Upload
terah
View
52
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ITWG Topical Workshop. Management of Instrumentation Projects 19 to 21 May 2014 Rolf Lindner. From idea to realization of a HighEnergyPhysics experiment The LHCb experiment at the LHC . Capital Investment: 75 MCHF Y early operational budged~2.5MCHF. ~1000 members - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ITWG Topical WorkshopManagement of Instrumentation Projects
19 to 21 May 2014Rolf Lindner
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
From idea to realization of a HighEnergyPhysics experiment
The LHCb experiment at the LHC
~1000 members~700 authors16 countries64 institutes
Capital Investment: 75 MCHFYearly operational budged ~2.5MCHF
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
The LHCb experimentLHCb stands for Large Hadron Collider beauty experiment• Specialized in b physics; b hadrons are heavy particles containing a
bottom (also named beauty) quark
• Measuring parameters of CP violation.C for charge conjugation, which transforms a particle into its antiparticle, and P for parity, which creates the mirror image of a physical system. CP-symmetry -> laws of physics should be the same under C and then P transformation.
Such studies can help to explain the Matter-Antimatter asymmetry of the Universe
Search for ‘New Physics’
The experiment is located at the LHC at CERN, Geneva
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
How all started – first idea
In the late 1980’ CP violation in the B system became a very ‘hot’ topicA proposal was made to study this subject at the SPS Collider at CERN, 1989 *
Two concepts• very large B production in the forward direction• use silicon detectors inside the beam pipe, where the
colliding particles are kept
Proposal was not approved but a successful test was made.
*Peter Schlein at all
silicon detectors inside the beam
pipe
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Then, the LHC
In September 1989 the CERN DG, C. Rubbia, asked to organize a year’s long study, with ~250 participants, whether and how a 17 TeV pp collider in the existing LEP tunnel could compete with the SSC. (Superconducting Super Collider)The LHC project started at the ECFA Large Hadron Collider Workshop, Aachen, Germany, 4-9 Oct 1990.
Propose a b physics experiment at this colliderDifferent modes were possible:
• Collider • Fixed Target, with extracted beam
Three groups of physicists submitted three Letters of Intent (LoI)
How all started –the chance
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Large Hadron Beauty Factorywith beam extraction
Three Letters of Intent: (1993)• Design very similar (forward direction)• Silicon Tracker close beam line COBEX
collider mode
Gajetinternal gas jet target
How all started – first proposal(s)
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Taking shape –natural selection
As not all three proposal can be accepted at the LHC, the LHCC discussed the relative merits of the different approaches in spring 1994.
The LHCC was set up after the March 1992 meeting in Evian-les-Bains. Intensive interaction between the Committee and the Collaborations is required in order to converge on the detector designs, and to review the construction, installation and commissioning of the experiments. Like other experiment committees, the LHCC makes recommendations to the CERN Research Board.
The LHCC, Larg Hadron Collider Committee.
Conclusion (extracts), 8 June 1994:• None of the collaborations has the necessary resources.• Collider mode has the greater potential.• Detector close to the beam is very desirable, but adequately
optimized design of spectrometer does not exist yet.
The committee therefore encourages all participants from the three proposals to join together to prepare a new letter of intent for a new collider mode b experiment to be submitted to the LHCC.
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
The three collaborations have decided to participate in a joint Letter of Intent.
The Spokespersons of the three original LoI’s defined:• An Executive Committee
consisting of two members of each of the three former collaborations
• A Collaboration Board consisting of a senior representative of each of the major institutes
o A first joint meeting of the new collaboration was held in July 1994
New groups joined the collaboration
Preparation of a new LoI and a Technical Proposal
Forming working groups around the major subjects
Taking shape –experiment is born
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Taking shape -preparing for approvalLetter of IntentOne of the first meeting
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Research BoardChairperson: CERN Director General Approval of Experiments at CERNThe Research Board receives the recommendations from all the CERN Experimental Committees, and takes decisions on them.
Large Hadron Collider Committee
review the construction, installation and commissioning
of the experiments
LHCb collaboration
Experiments submit
• LoI• TP• TDRs
Reports 4x per year:Status of construction, installation, operation and analysis
Recommends for approval
Approves the experiment
Getting Approved –lines of decisions
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Getting Approved –prepare the packageThe Technical Proposal:
• Setting up the organization of the collaboration Institutes responsible for the detector construction -> first LHCb Constitution
• A cost estimate of the full project is given
‘CORE’ cost for a Common Fund and Sub Systems
• Schedule R&D work and prototype studies Start of construction Start of installation
Describes the physics case, the different sub systems and the project planning.
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Next step after the approval by the CERN Research Board:Preparation of the
Memorandum of Understanding
Defines the programme of work to be carried out • for the construction• the distribution of charges• responsibilities among parties
It set the organisational, managerial and financial guidelines to be followed by the Collaboration.
Before proceeding to the final construction phase, each sub system will be subject to a technical, financial, and personnel review, by the Large Hardon Collider Committee.
