Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ISSN 1342-7482
Journal of Social Policyand
Social WorkJ S P S W
MARCH 2011
Japan College of Social Work
J S P
S W N
umber 15
2011
Japan College of Social W
ork
Journal of Social Policy and Social WorkNumber 15
Contents
Foreword
Ken-ichi Nakashima � � 1
Papers
Societal Changes and Establishment of Local Comprehensive Care System in Japan � 5–Reform of the long-term care insurance program and future of elderly welfare services
Hirokazu MurakawaMiyuki Murata
Reforms of Elderly Long-Term Care Insurance System in Germany and Japan � �25–Focused on the Development of Community Services for the Elderly with Consulting and Support Functions –
Hirokazu MurakawaKaori Yasumura
Multiple Regression Analysis of Compassion Fatigue/ Satisfaction Questionnaires, � �39and Correlation between these Questionnaires and Care Providers’ Behavior (FR behavior) in Japanese Child Welfare Facilities.
Takashi Fujioka
A Study of Methods of Model Formulation and assessment to Construct Models � �59of Effective Program Implementation Based on a Nationwide Survey of Support Providers
Noriyasu KosazaIwao OshimaHisao Sato
March 2011
No 15
ISSN 1342-7482
Journal of Social Policyand
Social WorkJ S P S W
MARCH 2011
Japan College of Social Work
J S P
S W N
umber 15
2011
Japan College of Social W
ork
Journal of Social Policy and Social WorkNumber 15
Contents
Foreword
Ken-ichi Nakashima � � 1
Papers
Societal Changes and Establishment of Local Comprehensive Care System in Japan � 5–Reform of the long-term care insurance program and future of elderly welfare services
Hirokazu MurakawaMiyuki Murata
Reforms of Elderly Long-Term Care Insurance System in Germany and Japan � �25–Focused on the Development of Community Services for the Elderly with Consulting and Support Functions –
Hirokazu MurakawaKaori Yasumura
Multiple Regression Analysis of Compassion Fatigue/ Satisfaction Questionnaires, � �39and Correlation between these Questionnaires and Care Providers’ Behavior (FR behavior) in Japanese Child Welfare Facilities.
Takashi Fujioka
A Study of Methods of Model Formulation and assessment to Construct Models � �59of Effective Program Implementation Based on a Nationwide Survey of Support Providers
Noriyasu KosazaIwao OshimaHisao Sato
March 2011
No 15
Journal of Social Policy and Social Work No.15( J S P S W)
Eighth Issue: MARCH 2011
Editor: Helen Fujimoto
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any formwithout the prior written permission
of the copyright owner
ISSN 1342-7482Published by Japan College of Social Work
3-1-30 Takeoka, Kiyose-shi,TOKYO, JAPAN, 204-8555
Printed in JapanKYOSHIN Co.,Ltd.
ISSN 1342-7482
Journal of Social Policy and Social WorkNo 15
MARCH 2011
Japan College of Social Work
Foreword
Ken’ichi NakashimaDirector, Social Work Research Institute
Japan College of Social Work
Social welfare studies, when compared to other human service fields such as medicine, nursing and
psychology, is a discipline which is closely linked to national politics, economy, legislation, social systems
and policies. The question of poverty, homelessness or NEETs is strongly influenced by politics and economy.
However, ways to support disabled people’s independence and to care for the elderly are also problems
which are to be discussed in connection with legislation and social systems rather than purely academically.
We need to grasp bullying and truancy among school children and child abuse too as problems of social
structure exceeding mere characteristics of individuals. In short, we can say that while social welfare studies
is a discipline always influenced by national tendencies, it is also one which can counterinfluence them
through carrying out research. In this sense, we should not limit our discussion to the extent of a framework
set up by us taking current legislation, social systems or policies as prescribed factors. Instead, researchers
of social welfare are expected to have a perspective according to which all can be changed and to compare
ideal and actual conditions, hence study and advocate directions for progress.
At present, actions are being taken to revise the international definition of social work and a proposal
for an Asian definition is also under consideration. What is well-being? What is social justice? What is
independence? What is a social network? Finally, what is the definition of “living” to be supported to begin
with? Rather than to produce a definition consisting of a few lines as a conclusion to several discussions
between researchers from different countries with various backgrounds, answering to expectations, it is
of even greater significance that the role of social welfare and social work is going to be redefined from a
universal perspective.
In this edition, some of the researches conducted at the Japan College of Social Work are published
in an English journal format. We hope that it can contribute to the further establishment of universal social
welfare and long-term care studies.
Journal of Social Policy and Social WorkNumber 15
March 2011
Contents
Foreword
Ken-ichi Nakashima ………………………………………………………………………… 1
Papers
Societal Changes and Establishment of Local Comprehensive Care System in Japan
-Reform of the long-term care insurance program and future of elderly welfare services
Hirokazu Murakawa ………………………………………………………………………… 5Miyuki Murata
Reforms of Elderly Long-Term Care Insurance System in Germany and Japan
-Focused on the Development of Community Services for the Elderly with Consulting and Support
Functions -
Hirokazu Murakawa ………………………………………………………………………… 25Kaori Yasumura
Multiple Regression Analysis of Compassion Fatigue/ Satisfaction Questionnaires, and Correlation
between these Questionnaires and Care Providers’ Behavior (FR behavior) in Japanese Child Welfare
Facilities.
Takashi Fujioka ……………………………………………………………………………… 39
A Study of Methods of Model Formulation and assessment to Construct Models of Effective Program
Implementation Based on a Nationwide Survey of Support Providers
Noriyasu Kosaza …………………………………………………………………………… 59
Iwao Oshima
Hisao Sato
5
Societal Changes and Establishment of Local Comprehensive Care System in Japan - Reform of the long-term care insurance program and future of elderly welfare service
Hirokazu MURAKAWA Miyuki MURATA
Introduction
As ageing population has been progressing on the global scale, situations surrounding ageing society
are posing the most serious problem in the social life in Japan as well as in foreign nations. With the
society getting matured and ageing population further progressing, how should elderly people spend their
longer life in their old age? In addition, various problems are piling up, such as increased nuclear families
in Japan’s depopulating society, solitude of elderly people, and an increase in frail elderly people and those
requiring health,medical and social care services.
In the development process of elderly welfare services in Japan, charity services by voluntary
gentlemen as well as elderly support services as a poor-relief program used to play central roles in the
past. Since lawmakers passed Act on Social Welfare Service for Elderly in 1963, institutional care services
provided by social welfare corporations have been playing certain roles until recently. Through submitting
Golden Plan and enacting Long-term Care Insurance Act, more emphasis is placed on the quality of
life (QOL) and self-reliance support for elderly people. In this context, at-home care services and other
services that would meet such needs are becoming necessary.
In the contemporary trend of social security structural reforms, including pension system and medical
care programs, the government started the Long-term care insurance program in 2000. It is necessary to
provide care services in line with user needs, improve service quality, and set up user-friendly, small-
size and multi-functional core facilities. As elderly people are estimated to occupy approximately 35% of
Japan’s total population in 2030s, social welfare corporations, social welfare councils, elderly people’s
volunteer activities, non-profit organizations, such as local NPOs, cooperative movement grups, and
agricultural cooperatives, as well as business sector for elderly, are becoming more important. It is the
time to strongly push ahead with developing various services and social resources in local communities.
This paper makes clear essential points of Japan’s societal changes (population, family, and local
communities) and discusses social policy-related problems with focusing on situations of elderly people in
the 2010s.
6
Chapter I. Trend surrounding aged society with declining birthrate
1-1. Shift from ageing society to aged society with declining birthrateThe term “Ageing society” has appeared on the scene for years, but it is the United Nations’ report that
points out the situations of ageing society for the first time. Ageing society means people aged 65 or over
occupy 7% or more of the total population in a nation. As Japan shifted to ageing society in 1970 and sees
further population aging thereafter, the nation falls under the situation called “Aged society” and suffers
common social problems with western advanced industrial countries. In addition, with birthrate dropping
for recent years, the social situation/term, “Ageing society with declining birthrate”, has been taking root
in Japan.
1-2. Population trend and ageing population in the worldThe overall world population stands at 6,414.75 million as of 2005 and is estimated to increase to
9,091.29 million in 2050. People aged 65 or over as a percentage to the total population have been
increasing from 5.2% in 1950 to 7.3% in 2005. In addition, the percentage is estimated to further rise
to 16.2% in 2050. Ageing population will progress rapidly in a half century ahead. Except for a large
portion of Africa, global-scale ageing population and maturation of the human society will be progressing
throughout the 21st century.
As shown in Table 1, elderly people register 20.1% of the total population in Japan, 19.7% in Italy,
17.2% in Sweden, 18.8% in Germany, and 12.3% in the United States as of 2005. Japan hits the world’s
highest figure of elderly people as a percentage to the total population.
Ageing population in Japan is characterized by its unprecedentedly high speed in the world. Elderly
population has increased from 7% to 14% of the total population only for 24 years. Ageing population in
Japan has been progressing at a much quicker pace than that in France (115 years) or Sweden (85 years).
The percentage of elderly citizens straightly indicates significant and abrupt changes for the society,
people, families, and local communities in Japan.
Analysts have long recognized that ageing population problems represent a social phenomenon
only observable in advanced industrial countries. However, as the United Nations calls our attentions
through “International Year of Older Persons” in 1999, developing countries such as China and India will
inevitably see ageing population as well from the middle to the second half in the 21st century.
7
Table 1. International comparison of ageing population rate (People aged 65 or over as a percentage to the overall population)
Nation Percentage of people aged 65 or overFuture estimate
2050Japan 2005 20.1% 39.6%The United States 2005 12.3% 20.6%The United Kingdom 2005 16.1% 23.2%Germany 2005 18.8% 28.4%France 2005 16.3% 27.1%Sweden 2005 17.2% 24.7%Italy 2005 19.7% 35.5%
(Source) Japan Center of Longevity Society, “Handbook of Elderly Care 2007,” p.3; the author has partially amended the data.
1-3. Population trend and ageing population in JapanAs of October 2007, the total population in Japan stands at 127.77 million, remaining almost flat at the
preceding year’s level. Population aged 65 or over stands at 27.46 million (11.70 million men and 15.76
million women), occupying 21.5% of the overall population (i.e., ageing rate).
Among elderly citizens, population of early-stage elderly people (aged 65-74) is 14.76 million, while
that of late-stage elderly people (aged 75 or over) stands at 12.70 million, exceeding 10 million.
In Japan, elderly citizens only occupied less than 5% of the nation’s overall population in 1950, but they
grew further than 7% in 1970 (so-called “ageing society”) and exceeded 14% in 1994, leading to rapid
progress in aged society. Population of elderly people will reach its peak at 38.63 million in 2042 and take
downturn thereafter.
Japan’s overall population started a downward trend in 2005, but ageing rate will keep rising, increasing
to 25.2% in 2013 and 40.5% in 2055 when one person out of 2.5 Japanese citizens will be older than 65.
Table 2. Trend of elderly population (1960 to 2050) (units: 1,000 / %)
Year
Population Percentage to overall population
TotalPeople aged 65
or overPeople aged 75
or overPeople aged 65
or overPeople aged 75
or overMen Women Total Men Women Total Men Women Total Men Women Total Men Women Total
1960 46,300 48,001 94,302 2,341 3,057 5,398 601 1,034 1,642 5.1 6.4 5.7 1.3 2.2 1.71975 55,091 56,849 111,940 3,838 5,028 8,865 1,119 1,722 2,841 7.0 8.8 7.9 2.0 3.0 2.51990 60,697 62,914 123,611 5,988 8,907 14,895 2,233 3,741 5,973 9.9 14.2 12.0 3.7 5.9 4.81995 61,574 63,996 125,570 7,504 10,757 16,261 2,564 4,606 7,170 12.2 16.8 14.5 4.2 7.2 5.72000 62,111 64,815 126,926 9,222 12,783 22,005 3,195 5,804 8,999 14.8 19.7 17.3 5.1 9.0 7.12005 62,349 65,419 127,768 10,923 14,838 25,761 4,308 7,331 11,639 17.5 22.7 20.2 6.9 11.2 9.12010 11,868 65,309 127,176 12,569 16,843 29,412 5,420 8,802 14,222 20.3 25.8 23.1 8.8 13.5 11.22015 60,806 64,624 125,430 14,570 19,211 33,781 6,378 10,074 16,452 24.0 29.7 26.9 10.5 15.6 13.12020 59,284 63,451 122,735 15,462 20,437 35,899 7,344 11,393 18,737 26.1 32.2 29.2 12.4 18.0 15.32025 57,406 61,864 119,270 15,562 20,792 36,354 8,617 13,050 21,667 27.0 33.7 30.5 15.0 21.1 18.22050 45,320 49,832 95,152 16,227 21,414 37,641 9,558 14,170 23,728 35.8 43.0 39.6 21.1 28.4 24.9
(Data) Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, “Population Census” and “Population Estimates”; and National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, “Population Projections for Japan” (Estimated as of December 2007, medium estimate)
(Source) Japan Center of Longevity Society, “Handbook of Elderly Care 2007,” p.1, 2007
8
Out of elderly population, population of early-stage elderly citizens will gradually decrease after hitting
a peak in 2016, but late-stage elderly people aged 75 or over are estimated to keep increasing and will
exceed early-stage elderly citizens in 2017, inevitably sending up the number of elderly citizens requiring
care services because they suffer dementia or become bedridden.
On the other hand, birthrate has been taking a downward trend, resulting in lower fertility. In contrast to
increased elderly population, child population (aged 0-14) will account for a lower percentage. This will
push down Japan’s overall population in the long run, bringing down labor force population, leading to
a decrease in taxpayer population and social insurance policyholders, which will surely pose significant
impacts on Japan’s socioeconomic structure as well as on the nation’s social programs, such as pension,
medical care, welfare, and care programs.
1-4. Aged society with declining birthrate, and its factors(1) Mortality rate and longer average life expectancy
Japan’s mortality rate (the number of deaths per 1,000 citizens) decreased by half for approximately 15
years from 14.6 in 1947 because mortality rate of babies, toddlers, and young people dropped sharply due
to improved living standards, better dietary life and nutrition, and progress of medical technologies. Since
then, the mortality rate kept a gradual downward trend, hitting the record low of 6.0 in 1979. It takes a
slight upward trend for recent years, standing at 8.6% in 2006 (1,106,000 deaths). However, since stronger
health awareness among Japanese citizens as well as remarkable development of medical technologies has
resulted in lower mortality rate for patients with cerebrovascular diseases and longer life for patients of
other diseases, the mortality rate for middle-aged or older citizens has been improving.
In particular, mortality rate for elderly people aged 65 or over has been consistently taking a downward
trend since the end of WWII, falling from 71.5 in 1950 to 47.4% in 1980, and 33.8% in 2006. As for a
gender gap of mortality rate among elderly persons, mortality rate for women significantly falls short of
that for men in any age bracket.
As mortality rate gets lower, average life expectancy for Japanese people has been sharply rising
from 50.06 years for men and 53.96 years for women in 1947 to 79.00 years for men and 85.81 years for
women in 2006. Japan is the nation with the greatest longevity.
As average life expectancy at the age of 65 has been also getting longer from 10.16 years for men and
12.22 years for women in 1947 to 18.45 years for men and 23.44 years for women in 2006, both men and
women are spending longer senior life. In the future, average life expectancy will keep getting longer
to 83.67 years for men and 90.34 years for women in 2055 (according to the December 2006 medium
estimates of National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, “Population Projections for
Japan”).
(2) Progress of lower birthrate
As for the trend of new-born babies in the post-WWII era, the number of live births tends to decrease
after the peak twice in the first baby boom (1947-1949) and the second baby boom (1971-1974). As of
2005, the number of live births stands at 1,062,530, while birthrate (the number of live births per 1,000
9
persons) is 8.4.
In addition, total fertility rate (i.e., the sum of age-specific birthrate of women aged 15 to 49, which
represents the number of children that would be born to a woman over her lifetime if she were to
experience the age-specific fertility rate for her age) sharply fell down since the first baby boom. The
rate stood at 2.22 in 1956 and kept the necessary level to maintain population (2.05 to 2.10) for a while.
However, it fell to 1.91 in 1975, falling below 2.00, and decreased to 1.46 in 1993, dipping from 1.5. Total
fertility rate kept falling thereafter. As of 2006, total fertility rate stands at 1.32, rising 0.06 point from the
2005 level.
Figure 1. Annual trend of live births and total fertility rate
(Source) Japan Center of Longevity Society, “Handbook of Elderly Care 2007,” p.5, 2007
A drop of live births and birthrate in this way is attributable to multiple factors. As Japan has a relatively
small number of babies born outside of marriage, direct factors would include a rise in first-marriage age
(tendency to marry later) and an increase in people going unmarried (an increase in people staying single).
A percentage of unmarried persons started to particularly rise for men aged 25-39 and women in their
20s around 1975. The rate of remaining single for life has been taking an upward trend both for men and
women, standing at 15.96% for men and 7.25% for women in 2005, rising stronger for men than women.
First-marriage age is also rising both for men and women.
Average number of children born to a married woman takes a slight downward trend. However, married
women in younger generation tend to give birth to fewer children than those in other generations. In
addition to tendency to marry later and an increase in people staying single, if married couples give birth
to a decreased number of children, fertility rate will further drop, according to some analysts.
These population trends have resulted from several social factors, such as increased women with higher
10
education background and self-reliance attitude, a rise in women’s labor-force participation ratio, poor
child-care services for babies and toddlers, difficult balance between child-rearing and working, husband’s
poor participation in child-rearing, and a change in social awareness of marriage and child-rearing.
1-5. Ageing population in each region(1) Population trend since the 1970s: Overpopulation and underpopulation
Ageing population in Japan significantly varies region by region. Significant regional gap is
attributable to a labor force shift from rural areas to urban areas in the high-growth era from the 1960s
to the 1970s. Since industrial structural change has sent out younger labor force to urban area and has
brought about concentration of younger generations from rural areas to urban areas, underpopulation
and ageing population in rural communities or local small cities have progressed, posing serious social
problems. Urban areas have also suffered from environmental deterioration or housing problems due to
overpopulation. In this sense, overpopulation and underpopulation have brought about overwhelmingly
serious problems.
(2) Ageing population in local areas
Ageing population significantly varies among local areas. Ageing population has been particularly
progressing in Tohoku, Shikoku, and Kyushu areas, while that in Tokyo metropolitan area and Kinki area
is progressing at a slightly slower pace, but is estimated to gradually take a quicker pace in the future.
In addition, elderly citizens occupy a majority of the overall residents in some municipalities, while
ageing population is expected to progress rapidly in some prefectures in Tokyo metropolitan area, such
as Tokyo, Chiba, Saitama, and Kanagawa Prefectures in the 2020s and the 2030s. In this context, it is
important to take countermeasures on ageing population from the viewpoints of decentralization and local
social welfare services.
Chapter II. Living conditions of elderly citizens in Japan
2-1. Households with elderly peopleAs of 2006, 18.29 million households have at least one elderly person, occupying 38.5% of the overall
households (47.53 million households).
Households with elderly people consist of 4.1 million “single-person” households (22.4%), 5.4 million
“husband-wife-only” households (29.5%), 2.94 million households with “parent(s) and unmarried
child(ren) only” (16.1%) and 3.75 million “three-generation” households (20.5%), suggesting a decrease
in three-generation households and a higher percentage of “husband-wife-only” households and “single-
person” households.
11
Figure 2. Trend of households with elderly person aged 65 or over
(Source) Japan Center of Longevity Society, “Handbook of Elderly Care 2007,” p.10, 2007
As for the future trend of elderly households in Japan, the total number of households with household
head aged 65 or over (hereinafter, such households are referred as “elderly households”) is estimated to
increase approximately 1.4 times from 13.55 million in 2005 to 19.03 million in 2030. On the other hand,
the number of ordinary households will increase from 49.06 million in 2005 to 50.60 million in 2015. As
a result, elderly households as a percentage to the total number of ordinary households will increase from
27.6% in 2005 to 39.0% in 2030 (“ordinary households” means a group of persons under the common
residence and livelihood or a single person that has his/her own household).
2-2. Economic life for elderly people(1) Income
Annual income of elderly households (average income as of 2005) stands at \3.019 million, slightly
exceeding a half of the average income of all households (\5.638 million). However, as elderly households
usually have fewer household members, income per household member is \1.89 million, suggesting
almost no gap with ordinary household’s average income per household member (\2.059 million) (See
Table 4).
