Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Is the private sector prepared to engage in MDR-TB management?
Findings from the Philippines
Tauhid Islam WHO/WPRO
PPM and PMDT: The Philippines Why PPM-PMDT? Assessments Finding way forward!
The Philippines: The pioneer country in conceptualizing PPM model
• 1993: PhilCAT • 1995: PPM DOTS project • 1999: PPM DOTS-Plus • 2003: DoH adopted PPM strategy • 2004: Operational guidelines • 2010: PhilPACT 2010-16 • 2011: 12% contribution to total
notifications of new TB cases • 2012: 24% contribution to total
notifications of new TB cases • 2013:
– 171 (26%) public hospital, – 157 (24%) private hospitals engaged, – 8513 private practitioners trained on
DOTS
The Philippines: Commendable progress in PMDT scale up
526 566
1953 2056
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12N
o. o
f pat
ient
s Year
Yearly enrolled• Good progress has been achieved in case finding and the scaling up against their targets
• The enrolment increased four times in 2011 compared to 2010
• Programme covers all 17 regions
• 45 treatment and satellite treatment centers
• 18 culture, 3 DST and 20 GeneXpert
Why PPM-PMDT? The same onion model applies!
• Despite progress, the number of MDR-TB cases notified in 2011 represents 19% of estimated caseload (among notified) of the Philippines.
Estimated MDR-TB among notified are within NTP network
1. Recorded in notification data
2. NTP or collaborating providers but not reported
3. Public or private but not notified
4. Present to health facilities but not diagnosed
Moving towards outside NTP network
1. Recorded in notification data
2. NTP or collaborating providers but not reported
3. Public or private but not notified
4. Present to health facilities but not diagnosed
Opening the PANDORA BOX Major challenge!
And opportunity to strengthen the system Specialized
Hospital
Specialist doctors
Specialized lab
Difficult patients
Long duration of Tx ADR
Availability of QA drugs
Catastrophic expenditure
A story line
Pharmacy Traditional healer
Private hospital
Private practitioners NGO FBO
Public health center/DOTS
Public hospital/DOTS
Public hospital
A story line
Private Specialist TB
doctor
Private Hospital
Public PMDT centres
A story line
Private laboratory
Public laboratory
A story line
Private market drugs
NTP drugs
PPM-PMDT Is it the same modality as PPM DOTS??
• The strategic information is
crucial for – understanding where the 'missing
MDR-TB cases' are being diagnosed and treated,
– assessing the quality of private sector MDR diagnosis and care, and
– developing appropriate mechanism. • Detailed assessment should
include the following sectors – Private physicians – Hospitals – Laboratory – Drug market
1 A survey among specialist private practitioners
on
the practise in dealing with MDR-TB suspects and patients in the
Philippines
Methodology • A pre-tested short questionnaire survey • Pulmonologists and infectious disease (ID) specialists who
are active members of two medical societies in the Philippines were approached – PTSI: Philippines Tuberculosis Society Inc – PSMID: Philippines society for Microbiology and Infectious
Disease • The questions were either emailed to respondents, or
provided in hard copies during a meeting and a national convention.
• The questions were sent to a total of 220 members of the two societies
• The survey yielded 152 respondents (69%) response rate
Findings
• 87% (132) encountered at least one highly suspected or laboratory-confirmed MDR-TB patients in their practice in the last 12 months.
• The average number of MDR-TB patients seen was 6 in the last 12 months.
• 86% specialist practitioners referred their MDR-TB patients to other facilities or physicians
• Among those who referred their cases, 33% specified that they referred them to NTP approved sites (either MDR-TB and/or DOTS facilities)
• 11% (15) managed themselves.