Getting Approved –agreement between all parties and financing
Technical Design Reports (TDRs)
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Research BoardChairperson: CERN Director General Approval of Experiments at CERNThe Research Board receives the recommendations from all the CERN Experimental Committees, and takes decisions on them.
Large Hadron Collider Committee
review the construction, installation and commissioning
of the experiments
LHCb collaboration
Experiments submit
• LoI• TP• TDRs
Reports 4x per year:Status of construction, installation, operation and analysis
Recommends for approval
Approves the experiment
LHC Resources Review BoardsChairperson: CERN Director for Research and Computing.Comprises the representatives of each Experiment's Funding Agencies and the management of CERN and of each Experiment's Collaboration. • reaching agreement on the MoU• monitoring the Common Projects and the
use of the Common Funds • monitoring the general financial and
manpower support• reaching agreement on a maintenance and
operation procedure and monitoring its functioning
• endorsing the annual construction and maintenance and operation budgets of the detector.
Getting Approved –lines of decisions
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
The Implementation - Technical Design Reports (TDRs)
After choosing the hardware technology for each sub system a TDR has to be prepared and submitted to the LHCC.
The TDR describes the • Requirements• Layout• Performance• Technology
and contains the (sub) project organisation• Participating institutes• Responsibilities• Schedule• Cost & resources, including risk mitigation
Cost given in the TDRs• only material• personnel & general tooling is not part of it
The a
ctivit
y bec
omes
a pr
oject
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
R&D
EDR
PRR
AssemblyQuality Assurance
Installation
Production
Time
Production drawings
Engineering Design Review
Production Readiness Review
TDR
2000 2006 2008
The Implementation - General timeline for a sub (sub) project to follow
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
R&D phase• Decision on technologies• Test beams• Working closely with Industry
• Several companies• Iterative process• Improving technology (timing, radiation etc.)
Production• Final Integration• Define production centres• Assembly sites• Quality assurance• Installation
Operation• Commissioning• Data Taking
The Implementation – from R&D to operation
for close monitoring:milestones
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
GLIMOSGroup Leader on Matters of
Safety
CoordinatorsTechnical CoordinatorResources CoordinatorOperation CoordinatorElectronics CoordinatorPhysics CoordinatorRun CoordinatorLHC radiation and safetyECS CoordinatorDAQ CoordinatorUpgrade CoordinatorLHC ContactOutreach Contact
Editorial Board
Speakers Bureau
Collaboration BoardRepresentatives from each collaborating
instituteCollaboration chair : one of the
representatives
Ultimate authority. All major decisions shall be approved.
ManagementSpokesperson + Deputy
Technical Coordinator, Resource Coordinator
executive body of the Collaboration.responsibility for managing the detector operation, upgrades, physics analysis.
Coordinator of sub systemCoordinator of
sub systemCoordinator of sub systemCoordinator of
sub systemCoordinator of sub systemCoordinator of
sub systemCoordinator of sub systemCoordinator of
sub systemCoordinator of sub systemProject Leader of
sub system
Formal contact persons forcommunication between the LHCb Management and the people working for the subsystem. Responsibility and authority to direct the work on thatsubsystem.
The Implementation –final structure of the collaboration
Technical Boardadvisory body to the Management, on all aspects of detector design, optimization, safety and cost.
Operation Planning Group
advisory body to the LHCb Management and ensures high quality data taking for physics analysis
Physics Planning Groupadvisory body to the Management and provides recommendations to ensure the best quality of the physics output
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Implementation 2001-2008
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
1989silicon
detectors inside the beam pipe
1993
1998
2003
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Summary – a long way
• From first idea in 1989 to first data taking in 2010 • 21 years• Many obstacles before final approval• Structure of the experiment evolves with time• Success of the project:
1. Bright idea2. Well defined common goal3. Voluntary agreement at all levels4. Healthy mixture of experts5. Close collaboration between
Collaborating institutes Industry Funding agencies
Rol
f Lin
dner
EIRO
Foru
mM
ay 2
014
Late 1980’s: First thoughts for measuring CP violation in the B system, at the SPS. Publication with 21 authors
1989: First proposal of experiment1990: Studies started for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Early 1990’s: Three proposals to study this B physics at LHC1993: Three Letter of Intent
~100 authors, 33 institutes
1994: Proposal to ‘merge’ all three proposals1995: LHCb gets structure, Letter of Intent for ONE B-experiment at LHC
~170 authors, 36 institutes
1998: Submission of the Technical Proposal and Approval of the LHCb experiment by the CERN Research Board336 authors, 42 institutes
2000: First Technical Design Report (out of 11)2005: Last Technical Design Report2002-2008: Construction of LHCb sub systems2008: Commissioning started
~600 members, 48 institutes
2010: Start of Data TakingNow: >1000 members, 700 authors, 64 institutes, 16 countries,
>160 papers published
Summary – time line