As for income sources for elderly households, \2.119 million come from “public pension” (70.2% of
the gross income), occupying the largest percentage, followed by “labor income” (\545,000; 18%) and
“money sent or other income” (\172,000; 5.7%).
12
Table 4. Income of elderly households
Category
Average income
Income per householdIncome per household member (average number of household members)
Elderly households
Gross income: \3.019 millionLabor income: \545,000 (18.0%)Public pension: \2.119 million (70.2%)Property income: \157,000 (5.2%)Social welfare benefits other than pension: \25,000 (0.8%)Money sent or other income: \172,000 (5.7%)
\1.89 million (1.60 persons)
All households Gross income: \5.638 million
(Source) Cabinet Office, “Annual Report on the Aging Society 2008,” Saeki Printing, p.26, 2008
According to Cabinet Office’s first survey report that focuses on elderly men and women’s economic
anxiety and their self help in their daily life (survey respondents: age 55 to 74), approximately a half of
elderly women make annual revenues less than \1.8 million. A little bit more than 20% of them spend
their life with the annual revenues less than \1.2 million. As for elderly male single persons, 10% of
unmarried male elderly persons make annual revenues of less than \600,000.
As for distribution of annual income of elderly households, the income bracket of \1 million or more
but less than \2 million controls the largest percentage of 27.1%, followed by that of \2 million or more
but less than \3 million (18.5%), \3 million or more but less than \4 million (16.9%), and less than \1
million (15.7%), and the median value stands at \2.4 million (See Figure 3). Elderly persons aged 65 or
over occupy 39.8% of the overall recipients of livelihood protection subsidy. Out of this, single-person
households controls 28.5%, and in particular, female single-person households account for 16.8%.
(2) Consumption
As for budget of households with the household head aged 65 or over, worker households with the
household head aged 65 or over have monthly disposable income of \307,983 a household, which consists
of consumption expenditures of \277,474, and savings and other surplus of \30,509. On the other hand,
non-worker households with the household head aged 65 or over have monthly disposable income of
\163,023 a household, including consumption expenditures of \203,567, which generates deficit of
\40,544. They cover this deficit by drawing down their savings.
13
Figure 3. Distribution of annual income of elderly households
(Data) Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, “Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions of
the People on Health and Welfare” (2006) (Annual income in the said survey) (Note) Elderly household means a household consisting of senior citizen(s) aged 65 or over or a
household comprising senior citizen(s) aged 65 or over and unmarried person(s) younger than 18 years old.
(3) Savings
Savings on hand for Japanese citizens tend to increase as they get older. According to “Annual Report
on the Aging Society 2008,” elderly households have \24.29 million savings on hand on average as of
2006, 1.4 times of the average of all households. Almost 20% of elderly households have savings on hand
more than \40 million.
As for whether or not they think they have enough savings for their old age, 27.9% of elderly
respondents think they “have sufficient savings” (i.e., the sum of respondents answering they “have
enough savings” and “have minimum savings at least”). Respondents choosing the answer option they
have “insufficient savings” (i.e., the sum of respondents answering they “have a little bit insufficient
savings” and “have quite insufficient savings”) occupy 64.7% of the overall respondents, rising 7.6% from
57.1% in the preceding survey.
(4) Housing
In terms of housings for elderly people aged 65 or over, almost 60% (59.0%) of senior citizens live
in the same residence for 31 years or longer (some of them are living in the same house since they were
born). On the other hand, 6.5% of senior people live in the same house for “5 years or shorter,” suggesting
a downward trend of senior citizens living in the same house for a long time of 20 years or longer.
Figure 4 shows residence patterns that elderly people aged 65 or over are wishing when they get run-
down.
14
Figure 4. Residence patterns that elderly people are wishing when they get run-down (multiple answers allowed)
(Data) Cabinet Office, “Consciousness Survey on Elderly People’s Housings and Living
Environment” (2006) (Note) This survey covers male and female respondents aged 60 or over all over Japan.
(5) Increased nuclear families and lifestyle changes
Social structural changes after WWII have significantly altered local communities and family life.
Traditionally, large families consisting of three or four generations were widely observable both in urban
and rural areas. However, as nuclear families have been getting increased until recent years, the percentage
of elderly citizens living with their children takes a downward trend. In fact, 79% of elderly people lived
with their children in 1963 when lawmakers passed Act on Social Welfare Service for Elderly, but the
percentage fell to 47.1% in 2002 and sharply dropped to 43.9% in 2006.
In addition, the percentage of husband-wife-only elderly households and elderly single-person
households stands at 52.2% as of 2006, occupying more than a half of elderly persons. In particular, Japan
is characterized by an increase in elderly persons living alone. According to the estimate of National
Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, single-
person households with household head aged 65 or over will sharply increase to 6.354 million households
in 2020.
A lot of senior citizens probably would like to spend a fulfilling life for their old age by making use
of their experiences and techniques in a local community they are accustomed to. In addition, as elderly
15
people now have a variety of self-fulfillment opportunities due to changes of the times, they enjoy
increased opportunities to actively work on what they long wish to do. On the other hand, weaker mental/
physical conditions due to ageing as well as problems requiring care services would prevent them from
achieving their life images that they have envisioned.
If they face weaker mental/physical conditions or problems requiring care services, they will feel a
lot of anxieties, such as what they should do, or how they should use or take procedures for, necessary
services or programs. These mental anxieties and cost burden associated with hospital visit, hospital stay
or other issues for continuing their life should not be underestimated.
Table 5 shows what elderly citizens are worrying in their daily life. Approximately 68% of elderly
people feel “very insecure” or “a little insecure,” suggesting an example of their anxieties about care
service problems.
Table 5. Expected care service providers if elderly citizens require care services
JapanThe United
StatesSouth Korea Germany Sweden
1. Spouse or partner 46.7 36.1 40.7 41.5 44.92. Son (including adopted son) 8.1 6.8 29.4 8.6 3.63. Daughter (including adopted daughter) 9.8 22.2 7.0 20.7 9.24. Spouse or partner of son or daughter 8.7 2.7 13.5 2.1 0.75. Other family members or relatives 1.3 6.0 0.5 5.0 2.26. Friends/acquaintances 0.3 2.9 0.1 3.6 2.37. Nonprofessional service providers, such as
volunteers0.7 0.1 0.6 1.0 0.8
8. Professional service providers, such as care attendants
10.4 13.8 0.5 8.3 28.6
9. Others 1.1 1.4 0.3 1.8 0.610. No care providers available 1.4 2.1 3.7 1.4 0.611. Unknown 11.2 5.2 3.8 4.7 5.8
(Data) Director General for Comprehensive Planning Coordination, Cabinet Office, “International Comparison Survey on Elderly Citizens’ Life and Awareness (FY2000)”
(Source) Japan Center of Longevity Society, “Handbook of Elderly Care 2007,” p.27, 2007
Long-term Care Insurance Act of 1997 became fully effective in 2000. Golden Plan 21, which was
developed in 1999, aims to provide better environment for care services and expand health welfare
programs for elderly citizens. In this context, Japan has entered a new stage called “Socialization of Care
services,” shifting away from heavy dependence on family members as care service providers in the past.
With the long-term care insurance program becoming operational, a variety of care services have been
spread out, but there are still a lot of problems, including elderly persons still unable to use these services.
16
Chapter III
3-1. Historically Systematic deployment of elderly care services: Since Long-Term Care Insurance Act became effective
Table 6 describes Japan’s social policies and welfare programs for elderly citizens since the end of
WWII. After efforts through Golden Plan and New Golden Plan, lawmakers passed Long-Term Care
Insurance Act in the Diet in December 1997, which became fully effective in April 2000. To take specific
countermeasures on elderly care for the 21st century, the government aims at “socialization of care
services” by setting up comprehensive care services/programs, such as at-home care services, facility-
based services, and care support services (care management), while local governments are working on
providing better environment for care services based on their long-term care insurance project plans
and health/welfare plans for elderly residents (for more information, see section 4 of this chapter and
Chapter V). In line with launch of the long-term care insurance program, Gold Plan 21 has started, putting
emphasis on countermeasures on dementia.
In June 2005, about five years later than launch of the long-term care insurance program in FY2000,
lawmakers amended Long-term Care Insurance Act in the Diet. This amendment to Long-term Care
Insurance Act is intended at sustainable and stable program operations mainly through (1) shifting to
a prevention-based system (such as expanding care preventive services and amending how to certify
long-term care needs), (2) clearly stating dignity of elderly citizens in Article 1 of the said legislation,
(3) improving policy actions on elderly patients with dementia, (4) setting comprehensive community
services, (5) reviewing facility-based benefit programs (introducing food/housing-cost-related user charges
and supplemental benefits), and (6) improving service quality (launching a new program to disclose care
service information). This amendment became fully effective in FY2006. In addition, it is decided that
municipalities will set up local comprehensive support centers that provide comprehensive counseling
services for local elderly residents, to prevent abuses on elderly persons and provide care preventive
services.
NPOs, which are incorporated in accordance with Act on Promotion of Specified Non-profit Activities,
are working on welfare activities for elderly citizens, such as group homes for elderly patients with
dementia. As lawmakers have passed Social Welfare Act in the Diet, social welfare corporations are also
working on addressing complaints and improving service quality, aiming to provide more user-friendly
services.
In addition, as Elderly Persons' Housing Act and barrier-free new legislation are put in place to provide
appropriate environment for elderly citizens’ smoother daily life, efforts are made for solving residence/
housing problems of elderly people and improving their living environment.
By the way, as care facilities/centers have been facing a serious shortage of care service staff at once
around 2000, lawmakers unanimously passed Care Work Force Securing Act in the Diet in May 2008.
Amendment to care service fees have led to 3% rise in service fees since April 2009. These efforts have
resulted from insufficient wage level and poor welfare programs for care workers. It is necessity to secure
care service human resources and improve working conditions mainly for certified care workers in the
17
future.
As mentioned above, in line with the preparation/implementation process of the long-term care
insurance program, Omnibus Decentralization Act became fully effective to push ahead with municipality
mergers. At the same time, the government introduced the adult guardianship program by amending Civil
Code. In this context, as more than 60 years have passed since the end of WWII, Japan’s society inevitably
needs structural reforms. It is also necessary to specifically and effectively solve problems, such as an
increase in jobless people and low-income workers, and economic negative impacts on elderly pension
recipients under global-scale economic fluctuations since 2008.
Table 6. Chronology on welfare programs for elderly citizens in the modern era
Calendar year Legislations, programs, facilities, and others on welfare services for elderly people1946 The Constitution of Japan established, opening up a road to a welfare nation1950 Public Assistance Act established 1951 Social Welfare Program Act established (launching programs on welfare offices, social welfare councils, and Judical
person of social welfare)1958 National Health Insurance Act amended drastically to expand insurance coverage all over Japan1961 National Pension Act established and coming into force1963 Act on Social Welfare Service for Elderly established (special elderly nursing homes and care attendant dispatching
business, etc.)1970 Public housing preferential admission program for elderly citizens1973 The elderly medical fee benefit program (Self-pay of elderly citizens became free of charge; this program continued
until 1982)1978 Elderly person short stay program started1979 Elderly person day services started1982 Act of Health and Medical Services for the Aged established (elderly medical services, prevention, rehabilitation, etc.)1987 Housing service for Elderly (housings with care services for elderly citizens) program started 1987 Certified Social Workers and Certified Care Workers Act established1989 Ten-Year Strategy to Promote Health Care and Welfare for the Aged (Golden Plan) developed and publicly announced1990 Welfare-related eight legislations, including Act on Social Welfare Service for Elderly, amended1991 Introduction of three-stage training system for care attendants 1992 Elderly care attendant services introduced1993 Plan of municipality geriatric health care & socialwelfare services established1993 Assistive Products Act established and coming into force1994 New Ten-Year Strategy to Promote Health Care and Welfare for the Aged (New Golden Plan) developed1995 Basic Law on Measures for the Aged Society established1996 Group-home Caremodel project for elderly patients with dementia launched1997 Long-term Care Insurance Act established (Fully implemented from April 2000)1998 Act on Promotion of Non-profit Activities (NPO Act) established1999 Civil Code partially amended (introducing the adult guardianship system)1999 Golden Plan 21 formulated2000 Omnibus Decentralization Act becoming fully effective2000 Social Welfare Act (user-friendly welfare services, regional welfare plan, etc.)2000 Transportation Barrier Free Act established2001 Health Promotion Act established (Health promotion target from children to elderly people)2001 Elderly Persons' Housing Act established (elderly citizen smooth admission rental housing, quality rental housing for
elderly people, etc.)2003 Act on Advancement of Measures to Support Raising Next-Generation Children established2005 Long-term Care Insurance Act es tabl ished ( local comprehensive support centers ,Prevent ion of
care,dependent,community-based services, etc.)2005 Elderly Abuse Prevention Act established2006 Barrier-free new legislation established2007 Care Scandal by a private service provider`Comsn` revealed (Long-term Care Insurance Act partially amended in the
next year to beef up restrictions)2008 Elderly People Medical Care Act becoming effective (Act of Health and Medical Services for the Aged radically
amended;),however, new next system is scheduled to start in 2013)
(by H. Murakawa)
18
3-2. Reorganization of elderly care services, and new approaches(1) Problems surrounding the long-term care insurance program
As demand-supply relation in care services is gradually getting matured after the long-term care
insurance program was put in place, a variety of problems are emerging on a local basis. Here are the main
points of these problems.
First, while various care services are supplied, the at-home care service sector is seeing a wide variety
of new market entrants. In this context, users are facing difficulty of service choice, wondering which
service providers they should select. This is a unique problem mainly to metropolitan areas, that is, users
are actually spending way too much time and cost before finding out a satisfactory service provider. In
addition, in response to heinous service providers, including the COMSN (its scandal revealed in 2007),
the government has decided to beef up applicable restrictions by partially amending Long-term Care
Insurance Act.
Second, as mentioned in the preceding section (at-home care, facility-based care, etc.), analysts are
raising questions on care services from qualitative perspectives. As an approach to secure care service
quality, service providers will need to disclose information, while policymakers should actively push
ahead with service evaluation in objective and specific manners.
Third, users are facing urgent needs, such as their long waiting time before admission to care facilities.
They are also making requests or complaints about facility-based service menu and facility operations. In
the meantime, facility operation problems are getting improved through efforts on small-size life units (unit
care). However, as problems, such as accommodation cost burdens and non-insurance cost burdens, are
emerging, policymakers need to take fine-tuned countermeasures for low-income persons.
If the viewpoint of residence care is incorporated, policymakers should reexamine the residence
(admission to residence or facility) facility-based service structure by making clear roles of care houses or
deploying elderly housing-related policy actions.
On the other hand, cost burden for using facilities should be disclosed in an easily understandable
manner to users. In relation with reforms on elderly medical care programs, it is a high time to reset
facility usage fees with focus on the ability-to-pay principle.
To solve these problems, policymakers should reorganize care insurance and elderly welfare systems
in a sustainable program. In addition, it is also necessary to systematically train human resources, mainly
certified care workers that play central roles in providing services and to systematically push ahead with
stress management for care workers.
(2) Reorganization of elderly care, and new approaches
In relation with reviewing the long-term care insurance program, some policymakers are considering
identifying new care services and launching a new insurance benefit program by partially reorganizing the
traditional care benefit and preventive benefit programs.
The first approach is to put more emphasis on preventive care services. Specifically, it is necessary to
stay focus on disease prevention services based on health promotion concept and effectively push ahead
with preventive care services for elderly citizens requiring supports or a portion of elderly people requiring
19
care services.
In parallel with this, local rehabilitation services should be also enhanced. Specifically speaking,
appropriate services for the acute, recovery, and maintenance stages should be made available in a
mutually related manner in a local community. It is necessary to specifically designate local rehabilitation
center easily accessible to elderly citizens. One idea would be to enhance capabilities of care-related
comprehensive facilities and local core hospitals in a way that they will play specific roles as local
rehabilitation center.
The third approach is to push ahead with local comprehensive care services. The concept of local
comprehensive care services has been traditionally put in place with focus on local medical services.
From the viewpoints of enhancing collaboration between health medical treatment and social welfare, it
is necessary to set up new model of local care services, including stabilization and development of local
comprehensive support centers.
Analysts recently pay increased attentions to developing and diffusing small-scale multifunctional
care services. Paying due attentions to local characteristics, group homes, elderly housings, and so-called
elderly day care centers/salons should be put in place in an interrelated manner. In any event, policymakers
should inevitably streamline construction cost, but it is necessary to work on improving quality of life for
users (or residents) in terms of program operations, rather than simply providing “cheep welfare” services.
(3) Problems of long-term care insurance and elderly health welfare programs
As a lot of new problems are emerging in relation with elderly local residents, policymakers should
launch elderly welfare programs from new perspectives, rather than simply reexamining the long-term
care insurance program.
First, it is necessary to make use of adult guardianship program that supports daily life of elderly
dementia patients and improve/enhance local welfare human rights protection projects. In this relation,
in line with the purposes of Elderly Abuse Prevention Act of October 2005, policymakers should make
efforts to respect dignity and human rights of elderly citizens.
Second, there are problems surrounding reorganization of facility-based care services. As long-term-
care and medical facilities will be abolished in the near future, how facilities in local communities will
be reorganized? In relation with elderly citizens waiting for their admission to special elderly nursing
homes, what should facility-based care services be in the future? In addition, what are appropriate elderly
housings adjunct to facility-based care services and their supplementary services (day services, salons,
etc.)? There are a lot of problems that should be solved.
Third, since illegal business practices on housing refurbishing services or financial instruments, as well
as so-called bank transfer scams, have been spread out nationwide, a lot of elderly citizens are suffering
from fraud damages. It is absolutely necessary to drastically enhance consumer counseling services and
beef up collaboration among organizations relating such as health and welfare services.
Due to amendment to the care service fees, service fees will rise 3% in total since FY2009, aiming to
secure care service human resources. Related organizations/facilities should correctly reflect such fee hike
to the salary level of care workers. In addition, policymakers should set up a new system to secure care
20
service human resources in the medium- and long-run.
Among a variety of problematic situations, citizen’s participation (in stand-watching, supports, mutual-
help, and local network) is desired at the municipality level, while municipalities should also make
community-building efforts with participation of elderly citizens.
Chapter IV. Toward setting up local comprehensive care system
4-1. Common aspects and diversity of elderly people's needsMore than 10 years have passed since the long-term care insurance program became effective to address
care service needs of elderly people. It is necessary to set up a new framework toward the 2020-30s when
ageing population will reach its peak, in particular, toward the year 2025 in which baby boomers will all
become late-stage elderly citizens. In relation with medium-term reforms on the long-term care insurance
program, the study group on “local comprehensive care” has been examining and suggesting possible
solutions for two years of FY2008-09. [note 1]
Analysts has traditionally discussed the concept of local comprehensive care to come up with details for
network of related organizations and possible collaboration among professional staff, while making clear
the necessity of cooperation among health, medical care, and welfare sectors in systematically deploying
local medical services.
The recommendations in March 2010 and related materials call for 1) expanding sustainable care
services and setting up appropriate framework, 2) beefing up collaboration between the care service sector
and the medical sector, 3) expanding elderly housings, 4) systematically pushing ahead with dementia-
related care, 5) paying attentions to elderly citizen’s isolated deaths in local communities, 6) taking policy
actions with due considerations to low-income people, and 7) securing care service human resources and
setting up their career progression system.
4-2. Common aspects and diversity of elderly people’s needsAs of September 2010, Japan has approximately 29.44 million elderly people aged 65 or over, and
ageing rate stands at 23.1% (as announced by Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications). In the
near future, elderly population will exceed 30 million, and ageing rate will also rise further than 25% (a
quarter of the overall population). In addition, 4.88 million people certified as requiring care services/
supports all over Japan. The nation has 826,000 persons staying in long-term care insurance-related
facilities, 2.924 million at-home service users, and 250,000 local-based service users (Ministry of Health,
Labour and Welfare, “Report on Long-term Care Insurance Program, preliminary report in May 2010”).
As the outcome of its longer-than-10-year history, the Long-term Care Insurance Program has yielded
the outcome that care services for elderly dementia patients and other elderly citizens requiring care
services have quantitatively expanded. However, problems surrounding elderly people in recent years
would firstly include elderly person’s isolated death. With increased nuclear families and single-person
households in the society, these problematic cases keep increasing, affected by weaker physical conditions
of middle-aged and elderly persons living alone and weaker family/local network connections. As a
21
lot of elderly persons older than 100 years old were identified as missing all over Japan this summer,
municipalities and case workers faced pressing works to address this problem.
