel to HG by the transitive property of parallel lines. The same argument shows that GFis parallel to EH. Thus EFGH is a parallelogram because both pairs of opposite sides areparallel.

H

E

D

Best Work #1 (HW# 1)

I chose this problem because it was my first opportunity to use some of the new GSP features I had learned and I enjoyed doing this proof.

Page 13: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

#1 The following statements have all appeared in the activities orexercises of this or the previous chapters. You have alreadyconstructed diagrams in Sketchpad illustrating these statements,and you may already have written informal proofs of some ofthese statements. Write out a careful step-by-step proof for eachstatement.

a.) Let O be the center of a circle, and let P, Q, and R be points onthe circle. Prove that the measure of the central angle, PQR, istwice the measure of the inscribed angle, PQR.

k

j

r

mPOR = 115.36 mPQR = 57.68

O

P

Best Work #2 HW #2

I choose this problem because I recall this one being on the Praxis when I took it. Also, this concept is often tested on the Geometry EOCT exams.

Page 14: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Best Work #2 Cont’dSOLUTIONProof: Construct a circle with center O and let

Angle PQR be an acute angle inscribed in the circle. Next, construct segments PR and OQ.

Segments OP, OR, and OQ are radii of the circle and therefore congruent. Hence, triangles OPR, OQR, and OPQ are isosceles triangles. Since base angles of an isosceles triangle are congruent, we have

mAngle ORQ = mAngle OQRmAngle ORP= mAngle OPRmAngle OPQ = mAngle OQP

The angles can be labeled as follows:

k = mAngle ORQ = mAngle OQRm = mAngle ORP = mAngle OPRn = mAngle OPQ = mAngle OQP

and r = mAngle POR.

First examine triangle OPR. Since we know that the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a triangle is 180 degrees, we can deduce

m + m + r = 180 (Substitution Property) 2m+ r = 180 r = 180 - 2m. Next consider triangle PQR, we can extablish the

following:

(m + n) + (n + k) + (k + m) = 180 2k + 2m + 2n = 180 2k + 2n = 180 - 2m. Since r = 180 - 2m and 2k + 2n = 180 - 2m, we can

now deduce

r = 2k + 2n (Substitution or Transitive Property) 1/2 r = k + n 1/2 mAngle POR = mAngle OQR + mAngle OQP =

mAngle PQR. (Substitution/Angle Addition Postulate)

mAngle POR = 2 mAngle PQR (Multiplication Property)

Therefore, the measure of the central angle (Angle POR) is equal to twice the measure of the inscribed angle (Angle PQR).

Page 15: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Best Work #3 (p.271 #24)

I chose this problem because Ptolemy’s Theorem seems to be a very useful theorem that I haven’t introduced my students to in the past. I know plan to do so in the future.

C

O

A

B

D

E

On the diagonal AC locate a point E such that the anglesDBC and ABE be equal. Since angles CDB and CAB subtendthe same arc, they are equal. Therefore, triangles DCB and and AEB are similar. Thus we get BA/EA = BD/DC or DC*BA = BD * EA.

Now, angles CBE and DBA are also equal; so triangles CBEand DBA are similar, so we may deduce the following:CB/CE = BD/DA or CB * DA = BD * CE.

If we sum up the two identities we obtain, we have:

DC*BA + CB* DA = BD * EA + DB * CE = BD * AC

24. Prove Ptolemy's Theorem. (Hint: Construct a point E, on the diagonal AC so that ABEis congruent to DBC. Then look for pairs of similar triangles. Remember that AC = AE +EC

Page 16: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Best Work #4 (p.271 #14)I chose this problem because I enjoy working problems involving special triangles and it’s proof is very succinct. In the past I have had a tendency to say too much.

12X

mBAC = 60.00

D

C

B

A

B

A

C

14. Suppose the ABC has A = 60 with theopposite side a = 12. Find the radius of thecircumcircle of ABC.

Since ABC is a special right triangle, we know

that sin 60 = 3 / 2 = 12 / x

x * 3 = 2 * 12

x = 24 / 3

Please note that x is the length of thediameter. Since the radius is half of thediameter, we can deduce:

r = 1/2 * 24 / 3

r = 12 / 3

Page 17: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

SKEMP ARTICLE REFLECTION

Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding

Skemp’s article is brilliant. For years I have struggled with trying to balance my students’ desire to understand instrumentally with my desire to teach relationally. As a student, I have been taught in both ways and I can see the value in both approaches. However, I recognize that relational understanding is real understanding, and I am constantly looking for new teaching strategies that will help my students develop a relational understanding of concepts.

