18

Issues relative to Tx response evaluation in RCC

  • Upload
    laken

  • View
    35

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Issues relative to Tx response evaluation in RCC. Dr. Camillo Porta S.C. di Oncologia Medica I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo , Pavia. We should take into account that …. RCC is an extremely peculiar cancer in terms of response evaluation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC
Page 2: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC
Page 3: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

RCC is an extremely peculiar cancer in terms of response evaluation ...

... mainly due to its unique molecular pathogenesis

Page 4: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC
Page 5: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

Rini B, Atkins M. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:992-1000Rini B, Atkins M. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:992-1000

ASL MRI

H&E stain (2x);

CD34 stain (20x)

Page 6: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

10 x 6 cm 11 x 7 cm

Abou-Alfa GK, et al. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4293–300

Page 7: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

Baseline Follow-up 1

Follow-up 2

Volume (cm3)

295 341 285

% necrosis 2.09 53.07 51.03

Abou-Alfa GK, et al. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4293–300

Page 8: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

After 4 weeks of sorafenib therapyBaseline

Gatzemeier U, et al. ASCO 2006, Atlanta, GA, USA

Page 9: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC
Page 10: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

Rioja J, et al. BJU Int 2010;106:1578-93Rioja J, et al. BJU Int 2010;106:1578-93

Page 11: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

Color-Doppler CEUS to predict PFSBaseline Week 6

Courtesy of Escudier B (ASCO 2005)

Page 12: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

Stillebroer AB, et al. Eur Urol 2010;58:75-83Stillebroer AB, et al. Eur Urol 2010;58:75-83

Stillebroer AB, et al. Cancer Imaging 2007;7:179-88Stillebroer AB, et al. Cancer Imaging 2007;7:179-88

Page 13: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC
Page 14: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

Therasse P, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;24:205–16

Page 15: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

1Morgan B, et al. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3955–642Evelhoc J, et al. NCI Cancer Imaging Program (http://imaging.cancer.gov)

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI)

Potential: May be used to study microvascular density, vascular permeability, extravascular/extracellular space

What we know: Successful therapies result in changes in DCE-MRI contrast-enhancement parameters which may prove to

be accurate and early indicators of response

One study demonstrated that DCE-MRI may act as a sensitive biomarker for response to the VEGFR inhibitor PTK787/ZK2225841

Pitfalls: High variability of the methods used for data acquisition and analysis lack of a general consensus on how best to acquire and/or analyse data

Only consensus recommendations are, at present, available2

Page 16: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)

What it is: An application of MRI that provides chemical information about specific tissue metabolites

How it works: Conventional MRI detects the NMR spectra of water in tissues, while MRS detects the resonance spectra of

chemical compounds other than water, allowing for a true depiction of in situ chemistry

This is distinctive for many pathological conditions, including cancer, and for different metabolic states

(eg, necrosis) Pitfalls: Expensive

Validated only for brain tumoursLack of standardisation

Increased level of choline and a decreased level of N-acetylaspartate, a pattern indicative of recurrent

glioma and radiation necrosis

Page 17: Issues relative to Tx  response evaluation in RCC

We badly need new response criteria for molecularly targeted agents

Also in this field, enrollment of patients into specifically designed studies is crucial