By the way, under the recent “deflation and economic crisis,” the pension/benefit level for elderly
citizens is an urgent problem. From income security perspectives, it is necessary to provide job
opportunities for elderly persons and sustain/stabilize the pension programs. In addition, for elderly
citizens suffering from various diseases, it is also urgently necessary to revitalize local medical services
and to shift to and establish an alternative program to replace the late-stage elderly medical program.
Looking in this way, almost 30 million elderly people in Japan have diversified needs for their daily
life and care services. In addition, it is necessary to find out a new direction to solve problems suffered by
elderly persons and provide comprehensive supports (including their consumption life-related problems).
4-3. Principles and basic direction of local comprehensive care services“Local comprehensive care” is a keyword when establishing new elderly policy actions, such as reforms
of the current Long-term Care Insurance Act and related programs. The following three points may be
pointed out as the principles of local comprehensive care.
(1) Continuing to live a life in a local community and residence that elderly citizens are accustomed
to (i.e., comprehensive life supports are important);
(2) Making selection by the elderly person on his/her own (elderly person’s needs should be
respected); and
(3) Making use of and maintain elderly people’s abilities, are important.
As for how to provide services, priority should be placed on at-home services (including local-based
services). It is necessary to improving daily living conditions for elderly citizens and providing better
housing for them (barrier-free is absolutely necessary both for rental house and their own house), while
facility-based services should play complementary services for elderly citizens that suffer difficulties of
spending their life at home.
In the 21st century trend of decentralization reform, policymakers should put more emphasis on roles
of local governments, mainly municipalities that are closer to local residents. They should also make
clear elderly health welfare and care service program plans that incorporate appropriate framework for
comprehensive life supports and various services from the medium- and long-term perspectives, with
focus on care services, preventive and medical services.
Specifically, in light of problem-solving-type life zones (such as school districts for elementary or junior
high schools) that addresses ageing population with lower birthrate, it is necessary to establish 24-hours
7-day-a-week service system, or in other words, carefully setting up appropriate menu for comprehensive
life support services. As suggested in the attached newspaper article, elderly citizens wishing to move
in a special elderly nursing home but still are on the waiting list are also suffering serious problems. In
this context, it is urgently necessary to provide appropriate facilities or elderly housings with alternative
functions.
22
4-4. Desirable services: Elements of local comprehensive careAs for desirable services in the local comprehensive care system, because of an increase in physically
weak late-stage elderly citizens and home-care dementia patients as well as increased patients with cancer
or other “terminal” conditions, it is important to collaborate between care service and medical sectors (in
particular, fundamentally setting up a team care program consisting of at-home care services including
local home-visit care, and home-visit nursing-care), and collaborate between the care/welfare side and
attending doctors/medical institutions.
Specifically speaking, it is necessary to work on the tasks inside/outside the long-term care program and
expand various care services as shown below.
(1) Tasks for drastically expanding at-home services
i) Establishing care management approaches to support local comprehensive care (such as setting up
comprehensive and coherent assessment planning approaches) [Note 2]
ii) Enhancing 24-hour short-time routine-run services (mainly, at-home care and home visit nursing-
care)
iii) Pushing ahead with home visit nursing-care and rehabilitation services
iv) Pushing ahead with at-home medical services (Japanese-type GP = Outlook for comprehensive
clinician system, creation of at-home terminal care teams, etc.)
v) Expanding local support projects (providing comprehensive life supports, such as expansion of
catering and other meal services)
vi) Reexamining care prevention projects (developing/diffusing multilayered preventive programs
that incorporate health promotion and lifestyle-related diseases prevention as the primary service,
coupled with disease prevention, secondary and tertiary prevention services)
(2) Putting more emphasis on elderly housings (adding public housings, UR housings, and elderly-
exclusive-use rental housings, as well as smoother moving-in)
(3) Improving/reorganizing long-term care insurance facility categories (improving special elderly
nursing homes, reorganizing care/medical treatment-type medical facilities, etc.)
(4) Systematically pushing ahead with dementia care (including establishment of local stand-watching
network)
(5) Drastically enhancing capabilities/framework of local comprehensive support centers
(6) Making clear importance and services of family member supports (respite support, counseling
service, etc.)
In relation with care human resources, the following tasks and countermeasures are necessary.
(7) Fostering/securing care workers, mainly certified careworkers
(8) Improving employment management and organization management practices by the employer
(9) Providing better working conditions for care workers (health management and welfare programs
for care workers)
(10) Launching more effective evaluation on service quality
23
4-5. Agenda for the futureUnder the recent “gap society” phenomenon and “deflation and economic crises,” it is important to
expand policy actions in line with elderly people’s lifestyles.
(1) It is absolutely necessary to take policy actions with due considerations to low-income people
(overcoming difficulties of joining unit care facilities, group homes, etc.)
In addition, in terms of isolated death of elderly persons in local community as well as missing
elderly citizens older than 100 years old, the following efforts should be made.
(2) It is necessary to solve specific problems in daily life by better addressing basic matters of elderly
people-related policy actions. As specified in “Act on Social Welfare Service for Elderly,” it is
needed to grasp the overall picture of elderly local residents and provide substantive counseling/
support services, mainly by municipalities.
The author attaches importance to daily life of citizens in Japan, including elderly people, and puts
emphasis on the following actions in order to set up sustainable care program for elderly people.
(3) Policymakers should start to reexamine possible financial resources and financial resource
breakdown (Because insurance premium from the fifth period after 2012 will rise to \5,000 on
national average, it might be important to “mitigate” insurance premium hike by increasing the
public expenditures).
(4) Reexamination of insurance premium and user charges is necessary. (It might be an idea to shift
to the ability-to-pay principle by introducing cost burden categories in line with income levels, for
example)
(5) Examining appropriate cost-sharing between the central and local governments (providing
adjustment subsidies in an appropriate manner, trend and result of “lump-sum subsidies”
accompanied with the decentralization reform)
Conclusion
Policymakers are expected to seek for new approaches, including possible approaches stated above. At
the same time, analysts pay increased attentions to what policymakers would do when preparing FY2011
budget, amending Long-term Care Insurance Act and the Fifth-period plan from FY2012 onward. To
conclude this paper, the author would like to add some comments on urgent matters.
(1) As a possible policy approach in line with the characteristics of ageing society with lower birthrate
in Japan, policy actions on next-generation fosterage supports to mitigate lower birthrate will
ultimately pose direct positive impacts on elderly support policy programs (because it will secure
future generations that will support pension and other programs). To put it briefly, policymakers
should prepare FY2011 budget to keep the “Child Allowance” program and increase the amount of
Child Allowance.
(2) As a characteristic of ageing population in the immediate future, urban areas such as Tokyo
metropolitan area will see rapidly ageing population. In particular, it is urgently necessary to launch
24
the local comprehensive care system, and secure special elderly nursing homes and other long-term
care insurance-related facilities as well as elderly housings with alternative capabilities in Tokyo,
Kanagawa, Chiba, and Saitama Prefectures. [Note 3]
(3) As care services and life support services are characterized by “services by person, for person,”
mobilizing the human resources available as much as possible is absolutely necessary. By
continuing policy actions that will overcome low-wage for care workers and radically improve
their working conditions, policymakers should push ahead with necessary and sufficient conditions
to attract younger workers to the care service sector and thereby keep the care service sector more
sustainable.
Lawmakers passed “Care Work Force Securing Act” unanimously, including ruling and opposing
parties, in the Diet in May 2008, but Japanese citizens earnestly desire solving problems for
improving citizen’s life through political leadership, rather than chaotic “distorted” Diet as
envisioned by mass media.
Breaking News and ThanksWe Have had the Great earthquake in Eastern Japan on March 11, 2011 ! We must support Victims,
especially the Elderly Children and Disable persons. In near future Japan administration & the Diet shall
enact the new legislation on the relief programs for victims by the earthquake.
We are thankful to the Volunteers devoted and to the each country with the international Solidarity.
[Note 1] Local Comprehensive Care Study Group, “Report of Local Comprehensive Care Study Group,” March 2010 (The
secretariat: Mitsubishi UFJ Research & Consulting)
Hirokazu Murakawa “Local Comprehensive Care” in ‘Elderly Health Welfare Handbook,’ Dai-ichi Hoki, October
2010
Hirokazu Murakawa, et. al. (ed), “Study on Long-term Care Insurance,” Dai-ichi Hoki, 2009
[Note 2] “Developing Japanese-style CPAT (tentative title),” Kosei Kagaku Kenkyuusha, 2010 (to be published shortly)
CPAT: Care Planning Assessment Tool
This is the outcome of Japan-Australia joint research project and is developed as a compact, visual common tool
intended for professional care workers, medical staff, health workers, and welfare staff.
[Note 3] “Plan to Secure Housings for Elderly People in Tokyo,” October 2010
25
Reforms of Elderly Long-Term Care Insurance System in Germany and Japan - Focused on the Development of Community Services for the Elderly with Consulting and Support Functions -
Hirokazu MURAKAWA Kaori YASUMURA
Introduction
Japan entered the 21st century with the prominent social trends of low birth rate and ageing population.
The challenge regarding long-term care arose with the increasing number of the elderly who needs
medical and social cares, attracted much attention and it became one of the biggest issues to consider in
the latter half of the life for every older person in the country. This phenomenon is happening not just in
Japan but also globally, especially in most of the developed countries. The governments are trying various
ways to deal with this; Germany introduced long-term care insurance in 1995 that focuses on a social
insurance model. The United Kingdom and the Northern European countries, including Sweden, employ
tax-funded public service as its main provider with NPOs playing a certain roles, while the United States
relies heavily on the market mechanism. The techniques and methods for assessment of needs and the care
management that meet the needs of the elderly have also been developed against these backgrounds.
The present paper aims to explain and comment on the Japanese long-term care insurance system, its
social background, the structure and the features of the services, drawing comparison with the recent
trends in Germany. It also attempts to provide the mid-term vision for the Japanese system, based on the
sustainability and on-site practical knowledge.
Among others, the revision of long-term care insurance law in 2005 in Japan, as well as the German
long-term care reform of 2008 highlighted the need of the systems to function in a sustainable and
balanced manner, the need for popularization of comprehensive community services, including dementia
care, and collaboration with preventive system. The increase of the elderly population living alone and/or
with dementia, along with the rapidly ageing population of large cities are imperative challenges.
In the era of rapid social and economic changes domestically and internationally, including the
polarization of society with higher numbers of jobless, these reforms and supports clearly identify the
roles of long-term care, medical care, pension, and employment systems in social policies and measures,
which will contribute to creating more cohesive social policies.
26
1�.�German�long-term�care�insurance�reform�in�2008����(Pflegereform�2008)
1-1� Preceding Japan, the long-term care insurance law was enacted in 1994 in Germany with the gradual
implementation from 1995. The law went through several revisions and in 2008, a major reform
(Pflegereform 2008), including a gradual increase of benefit payments and provision for more thorough
care for dementia, was introduced. As in Japan, Germany faces challenges such as tight budgets for
long-term care, increase in the numbers of elderly with dementia, and lack of care services and human
resources. Though there are considerable differences, including the collection of contributions, the
provision of cash benefit as well as the scope of the benefit recipients, the trends in the German reform
provide a valuable suggestion for Japan to investigate its future long-term care insurance system.
As for the running of the long-term care insurance system, the care management function has been
playing a significant role in Japan. On the other hand, in the original German system, the function
equivalent to the Japanese care management was not clearly defined. Therefore, when applying for the
benefits and services including long-term care, the elderly and their families were using the information
providing service offered by the local authorities as well as consulting supports offered by care service
providers. Several issues were pointed out regarding this situation, and the 2008 reform, which was
implemented gradually from July 2008, created a consulting support and service coordinating function
within the long-term care insurance system.
In this paper, an overall picture of the German long-term care reform of 2008 is firstly outlined and its
issues are discussed. The focus is especially placed upon the newly created consulting support and service
coordinating function, the care support centers (Pflegestützpunkt). After discussing its notable points and
issues, we would like to move on to the investigation that seeks a favorable future of consulting support
and service coordinating function in Japan.
1-2��The�long-term�care�insurance�reform�in�2008�(Pflegereform�2008)To cater for the ageing population and accompanying increase of the elderly in need of care, a major
reform of the long-term care insurance system was introduced in Germany in 2008. The reform is focused
mainly on the following areas; (1) benefit payment increase with focus on home care, (2) enhancement of
information provision for the elderly in need of care and their families, (3) enhancement of comprehensive
support for individuals with dementia, and (4) enhancement of the information provision regarding the
quality of care-homes. To achieve these, the contribution rates were raised from 1 July 2008, to 1.95% of
income (2.2% for those without a child). Especially notable points of the reform are explained further as
follows:
(1) Increase of benefit payments
Monthly payments for care recipients will increase gradually till 2012. Table1 show the amounts given
for individuals in need of care but who prefer to stay at home. Increase is most apparent in the benefits
in-kind for at-home-care, compared to institutional care, with support enhancement of a shift from
27
institutional care, such as medical facilities, to homecare as well as an acceleration of benefit eligibility
evaluation procedures.
Table 1 Benefit levels for benefits in-kind
Care level(Monthly:€) Pre2008 2008 * 2010 2012
Ⅰ 384 420 440 450
Ⅱ 921 980 1,040 1,100
Ⅲ ** 1,432 1,470 1,510 1,550
*Amount payable from 1 July 2008** Payment for most severe cases remains the same at 1,980EUR per month (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: Gut zu wissen-das Wichtigste zur Pflegereform 2008, Juni 2008)
(2) Measures for dementia patients
Homecare benefits were raised for those with severe incapacity for everyday life, such as severe
dementia patients and mentally disabled individuals. It was 460 EUR per year before 2008 but was raised
to 100 EUR (basic benefit) or 200 EUR (severe cases) per month, resulting in 1,200 - 2,400 EUR annually.
This applies to those dementia patients in institutional care as well, enabling the institutions to provide
additional cares and activities with extra staff for the patients.
(3) Establishment of the care support centers (Pflegestützpunkt) as the comprehensive consultation
provider
This will be discussed in detail in the later sections.
(4) Enhancement of nursing leave
Those who work at a company with more than 15 employees are entitled to nursing leave for up to 6
months. Though the salary will not be paid during this period, the social benefit entitlement will continue.
(5) Improvement of care quality
A federal level of quality improvement measure (Expertenstandards) was introduced and care quality
assessment was enhanced.
Every institution is obliged to accept a yearly inspection without notice. The resulting quality
assessment report is published on the Internet, at the institution and Pflegestützpunkt.
The reform also includes guaranteeing of care workers’ wages, support enhancement of self-help groups
and volunteer activities as well as enhancing prevention and rehabilitation.
1-3��Notable�points�and�issues�of�the�reform1�The most notable and welcome point of the 2008 reform is the strong preference for homecare over
1The notable points and issues regarding the German long-term care reform of 2008 sums up the response of a questionnaire, sent to academics and care work practitioners in Germany by the author.
28
institutional care. Most of the frail elderly, in Germany or in Japan, want to continue living at their own
home as long as possible. Promoting home care is also financially favorable compared to institutional care.
However, it is not clear at this point whether the care quality and quantity required can be achieved, and
further improvement may be necessary.
There is also a positive advancement regarding the benefit amounts for individuals with dementia.
However the care service provision in terms of quality and quantity is not sufficient and it is imperative
that measures are put in place to train qualified caregivers.
The biggest challenge is the finance. Demographic changes and the increasing number of individuals
needing care will certainly reduce the contribution income and push up the cost. The long-term care
insurance system in Germany was conceived originally as a partial insurance, rather than intending to
cover all the living costs of the recipients. It is not clear at this point to what extent the long-term care
benefit can cover the cost in future, and personal provision will become more important.
The possibility of a support system other than the social insurance provision, such as community-led
services and volunteering, needs to be investigated as well. The ultimate goal is to make sure the frail
elderly stay and receive care at home till the last possible stage, without becoming dependant on the public
assistance. This in turn enables a comparative reduction of the cost over institutional care with increased
quality of life for the elderly.
1-4��Long-term�care�insurance�in�JapanThough there are considerable differences between the German and Japanese long-term care insurance
systems, the German reform in 2008 provides several insights for Japan.
The first point is the issue regarding homecare services. The increase of the benefit amounts
demonstrated the preference of homecare over institutional care in Germany, but this should not be taken
just as a cost cutting measure to control expensive institutional care. The challenge is to make it a really
supportive measure for the elderly to continue to live at home and be cared for as they wish. In order to
achieve that, it is necessary to secure the quantity and quality of homecare services as well as to provide
various out-of-the system services in order to meet the variety of needs of the elderly. So, establishing a
function that collects and provides the information regarding long-term care, that also organizes the actual
care effectively and efficiently, combining the services within and outside the official system, will become
more important. The comprehensive community support center, which will be discussed in detail later,
will be expected to play an important role here.
The second point is regarding the measures to cope with the increasing number of elderly with
dementia. The benefits for those who have severe incapacity for everyday life including the elderly with
dementia were significantly raised in the German reform. It is a welcome move; however, securing sufficient
number of qualified staff is necessary. The issue of the elderly with dementia is becoming widely reported
in Japan, but there are still many cases where the burden of caring for such individuals falls solely on the
families. It is imperative to improve the dementia care system so that it offers easy-to-use services.
Financing these cares is the biggest challenge for both countries. Increasing numbers of the elderly
and the individuals in need of care will put larger pressure on care budgets that both countries need to
29
address urgently. A reform that takes the cost effectiveness of the services into account is inevitable but
the situation where necessary care is no longer provided for the individual in need of such care must be
avoided. In the German reform in 2008, both the contributions and the benefit provision were raised at
the same time. Its financial outcome as well as the long-term trends such as improvement of the life of the
elderly in need to be monitored and analyzed carefully in future.
2�.�The�consulting�support�and�service�coordinating�function�for�the�elderly�in�Germany
Under the reform in 2008, Pflegestützpunkt (care support center) were newly created as the
comprehensive service provider for the elderly in need. Here, the background of establishing such a
service and its overall function are summarized and its notable points and issues will be discussed. From
there we will further provide some opinions regarding how consulting support organizations such as
comprehensive community support centers in Japan should be run.
2-1��Establishment�of�the�Pflegestützpunkt�(care�support�center)Traditionally in Germany, consultation and organizing the services for the elderly in need and their
families were offered by municipal information service and care service providers. However, this was
deemed to be unsatisfactory. The collaborative link between the municipal information service and the
care service providers was weak and there was qualitative variability among the municipalities. The care
service providers tend to work for their business interests. And the consultation for support had a too
narrow scope. To counter these problems, Pflegestützpunkt, a ‘one-stop-shop’ for information, consultation,
and service coordination was established. Following is a summary of Pflegestützpunkt. However, being a
federal republic with a large part of the power lying at the state level, it is the states which decide matters
concerning Pflegestützpunkt, including their establishment, thus there are wide regional differences.
(1) Function
Pflegestützpunkt offers comprehensive consultation to the elderly in need of care and their families. It
also coordinates, organizes, and arranges long-term care, medical care, and official aid and other support
services.
(2) Consulting support service
From January 2009, all individuals in need of care became legally entitled to access the care
consultation (Pflegeberatung). All the municipalities are now obliged to offer those individuals
comprehensive care support service; however, it is up to the individual whether to use this service or
not. The care consultation includes provision of information regarding local care services inside and
outside the long-term care insurance system as well as organizing and coordinating a comprehensive
service package. Consultation is given by a care advisor (Pflegeberater) stationed at Pflegestützpunkt. The
qualifications of a care advisor are not clearly defined, but social workers, geriatric caregivers and nurses
are considered appropriate candidates and a senior level case management course is being set up. Related
30
organizations such as social workers institutes produced a shared guideline that requires the care advisor to
have advanced expertise on case management, with on-site experience of at least one year after obtaining
a qualification from a specialized higher education course.
(3) Configuration
Pflegestützpunkt makes it a principle to be neutral and independent, but it is allowed to be set up as a
part of the existing consultation support organizations and care service providers.
2-2��Notable�points�and�issues�regarding�PflegestützpunktNotable and welcome points for setting Pflegestützpunkt are as follows: (1) Individuals in need of care
and their family can solve problems regarding the provisions of health, long-term care insurance, and other
related services at a one-stop organization. (2) The same dedicated care advisor continuously looks after
a care recipient enabling comprehensive planning, coordination, and follow-up of the services, which in
turn mitigates the burden of the care recipients and their family. (3) Comprehensive planning for each care
recipient is expected to have a positive effect toward rationalizing limited budgets. (4) Care advisers at
Pflegestützpunkt, in principle, do not belong to any care service providers, enabling avoidance of influence
peddling.