I think that most teachers probably use the instrumental approach to understanding because it is easier to teach that way. In order to teach relational understanding, the teacher’s knowledge base must be really strong. Writing proofs is a great exercise in relational understanding because it requires you to justify and explain every step. There is no way to write a proof successfully without having a clear understanding of the problem being addressed. Also, proof writing is all about rigorously communicating mathematical ideas.

Skemp’s article has reaffirmed many of my beliefs about teaching and I will continue to strive for relational understanding in my classroom. One of the reasons that I chose to take College Geometry is because I want to improve my proof writing skills. I strongly believe that developing stronger proof writing skills will help me become a better relational teacher, which is my ultimate goal.

Page 18: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Mathematical AutobiographyI have always excelled in mathematics. I like math because it is not subjective like

so many other subjects are. Also, math relates to everything. Therefore it seemed to make sense for me to major in mathematics at Clark Atlanta University. I had received a full Academic Scholarship to enter a 5-year BS/MS program in Mathematics.

In college, I was able to work closely with some extraordinary mathematicians (Dr. J. Ernest Wilkins, Dr. Abdulalim Shabazz and Dr. Ronald Mickens). Dr. Wilkins was one of my professors and served as my mentor for my Master’s Thesis. Dr. Shabazz was also my professor and chaired the math department. I didn’t take a course from Dr. Mickens, but was given an opportunity to assist him with some research he was doing that involved mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.

The life stories of the aforementioned three men are so extraordinary, that one can not help but be influenced by their work and their passion for mathematics and mathematical research. They certainly influenced me to be a life-long learner of mathematics and to share what I have learned with others. They also help me to see how math played such an important role in so many things. Dr. Shabazz would always say, “Math is life and life is math”. I often share this quote with my students.

I come from a long line of educators (My grandmother and my mother were teachers). Therefore, when I moved to California to work as a Software Engineer (minored in Computer Science), everyone knew that I would eventually come back home and teach.

.Since returning to Atlanta, I have completed further studies at Georgia State in Math

Education and Educational Leadership. As a result of these studies, I earned a second Master’s in Math Education and a certification in Educational Leadership. Currently, I am pursuing an Ed.S in Math Education.

If you would like to know about my work with students, please go to: www.jenarainey.com

Page 19: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Monge’s Theorem

SOLUTION

My strategy for solving this problem is to consider 3 right cones on the three circles as bases. Next, if you observe their common tangent planes you notice that they intersect in three lines A', B' and C' corresponding to the three points A, B and C in the theorem. Now, A' and B' intersect at the apex of one of the cones. Similarly, B' and C' intersect and so do C' and A'. Thus A', B' and C' are coplanar, and so A, B and C are collinear.

Monge's theorem says that for three disjoint circles of unequal radii, with no one contained in any other, the pairs of external tangents meet in three points that are collinear.

Page 20: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Inscribed Angle TheoremThe Inscribed Angle Theorem states that the measure of an angle inscribed in a circle is half the measure of the arc it intercepts.  It follows that all inscribed angles that intercept a given arc have equal measure.

(PROOF ON NEXT SLIDE)

My strategy for solving this proof is consider the following three cases:

fig 1. Center ofcircle is insideangle

fig 1. Center ofcircle is notinside angle

fig 1. Center ofcircle is on QR

O

R

O

R

O

S

Q

P

Q

P

P

Q

R

Page 21: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Inscribed Angle Th. (cont’d)SOLUTION:CASE 1: Center of circle is on QRAn exterior angle of a triangle is the sum of the other two interior angles, so the measure of POR is equal to the sum of the measures of OPQ and OQP.  OPQ is an isosceles triangle (because radii OQ and OP are equal) so the measures of angles OPQ and OQP are equal.  So the measure of angle POR is twice the measure of angle PQR.

fig 1. Center ofcircle is on QR

CASE 2: Center of circle is not inside angleBy constructing a diameter from Q through O meeting the circle at point a S: Observe that angle ROS is twice angle RQS.  By the same reasoning, angle POS is twice angle PQS.  The measure of angle POR is the difference of the measures of POS and ROS, and the measure so the measure of angle POR is twice the difference of the measures of PQS and RQS, and that difference is the measure of PQR, so the measure of POR is twice the measure PQR.

fig 1. Center ofcircle is notinside angle

S

Page 22: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Inscribed Angle Th. (cont’d)Case 3: The center of the circle is inside the angle

In case 3, if we construct a diameter QD,

we observe that ∠ SOR is twice ∠ SQR,

and ∠ POS is twice ∠PQS.