2 An assessment of
The potential role of the private sector in managing MDR-TB in the
Philippines
Study preparation: Involving all stakeholders
Methodology
• Semi-structured questionnaires
• Trained field interviewers (6 pulmonologists)
• One-on-one interviews with the study subjects
Study population: response rate
Geographic involvement of study population
Hospitals
87% 96%
47% 46%
13% 4% 53% 54%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Free TB dxcs Free TB drugs Free MDR-TB dxcs Free MDR-TBdrugs
% h
ospi
tals
Aware Not aware
Anti-TB drugs in hospital pharmacies (n=72)
Anti-TB drugs No. pharmacies
Single: H, R, Z, E 33 (46%)
FDC: HRZE 62 (89%)
HRE, HRZ 30-55 (42%-76%)
HR 31 (43%)
Fluoroquinolones
Ofloxacin 35 (49%)
Levofloxacin 35 (49%)
Ciprofloxacin 33 (46%)
Moxifloxacin 31 (43%)
Injectables
Streptomycin 39 (54%)
Amikacin 56 (78%)
Kanamycin 0
Capreomycin 0
Group 5 drugs
Clofazimine 0
Clarithromycin 69 (96%)
CoAmoxiclav 72 (100%)
Imipenem/Meropenem 55 (76%)
Linezolid 31 (43%)
Oral b-static SLDs
Ethionamide, Cycloserine, PAS
0
Treatment rate among MDs who saw TB/MDR-TB patients
Private Practitioners
Use of standard regimens for TB
82%
18%
Standard Regimen:2HRZE/4HR
72%
28%
Standard Regimen:2HRZES/HRZE/5HREOther regimens
New cases (n=108) Previously treated cases (n=86)
Regimens for chronic TB cases 20 regimens by 21 MDs
11. 2HRZES/HRZE/5HRE (2) 12. 2HRZES/HRZE/6HRE 13. 2HRZES/4-6HRZE/HR 14. HRZE/HRE + S, Lfx 15. HRZE + 1 wk Cfx or Mfx 16. HRZE + any FQ (Ofx, Lfx, Mfx) 17. 3HRZES + 1 mo Lfx (sometimes) 18. 2HRZESFq/HRZEFq/5HRE 19 2HRZESCfx/HRZECfx/3HRECfx+2HRE 20. HRZE initially. If resistant + 2-3 S and/or Cfx until end of treatment
Regimens for DR-TB suspects (9 regimens by 21 MDs) HRZE(S) + FQ + Cla
Regimens for MDR-TB patients 6 regimens for 6 MDs
1. HRZES Lfx 18-24 mos 2. HRZES Ofx/Lfx/Mfx 2 mos after (-) 3. HZES Lfx Till CD4 ct normal 4. 2HRZES Cfx/10HRZE Cfx 12 mos
(Amikacin sometimes) 5. HRZES Cfx (Amikacin) 24 mos 6. HRZE Cfx/Mfx Cla 12 mos Injectable: 2-6 mos
Practices: • Ambulatory in all 6 • No treatment partner in 4 • Family member in 3, volunteer,
public HW
Private laboratories Procedure No. (%)
laboratories Method
Smear microscopy 14 (100%) Kinyoun’s (8) Zhiel Neelsen (7) Fluorescence (3)
Culture 14 (100%) Solid (13) Liquid (12)
DST 12 (86%) MGIT (8) Conventional (5)
Molecular techniques 4 Xpert MTB/RIF (3) Line probe assay (HAIN test) -1
Q to MDs. Are you interested and willing to (further) collaborate with gov’t for MDR-TB control?
Q to Hospitals and Labs. Are you interested and willing to (further)
collaborate with the gov’t for TB/ MDR-TB control?