With the establishment of care support centers, the support for service activities run by volunteers was
enhanced. As a worsening of the insurance finance is expected in the future ageing society, enhancement
of variety of services that do not depend on the social insurance is necessary. It is expected that
Pflegestützpunkt will collect information about and coordinate various services including self-help groups
and volunteer services outside the official benefits as well as playing a role in promoting and creating new
services.
Meanwhile, problems are apparent too. First, it is up to the users whether they use their care consultation
entitlement or not, thus it is unknown at this point how many people would take up the service and how
effective it is. Since it is expected that the set-ups and management format of the centers would be varied,
it is also difficult to verify the effectiveness of the operation in terms of promoting homecare and lessening
the family burden. Though it is expected that enhancing at-home long-term care would reduce cost, setting
up the new support centers, as well as increasing provision of the benefits owing to the increasing number
of elderly clients would push up the cost considerably, thus financial outlook in future is still severe. And
if the take-up of the care consultation entitlement is low, the expected effects, such as the mitigation of
care recipients and families’ burden and efficient use of services, would be generally low. The challenge is
the actual functionality of Pflegestützpunkt and promotion of its existence to the would-be users.
2-3�� �The�consulting�support�and�service�coordinating�function�for� the�elderly� in�Japan
In Japan, care management/care managers play a core function in consulting support and service
coordinating. The German initiatives such as independent consultation, unified provision of information
and service coordination, and introduction of a higher qualification path for care advisors with courses that
31
place importance on interpersonal support techniques as well as basic qualifications, should be watched
carefully, since there are considerable benefits that Japan might be able to adopt in realistic ways.
In addition, the German initiative of Pflegestützpunkt may also give us some ideas regarding
the comprehensive community centers of Japan that is currently functioning as the comprehensive
consultation service for the elderly in need. In order to run care services within and outside of the long-
term care insurance system efficiently, effectively, and responsively to the needs of the users, it is firstly
necessary to form a close collaboration between consultation services, care planning entities, and care
service providers. As the independent comprehensive consultation organization, the comprehensive
community support centers can play an important role. Since there is a limit as to the extent of services the
long-term care insurance system can offer, and since further budget tightening is expected in the long-term
care area, it is clear that new services that do not rely on the system, such as volunteering and community
specified services, will become more important. Development and coordination of such new services is
one of the priorities that the comprehensive community support centers should address.
3�.� �Main� points� of� the�Japanese� reform�of� the� long-term�care�insurance�system�and�its�development
3-1��Strategic�viewpoints�of�the�reformThe basic standpoint of the revision of the long-term care insurance (June 2005, in force from April
2006) is long-term sustainability; to create a system that functions continuously in a stable manner, taking
the 2015 problem into consideration8) when the whole baby-boomer generation reaches retiring age.
One of the biggest challenges is to change the system toward a more prevention-oriented one, and it is
imperative to create a system in which the elderly lead healthy and active lives for as long as they can. At
the same time the system needs to be able to cope with new challenges such as the increasing number of
the elderly living alone or with dementia and the rapid population ageing of large cities8).
3-2��Shift�to�a�prevention-oriented�systemThe linchpin of the reform is the ‘shift to a prevention-oriented system’. Looking through the 5 years
trend since long-term care insurance was introduced in 2000, prominent increase of the elderly in need of
care, who were registered as having relatively mild impairment, is observed 9).
With rapid ageing of the society as the background, the class 1 insured, who are over 65 years old,
increased from 21.65 million, when the insurance started, to 25.16 million (as of April 2005). The number
of the elderly registered as in need of care or support also increased by about 2 million, from 2.18 million
(April 2000) to 4.11 million (April 2005) among which the biggest increase was of those with relatively
mild impairment with ‘need of support’ and ‘need of care level 1’ categories. The total number of elderly
who use the service doubled from the original 1.49 million to 3.23 million, showing that the system, which
started in April 2000, is now well established in the society after 6 years.
With the increase in the use of the service, the cost of long-term care insurance almost doubled from
3.6 trillion yen in 2000 to 6.8 trillion yen in 2005 showing more than a 10% increase every year. The
amount of the contributions is revised every 3 years and as the result of the increase in the service users,
32
the amount of class 1 contribution (contribution collected from those over 65 years old) jumped 13% from
the first phase (2000-2002) to the second phase (2003-2005) with the national average of 2,950 yen per
month, which further increased in the third phase (2006-2008) to 4,090 yen per month. It was calculated
as approximately 4,270 yen per month for the fourth phase but settled to 4,080 yen per month (national
average) by digging into the fund.
The definition, service contents and management of the so-called preventive measures benefit, which
was provided as a part of long-term care insurance system for those registered as in need of support, was
revised. New classification of support level was introduced and those registered as in need of support level
1 and 2 are now eligible to use the preventive measures care services.
3-3��Establishment�of�comprehensive�community�support�centers�and�its�issuesThe elderly who live in a community have a variety of needs and problems. An increasing number
of them living alone and/or with dementia (including early onset Alzheimer’s and mild cognitive
impairment), and new problems such as abuse of the elderly are emerging. The comprehensive community
support centers are positioned to combat needs of these varied and complex elderly in order to function as
the integrated consultation and support service provider 10) 11).
The main challenges that the comprehensive community support centers face are how to provide the
service to those who may need preventive measures; identifying the individuals who may be classified as
newly introduced and unique-to-Japan support level 1 and 2, and helping them to maintain and improve
their everyday life capabilities. The contents of the support care services are defined from the viewpoint
of maintaining and improving everyday life, new programs were introduced and the existing program
reviewed. In addition to the existing services such as day center, programs such as motor function
exercises, improvement of nutrition, and oral care were included. The widening of the scope of the service
recipient is being requested to include not just those registered as in need of support, but also those who
are officially ‘independent’ but may be frail and in need of certain support and care coordination.
Since the enactment of the Elderly Health Law of 1982, the importance of prevention has been pointed
out along with treatment and rehabilitation, and it covers a wider spectrum nowadays, such as health
promotion and prevention, illness prevention and treatment, and care preventive measures. However, there
are large differences between the municipalities in terms of community-based prevention and life support
programs, and those municipalities who have traditionally run the care services focused and limited on
the elderly in need of real care are now urged to change. Either way, in order that the elderly including
those living alone and/or with dementia can continue to live in the familiar environment with individual
needs met, the most important is to overhaul and promote the service management system so that it is
comprehensive and integrated in the community.
The comprehensive community centers firstly are to establish a prevention management system that is
consistent and continual, that provides service to the elderly before they become registered as in need of
support or care, and staffed by social workers, public health nurses, and chief care managers. In order to
secure independence and fairness for service recipients as well as for the provider, the center management
committees will run the service, of which the members are to be the municipality, community service
33
providers, and the representatives of the insured.
The comprehensive community centers are also to provide comprehensive consultation, work as the
advocacy of the rights and entitlement, and create local networks as an independent organization 10)11),
and, as with any new organization, such developments need to be monitored.
3-4���New�type�of�approach�–� introduction�and�popularization�of�community-based�services
In order for the elderly to continue their life in a community with which they are familiar, it is
important that various services be offered at the village/town/city level12). For this reason, community-
based services including such initiatives as small-scale multi-functional care, nighttime home-visit care
service, group homes that are able to care for dementia patients and specially designated small-scale
nursing homes were introduced. In principle, these services are available for the resident of any village/
town/city as a rule and price are set at the village/town/city level. Approval procedures of the care care
service providers have also been left to the village/town/city since April 2006.
With the introduction of the definition of ‘everyday life area’ set out in the third phase of the long-term
care plan, village/town/city authorities need to enhance concrete measures taking new viewpoints and
local needs into consideration.
The focus of the fourth phase plan, that covers the timescale of April 2009 onward, is the
popularization of the community-based service, with a part of management criteria regarding small-scale
multi-functional care and night-time home-visit care service amended in view of a 24x7 care approach.
3-5��Practical�issues�and�quality�improvement�of�group-home�careSince the introduction of the long-term care insurance, group homes for the elderly with dementia have
been rapidly established with 9,800 facilities as of December 2008. They are playing a very effective
role as social resources supporting the elderly with dementia and their families, and have been highly
praised from several fronts, including overseas specialists, at the 20th Alzheimer’s Disease International
Conference held October 2004 in Kyoto. However, problems regarding the running of these group homes
have become apparent recently, such as misconduct of staff and fire involving loss of lives (Nagasaki
prefecture and Sapporo city).
Except for certain areas, the quantity of group homes is being fulfilled, so the improvement in quality,
as well as the diversification of management configuration, is the challenge now. One of the examples of
quality improvement initiatives is the support for the residents at terminal care stages. From April 2006,
payment for such care was increased as well as the pay for the night-shift staff.
3-6��Residential�care:�promotion�of�unit�care�and�reorganization�of�institutions As a part of the long-term care insurance system reform, a new type of specially designated elderly
care homes were introduced from 2003, and the unit care initiative (small scale residential care) is well
underway. There are three types of residential care facilities for the elderly within the system and each of
them has its own management challenges.
34
(1) Specially designated long-term care facility: the immediate challenge is to enhance the capability
of providing sufficient terminal care, as well as to introduce and implement unit care approach.
(2) Long-term care and health facility: focus should be placed upon enhancement of rehabilitation
provision. The challenge for the service providers and related organizations is to establish the
preventive measures and short-term intensive rehabilitation services.
(3) Long-term care and medical facility: As the medical care structural reform is underway, the
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is proposing to create convalescent wards in general
hospitals (December 2005), with a view achieving that by 2012. The basic purpose is to mitigate
so-called ‘social hospitalization’ (hospitalization of the elderly for non-medical reasons), with
the introduction of clear classification of medical treatment and long-term care.
As for the fourth phase (2009-2011), one that is drawing attention is the attempt to turn geriatric wards
in hospitals into long-term care and health facilities. The challenge is to establish a care infrastructure and
to set its direction in the community, including the development of aforementioned small-scale specially
designated long-term care facilities as well as housing policies for the elderly.
3-7���Revision�on�residential�care�benefit:�defrayment�of�accommodation�and�food�costs�by�users�and�supplementary�benefit
Up to now, the proportion of residential care users in the long-term care insurance system was
approximately 25%, but the cost of financing such care exceeded 50%. In order to balance the burden of
the users for homecare and residential care, as well as to adjust the long-term care benefits and pension
provision, the costs for accommodation and food (cost of meals including the cost of preparation, and
not just the cost of materials) at the long-term care facilities was placed outside the benefit and now users
have to pay them. As for the accommodation cost, the revision aimed to redress the difference of the
accommodation types (private room or dormitory) and as for the food, the cost of cooking food was added
to the cost of materials. These extra costs of accommodation and food are settled between the user and the
service providing facility.
As for the elderly who cannot afford to pay this extra cost, detailed measures are provided as a
supplementary benefit. For example, those care users (applicants) in the insurance contribution class 1 to
3, the difference between the officially set ceiling, and the actual average accommodation and food cost
(standard cost) of the facility is paid from the system as a supplementary benefit (specified long-term care
resident service cost). The user cost mitigation schemes by social welfare corporations need to be utilized
and popularized.
3-8��New�aspects�regarding�the�regulation�of�the�agency�service�providersAs more and more varied entities come into the care providers’ market, problems such as fraudulent
claims are also increasing. With this in mind, the revised law includes clauses regarding information
disclosure and reviewing of the regulations for the agency service providers, in order for the users to make
appropriate choices and high quality service to be provided.
The agency service providers are now legally obliged to publish information regarding the service
35
contents as well as administrative performance so that the users can choose the appropriate care for
themselves. The items to be disclosed include the features of the services, the costs, the physical features
of the facility, and staff ratios. The one-way provision of the information can invite the manipulation of
information, so the shift to a two-way interaction scheme is desirable where the requests and responses
from the users are received and acted upon.
The regulation of agency service providers was tightened as part of the revision. When applying to
be an authorized service provider, the application is now not accepted if the applicant or a board member
has had his/her authorization withdrawn within the past 5 years. In the past, once the authorization was
granted, authorized service providers could continue providing the services without renewal, but now,
reapplication must be made every 6 years to eliminate sub-standard agency service providers.
4.��Challenge�for�the�future:�service�quality�improvement�and�system�stability
Several points regarding the future challenge of the long-term care insurance system are described
below.
4-1��Service�quality�improvement�and�cultivation�of�human�resourcesFirstly, the issues regarding the cultivation of human resources, and staff education in order to improve
the quality of long-term care services, must be addressed. Especially as for the care management, the pillar
of the long-term care insurance system, the newly established 5 yearly renewal rule for the care managers
and introduction of the chief care manager position is expected to improve the present situation.
Secondly, the issues regarding the home visit care, the central service in the non-residential care, must
be addressed as follows in order to improve the quality; (1) identification of clear roles and responsibilities
of service providers etc, (2) improvement in the quality of care workers (cultivation of human resources
and staff training, positioning qualified care workers as its core), (3) identification of responsibilities and
qualifications of managers in agency services providers.
Thirdly, the issues regarding the education and creation of the career path of the on-site care workers,
who will play an important role in the promotion of the unit care approach in the facilities. Requirements
on education and training to improve care quality have been often talked about in the past but they lacked
clear consideration on the conditions of the work. It is essential, therefore, that the whole employment
environment improve, including the worker’s standard wage, as well as welfare and social security.
4.2��Restructuring�of�system�of�the�long-term�care�insurance�facilitiesThere are three types of residential care facilities for the elderly within the system; (1) Social and
Nursing care Homes, (2) Nursing-care and health facility, and (3) Long-term care and medical facility.
As for (3), with the medical care structural reform underway, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
is proposing to create convalescent wards in general hospitals (21 December 2005), with the aim of
achieving that by 2012. The basic purpose is to mitigate so-called ‘social hospitalization’ with the
introduction of a clear classification of medical treatment and long-term care.
36
As for the fourth phase (2009-2011), one that is drawing attention is the attempt to turn geriatric wards
in hospitals into long-term care and health facilities. The challenge is to establish a care infrastructure
and to set its direction in the community, including the development of small-scale specially designated
long-term care facilities that form a part of the aforementioned community-based care services and other
residential facilities (private care homes, care houses, and dedicated rental accommodation for the elderly).
4-3��Sharing�the�burden�in�the�mid�to�long-term�futureThe revision of 2005 also addressed the introduction of new contribution levels, taking into account the
payment capability of the contributors, the enhancement of the power of municipalities (insurers), and the
establishment of fairer assessments of individuals’ care levels.
With the widening range of incomes in the 2nd tier of the contribution levels, it was divided in two
to create the new 2nd tier and 3rd tier. It is important to note that the ‘pay-as-you-can’ approach became
clear, with emphasis on the paying capability of the insured.
Also in the revision of 2005, the contribution collection system was improved, with the convenience of
the users in mind.
Amalgamation of villages, towns, and cities continued during 2000 to 2010, and that must have
enhanced the care infrastructure of the insurers (municipalities). Strengthening of the functionalities of the
insurers, the managing entities of the long-term care system, on such issues as designation, guidance and
monitoring of aforementioned community-based care services, as well as the stability of the infrastructure,
all are of the utmost importance.
The trust in the nation’s social security system, which has traditionally leant heavily on the social
insurance method for its pension and medical insurance, has been shaken lately and new approach to
funding is urgently sought.
Conclusion:�From�the�structural�viewpoint�of�long-term�care�for�the�elderlyFrom the background of the introduction of the long-term care insurance and the recent revision, it is
important to raise issues from the structural viewpoint13) that can be summarized as follows.
Since around the time of the introduction of long-term care insurance in 2000, the tendency is emerging
to cram all kinds of problems that affect the elderly into the terminology ‘care need’, especially among the
government administrations and care experts. That in turn has created the mindset of creating more and
more services for the elderly ‘in need of care’, that again, in turn, rationalizes the agency care providers’
sub-standard behaviors including fee-for-service system and maximization of profit. In order truly to
support the elderly socially and generally, with elimination and correction of the sub-standard service
providers, as revealed in the ‘Comson scandal’ in 2007, the following points need to be addressed.
(1) Health promotion as a national value (Healthy Japan 21)
(2) Promotion of preventive healthcare with primary care as its core and streamlining of medical
costs (reducing of long hospital stays)
(3) Unification of homecare and community-based care (catering for the everyday life needs of the
elderly = introducing the viewpoint of stay-at-home care)
37
(4) Promotion of concrete preventive measures (development and popularization of health
promoting, illness prevention, care-dependence prevention programs)
(5) Limiting and restructuring of residential care facilities (clear classification of care, medical, and
residential facilities)
(6) Enhancement of accommodations for the elderly (specialized accommodation units for the
elderly and group homes)
(7) Consolidation and localization of related policies based on improving QOL (improvement of
residential environment, including the town planning level)
(8) Securing the human resources with care workers as its core and creating a career path for them
(9) Supporting the low income bracket elderly and reducing their charges & premium.
(10) Supporting Victims by Big earthquake of Eastern Japan in March 2011. especially Elderly,
Children and Disable persons.
Though the vision for 2015, when the baby boomers enter the age of retirement, is getting somewhat
clearer with the securing of the mid-term stability of the long-term care system, we cannot be optimistic
for the long-term future. We need to look carefully, along with the reforms of medical insurance and
pension systems, into the strengthening of the social security structural reform as well as mid to long-
term financing, including the possibility of raising consumption tax rates and restructuring of ring-fenced
welfare tax etc. A reform agenda with the keyword, ‘constructing comprehensive community care system’
will be tabled in 2011, which is expected to be introduced in the fifth phase starting April 2012, following
the amendment of the law.
Quotes�and�references 1 Tokyo Metropolitan Foundation for Social Welfare and Public Health (2005): Turning point in long-term care- The
mechanism of the new system and current situation in Germany
2 Matsumoto K. (2007) : German Social Security III - The long-term care insurance. Sinzansha
3 Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: Gut zu wissen-das Wichtigste zur Pflegereform 2008, Juni 2008
4 Richter E. (2008):Gerangel um Pflegestützpunkte. Forum Sozialstation 150/ Feb. 2008, 8-10
5 Richter E. (2008): Pflegestützpunkte: Länder entscheiden, Kassen zahlen. Forum Sozialstation 151/ Apr. 2008, 12-14
6 Wißmann P. (2003): Case Management. In: Zippel C, Kraus S (Hg.): Soziale Arbeit mit alten Menschen. Berlin:
Weißensee Verlag,121-137
7 Wißmann P. (2003): Informations-, Beratungs- und Vermittlungsstellen für ältere Menschen. In: Zippel C., Kraus S.
(Hrsg.): Soziale Arbeit mit alten Menschen. Weißensee Verlag, Berlin
8 The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2004): Care for the elderly in 2015
9 Health and Welfare Statistics Association (2005): Annual shift of long-term care insurance related statistics – The major
statistic data for 5 years since the establishment of the insurance system
10 The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2005): Comprehensive community support center guide
11 Preparing to establish comprehensive community support centers. (2006): Support Vol.14, Daiichi-hoki
12 Miyajima W. (2006): Small-scale multi-functional care. Community health and welfare policies study group.
Community health and welfare case study. Daiichi-hoki March addition
13 Murakawa H. (2004): The principles of the care of the elderly. The Elderly care practice case study. Daiichi-hoki
38
39
Multiple Regression Analysis of Compassion Fatigue/ Satisfaction Questionnaires, and Correlation between these Questionnaires and Care Providers’ Behavior (FR behavior) in Japanese Child Welfare Facilities
Takashi Fujioka
【Abstract】
The purpose of this study was to examine multiple regression analysis of Compassion Fatigue/ Satisfaction Questionnaires and Correlation between these questionnaires and care providers’ behavior in Japanese child welfare facilities.
Through the hierarchical OLS regression analysis , experience as a care provider is very important for examining Compassion Satisfaction. It was predicted that Compassion Fatigue and Satisfaction will impact the burn out separately. The author constructed the linear multiple regression equation on Burnout risk, Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction. The second purpose of this study is to ascertain the relationship of Compassion Fatigue /Satisfaction with FR(Frightened/ Frightening) behavior.
The hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between Compassion Fatigue, Compassion Satisfaction, and FR behavior. As a result, only one factor , PTSD significantly effects Total FR behavior. From the results of Correlation between four factors of Compassion Fatigue and the three factors of FR behavior among care givers in child welfare facility, Frightened behavior in FR behavior have the significant correlation with Dissociation behavior, Secondary Traumatic Stress, PTSD, Denial tendency, and Trauma experience. Frightening behavior in FR behavior has a significant correlation with PTSD only in Compassion Fatigue. Depersonalized behavior in FR behavior check lists have a significant correlation with Dissociation behavior, and PTSD. Dissociation behavior has a significant correlation with all four factors in Compassion Fatigue.
Through the results, we discussed that "Trauma- dominance Compassion Fatigue" would be easy to cause a stronger dissociation tendency, and the degree of the burnout tendency would be different by the state of children with some problems and disorders, how to live in family and community, especially in the childhood. In other words, the care providers would be exposed to compassion fatigue, particularly secondary wound-related stress, in addition to own trauma experience. That is, the care providers must be exposed to trauma experiences of children double more while they are exposed to their own trauma experience.
40
【Keywords】
Compassion Fatigue , Compassion Satisfaction, Dissociation, FR behavior, Burnout risk, Secondary Traumatic Stress(STS), Third Traumatic Stress (TTS)
Recently there are some researchers who think that burnout seems to be connected with the concept of
Secondary Traumatic Stress or Compassion fatigue, especially among workers who contact with injured,
disordered or traumatized persons. A caregiver or a supporter who listens to the story by injured people
is hurt by the story at the same time. A clinical social worker or a therapist who works as a helper, a
caregiver, and a supporter with injured, disordered or traumatized persons experiences the drawing out
of earlier memories in which he or she has been hurt. In Japan there are many researches on Secondary
Traumatic Stress and Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction, but it is necessary to investigate these concepts
from the standpoints of Japanese situation and culture in Japanese clinical field and facility(FujiokaT,,
2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2010; Fukushima,M.2009; Kon,Y.&Kikuchi,A. 2007; Shinozaki,T.2007;Nishi
,M.&Nojima,K.2002).
When burnout risk/ compassion fatigue were prevented for care workers or care providers , for
example through consultation of support measures, training, and collaboration, maltreated children
would be supported from the viewpoint of attachment to developmental disability, and a state of the staff
as "a container of attachment" would be kept in good condition. I have challenged that many care givers
would be good container through the clinical attachment approach, for example the use of ‘Life Script of
Attachment’, and self-monitoring by Compassion Fatigue Self Check Test. The purpose of this study is
to examine the effect of self-monitoring by Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Self Check Test to Burn out
risk, and to investigate the relationship of these questionnaires with inadequate approach, FR behavior by
care providers to children in Japanese Child Welfare Facility.
Meaning of Compassion Fatigue
A Care giver has “Compassion Fatigue" by being an care giver, and by balance with “Compassion
satisfaction " which is joy of being a care giver , which is assumed to protect from risk of burnout
(Figley,1995). Originally, in the English word of “Compassion”, there are meanings such as "intense
feelings, eagerness, passions such as anger, intense love" in Passion. We use the word of Compassion, it
means that Com – means “with”. So when we say “Compassion with” , we always feel “passion with
together”. In addition to this meaning, I find that Passion means martyrdom. I think that “ Compassion”
means “become a martyr with hurt persons/especially maltreated abused children” in the clinical child
welfare field. It means profoundly to be with abused children and neglected children.
Dissociation and Compassion fatigue
Social workers, care workers and case managers working in welfare facilities and agents have a wide
range of stresses in performing their duty. Specifically, when they are concern with and support the clients
who had severe traumatic experiences, there is a possibility that care workers and case managers and
41
social workers themselves have to confront their own trauma. Moreover, the specialty of the helpers,
the building of sympathy and relationship with clients, increasingly means placing them in the process
of extending to the situation of burnout. In this case, the dissociation which is a peculiar reaction to the
trauma, happens to the side of the helper. The helper sometimes cuts off his/her character, personality
and feelings in the process to the burnout. Fujioka(2005) pointed out the importance of the process
of burnout and reexamined the process in through the concept of dissociation. As a result, the author
suggested the possibility that the helper confronts the situation of the similar phenomenon-dissociation-
as clients. To prevent such a high risk situation, the necessity of the self check list about the burnout and
compassion fatigue was suggested. Dissociation is the key concept of Pierre Janet, especially this concept
connects trauma and the attitude of protecting hurt mind.
Secondary Traumatic Stress or Compassion fatigue and the idea of Pierre Janet
Fujioka (2006) discussed secondary traumatic stress or compassion fatigue though some concepts of
Pierre Janet. He pointed out that treatment for Trauma follows two ways, to be confronted or to confront
with traumatic experiences. One is to confront trauma directly, and the other is to confront trauma
indirectly. The relationship between fatigue and traumatic memory was indicated in P. Janet’s idea.
When human being continues to confront trauma for long time, he/she avoids feeling pain, bitterness,
tightness and suffering and creates a condition of dissociation. In case of Compassion Fatigue, the same
situation or dissociation will be created in the mind for long time. But as Janet pointed out, keeping
trauma means continuing to feel serious fatigue. I think that compassion fatigue has two meanings, one is
fatigue by traumatized children and the other is fatigue by care givers’ own trauma. Perhaps the treatment
to traumatized children means severe situation for care givers with severe trauma through the relationship
with children who have some problems, some disorders or severe trauma.
I think that discussion about Treatment for traumatized children means the profound examination on
preventing Compassion Fatigue.
I discussed that it is necessary to investigate the relationship of compassion fatigue and personal
dissociation tendency. Perhaps many Japanese people have high dissociation tendency, so there will
be strong connection between compassion fatigue and personal dissociation tendency. If the expert in
child welfare facility has some traumatic experiences in his or her life, the relationship with traumatized
children would draw out pain or specific memories in the past time. He or she may be always exposed
to the traumatic memory or the traumatic emotion. If the supportive atmosphere would be prepared for
him or her, he or she might not be exposed to a risk of dissociation, and not feel Compassion Fatigue so
severely.
Compassion Fatigue in two facilities in Japan
Fujioka(2008) discussed secondary traumatic stress or compassion fatigue in relation to the concepts
of the helper’s own trauma and stress. He distributed questionnaires to facility A (16 people; 2 male 14
female), facility B (22 people; 12 male, 10 female). The results showed that the degree of compassion
satisfaction was low in both facilities in Japan. Even a certain level (level 2) poses a comparatively high
42
(40%) risk of burnout, while for 60%, there was low risk of burnout (together, 0;A,B provides equipment
for level 3,4 of a high domain). However, 36% occupied the classified level 4,5 and nearly 40% was in
a state of high compassion fatigue. The possibility is suggested that compassion fatigue becomes high
before actual burnout. A social worker may sense the degree of this compassion fatigue early, and it is
an important precaution to plan some countermeasures before it becomes severe burnout, and forces the
social worker to take leave of absence from duty or to resign.
The discussion in Fujioka(2008) is conducted from 4 standpoints. 1.Third Traumatic Stress ; Traumatic
stress in a family who has a caregiver, care worker, and/or social worker. 2. Defense against "Family
Burnout" of a helper. 3. The construction of relations between place of work and everyday life. 4.The
treatment for dissociation and the construction of integration of daily life as a worker in the people-
supporting field and as a member of family and community. It was necessary to investigate Compassion
Fatigue about other people in Japanese Child Welfare facility through the standard of Compassion
Fatigue/Satisfaction in Japanese.
Factor Analysis on Compassion Fatigue and Satisfaction in 110 persons in Japanese child welfare facilities.
Based on investigation by Japanese edition of questionnaires developed by Figley,C. et al.,
Fujioka(2007) studied the basics toward standardization of these questionnaires to relate to compassion
satisfaction and compassion fatigue. Furthermore, he suggested coping methods for burnout and
compassion fatigue based on them.
As a result of data analysis, four factors of "satisfaction in relations with fellow workers", "satisfaction
in relations with users", "satisfaction as nature of care workers or social workers " and "feeling of
satisfaction in life" were extracted on compassion satisfaction.
On compassion fatigue, four factors of "compassion fatigue accumulated as substitution-related
trauma", "denial feelings", "PTSD-like compassion fatigue" and "a trauma experience of care worker or
social worker oneself" were extracted.
From these results, it was suggested that there were 2 types of compassion fatigue; one is "Trauma-
dominance Compassion Fatigue" that has a certain trauma recurred, and another is "Stress-dominance
Compassion Fatigue" that has the possibility to become a new trauma.
About burnout standards by Figley,C. et al., correlation with the burnout standards that Maslach,C. et al
made was high and the result was provided that factor structures were approximately similar.
It was suggested that the general scores of compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue and burnout
affects burnout prevention, coping with compassion fatigue and awareness of compassion satisfaction.
Especially "considerably high danger " group occupies 35%, and "high danger " group occupies 17%,
while " high- risk compassion fatigue" groups occupy 52% together. This suggests the necessity of support
for care workers or social workers in all child care or child welfare facilities.
Correlation of measures on compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue and burnout with coping
methods with burnout, burnout in family and disagreement of policies of nursing and treatment were
examined in Fujioka(2007). 1, When a care worker or a social worker who feels bitterness and tightness is
supported by peers, friends, and families, compassion satisfaction becomes high. 2, Feelings that bitterness
43
and tightness are supported by peers, friends, and families may prevent from high depersonalization
tendency. 3, A person who feels enough compassion satisfaction does not give Third Traumatic
Stress(TTS) (for example, negative behavior and negative verbal expression to family. 4, A feeling of
emotional exhaustion is related to third traumatic stress. 5, Disagreement of a nurturing policy between
an administrator and a care worker or social worker lead the whole risk of burnout to a higher degree. 15
items were suggested as anti-burnout coping skills for compassion fatigue such as "inflection of a self-
check list".
Factor Analysis on Compassion Fatigue and Satisfaction in 212 persons in Japanese child welfare
facilities.
From the standpoint of many research on Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction, Fujioka(2010) examined
some support programs in relation with burnout measures and compassion fatigue and satisfaction.
As a result of data analysis of 212 persons, he was able to get a result similar to Fujioka (2007). About
Compassion Satisfaction, four factors were extracted. Four factors were named as follows; "satisfaction
in relations with fellow workers", " satisfaction in relations with a child or children", " satisfaction in the
nature of care workers or social workers", and "feeling of satisfaction in life"
About compassion fatigue, four factors of "compassion fatigue accumulated as a substitution-related
trauma", "denial feelings", "PTSD-like compassion fatigue" and "a trauma experience of care worker or
social worker oneself" were extracted.
Correlation of these factors with Burnout Standard made by Maslach, C. and Jackson proved to be
statistically significance. On this basis, the following points were suggested. 1 Compassion satisfaction
showed significant negative correlation with "the emotional consumption feeling" that was a lower
factor and "de-personification" of standardized burnout measures, and equilateral correlation with
"sense of accomplishment of each individual" was suggested. 2 With a feeling of consumption and de-
personification, equilateral correlation with Compassion Fatigue was suggested. But Compassion Fatigue
was not related with personal sense of accomplishment. 3 A meaningful difference is seen in the number
of years in Compassion Satisfaction. It was suggested that for ten years, it was necessary to regard care
givers to be a professional care provider. 4 Compassion Fatigue accumulated as a substitution-related
trauma (Secondary Traumatic Stress) was related to Third Traumatic Stress by care givers’ families.
5 There was an association between Compassion Fatigue or Satisfaction and Burn out. Third Traumatic
Stress(TTS) is key concept for supporting a care giver’s family.
Third Traumatic Stress of Care givers’ and Social Workers’ Families
The family of a care giver has the possibility to be exposed to Third Traumatic Stress. I suggest that
members in care worker’s family have further stress if care workers receive Secondary Traumatic Stress
from children with some troubles and clients and he/she can not deal with as Secondary Traumatic Stress
or Compassion Fatigue. Fujioka (2007, 2008) called this " Third Traumatic Stress (TTS)". It is very
important for a care worker to receive enough support from families , fellow workers, and social system as
good environment.
44
Compassion Fatigue and the methods/attitudes of Child Care Support
The author thinks that Child Care Support is support for Parents and Care- Workers. It is important for
child care workers to investigate the relation of the main point of attachment parenting with Compassion
fatigue or Satisfaction. For child care, it is necessary to construct pro-support, pro- help to Parents and
Care givers. "The problem" that children have, "a problem" and "a feeling of maladjustment" are "the
points of contact of a relation with care givers and children". Problems in attachment become the point of
contact with children. A look at such " problems“ is very important. The author thinks that Compassion
Fatigue /Satisfaction affects occupational commitment just like FR(Frightened/ Frightening) behavior.
But nobody has investigated this standpoint on Compassion fatigue/Satisfaction and Burnout. Especially,
FR action (including an expression / a gesture etc.) “Frightened or Frightening” (FR) is very important in
the area of Child welfare facility. An inappropriate action for parenting is a point to "let a child feel fear"
with an abused child. A care giver who has various "unsolved models" was hurt (a trauma), and cannot
arrange experiences.
When burnout risk/ compassion fatigue were prevented for care workers, for example; consultation of
measures supports, the training, collaboration, maltreated children would be supported from a viewpoint
of attachment to developmental disability, and a state of the staff as "a container of attachment" would
be kept in good conditions. The author have challenged that many care givers would be good container
through clinical interview and insight to own self by ‘Life Script of Attachment’, and self-monitoring and
self-awareness by Compassion Fatigue Self Check Test.
When relations with the staff and children become complicated, feelings of satisfaction with children
are reduced, and that compassion fatigue increase mainly on substitute trauma. In this way it is thought
that further examination of compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction as support programs to abused
children effectively.
Purpose of the study.
The purpose of this study is to conduct a multiple regression analysis of Compassion Fatigue/
Satisfaction Questionnaires and examine the correlation between those Questionnaires and Care Providers’
Behavior in Japanese Child Welfare Facilities.
To that purpose, we had three primary research questions: (1) Is there an association between Burn out
and Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction ?; (2)Is there an association between three control variables and
Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction ? : and (3) Does Compassion Fatigue /Satisfaction effect care provider’s
professional commitment as FR(Frightened/ Frightening) behavior on the standpoint of clinical attachment
approach ?
Methods
Sample and Procedures
For purpose (1)(2) data was obtained from some child welfare facilities in Japan. The author
distributed a questionnaire to each facility. Explanation of the research was conducted at a workshop. The
45
purpose of the questionnaire, the observance of obligation of keeping secrecy, management of personal
information, a way of entry were explained to all care providers in each facility. I had each staff fill out
the questionnaire and collected them later. These were unsigned. Study questionnaires were coded in
a manner that prevented duplicate responses while maintaining anonymity of respondents. Completed
questionnaires were received from 212 respondents.
For purpose (3) data was obtained from some child welfare facilities in Japan. The same procedure
was used as purpose (1)(2). Study questionnaires were coded in a manner that prevented duplicate
responses while maintaining anonymity of respondents. Completed questionnaires were received from 61
respondents.
Measures
Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Scale -Original Version- (66 items)
We used Care giver Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction was measured with the Compassion Fatigue/
Satisfaction Scale (Original version, Figley and Stamm,2002; Japanese Translated version , Fujioka 2007).
The Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Short Version is a 66-item self- report instrument that instructs
respondents to indicate how frequently they experienced each of 66 symptoms during the previous week
using a 6-choice, Likert-type response format ranging from never (0) to very often (5). The 66 items of the
Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction and burn out are designed to be congruent with the 26 symptom criteria
of Compassion Satisfaction, the 23 symptom criteria of Compassion Fatigue and the 17 symptom criteria
of Burn out (Figley and Stamm, 2002).
FR behaviors.
The author constructed new check lists about FR behavior with reference to Main, M., & E. Hesse (1996)
and Abrams,K.Y., Rifkin,A.& Hesse,F. (2006) .
For example, parts of FR behavior Check lists are as follows; I change how to put out and intonation of
a voice suddenly . I change an expression suddenly. I suddenly access a child. I take no notice of crying.
I leave a crying child and go to other places. I stare with a look letting a child be afraid. I will not dare
to look at a child. I contact in a voice letting a child be afraid. I scowl at a child. I contact a child with no
expression. I take an incomprehensible action for even myself . I contact a child stickily. I contact not
to harm a mood of a child. I contact a child with a frightening face. I hurl negative words at a child. I am
irritated and put up a hand to a child. I catch a child and strongly shake it.
FR behavior Check lists is a 25-item self- report instrument that instructs respondents to indicate how
frequently they experienced each of 25 symptoms during the previous week using a 5-choice, Likert-
type response format ranging from never (1) to very often (5). These FR behavior Check lists have three
factors, Frightened behavior, Frightening behavior and De-personalized behavior by Factor Analysis.
Dissociation behaviors.
The author picked up the five items from the daily dissociation check lists of Masuda (2006) . The
check lists is a 5-item self- report instrument that instructs respondents to indicate how frequently they
46
experienced each of 5 symptoms during the previous week using a 5-choice, Likert-type response format
ranging from never (1) to very often (5).
Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Scale -Short Version -(34 items)
Care giver Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction was measured with the Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction
Scale (based on Figley and Stamm,2002; Fujioka 2007,2010). The Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction
Short Version is a 34-item self report instrument that instructs respondents to indicate how frequently
they experienced each of 34 symptoms during the previous week using a 5-choice, Likert-type response
format ranging from never (1) to very often (5). The 34 items of the Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction
are designed to be congruent with the 17 symptom criteria of Compassion Satisfaction and 17 symptom
criteria of Compassion Fatigue by factor analysis of 66 original items of Compassion Fatigue/
Satisfaction self check lists (Figley and Stamm,2002). These Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction Scale
-Short Version - have 8 factors; 4 factors on Compassion Fatigue,(1,Secondary Traumatic Stress or
compassion fatigue accumulated as a substitution-related trauma, 2,PTSD-like compassion fatigue,
3,Denial Feelings , 4,Trauma Experience of care worker or social worker oneself ) and 4 factors on
Compassion Satisfaction (1,satisfaction in relations with fellow workers, 2 satisfaction in relations
with a child or children, 3, satisfaction as nature of care workers or social workers, and 4,feeling of
satisfaction in life) by Factor Analysis(based on Figley and Stamm,2002; Fujioka 2007, 2010).
Control variables.
Based upon previous research linking them to independent and dependent variables, the following three
control variables were included in the study questionnaire: care giver age, gender, experience. Experience
was operationalized as the number of years working in a child welfare facility.
Data analysis
Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package named SPSS. First, a hierarchical ordinary least
squares regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between Compassion Fatigue and
Compassion Satisfaction and the relationship between these questionnaires with FR behavior . Next
multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between Compassion Fatigue,
Compassion Satisfaction and Burn out. In addition to these analyses the correlation between four factors
of Compassion Fatigue/Satisfaction and the three factors of FR behavior among care givers in child
welfare facility were determined.
Results
Sample Characteristics
For investigating purposes (1) and (2), Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics for demographic and
other key variables. 212 study participants had five age groups; 20's(50%), 30's(30.2%), 40's(8.5%),
50's(9.9%), 60's(1.4%). Gender ; male(45.3), female(54.7). The sample had an average of 8.14 years (SD
47
= 8.30) of experience. Scores on the Compassion Satisfaction Scale ranged from 29-119 with a mean of
72.887 (SD =14.980). Scores on the Compassion Fatigue Scale ranged from 8-77 with a mean of 34.821
(SD =13.433 ). Scores on the Burn out Scale (Figley and Stamm, 2002) ranged from 9-61 with a mean of
35.283 (SD =10.084).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for key variables (n = 212).Number (%) Mean (SD) Range
Gender
Male 96 (45.3)
Female 116 (54.7)
Age
20's 106 (50 )
30's 64 (30.2)
40's 18 ( 8.5)
50's 21 ( 9.9)
60's 3( 1.4)
Experiences (Years) 8.140 ( 8.300)
Compassion Satisfaction 72.887 (14.980) 29-119
Compassion Fatigue 34.821 (13.433) 8-77
Burn out (Figley and Stamm 2002) 35.283 (10.084) 9-61
For investigating purposes (3) new study participants attended this study. 61 study participants had five
ranges of age; 20's(67.2%), 30's(27.9%), 40's(0%), 50's(3.3%), 60's(1.6%). Gender ; male(24;39.34%),fem
ale(37;60.66%). The sample had an average of 5.32 years (SD = 5.82) of experience.
