24
Isidima COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WORKER PROGRAMME Presentation to PCF Review Findings and Recommendations 18 November 2009

Isidima COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WORKER PROGRAMME Presentation to PCF Review Findings and Recommendations 18 November 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Isidima

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WORKER PROGRAMME

Presentation to PCF

Review Findings and Recommendations

18 November 2009

Isidima

Presentation Outline

• Part 1: Introduction and Background

• Part 2: Review Findings

• Part 3: Recommendations

Isidima

Part1: Introduction and Background

Isidima

Introduction

• CDWP Review Commissioned January 2009 and completed end of March 2009– Request for comment from Municipalities– Municipal Managers Forum– Presentation to DCF’s – SALGA (Western Cape)

• Minister Bredell: ‘…fix challenges and make the CDW Programme work…’

Isidima

Introduction• Objectives of the CDWP:

– Facilitate Access to Government Services for Communities

– Facilitate Socio-Economic Opportunities and Partnerships

– Deepen Governance through Public Participation– Share Information on National and Provincial

Government Services

• Programme is implemented by provincial government in co-operation with local and national government

Isidima

Background

• CDWP Announced in 2003 and implemented in 2005 in Western Cape

• Trained 650 CDWs through Learnership in partnership with LGSETA

• DLG&H appointed 200 CDWs in 2006

• Former Project Consolidate Municipalities and Urban Nodes Prioritised

Isidima

The work programmes of CDW’s are made up of three integrated components:

Local GovernmentPriority issues

40%

Provincial GovernmentPriority

Programmes30%

National GovernmentPriority Programmes

30%

Isidima

Successes• Enhancing Citizen Awareness around Integrated

Development Processes (IDP)• Good working relation with Government

Departments and Agencies to make services more accessible to citizens

• Critical support role in Disasters e.g. Internally Displaced Persons Disaster

• Roll-out of various government surveys e.g. Display of Service Charters by Departments, Indigent identification, etc.

Isidima

Part 2: Review Findings

Isidima

Review Findings (1)

• Perception that CDWs are politicised and not accountable

• Communication about role of CDW Programme weak

• Poor relationship between CDWs, Ward Committees/Forums and Councillors

• Referral system for service delivery issues requires revision

Isidima

Review Findings (2)• Need for greater decentralisation

• CDWs need to be provided with the necessary support and supervision

• Information Management System required– Monitoring and Evaluation processes in the

CDWP are inadequate

• Inadequate career-pathing• CDWs under-resourced (e.g. transport)

Isidima

Part 3: Recommendations

Isidima

Recommendations

• Respond to Key Challenges

• De-link programme from Political Office (Speaker or Mayor)

• Embed Programme Administratively

• Enhance Accountability and Efficiency

• Effective Partnerships with all three Spheres of Government

Isidima

Recommendations

• Work content: 40% Local, 30% Province and 30% National

• MM or his/her designated official to supervise municipal CDW work programme together with Regional Co-ordinator: Weekly Plans, Monthly Reports

• CDWs should not report directly to politicians (e.g. Speaker)

• Designated municipal official to account for CDW municipal work programme to Council

Issue:

‘How will CDWs be more Accountable to Municipalities?’

Isidima

Recommendations

• Case Referral Form

– Allegations of corruption / service delivery issues to be reported by CDW’s on case referral form and submitted to municipal designated official

– Municipality to follow up and inform stakeholders

Issue:

‘How should CDWs deal with service delivery complaints and allegations of Corruption?’

Isidima

Recommendations• CDW Appointment Processes:

– Provincially driven process to fill vacancies

– Municipal designated official to be included on panel

– Province to draw from pool of trained learners

Issue:

‘How can Municipalities influence the appointment of CDWs?’

Isidima

Recommendations

• Disciplinary Processes:

– Provincial Labour Relation policies and procedures apply

– To be done expeditiously

– Municipalities will be kept informed

– Municipality to fully support process

Issue:

‘How will the Department ensure discipline of CDWs?’

Isidima

Recommendations

• MOA to specify the % split of CDW work between spheres and how this will be monitored

• Municipal specific conditions, as requested by Municipalities to be incorporated in MOA

• Municipalities to provide Financial Reports on Operational Support Grant as per PFMA/MFMA

Issue:

‘How will the Relationship between Municipalities and the Department be Governed?’

Isidima

Recommendations

• Councillors and CDWs: Roles and Responsibilities to be clarified (SALGA Support)

• CDWs to report service delivery issues to councillors and work together on ward programme

• Ward Committees: CDWs to attend as support but not act as secretariat

• CDWs to mobilize for public participation, especially in IDP processes and Community Based Planning

Issues:

‘What is the role of Councillors and CDWs?’

Isidima

Recommendations

• DPSA Skills Audit• Implement CDW Review

Recommendations on Further Training Needs

• Better departmental support (IPDPs)

• Partnership with PALAMA• Municipal-Specific Training

(Municipal Policies, Budget etc.)

• Municipal CDWs to be included in Training

Issue:

‘What is the Department doing about the further Training needs of CDW’s?’

Isidima

Recommendations

• New Structure: CDWs /Supervisors/ Regional Coordinators/ Deputy Directors/ Director

• Field Support: – “Middle” layer of supervisors to

improve supervision and provide career-pathing

– Regional Coordinators to each have administrative support

• Provincial Office:– Information Mgmt Officer appointed – Second Deputy Director Regional

Coordination appointed– Four administrative officers placed in

Provincial Office

Issues:

‘How will the supervision of CDWs be improved?’

Isidima

CDW POLICY

• National Draft Policy Document Circulated– Input and Engagement required

• Summits in all Provinces– Provincial Summit held on 09 September

2009 (Sea Point, Cape Town) – Draft Summit report (GTZ)

• National Summit 30 November 2009

Isidima

Further Consultation Process• Draft Recommendations process:

– Approval by / comments from MEC (16 October)– Consultation through PCF and SALGA Western Cape

PEC (November 2009)– Approval by / comments from Cabinet (December)

• National CDW Policy Summit – 30 November 2009

– Revise recommendations, if required• Municipal Road show to engage with each

municipality (January - February)• Final recommendations: March 2010• Implementation process: April 2010 onward

Isidima

Baie Dankie

Thank You

Enkosi