55% 45%
Hospitals for MDR-TB (n=58) Willing Unwilling
Laboratories (n=14): 100% willing to collaborate for both TB and MDR-TB control
Possible areas of collaboration with Hospitals (n=64),
MDs (n=102) and Laboratories (n=14)
Area for collaboration Hospitals No. (%)
MDs No. (%)
Labs No. (%)
1. Training 59 (95%) 75 (74%) 11 (79%)
2. Becoming a DOTS/MDR-TB referring hospital 54 (92%) 77 (76%) -
3. Becoming a facility for TB laboratory tests 49 (78%) N/A -
4. Establishment of a DOTS facility 42 (76%)* 4 (4%) -
5. Becoming a facility for DR-TB laboratory tests 63 (43%) N/A 12 (86%)
6. Establishment of an MDR-TB facility (or as MD) 24 (38%) 3 (3%) -
7. Advocacy 23 (36%) 81 (79%) 13 (93%)
8. Research 12 (19%) 53 (52%) 14 (100%)
3 Market size and utilization of TB Drugs
in the Philippines
NTP driven procurement Procurement year and equivalent cohort year* 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Cat I & III Kits
GDF 130,784 64,408
Local Procurement 114,544 256,810 378,000 228,157
Total 130,784 178,952 256,810 378,000 228,157
Corresponding notified new and relapse cases* 139,603 146,565 166,323 195,560 203,826
Difference -8,819 32,387 90,487 182,440 24,331
Cat II Kits
GDF 3,205
Local Procurement 16,372
Total - 3,205 - 16,372 - Corresponding notified retreatment cases* 6,289 6,602 8,066 10,528 13,103
Difference -6,289 -3,397 -8,066 5,844 -13,103 Total cost (USD in millions) 2.3 5.5 12 13 5.5
Private sector Anti TB drug sales
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 201121
22
23
24
25
26
Mill
ions
Dosage unit Sales in USD
Private sector Anti TB drug sales
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
4FDC (J04A5) 39,021,040 41,895,860 46,120,220 42,456,960 43,103,500
Number of new TB patients can be treated
77,423 249,380 274,525 252,720 256,568
• Standard treatment regimen: • 4 FDC : 2 FDC = 1 : 2
• Private sale: • 4 FDC: 2 FDC = 5: 1 • Indicates drugs may not be used
as per standard treatment regimen
Second line drugs (Source: FDA database)
Gr Description Drugs availability Products
registered
2 Injectable Kanamycin Yes 2
Amikacin Yes 36
Capreomycin Yes 3
3 Fluroquinolone Moxifloxacin Yes 9
Levofloxacin Yes 120
4 Oral bacteriostatic Cycloserine Yes 1
Ethionamide No NA
Protionamide No NA
PAS No NA
Terizidone No NA
5 Unclear Linezolid Yes 4
TB drug sales in the Philippines (2007-2011)
• An enormous amount of TB drugs are channelled through the private drug market: – Enough to treat 250,000 TB Patients annually
assuming compliance with international regimens – Combining public and private sales in 2011, TB
cases could be treated which is 2.5 times higher – Indicating severe under reporting and/or misuse
of drugs • Not all second line drugs are available in the private
market and it is impossible to describe an adequate private sector MDR-TB regimen
Finding Way forward Stakeholders meeting
Is the private sector prepared to engage in MDR-TB management?
Hospital Private Practitioners
Private laboratories
Focus group discussion
Reality Quality
Regulate
Engage
• Mandatory notification • Accreditation • Minimum set of quality
criteria • Regulation of drug sales
• Information directory • Insurance packages • Training curricula • Involve academia and medical
associations in advocacy plan
Framework
To PPM Subgroup In this era of new drugs and diagnostics
• Revitalize PPM-PMDT task force
Acknowledgments • Technical Working Group
– Proponent: WHO-Western Pacific Region (WPR) in collaboration with the National TB Program (NTP), DOH, Phil., National TB Reference Lab (NTRL), WHO-Phil.
– Study Team: – Dr. Camilo Roa – Dr. Maridel Borja – Dr. Ma. Imelda Quelapio – Dr. Tauhid Islam – Dr.Kitty van Weezenbeek
– Advisory Group: – Dr. Jubert Benedicto – Dr. Lalaine Mortera – Dr. Roentgene Solante
– Consultant-Interviewers – Dr. Shane C. Boiser – Dr. Chariza Halun – Dr. Lerma Malabag – Dr. Jennifer S. San Luis – Dr. Andre Tanque – Dr. Ma. Philina P. Villamor – Ms. Alma Palparan
Acknowledgments – Partners
– Phil Coalition against Tuberculosis (PhilCAT)
– Phil College of Chest Physicians (PCCP)
– Phil. Society for Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (PSMID)
– Phil Tuberculosis Society, Inc. (PTSI)
– Research Team – Jundelle Romulo – Gilbert Madriaga – Kevin Borja – Ruby Lamac – Chris Mercado
– Admin staff: – Reissie Francisco
• Study participants – 76 hospitals, 118 Medical Doctors, and 14 laboratories
Thank YOU
Salamat Po