Multiple regression analysis
Table 2 displays the results of the hierarchical OLS regression analysis for predicting Compassion
Satisfaction among care givers in a child welfare facility. Of the three control variables entered in Step 1
only experience significantly predicted Compassion Satisfaction. When Compassion Fatigue was added
in Step 2, only experience was significant. Compassion Fatigue did not predict Compassion Satisfaction.
48
Table 2. Hierarchical regression analysis predicting Compassion Satisfaction among care givers in child welfare facility.
Step 1
B(se) β p R2
Age -1.845 (2.063) -0.038 0.111
Gender -1.150 (2.063) -0.038 0.578
Experience 0.315 (0.145) 0.174 0.031*
0.026
Step2
B(se) β p R2
Age -1.751 (1.153) -0.122 0.130
Gender -1.300 (2.061) -0.043 0.529
Experience 0.307 (0.145) 0.170 0.035*
Compassion Fatigue -0.109 (0.076) -0.098 0.155
0.035
* p<.05
Table 3 displays the results of the Multiple regression analysis for predicting Burnout among care
givers in child welfare facility. In MRA Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction significantly
predicted Burn out.
Linear multiple regression equation ;
Burnout risk = 0.490×Compassion Fatigue + (-0.163×Compassion Satisfaction) + 30.123
……………………. (a)
Table 3. Multiple regression analysis predicting Burnout among care givers in child welfare facility.
B(se) β p R2
Compassion Fatigue 0.490(0.036) 0.652 .0001**
Compassion Satisfaction -0.163(0.033) -0.242 .0001**
Constant Term 30.123(2.841)
0.516
Table 4 displays the results of the hierarchical OLS regression analysis for predicting FR behavior. The
hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between Compassion Fatigue,
Compassion Satisfaction, and FR behavior. Step 1 FR behavior regressed on the three control variables.
Step 2 added the Compassion Fatigue variable in addition to the three control variables to determine if
Compassion Fatigue predicts FR behavior. Step 3 added Compassion Satisfaction as a predictor variable
in addition to the control variables and Compassion Fatigue.
49
Table 4. Hierarchical regression analysis predicting FR Behavior among care givers in child welfare facility.
Step 1
B(se) β p R2
Age 1.058 (2.808) 0.093 0.708
Gender -4.135 (2.537) -0.215 0.109
Experience 0.035 (0.401) 0.021 0.931
0.054
Step2
B(se) β p R2
Age 1.239 (2.109) 0.109 0.591
Gender -2.059 (2.109) -0.107 0.333
Experience -0.135 (0.329) -0.083 0.684
Compassion Fatigue 0.553 (0.104) 0.587 0.0001**
0.380
Step3
B(se) β p R2
Age 1.203 (2.316) 0.106 0.606
Gende -2.198 (2.173) -0.114 0.316
Experience -0.128 (0.332) -0.079 0.703
Compassion Fatigue 0.538 (0.116) 0.570 .0.0001**
Compassion Satisfaction -0.033 (0.107) -0.0376 0.756
0.381
Table 5 displays the results of the Multiple regression analysis for predicting FR behavior. The Multiple
regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between Compassion Fatigue, Compassion
Satisfaction, and FR behavior.
Linear multiple regression equation ;
FR behavior = 0.550×Compassion Fatigue + (-0.007×Compassion Satisfaction) +32.8756
……………………. (b)
Table 5. Multiple regression analysis predicting FR behavior among care givers in child welfare facility.
B(se) β p R2
Compassion Fatigue 0.550 (0.106) 0.594 .0001 **
Compassion Satisfaction -0.007 (0.099) -0.008 0.945
Constant Term 32.876(6.995)
0.357
Table 6 displays the results of the h Multiple regression analysis for predicting FR behavior. The
hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between four factors of
Compassion Fatigue and FR behavior.
50
Linear multiple regression equation ;
FR behavior = 0.381 × Secondary Traumatic Stress + 1.167 × PTSD + (-0.039×Denial Feeling)
+ 0.157×Trauma Experience + 31.356 ……………………. (c)
Table 6. Multiple regression analysis predicting FR behavior among care givers in child welfare facility.
B(se) β p R2
Secondary Traumatic Stress 0.381 (0.324) 0.151 0.244
PTSD 1.167 (0.211) 0.5916 .0001 **
Denial Feeling -0.039 (0.457) -0.0096 0.932
Trauma Experience 0.157 (0.387) 0.0488 0.687
Constant Term 31.356 2.286
0.466
Table 7 displays the results of Correlation between four factors of Compassion Fatigue and the three
factors of FR behavior among care givers in child welfare facility.
4 factors of Compassion Fatigue contained Secondary Traumatic Stress, PTSD, denial tendency, trauma
experience . 3 factors of FR behavior contained Frightened behavior, Frightening behavior, Depersonalized
behavior.
Frightened behavior in FR behavior have the significant correlation with Secondary Traumatic
Stress, PTSD, denial feeling, trauma experience in Compassion Fatigue and Total FR Behavior ,
Dissociation behavior . Frightening behavior in FR behavior has significant correlation only with
PTSD in Compassion Fatigue. Total FR Behavior have the significant correlation with Dissociation
Behavior. Depersonalized behavior in FR behavior check lists has significant correlation with
Dissociation behavior, PTSD in Compassion fatigue. Dissociation behavior has significant correlation
with all four factors in Compassion Fatigue (Secondary Traumatic Stress, PTSD, Denial feeling, Trauma
experience).
Table 7. Correlation between four factors of Compassion Fatigue and the three factors of FR behavior among care givers in child welfare facility.
BehaviorFrightened
Behavior
Frightening
Behavior
Depersonalized
Behavior
Total FR
Behavior
Dissociation
BehaviorFrightened Behavior 1.0000
Frightening Behavior -0.0007 1.0000
Depersonalized Behavior 0.1967 0.521** 1.0000
Total FR Behavior 0.608** 0.692** 0.804** 1.0000
Dissociation Behavior 0.643** 0.123 0.329** 0.541** 1.0000
Secondary Traumatic Stress 0.590** 0.075 0.119 0.394** 0.439**
PTSD 0.359** 0.488** 0.552** 0.662** 0.500**
Denial Feeling 0.457** -0.058 0.021 0.219 0.440**
Trauma Experience 0.338** 0.124 0.221 0.333** 0.325*
Total Compassion Fatigue 0.588** 0.274* 0.366** 0.597** 0.594**
* p<.05 **p<.01
51
4 factors of Compassion Fatigue (Secondary Traumatic Stress, PTSD, Denial Feeling, Trauma Experience )
3 factors of FR behavior (Frightened Behavior, Frightening Behavior, Depersonalized Behavior)
Table 8 displays the results of Correlation between four factors of Compassion Satisfaction and the
three factors of FR behavior among care givers in child
welfare facility. Frightened behavior in FR behavior has significant negative(-) correlation with
satisfaction as nature of care workers . Frightening behavior and Depersonalized behavior in FR behavior
have no significant correlation with four factors in Compassion Satisfaction. Total FR Behavior has
significant negative(-) correlation with satisfaction in relations with a child or children. Dissociation
Behavior has significant correlation with Total Compassion Satisfaction, especially satisfaction in
relations with a child or children and satisfaction as nature of care workers.
Table 8. Correlation between four factors of Compassion Satisfaction and the three factors of FR behavior among care givers in child welfare facility.
BehaviorFrightened
Behavior
Frightening
Behavior
Depersonalized
Behavior
Total FR
Behavior
Dissociation
BehaviorFrightened Behavior 1.000
Frightening Behavior -0.001 1.000
Depersonalized Behavior 0.197 0.521** 1.000
Total FR Behavior 0.608** 0.692** 0.804** 1.000
Dissociation Behavior 0.643** 0.123 0.329** 0.541** 1.000
Satisfaction in relations with fellow workers
-0.104 -0.054 -0.211 -0.176 -0.207
Satisfaction in relations with a child or children
-0.202 -0.144 -0.206 -0.265* -0.265*
Satisfaction as nature of care workers
-0.351** 0.086 -0.207 -0.240 -0.468**
Feeling of satisfaction in life 0.006 0.071 -0.119 -0.021 -0.115
Total Compassion Satisfaction -0.222 -0.031 -0.250 -0.246 -0.351**
* p<.05 **p<.01
4 factors of Compassion Satisfaction (Satisfaction in relations with fellow workers, Satisfaction in relations with a child
or children, Satisfaction as nature of care workers, Feeling of satisfaction in life)
Table 9 displays the results of Multiple regression analysis predicting Three factors of FR behavior
among care givers in child welfare facility. We investigated each Criterion Variable. As a result, Frightened
behavior in FR behavior has significant correlation with Secondary Traumatic Stress or compassion
fatigue accumulated as a substitution-related trauma. And Frightened behavior has significant –tendency
correlation with Denial Feeling(p=0.068 † < .10 ). Both Criterion Variable, Frightening Behavior and
Depersonalized Behavior have significant correlation with PTSD-like Compassion Fatigue.
52
Table 9. Multiple regression analysis predicting Three factors of FR behavior among care givers in child welfare facility.
Criterion Variable; Frightened Behavior
B(se) β p R2
Secondary Traumatic Stress 0.590 ( 0.176) 0.453 0.001**
PTSD 0.159 (0.115) 0.156 0.172
Denial Feeling 0.461 (0.248) 0.221 0.068
Trauma Experience -0.082 (0.210) -0.049 0.698
Constant Term 10.841 (1.241)
0.408
Criterion Variable; Frightening Behavior
B(se) β p R2
Secondary Traumatic Stress -0.075 (0.169) -0.066 0.660
PTSD 0.476 (0.111) 0.538 0.0001 **
Denial Feeling -0.300 (0.239) -0.165 0.214
Trauma Experience 0.052 (0.202) 0.036 0.798
Constant Term 11.137 (1.195)
0.272
Criterion Variable; Depersonalized Behavior
B(se) β p R2
Secondary Traumatic Stress -0.133 (0.1700) -0.113 0.435
PTSD 0.533 (0.111) 0.576 0.0001 **
Denial Feeling -0.200 (0.240) -0.105 0.408
Trauma Experience 0.187 (0.203) .124 0.362
Constant Term 9.378 (1.201)
0.330
†p<.10 * p<.05 **p<.01
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to examine multiple regression analysis of Compassion Fatigue/
Satisfaction Questionnaires and determine the correlation between those Questionnaires and Care
Providers’ Behavior in Japanese Child Welfare Facilities.
An association between Burn out and Compassion Fatigue / Satisfaction
Through the hierarchical OLS regression analysis , when Compassion Fatigue was added in Step 2, only
experience was significant. Experience is very important in thinking about Compassion Satisfaction.
The author described the relationship between experience and Compassion Satisfaction in Fujioka(2007) .
Fujioka(2007) indicated that Compassion satisfaction changes up and down every year after beginning to
work, and numerical value of Compassion satisfaction is stabilized from 7 years to 10 years.
In this study, Compassion Fatigue did not predict Compassion Satisfaction. It was predicted that
Compassion Fatigue and Satisfaction will impact burn out separately. So the author constructed the linear
53
multiple regression equation (a) as follows;
Burnout risk = 0.490 × Compassion Fatigue + (-0.163 × Compassion Satisfaction) + 30.123
We have to investigate the reason of the influence to Burn out. This was first challenge to construct the
numerical formula, Burnout risk and Compassion Fatigue / Satisfaction.
The relationship of Compassion Fatigue /Satisfaction with the interaction between care providers and
children, just like FR(Frightened/ Frightening) behavior
The hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between Compassion
Fatigue, Compassion Satisfaction, and FR behavior. Step 1 FR behavior regressed on the three control
variables. But we had no significant effect of three variables to FR behavior. Next it was indicated
that the Compassion Fatigue predicts the FR behavior significantly. Step 3, we added the third factor,
Compassion Satisfaction. We did not find significant effect in this research. So the author constructed the
linear multiple regression equation (b) as follows;
FR behavior = 0.550 × Compassion Fatigue + (-0.007 × Compassion Satisfaction) + 32.8756
……………………. (b)
The hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between four factors of
Compassion Fatigue and FR behavior as follows;
FR behavior =0.381 × Secondary Traumatic Stress + 1.167×PTSD
+ (-0.039×Denial Feeling) + 0.157 × Trauma Experience + 31.356
……………………. (c)
These were first challenge to construct the numerical formula, FR behavior and Compassion Fatigue /
Satisfaction.
A hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between four factors of
Compassion Fatigue and FR behavior. PTSD significantly affected FR behavior. PTSD is an important
factor in four factors of Compassion Fatigue.
Fujioka(2005) described that compassion fatigue has two kinds, one is stress-based compassion fatigue
and the other is trauma-based compassion fatigue. It is thought that FR behavior is connected with stress-
based compassion fatigue.
Table 7 displays the results of Correlation between four factors of Compassion Fatigue and the
three factors of FR behavior among care givers in child welfare facility. Frightened behavior in FR
behavior has significant correlation with Secondary Traumatic Stress, PTSD, denial feeling, trauma
experience. Frightened behavior in FR behavior seems to be connected to a care provider’s trauma or
scar in childhood. It is necessary for a care provider to confront his or her own trauma experience with a
supervisor .
Frightening behavior in FR behavior has significant correlation with only PTSD in Compassion
Fatigue. Frightening behaviors are inadequate for care providers, but it is possible to deal with PTSD
54
before it leads to severe FR behavior, if care givers can notice beforehand. Depersonalized behavior in
FR behavior check lists have significant correlation with Dissociation behavior, PTSD. Depersonalized
behavior in FR behavior
Depersonalized behavior can be dealt with before it leads to severe FR behavior. Dissociation behavior
has significant correlation with all four factors in Compassion Fatigue (Secondary Traumatic Stress,
PTSD, Denial feeling, Trauma experience). In this study we confirmed the relation between Dissociation
and Compassion Fatigue. It could be determined that Fatigue and Dissociation were related closely, just as
Pierre Janet already described in 19 century.
In addition, we found that three parts of concepts of FR behavior connect with each part of Compassion
Fatigue. Especially Frightened behavior in FR behavior connect with all aspects of Compassion Fatigue.
And Frightening Behavior has significant correlation only with PTSD in Compassion Fatigue. It could be
ascertained that FR behavior and Compassion Fatigue are closely related.
Table 8 displays the results of Correlation between four factors of Compassion Satisfaction and the
three factors of FR behavior among care givers in child
welfare facility. Frightened behavior in FR behavior has significant negative(-) correlation with
satisfaction as nature of care workers . Satisfaction as nature of care workers will be developed by training,
workshop and supervision. For Protecting FR behavior by care workers we have to construct career
development system in Child welfare facility. Monitoring the nature of care workers is very important for
support to care workers.
Frightening behavior and Depersonalized behavior in FR behavior have no significant correlation with
four factors in Compassion Satisfaction. Total FR Behavior have the significant negative(-) correlation
with satisfaction in relations with a child or children. Satisfaction in relations with a child or children
is main part of compassion Satisfaction with children. Dissociation Behavior has significant negative(-)
correlation with Total Compassion Satisfaction, especially satisfaction in relations with a child or children
and satisfaction as nature of care workers. Awareness and talking about satisfaction in relations with a
child or children and satisfaction as nature of care workers have the role of protection from consequences
of dissociation in the field of facility.
Table 9 displays the results of Multiple regression analysis prediction. Frightened behavior in
FR behavior has significant correlation with Secondary Traumatic Stress or compassion fatigue
accumulated as a substitution-related trauma. And Frightened behavior has low correlation with Denial
Feeling(significantly tendency; p=0.068). Frightened behavior will be connected to a care giver’s own
trauma, so Secondary Traumatic Stress and denial feeling will be activated in a care giver when contacting
with abused children. Both Criterion Variable, Frightening Behavior and Depersonalized Behavior have
the significant correlation with PTSD-like Compassion Fatigue. For protection of burnout and inadequate
behavior to children, it will be very important to be aware of and to treat PTSD-like symptoms among
care givers and supervisors.
55
Compassion Fatigue of Trauma Dominance and Compassion Fatigue of Stress Dominance
Fujioka(2005) described that compassion fatigue has two types of, Trauma-dominance Compassion
Fatigue(TDCF) and Stress- dominance Compassion Fatigue(SDCF). In Stress- dominant Compassion
Fatigue, the trauma may be deeply and profoundly hidden in the mind, and stress would be felt in a
situation of work. I think Trauma-dominance Compassion Fatigue would be easy to cause a stronger
dissociation tendency, and the degree of the burnout tendency would differ by the state of a child, how to
live in family and community and how to live in the past, especially in childhood. Deep sadness (grief,
sorrow, lament) and profound trauma will draw out compassion fatigue for a care giver or a care provider
who continues to be exposed to Trauma-dominance Compassion Fatigue and experiences dissociation
unconsciously under those situations. Children who had a severe trauma will draw compassion fatigue
of trauma dominance of a care provider easily. I think that under these helping situations with abused
or traumatized or neglected clients(children or elderly people or handicapped people), compassion
fatigue would be easy to connect to severe burnout situation. In this study we found dissociation
tendency is connected with all four factors in Compassion Fatigue (Secondary Traumatic Stress, PTSD,
Denial tendency, Trauma experience). I have to emphasize that dissociation tendency is a key concept
of Compassion Fatigue. P. Janet already pointed out the relationship between traumatic memory and
psychological fatigue in the latter part of 19 century or early 20 century. The author discussed this
point through compassion fatigue and dissociation in child welfare facilities. In other words, when care
providers are exposed to compassion fatigue, particularly secondary wound-related stress, their own
trauma experience may be drawn out. And care providers must be exposed to trauma experiences of
children doubly more while they are exposed to their own trauma experience. This is Trauma- dominance
Compassion Fatigue.
Further tasks in these area
Fujioka(2010) described four tasks of support programs as follows. 1, Necessity of enhancing
investigations in other child welfare facilities. 2, Continuity of investigations. 3, Necessity of construction
of individually-related examination about Compassion fatigue/Satisfaction and FR behavior or Clinical
Attachment Approach. 4, Necessity of construction of the Academic Domain on Support for Care
Giver or other professionals for users and clients.
The author emphasized in this study that it is necessary to investigate the relationship of professional
approach to clients with Compassion Fatigue and satisfaction. Perhaps it is very important for the
protection of burnout or inadequate behavior in care providers and social workers to examine these
subjects on Compassion fatigue/Satisfaction.
ReferencesAbrams,K.Y., Rifkin,A.& Hesse,F. 2006. Examining the role of parental frightened/frightening subtypes in predicting
disorganized attachment within a brief observational procedure. Development and Psychopathology, 18,345-361.
Boscarles, J.A., R.Figley and Richard E. Adams 2004. Compassion Fatigue following the September 11 Terrorist Attacks:
A study of Secondary trauma among New York
Bowlby, J. 1969. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1 New York: Basic Books.
56
Cherniss, C. 1980. Professional Burnout in Human Service Organization. Praeger, New York.
Figley, C. R. 1982. Traumatization and comfort : Close relationships may be hazardous to your health. Keynote address for
Families and Close Relationships : Individuals in Social Interaction, Conference at Texas Tech University, Lubbock,
TX.
Figley, C. R. 1985. Trauma and its wake: Study and treatment of PTSD. Newyork:Brunner /Mazel.
Figley, C. R. 1989. Helping traumatized families. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass
Figley, C. R. (Ed.) 1995. Compassion fatigue : Coping with secondary traumatic stress disorder in those who treat
traumatized. Brunner/Mazel : New York
Figley, C. R. (Ed.) 1998. Burnout in Families : The Systemic Costs of Caring. CRC Press : New York.
Figley, C. R. 1999. Compassion Fatigue : Toward a New Understanding of the Costs of Caring. In B. H. Stamm (Ed.)
Secondary Traumatic Stress. Lutherville, MD : Sidran Press.
Figley, C. R. (Ed.) 2002. Treating Compassion Fatigue . Brunner-Routledge : New York. p107-119.
Figley, C. R. 2006. Lectures on Compassion Fatigue at the Seminar for Social Workers, Medical Doctors and Marriage,
Couple Counselors in Florida.
Figley, C. R. 2007. Private discussion at Florida State University (2007/02/24)
Figley, C. R. & Stamm, B. H/ 1996. Review of the Compassion Fatigue Self-Test. In B. H. Stamm (Ed.), Measurement of
stress, trauma, and adaptation. Lutherville, MD : Sidran Press.
Freudenberger, H. J. 1974. Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues, 30, 159-165.
Freudenberger, H. J. 1975. Staff burnout syndrome in alternative institutions. Psychotherapy, 12 (1), 73-82.