So ∠ POR (the sum of ∠ POS and ∠ SOR) is

twice ∠PQR (sum of ∠ PQS and ∠ SQR). fig 1. Center ofcircle is on QR

Page 23: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Law of Sines Theorem (MORE ON NEXT SLIDE)

The Law of Sines Theorem states: a/(sin A) = b/(sin B) = c/(sin C) = the diameter of the circumscribed circle.

SOLUTION:In order to solve this problem, draw an altitude of the triangle (extending side b, if necessary):

From the diagram, it is clear that h=c sin A, and that h= a sin C.  (If side b needed to be extended, because angle A is larger than 90 degrees, then note that the sine of A is equal to the sine of the supplement of A, so even though h is to the right of A, it is still true that h=c sin A.)So c sin A = a sin C,so c/(sin C) = a/(sin A)By drawing a different altitude, the same can be shown of any two sides, proving the following:

c/(sin C) = a/(sin A) = b/(sin B).

C

B

A

a

b

c

h

Page 24: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Law of Sines Theorem (cont’d)

a

b

A

BC

D

SOLUTION CONT’D: (Part 2)Now we must show that a/(sin A) is equal to the diameter of the circumscribed circle.  Consider A, which is ∠subtended by chord a of the circle:

∠A is the same as D in the diagram, below, because it ∠is subtended by the same chord.  (Or, perhaps D is ∠supplementary to A, which happens if A is obtuse).∠ ∠

Since triangle BCD is a right triangle, we know that a/(sin D) is the length of BD, which is the diameter of the circle.  Since m∠A = m∠D or is supplementary to D, their sines are equal. Thus, we can deduce:a/(sin D) = a/(sin A) = the diameter of the circle.  Hence, the second part is proved.

a

A

BC

Page 25: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Page 22 (# 19) What would you need to know to prove the Crossbar Theorem?CROSSBAR THEOREM: Let P be a point interior to XYZ. ∠ Then the ray AP crosses the segment XZ.

SOLUTION: In order to prove this theorem you

need to know Pasch’s Theorem which states that if A, B, and C are distinct, noncolinear points and l is a line that intersects segment AB, then l also intersects either segment AC or segment BC.

Consider the diagram on the right: Choose a point M such that X *Y *M (Y is between X and M). We can then apply the Pasch theorem to ∆ZMX and conclude that YP crosses either XZ or MZ. Since M and X are on opposite sides of YZ, it follows that M and P are on opposite sides of YZ and hence all points of MZ are on the side of YZ opposite to all points on YP. Therefore, YP does not cross MZ. Next, we can eliminate the possibility that the opposite ray, YQ, crosses either DZ or XZ. We can easily observe that both of these segments are on the opposite side of MX from YQ. Hence, the only possibility not eliminated is that YP crosses XZ.

Y

X

Z

P

Y

X

Z

P

MQ

Page 26: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Review Question from Test 1Question Sixteen:

ABCD is a parallelogram. AX ≌CW. Prove XD ≌ BW.

W C

A B

D

X

Solution: My strategy for solving this problem is to show ∆DAX ∆BCW≌

Since ABCD is a parallelogram AD ≌BC and A C. Since we are given that ∠ ≌ ∠

AX ≌ WC, we know that ∆DAX ≌ ∆BCW by SAS. Hence, XD ≌ BW by CPCTC (Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent.)

Page 27: J. Rainey’s E-Portfolio

Review Question from Test 1Question Twenty: AB is a diameter of the circle, center O.

AB ≌ BC. Prove that AD ≌ DC

C

A O B

D

Solution: My strategy for solving this problem is to show ∆ADB ≌ ∆ADB.

Since we are give that AB ≌ BC we know that ∆ABC is an isosceles triangle and therefore A C.∠ ≌ ∠

Also, we know that if diameter is the hypotenuse of a triangle inscribed in a circle, then the triangle is a rt. triangle. Hence, we can further deduce that m

ADB = m CDB = 90. Hence, ∠ ∠ ∆ADB ≌∆ADB by AAS.

Therefore, AD ≌ DC by CPCTC.