Freudenberger, H. J. 1977. Burn-out: Occupation hazard of the child care worker. Child Care Quarterly, 6(2), 90-99.
Freudenberger, H. J. 1986. The issues of staff burnout in therapeutic communities. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 18(2),
247-251.
Fujioka, T. 2004. Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress in Care Workers and Case Managers Working in Welfare
Facilities. Annual Report of Japan College of Social Work, Vol.40. 13-29. (In Japanese with English summary)
Fujioka, T. 2005. Secondary Traumatic Stress and Dissociation in Care Workers, Case Managers and Social Workers
Working in Welfare Facilities and Agents.
Study Report of Japan College of Social Work, Vol.52, 149-163. (In Japanese with English summary)
Fujioka, T. 2006a. Compassion Fatigue and Dissociation -Through The Clinical Approaches by Pierre Janet- Journal of
Social Policy and Social Work Vol.10. 23-33. (in English)
Fujioka, T. 2006b. Secondary Traumatic Stress (Compassion Fatigue), Burnout and Compassion Satisfaction in Care
Workers, Case Managers and Social Workers Working in Welfare Facilities and Agents. Study Report of Japan
College of Social Work, Vol.53. 27-52. (In Japanese with English summary)
Fujioka, T. 2007. On the Structure of Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion fatigue in Child welfare facilities. Study
Report of Japan College of Social Work, Vol.54, 5-116. (In Japanese with English summary)
Fujioka, T. 2008. Compassion Fatigue in Japan. Journal of Social Policy and Social Work Vol.12 5-13. (in English)
Fujioka, T. 2010. On the Construction of Support Program for Care Givers in Child Welfare Facilities on the Standpoint of
Compassion Fatigue. Study Report of Japan College of Social Work . Vol.57, (in Japanese with English abstract ) (in
print)
Fukushima, M. 2010. Compassion Fatigue and Empathy among Victim Support Workers- With Use of Questionnaire
Study-. Study Report of Japan Women’s University. Vol. 16, 85-100. (in Japanese with English abstract )
Hochschild, A, R. 1983. The managed heart. Berkeley : University of California Press.
Janet, P. 1889. L'automatisme psychologique. Paris: Felix Alcan.
Reprint: Societe Pierre Janet, Paris, 1973.
Janet, P. 1897. L'influence somnambulique et le besoin de direction. Revue Philosophique, 43, I, 113-143. Also in P. Janet
57
(1898a), Névroses et idées fixes, Vol. 1 (pp. 423-484). Paris: Félix Alcan. (Reprint: Société Pierre Janet, Paris, 1990.)
Janet, P. 1923. La médecine psychologique. Paris, Flammarion.
Janet, P. 1925. Psychological Healing, vols 1,2. New York, Macmillan.
(original publication: Les medications psychologiques,vols 1-3. Paris, Felix Alcan, 1919).
Joinson, C. 1992 .Coping with compassion fatigue. Nursing, 22(4), 116-218.
Kon,Y.& Kikuchi,A 2007. An Attempt to Construct a Scale of Compassion Fatigue and Its Related Affects. Study Report
of Department of Social Work, Iwate Prefectural University. Vol.9, 23-29. (in Japanese with English abstract )
Kubo M. 2004. The Psychology of Burnout. Science Publishing Co. (In Japanese)
Main, M., & E. Hesse 1996. Disorganized and disorientation in infancy Strange Situation behavior. Phenotypic
resembalance to dissociative states. In l.Michelson and W. Ray (Eds.) Handbook of dissociation: theoretical,
empirical, and clinical perspectives. New York, Plenum Press, 107-138.
Masuda,R. 2006. Discriminant validity and item context of Normal Dissociation Scale-short form- Correlation with
splitting-projection and depersonalization/derealisation- Kyushu University Psychological Research. Vol.7 117-123.
Maslach, C. 1976. Burn-out. Human behavior, 5(9), 16-22.
Maslach, C. and Jackson, S.E. 1981 The Measurement of Experienced Burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2: 99-
113.
Nishi, M. & Nojima,K. 2002. STS in the shelter staff. Kyushu University Psychological Reseach. Vol.3,157-165.( in
Japanese with English abstract)
Orlans, M. & Levy, T. M. 2006. Healing Parents-Helping Wounded Children Learn to Trust & Love. Child Welfare
League of America, Inc. ; Washington.
Pearlman, L. A. 1999. Self-Care for Trauma Therapists : Ameliorating Vicarious Traumatized. In B. H. Stamm(Ed.)
Secondary Traumatic Stress. Lutherville, MD : Sidran Press.
Pearlman, B.& Hartman,E.A. 1982. Burnout:Summary and future research. Human Relations,35,283-305
Pines, A. M., Aronson,E. 1988. Career Burnout:Cause and Cures(2nd ed). Free Press,New York.
Pines, A. M., Aronson, E. & Kafry, D. 1981. Burnout: From tedium to personal growth. New York: Free Press.
Pines, A. & Maslach,C. 1980. Combating staff burnout in child care centers: A case study. Child care quarterly ,9,5-16.
Shimizu T., Tanabe T., and Nishio Y. (Eds), 2002. Burnout in Social Worker- the actual state and the treatment. Chuouhouki
Publishing Co. (In Japanese)
Shinozaki, T. 2007. Factors related to compassion fatigue among Children’s Home staff members. Child Abuse and
Neglect. Vol.9, No.2 . 246-255. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Stamm, B. H. (Ed.) 1999. Secondary Traumatic Stress : Self-Care Issues for Clinicians, Researchers, &Educators.
Lutherville, MD : Sidran Press.
Stamm, B. H. 2002. Measuring compassion satisfaction as well as fatigue: Developmental
history of the Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Test. In C. R. Figley (Ed.), Treating compassion fatigue (pp. 107–119).
New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Stamm, B. H. 2003. Professional Quality of Life: Compassion Fatigue and
Satisfaction Subscales, R-(Pro-QOL) http://www.isu.edu/~bhstamm (2005/2/25)
Stebnicki, M. A. 2010. Empathy Fatigue:Healing the Mind, Body, and Spirit of Professional Counseloors. Springer Pub.
Co.
59
A Study of Methods of Model Formulation and Assessment to Construct Models of Effective Program Implementation Based on a Nationwide Survey of Support Providers Based on Implementation of Critical Ingredients of an Employment Transition Support Program for Persons with Disabilities and Analysis of Factors Governing that Implementation
NORIYASU KOSAZA IWAO OSHIMA
HISAO SATO
【Abstract】
The purpose of this study is to examine model formulation and assessment approaches in order to construct an effective model of program implementation using results of a nationwide survey of support providers. This study examined the development of methods of formulating and assessing effective models of program implementation based on the example of the employment transition support program for persons with disabilities pursuant to the Services and Support for Persons with Disabilities Act.
Measurement of its performance primarily via the employment transition rate also demonstrated the effectiveness of program implementation in accordance with this model. And results indicated that the Nationwide Survey of Support Providers is an effective approach to construction of an effective model of program implementation. Though there are some points that should be examined, this approach using results of a nationwide survey of support providers is proven to be effective.
I. Introduction
Overall, Japanese programs to provide social welfare services tend to involve support systems
independently established by individual support providers. Thus, forms and methods of support that
are considered effective are common among many of the parties concerned, and establishment of
methodologies to formulate more effective program models is delayed. In such circumstances, avenues
to formulate better methods of providing support based on findings from sites of program implementation
are blocked, and providers are not required to ensure the quality of services. Often, the forms of support
60
provided by a provider cannot be adequately ascertained from outside the provider. Moreover, program
users have difficulty selecting critical services.
Varied entities operate in the field of social welfare, making construction of an effective model of
program implementation difficult. An effective model of program implementation must be formulated in
accordance with varying levels of implementation. However, many ingredients are known to be common
to critical forms of support and the way they are organized, i.e. the heart of a program1). Use of findings
from sites of program implementation and collaboration between program implementers and researchers
are essential to the construction of an effective model of program implementation2).
Exchange of information by program implementers and researchers is needed to develop a more
effective model of program implementation. An effective model of program implementation created in
collaboration with program implementers should be adjusted and revised in accordance with conditions at
various sites of program implementation.
This study sought to examine model formulation and assessment approaches in order to construct an
effective model of program implementation using results of a nationwide survey of support providers.
Specifically, this study examines the example of the employment transition support program for persons
with disabilities introduced pursuant to the Services and Support for Persons with Disabilities Act. This
study seeks to clarify the implementation of critical program ingredients based on results of a survey of
support providers nationwide, it seeks to analyze factors governing the implementation of those program
ingredients, and it seeks to examine methods of formulating and assessing effective program models as
would be feasible in light of the provision of welfare services in Japan.
II. Methods
1. Selection of survey participantsThis study examines the development of methods of formulating and assessing effective models
of program implementation based on the example of the employment transition support program for
persons with disabilities pursuant to the Services and Support for Persons with Disabilities Act. A
self-administered nationwide survey (denoted here as the Nationwide Survey of Support Providers)
of providers of employment transition support (denoted here as Support Providers) for persons with
disabilities was conducted by mail. This employment transition support program was selected for several
reasons, including the substantial need for the program on the part of program users, the fact that the
program is relatively new since it was created under the Services and Support for Persons with Disabilities
Act, the fact that the program has a usage deadline, and the fact that measurements of its performance
have not been made adequately available.
2. Survey content and structure of the survey formThis study consisted of 2 surveys. The first was a basic survey that primarily sought to determine basic
information about Support Providers. The second was a survey on implementation of critical program
ingredients (denoted here as the Survey on Implementation of Critical Ingredients or Implementation
61
Survey) that consisted of indices to measure critical program ingredients in an effective model of program
implementation constructed on the basis of theories of program assessment and studies to qualitatively
assess programs.
The basic survey sought to ascertain the basic status of the support provider, e.g. year the program
started, user capacity, the number of persons with disabilities who were entering the workforce, the
number of employees, and the provider’s orientation, indices related to program effectiveness, and the
provider’s efforts at implementing the program.
The Survey on Implementation of Critical Ingredients sought to ascertain the implementation of
Critical Program Ingredients that comprised an effective model of program implementation3). An
effective model of this program will be constructed through adjustments to the program’s structure based
on theories of program assessment, observing sites of program implementation and conducting studies,
like those involving interviews, to qualitatively assess the program, and exchanges of opinions among
program implementers and researchers; thus, a model will be formulated with the consensus of program
implementers and researchers4). There are 169 critical ingredients that fall under 23 items. This study
measured the adherence of a model created by our research group by determining the implementation of
ingredients falling under each item. These items were classified into 5 domains depending on their content
(Table 1). The Implementation Survey rated each item on a 4-point scale. Ingredients that represented
specific methods of support were checked off if applicable. Based on survey results, scale scores were
from 4 points, indicating extensive implementation, to 1 point, indicating minimal implementation. This
Likert scale provided a fidelity scale to measure model adherence. When the scale score for a domain is
indicated, this indicates the sum of the scale scores for each item divided by the number of items. Thus,
all of the scale scores for each domain and each item range from 1 to 4 points.
Characteristics of each domain were as follows. Domain A indicated The Organization Providing
Services and consisted primarily of aspects like the form of organization implementing the program,
its system of contacts, and fostering of staff members. Domain B indicated the Provision of Services
to Program Participants and consisted of acceptance criteria and publicity efforts. Domain C indicated
Support Processes from the Start of Program Use to the Formulation of an Employment Transition
Support Plan and consisted of activities ranging from forming relationships at the start of program use to
drafting of a support plan. Domain D indicated Support Processes Facilitating Employment Transition
and consisted primarily of a wide range of support efforts like acquiring the skills to find employment,
assessment of the individual’s current status, and job placement. Domain E indicated Processes Required
in Support of Continuous Employment and consisted of construction of support systems and required
actions with a focus on conditions after entry into the workforce. Rather than merely indicating support
based on actual laws and ordinances, these domains encompassed a broader range of support services and
how long they were provided. This was done in order to formulate a model of a program that would help
users to enjoy a stable career and ultimately enjoy a better quality of life. In addition, the model was the
result of collaboration between program implementers and researchers and items included were deemed
valid.
62
Table 1 Critical Ingredients of the employment transition support program
Domain name・Item name No. ingredientsA The Organization Providing Services
A1 Support provided by employment support staff
A2 Roles and responsibilities of employment support staff
A3 Team approach to employment support
A4 Coordination with living support services and healthcare facilities
A5 Function of coordinators (service administrators/managers)
A6 Fostering and supervising staff members
9
6
5
6
16
7B Provision of Services to Program Participants
B1 Acceptance of individuals who wish to receive employment transition support with no
exclusion criteria
B2 Active publicity efforts to identify and retain users
7
10
C Support Processes from the Start of Program Use to the Formulation of an Employment Transition
Support Plan
C1 Sharing of employment goals, motivation, and partnering
C2 Providing assessment predicated on the users’ wishes in a realistic employment environment
C3 Drafting an employment transition support plan in order to promptly satisfy the desire to
work
5
6
4
D Support Processes Facilitating Employment Transition
D1 Acquiring the skills needed to find employment
D2 Assessment in environments similar to actual workplaces
D2-1 Assessment when the individual primarily wishes to work within the facility
D2-2 Assessment when the individual primarily wishes to work outside the facility
D3 Maintaining and improving the individual’s motivation to enter the workforce
D4 Use of apprenticeships and trial employment at potential employers
D5 Actively and routinely cultivating cooperative support providers in accordance with
individual needs
D6 Active job placement with the goal of open employment
D7 Hunting for a variety of jobs in accordance with the individual’s inclinations
D8 Efforts to promptly facilitate entry into the workplace in accordance with the individual’s
wishes
9
-
6
7
8
7
7
7
7
6
E Processes Required in Support of Continuous Employment
E1 Providing assistance with settling in and continued support after entry into the workforce
E2 Support for individuals who wish to leave or transfer jobs
E3 Continued support for businesses
E4 Team approach to provide comprehensive employment and living support
5
6
4
9
Source: Koukanoagaru-Syurouikoushien-Program-no-Arikata-kenkyukai (2009)
3. Conduct of a Nationwide Survey of Support Providers (1) Survey period
This survey was conducted from March-July 2009.
63
(2) Survey participants
Potential survey participants were all Support Providers nationwide. Prefectural and city governments
were asked about the actual number of those providers in December 2008. In accordance with their
responses, survey forms were mailed to 1,213 Support Providers.
(3) Number of responses and response rate
Responses were received from 738 Support Providers, indicating a response rate of 60.8%. Of the
responses, valid responses were received from 727 Support Providers, indicating a response rate of 59.9%.
4. Ethical considerationsA written description clearly explaining the purposes of this research, a summary of the study, and how
responses would be handled was enclosed with the survey form. In addition, participants were allowed
to respond anonymously to the survey form, and survey forms were coded to protect anonymity. Both
survey forms were combined when collected and then coded and analyzed. With regard to comments,
slight changes were made to proper names and the like so that the names of Support Providers could not
be identified, but considerations were made to leave passages intact.
III. Survey results
1. Basic surveyThe primary results from the survey forms were previously published by Kosaza, Oshima, Kouda et al.
(2010). The following describes only significant survey results.
The most prevalent major disability of users was a mental disability; such users were accepted by
81.8% of all Support Providers. In addition, 44.8% of Support Providers accepted users with a mental
illness and 31.5% of Support Providers accepted users with a physical disability.
The most prevalent user capacity was fewer than 6 users, according to responses from 181 Support
Providers. Forty-seven point eight percent of Support Providers had a user capacity of 10 or fewer users,
revealing that most Support Providers were relatively small-scale. That said, other programs were often
offered by the same entity, and only 15 Support Providers responded that they offered no programs besides
this program. Over half of the other programs offered by the same entity were a Type B (non-contracted
work) continuous employment support program (70.3%) or a group home/total care facility (54.1%).
Programs that the Study Group considered critical were an employment and living support center program
for persons with disabilities, offered by 13.3% of providers, and a job coaching program, offered by 19.1%
of providers.
In addition, Support Providers most often (65.2%) had users using the program for a duration of longer
than a year and a half. This is close to the cap on the length of time programs can be used and indicates
that this method of support must be reconsidered.
From April to December 2008, 1,391 persons with disabilities entered the workforce. The employment
transition rate during this period was 12.1%; calculated annually, this rate would be 16.1%. This result is
64
higher than the 14.7% in the latest study published by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare.
Table 2 Number of Support Providers by user capacity
User capacity No. of Support Providers (%)Fewer than 6 users
7-10
11-15
16-20
21-25
26-30
31 or more users
181(26.0)
152(21.8)
118(16.9)
103(14.8)
36(5.2)
42(6.0)
65(9.3)
Source: Kosaza, Oshima, Kouda et al. (2010)
Table 3 Average duration of program usage by users
Average duration of usage No. of Support Provider (%)Under 1 month
Up to 3 months
Up to half a year
Up to a year
Up to a year and a half
Longer than a year and a half
6(0.9)
8(1.3)
16(2.5)
89(14.0)
102(16.1)
414(65.2)
Source: Kosaza, Oshima, Kouda et al. (2010)
Table 4 Breakdown of major disabilities of program users
Type of disability No. of Support Providers (%)Physical disability
Mental disability
Mental illness
Developmental disability
Refractory illness
No specific disability
229 (31.5)
595 (81.8)
326 (44.8)
113 (15.5)
18 (2.5)
9 (1.2)
Note) Multiple responses were allowed, so the number of support providers responding exceeds the total number of 727
Support Providers
Source: Kosaza, Oshima, Kouda et al. (2010)
65
Table 5 Programs offered by the same entity
Program name No. of Support ProvidersEmployment and living support center for persons with disabilities
Job coaching
Businesses that encourage the hiring of persons with severe disabilities
Job acclimatization training system
Contracted [vocational] training program
Counseling and support program*
Type A (contracted work) continuous employment support program*
Type B (non-contracted work) continuous employment support program*
Independence training program*
Group home/Total care facility*
Regional activities support program*
In-home care*
Psychiatric hospitals and clinics
Other
97
139
9
14
47
243
82
511
207
393
166
148
16
171
Note) An asterisk (*) indicates services pursuant to the Services and Support for Persons with Disabilities Act. Multiple
responses were allowed.
Source: Kosaza, Oshima, Kouda et al. (2010)
2. Survey on Implementation of Critical Program IngredientsThe level of implementation of Critical Program Ingredients falling under 23 items from A1 to E4 was
ascertained. That said, D2 featured a question with responses regarding assessment within the facility and
assessment outside the facility, so results were tallied for 24 items.
By domain, the average scale scores on the fidelity scale are as shown in Table 6. Roughly half of the
scores for Domains A to C adhered to the model while those for Domains D and E tended to be somewhat
lower.
Table 6 Average scale scores on the fidelity scale by domain
Freq. Scale avg. (Item avg.) SDDomain A
Domain B
Domain C
Domain D
Domain E
All
671
684
681
602
666
569
2.45
2.57
2.58
2.14
2.18
2.33
.652
.726
.729
.646
.825
.589
The average scale scores on the fidelity scale were then determined by item. Specific figures are as
shown in Table 7; variations in average scale scores were noted even in the same domain. Below, scale
scores for the top items and bottom items in each domain were compared.
Domain A included items among the top 5 items and the bottom 5 items, with a difference between the
two of 0.81 points. In Domain B, both items had relatively high scores with a difference of 0.32 points.
66
Items in Domain C also had relatively high scores with a difference of 0.39 points. In Domain D, items
D21 and D7 had relatively high scores but overall most items had low scores with a difference of 0.56
points. Items in Domain E had relatively low scores overall with a difference of 0.49 points.
In addition, about 40% of Support Providers had no persons with disabilities who were entering the
workforce during the survey period, so scores for some items in Domain D, which included employment
transition performance, and scores for items in Domain E, which primarily involved support after entry
into the workforce, were low overall. However, systems for support after entry into the workforce should
be provided once users have registered to receive support, so efforts by Support Providers with no persons
with disabilities who were entering the workforce at the time of the study were also assessed.
Table 7 Average scale scores on the fidelity scale by item
Item Freq. Avg. SD Item Freq. Avg. SD
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
697
692
693
694
683
684
2.89
2.68
2.29
2.08
2.76
2.29
.825
.867
.970
.893
.845
.903
D21
D22
D3
D4
D5
D6
D7
D8
629
632
637
636
635
637
636
637
2.46
2.13
2.14
1.92
2.15
2.04
2.48
1.80
.926
.950
.842
.889
.864
.849
.974
.797
B1
B2
686
685
2.73
2.41
.897
.868
C1
C2
C3
686
686
682
2.76
2.60
2.37
.809
.838
.919
E1
E2
E3
E4
682
674
678
681
2.28
2.29
2.23
1.96
1.086
1.064
.996
.851D1 686 2.20 .892
3. Fidelity scale scores by domain in terms of Support Providers’ basic attributesIndicators of the scale of the Support Provider, the effects of user capacity, the effects of the average
duration of program usage, and the effects of parallel programs were determined. That said, the effects of
different disabilities have been omitted here since many of the Support Providers accepted persons with
multiple disabilities. In addition, there were no differences in the fidelity scale scores by domain for the
number of persons with disabilities who were entering the workforce and the employment transition rate.
The number of persons with disabilities who were entering the workforce and the employment transition
rate served as indices of performance and are indicated in the Discussion.
(1) The effects of user capacity
Assignment of personnel to the program is dictated by laws and ordinances, so user capacity can also
affect the number of staff members assigned. The number of users per staff member may be the same,
but Support Providers with a small user capacity are likely to have a small number of total staff members.
A reduction in the total number of staff members carries the drawback of precluding specialization in
various support efforts and publicity efforts. In actuality, many Support Providers do not provide adequate
services under current criteria for staff assignment.
67
Fig. 1 Average scale scores on the fidelity scale by user capacity
2.42
2.30
2.23
2.67
2.64
2.55
2.23
2.06
2.06
2.49
2.50
2.44
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
All
Domain E
Domain D
Domain C
Domain B
Domain A
10 individuals or fewer
11 individuals or more
As confirmed by actual data, average scale scores for Support Providers with a user capacity of 10
individuals or fewer were lower than those of Support Providers with a user capacity of 11 individuals
or more in all domains (Fig. 1). The difference in Domain E, which involves services after entry into the
workforce, in particular was marked.
(2) The effects of the average duration of program usage
A short duration of program usage indicates that users have soon developed the desire to work.
Thus, Support Providers with a short duration of program usage would be more effective at program
implementation.
Comparing actual scale scores indicated that Support Providers with a short average duration of
program usage had high scale scores in all domains (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 Average scale scores on the fidelity scale by duration of usage
2.26
2.09
2.05
2.53
2.55
2.45
2.53
2.47
2.41
2.73
2.66
2.64
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
All
Domain E
Domain D
Domain C
Domain B
Domain A
Shorter than 1.5 yrs
Longer than 1.5 yrs
68
(3) The effects of parallel programs
Most of the Support Providers studied offered some form of parallel program. The 4 most prevalent
of these programs were: a Type B (non-contracted work) continuous employment support program, a
counseling and support program that can serve as a point of contact for users, an employment and living
support center for persons with disabilities that can serve as a local base for services, and a job coaching
program, which is considered to be a critical form of support after entry into the workforce. The scale
scores in individual domains were compared for these 4 programs.
When a Type B (non-contracted work) continuous employment support program is offered as a parallel
program, the scale score was lower than when it was not offered in parallel. In regard to the other 3
programs, Support Providers with parallel programs had higher scale scores.
The average scale scores were compared for Support Providers with parallel programs. A Type B (non-
contracted work) continuous employment support program resulted in the lowest scale scores in all of the
domains. A counseling and support program resulted in a relatively high scale score in Domain B, which
includes publicity efforts and tended to result in somewhat higher scores in other domains as well. In
addition, an employment and living support center program for persons with disabilities resulted in the
highest score in Domain A, which indicates The Organization Providing Services, and resulted in rather
high scale scores in other domains as well. A job coaching program resulted in high scale scores overall.
It resulted in higher scale scores in Domains C, D, and E, which are directly affected by support, than did
other parallel programs (Fig. 3).
These results indicate that programs offered in parallel by the same entity also affect the employment
transition support program for persons with disabilities.
Fig. 3 Average scale scores on the fidelity scale in terms of parallel programs
2.31
2.16
2.13
2.55
2.54
2.48
2.39
2.30
2.22
2.63
2.64
2.57
2.46
2.35
2.32
2.73
2.65
2.69
2.52
2.48
2.36
2.75
2.61
2.66
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
All
Domain E
Domain D
Domain C
Domain B
Domain A
Job coaching program
Employment and living support center program for persons with disabilities
Counseling and support program
Type B continuous employment support program for persons with disabilities
69
IV. Discussion
1. Validity of an effective model of program implementationAn effective model of program implementation constructed through collaboration between program
implementers and researchers has a certain degree of validity because of the way in which it was
established. In addition, measurement of its performance primarily via the employment transition rate
also demonstrated the effectiveness of program implementation in accordance with this model.
Specifically, Support Providers with an annually calculated employment transition rate during the
survey period of over 20% had average scale scores substantially exceeded those of Support Providers
with no persons with disabilities who were entering the workforce from April-December 2008. This was
true in Domain E, which primarily involved support after entry into the workforce, and similar trends were
noted in all of the domains, assuring the validity of this effective model of program implementation (Fig. 4).
In addition, Support Providers with a relatively short duration of program usage had high average scale
scores for all items, so this effective model of program implementation can be deemed to be consistent
with the original goals of the program in the sense of achieving entry into the workforce, which is what
users want (Fig. 2).
Thus, the validity of this effective model of program implementation and its critical ingredients is
assured.
Fig. 4 Average scale scores on the fidelity scale by the employment transition rate
2.08
1.73
1.87
2.40
2.47
2.34
2.56
2.61
2.42
2.78
2.65
2.68
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
All
Domain E
Domain D
Domain C
Domain B
Domain A
20% or higher
none
2. Improvement in average scores on the fidelity scaleResults of this study have indicated the validity of this effective model of program implementation with
regard to the employment transition support program for persons with disabilities. Thus, improvements
70
in average scores on the fidelity scale must be examined based on results of other studies. Having
specifically examined the bottom 5 items in terms of average scale scores, the current work will examine
improvements in the average scale scores for each domain.
Items with low average scale scores were items D8, D4, E4, D6, and A4. Items D8 and D4 can be
classified as items directly related to support with an eye towards entry into the workforce while items
E4, D6, and A4 can be classified as items required for liaison with other organizations, like obtaining
workplace information.
Item D8 asked about the results of employment transition support, and this item is likely to be
improved as a result of a review of support systems overall. Item D4 involved apprenticeships and trial
employment, so this item will be readily affected by changes in the employment transition rate. Thus,
program orientation must be reviewed from a long-term perspective. Actual survey results also indicated
that about 40% of Support Providers had no persons with disabilities who were entering the workforce,
and items D8 and D4 corroborate this finding.
Items E4, D6, and A4 will now be examined. Item E4 involved network-building to maintain quality
of life after one’s entry into the workforce and is an essential ingredient to a stable career. Responses
from Support Providers with no persons with disabilities who were entering the workforce from April-
December 2008 may have affected this item, but a network must be constructed prior to employment
transition. Item D6 indicated the difficulty of job placement. This item was affected by both the lack of
adequate network-building primarily in the form of Hello Work (public employment offices) and external
factors such as a lack of privately owned support providers to cultivate depending on the region. Item
A4 indicated that liaison with networks to sustain quality of life was lacking when programs had to
specialize in employment transition. Issues common to these 3 items were the lack of adequate sharing of
information and network-building in regions. As an example, information on job placement is often not
shared with other support providers offering the same program. In addition, small-scale support providers
lack the sheer number of staff members and are unable to allocate time to network-building. As a result,
information is likely to be concentrated in large-scale support providers and support providers offering
other programs in parallel. Personnel assignment criteria are based on laws and ordinances, and Support
Providers often are unable to make improvements themselves. These points were noted in the comments
and indicate the limitations of a model based on laws and ordinances.
An orientation towards improving average scale scores on the fidelity scale indicated the effectiveness
of parallel programs offered by the same entity. As an example, Support Providers that used a job
coaching program had average scale scores in Domains C to E that substantially exceeded the average. In
addition, a counseling and support program resulted in higher average scale scores for Domain B, which
involved publicity efforts and acceptance. Offering an employment and living support center program for
persons with disabilities (such centers are considered to have a wealth of information) in parallel led to
high scale scores for each item. Conversely, average scale scores tended to decrease when a Type B (non-
contracted work) continuous employment support program, which is not predicated on an employment
contract, was offered in parallel. The extent of a user’s disability and factors such as regional differences
must be taken into account, but a Type B (non-contracted work) continuous employment support program
71
cannot readily coexist with a program that has an employment transition to open employment as its goal.
Given these facts, construction of regional networks and sharing of information will lead to
improvements in average scale scores on the fidelity scale. In addition, parallel programs differ in
effectiveness depending on their nature but can be considered effective when predicated on employment
transition. Whether or not personnel assignment criteria as stipulated by laws and ordinances are
appropriate must also be reexamined.
3. Formulation and assessment approaches using the Nationwide Survey of Support Providers
This study used the Nationwide Survey of Support Providers to examine examples of model
formulation and assessment approaches based on the example of the employment transition support
program for persons with disabilities. This survey allowed the validity of an effective model of program
implementation to be ascertained and it allowed the current status of the aforementioned program to be
ascertained. In particular, this survey indicated that an effective model of program implementation will
help to improve the employment transition rate, which is a major issue with the program, and this survey
allowed the closer examination of program orientation with an eye towards specific improvements. As a
result of analyzing changes in average scores on the fidelity scale by individual efforts, the effects of those
efforts on program implementation can be measured. Thus, measuring a program’s effects using a fidelity
scale can also be used to verify models of effective implementation of other programs.
There were other anticipated benefits of conducting the Nationwide Survey of Support Providers.
These were that the Nationwide Survey of Support Providers allowed many program implementers to
determine an effective model of program implementation and that the survey provided an opportunity
for program implementers to reaffirm their own practices, e.g. pros and cons of the models of effective
implementation. Survey responses took some time but represented less of a burden to sites of program
implementation in comparison to observation of other sites of program implementation or participation
in training workshops. Thus, the survey was particularly effective for Support Providers with substantial
time constraints. Another major benefit was the ability to provide research results to Support Providers
throughout the country as a result of their completion of the survey form. The survey form featured a
number of research results, allowing the systematic provision of information. A benefit for researchers
was the fact that responses from numerous program implementers facilitated the obtaining of information
needed to restructure this effective model of program implementation. Program assessment requires
collaboration with program implementers, so increasing the exchange of information between program
implementers and researchers is crucial.
4. Topics for the futureAs indicated, methods of model formulation and assessment using the Nationwide Survey of Support
Providers are effective, but several issues remain at this point. First is the process by which an effective
model of program implementation is constructed. The effective model of program implementation
used in this study was originally devised based on theories of program assessment and has been revised
72
in conjunction with program implementers. This study began by using an effective model of program
implementation that had already been constructed, but cooperation by numerous program implementers
and researchers was needed to construct this model. The model had to be constructed using appropriate
techniques and studied repeatedly in order for the Nationwide Survey of Support Providers to be effective.
The current model represents the fruits of about 2 years of research and it proved effective. Second is
the difficulty of applying the model to programs that do not have a consistent format. As an example,
support systems and intended users may change when systems are run by prefectural and city governments
and municipalities even if programs are pursuant to the same laws and ordinances. This issue can be
overcome by adequately determining the evaluability of a program beforehand. Third is the difficulty of
applying the current technique to programs that are highly unique and rooted in the community. In such
instances, efforts in the community must be assessed by assembling case studies. Fourth, there was no
weighting by item or ingredient in the Implementation Survey conducted in this study; the inability to
emphasize particularly important forms of support is an issue worthy of note. However, the current survey
content has been improved through the development of a fidelity scale with weighting4). Fifth and last are
the budgetary constraints on all research. In some instances a survey of all support providers nationwide
would be difficult. Carefully scrutinizing prerequisites in terms of the region, program scale, and the like
will allow effective model formulation and assessment even on a small scale, and the same technique can
be used to resolve Issues 2 and 3.
V. Conclusion
Results of the Nationwide Survey of Support Providers conducted in this study were closely
examined, and methods of improving those results were studied. Results indicated that the Nationwide
Survey of Support Providers is an effective approach to construction of an effective model of program
implementation. In addition, the Nationwide Survey of Support Providers was also effective as a means
of promulgating or sharing research results. Some issues remain at this point, but all of these issues can
be remedied. Several have already been remedied and revised to take advantage of the lessons learned.
Collaboration with a greater number of program implementers is required to improve the accuracy of
this research. When there are various constraints, however, opportunities must be provided for program
implementers and researchers to disseminate information. The Nationwide Survey of Support Providers
was effective a means of accurately ascertaining current conditions at a range of sites of program
implementation and the survey will allow the construction of better program models.
This study was conducted with a 2008 research grant for joint research at the Japan College of Social
Work. In addition, an effective program model of the employment transition support program for persons
with disabilities was constructed by our research group on the basis of a Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science, and Technology Research Grant for Basic Research (A) (Topic No. 19203029) (Principal
Investigator: Iwao Oshima) and served as the basis for the Survey on Implementation of Critical Program
73
Ingredients in this study. The authors wish to express their thanks to all of the Support Providers who
responded to the surveys for their numerous notes and encouragement.
Note
1) Koukanoagaru-Syurouikoushien-Program-no-Arikata-kenkyukai(2009)
2) Oshima, I., et al. (2010). kosaza, N., Oshima, I., Domyo, A., et al. (2010)
3) Koukanoagaru-Syurouikoushien-Program-no-Arikata-kenkyukai(2009)
4) Koukanoagaru-Seishinsyogaisyataiinsokushienjigyo-Syurouikoushienjigyo-Monitoring-System-no-
kaihatsukenkyukai(2010)
ReferenceEnglish
Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E. (2003). A Working Life for People with Severe Mental Illness. New York: Oxford Press.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., Freeman, H.E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach 7th Edition. SAGE Publications.
Weiss, C. H., (1997). Evaluation -2nd ed. Prentice Hall.
Japanese
Fukui, S., (2010): 福井里江 (2010)「プログラム評価とは何か~リハビリテーション領域における展開可能性~」『リハビリテー
ション研究』No.145,日本障害者リハビリテーション協会,2-7.)
Kosaza, N., Oshima, I., Kouda, M., et al. (2010): 小佐々典靖,大島巌,香田真希子,新井山克徳,伊藤友里,高原優美子,佐藤久夫(2010)「障害者自立支
援法下における就労移行支援事業の現状と課題 ~全国実状把握調査結果から~」『リハビリテーション研究』No143,日本障害者リハビリテーション協会,25-30.)
kosaza, N., Oshima, I., Domyo, A., et al. (2010)
小佐々典靖,大島巌,道明章乃,贄川信幸,李載徳,廣瀬圭子,宇野耕司(2010)「既存の社会福祉事業を検証し効果的なプログラムに再構築する試み -精神障害者退院促進事業・障害者就労移行支援事業における取り組み-」『リハビリテーション研究』No.145,日本障害者リハビリテーション協会,20-25.)
Koukanoagaru-Seishinsyogaisyataiinsokushien-Program-no-Arikata-kenkyukai (2009): 効果のあがる精神障害者退院促進支援プログラムのあり方研究会 (2009)『効果のあがる精神障害者退院促進
支援プログラム実施のあり方に関する研究報告書~プログラム評価の方法論を用いた実施マニュアル作り~』平成 20年度日本社会事業大学学内共同研究報告書.
Koukanoagaru-Syurouikoushien -Program-no-Arikata-kenkyukai(2009): 効果のあがる就労移行支援プログラムのあり方研究会 (2009)「効果のあがる障害者就労移行支援プログラム
実施のあり方に関する研究報告書~プログラム評価の方法論を用いた実施マニュアル作り~」平成 20年度日本社会事業大学学内共同研究報告書.
Koukanoagaru-Seishinsyogaisyataiinsokushienjigyo-Syurouikoushienjigyo-Monitoring
-System-no-kaihatsukenkyukai (2010): 効果の上がる退院促進支援事業・就労移行支援事業モニタリングシステムの開発研究会 (2010)『効果の上が
る退院促進支援事業・就労移行支援事業モニタリングシステムの開発~効果的プログラム要素を活用した
74
フィデリティ尺度の作成~』平成 21年度日本社会事業大学学内共同研究報告書 .
Harada, I. (2010): 原田郁大(2010)『効果的な「若者自立塾」プログラム構築に向けた「効果的援助要素」の検討~全国 15事
業所訪問調査に基づく事例分析とその妥当性の検証~』日本社会事業大学大学院社会福祉学研究科修士論文 .)
Oshima, I., et al. (2010): 大島巌,小佐々典靖,贄川信幸,道明章乃 (2010)「科学的な実践家参画型プログラム評価の必要性と実践的
評価者・評価研究者育成の課題」『リハビリテーション研究』No.145,日本障害者リハビリテーション協会,32-37.
75
Contributors
Hirokazu MurakawaProfessor Japan College of Social Work
Takashi FujiokaProfessorJapan College of Social Work
Miyuki MurataLecturerKyoei University
Noriyasu Kosazaproject ResearcherJapan College of Social Work
Kaori YasumuraCoordinatorWork Support Center Shinjuku
Iwao OshimaProfessorJapan College of Social Work
Hisao SatoProfessorJapan College of Social Work
“Journal of Social Policy and Social Work”Edition Guidance
1. The document discussed in this guidance is named "Journal of Social Policy and Social Work", an English journal published by the Japan College of Social Work. It shall be published annually on or around March 1st.
2. Contributors to the "Journal of Social Policy and Social Work" shall be basically researchers and educators of the Japan College of Social Work and guest professors of the Social Work Research Institute. When co-authoring a paper, a researcher or education member shall be the primary author. Contribution of an overseas researcher may be requested if the administration committee admits the need.
3. Manuscripts used in the journal will be edited by the members selected from the administration committee of the Social Work Research Institute. Manuscripts will be recruited in April. The administration committee will determine the manuscript to be published. However, the format of the manuscript may be changed by the editors to conform to the total format.
4. A manuscript to be published in the journal should not have been published in any other journal.5. The categories of manuscripts to be published in the journal shall be limited as below: (1) Research paper (2) Research note (3) Other categories approved by the administration committee.6. A manuscript shall be written in accordance with the guidance and submitted to the office of the Social Work
Research Institute by the end of November.7. Basically, a manuscript may be rewritten once by the writer himself/herself.8. The published journal shall be distributed to the researchers and educators of the Japan College of Social Work
and relevant organizations and parties. Thirty off-prints of the article shall be given to the writer. However, if the writer requires more than 30 copies, he/she shall pay for the extra copies.
9. Copyright of the papers published in this Bulletin belongs to the respective authors, and that of the edited publication to the Japan College of Social Work. Without permission from the copyright holders, no papers may be copied or published elsewhere.With the agreement of the copyright holders, the Japan College of Social Work may post the papers on the internet.
10. This guidance shall be enforced from July 8, 1996. This guidance shall be enforced from Dec. 20, 2001. This guidance shall be enforced from Oct. 17 ,2002.
“Journal of Social Policy and Social Work”Guide for Submission of Manuscripts
1. Anyone who wishes to submit a paper to the Journal should enter the writer's name, paper title (in English), number of words planned for the manuscript, number of figures and tables and number of off-prints required and submit it to the office of the Social Work Research Institute.
2. Manuscripts should be typed using horizontal, double-space format. Manuscripts may also be submitted by floppy disk. In this case, the applied computer model and software program name should be clearly described.
3. The maximum number of words in a manuscript should be 6,000 per article, not including figures, tables, notes, and quoted documents.
The writer should also submit a list of key words and an abstract of about 250 words to accompany the manuscript.
4. Figures and tables should be submitted in attached sheets and the places where the figures and tables will be inserted must be indicated in the manuscript. Each figure or table will be counted as one page. No more than 10 pages will be allowed. If the number of pages of figures and tables greatly exceeds the given limit, the administration committee shall discuss the matter and may decide not to publish the paper.
5. Notes and quoted documents should be marked with numbers in small letters in the given position (each number to be enclosed with parentheses at the upper right of the description of the corresponding note or quoted document). They should be listed at the end of the manuscript.
6. Basically, the detailed rules of writing a manuscript are as shown below: 1)The paper shall be organized based on the following rules:
(1) Description of chapters: I, II, and III(2) Description of sections: 1, 2, and 3(3) Description of clauses: (1), (2), and (3)(4) Description of sub-clauses: ①, ②, and ③
2) The paper title, writer's name and department/division to which the writer belongs shall be clearly given on the front cover of the paper.
7. This guidance shall be enforced from July 8, 1996.