Upload
cathleen-shelton
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Is Genetic Integrity Important in the Ecological Restoration of
Bison?
James Derr and Natalie Halbert
WCS Meeting, Rapid City, SD
18 November 2008
Genetic integrity involves the extent, distribution and history of genetic diversity from a species.
We need to concern our self with:
Compare levels of genetic diversity among populations.Establish genetic relationships between populations.Are some populations “unique” genetically?– Natalie Halbert later today
Test for mitochondrial and nuclear bison-domestic cattle introgression and the technology needed to move to second generation introgression detection.– This presentation
An analysis of domestic cattle introgression in some An analysis of domestic cattle introgression in some important American bison populations ….important American bison populations …. The cold, hard facts….The cold, hard facts….
DianeHargreaves.com
““What is life? What is life? It is a flash of It is a flash of a firefly in the a firefly in the night. It is a night. It is a breath of a breath of a buffalo in the buffalo in the winter time.”winter time.”
Crowfoot 1890Crowfoot 1890
Hybrids HappenHybrids Happen
““Beast knows beast; birds Beast knows beast; birds of a feather flock together”of a feather flock together” - Aristotle (384 – 322 B.C)
Really... Hybrids do Happen.
The hybridization experiments conducted in the late 1800s, have left a legacy of a small amount of cattle genetics in most US federal
herds and in some cases considerable levels of cattle genetics
in many non-federal bison herds.
Bison / domestic cattle hybrids..Hybridization does not happen by chance.
All US DOI herds with domestic cattle issues can trace their introgression to early attempts to “improve” beef cattle breeds.
Hybrids were “forced” by overcoming pre-zygotic isolating mechanisms (behavior, seasonality, etc.). However, they were still faced with post-zygotic isolating mechanisms (Haldane’s rule, fetal development problems and most likely disruption of co-adapted gene complexes). Nevertheless these “genome preserving” evolutionary forces failed to completely prevent introgression.
The Current TechnologyThe Current TechnologyCurrent technologyCurrent technology..
-Mitochondrial DNA sequencing and genotyping to Mitochondrial DNA sequencing and genotyping to identify and define domestic cattle maternal identify and define domestic cattle maternal lineages. lineages. (T. Ward and N. Halbert (and others) worked to develop these procedures).(T. Ward and N. Halbert (and others) worked to develop these procedures).
-Nuclear microsatellites markers developed from Nuclear microsatellites markers developed from bovine pbovine positional cloning and gene mapping and gene mapping projects to uncover evidence of hybridization and projects to uncover evidence of hybridization and to estimate relative levels of cattle introgression. to estimate relative levels of cattle introgression. (T. Ward, R. Schnabel and N. Halbert (among others) conspired to develop these (T. Ward, R. Schnabel and N. Halbert (among others) conspired to develop these procedures)procedures)
Mitochondrial DNAInherited only through the female lineage.Inherited only through the female lineage.
Is a haploid genome, no recombination.Is a haploid genome, no recombination.
The genome is relatively small (about The genome is relatively small (about 16,500bp).16,500bp).
Required for energy production in the cell.Required for energy production in the cell.
High rate of nucleotide substitution.High rate of nucleotide substitution.
DNA sequence is very well characterized.DNA sequence is very well characterized.
Determining Mitochondrial DNA Status in American BisonWard, T.J., J.P. Bielawski, S.K. Davis, J.W. Templeton, and J.N. Derr. 1999. Identification of domestic cattle hybrids in wild cattle and bison species: A general approach using mtDNA markers and the parametric bootstrap. Animal Conservation 2:51-57.
This procedure is based on a multiplex PCR reactions with universal primers as internal controls and Bos taurus / Bos indicus specific primers.
mtDNA results -mtDNA results - federal, state and private bison herdsfederal, state and private bison herds
5,246 bison sampled to date from US and Canadian federal populations. bison sampled to date from US and Canadian federal populations. All appear free of cattle mtDNA except for a small number of animals appear free of cattle mtDNA except for a small number of animals ((14) at the National Bison Range) at the National Bison Range**. The origin of introgression was . The origin of introgression was confirmed through DNAconfirmed through DNA sequencing.sequencing.
14 / 5,246 animals = 0.26%
5,655 bison sampled from over 100 private, State and NGO populations. Evidence of domestic cattle mtDNAcattle mtDNA was found in all of these herds except for a very few.
387/5,655 animals = 6.84%.
Remember, this % is not the amount of cattle genes, it is the % of animals with cattle mtDNA.
* * There are a few possible Alaskan herds (Delta Junction Herd and/or the There are a few possible Alaskan herds (Delta Junction Herd and/or the Farewell herd) that were established from NBR and may pre-date this Farewell herd) that were established from NBR and may pre-date this introduction event of cattle genetics. If this is true, then these herds are the introduction event of cattle genetics. If this is true, then these herds are the only surviving intact genomes from the NBR lineage.only surviving intact genomes from the NBR lineage.
For comparison, let’s take a look at what is know from human mitochondrial DNA
Several human diseases/disorders are now known to be the result of mitochondrial mutations. Some examples include; myoclonic epilepsy, Leber’s Optic Neuropathy, Kearns-Sayre syndrome, Pearson’s syndrome and possibly some forms of Alzheimer’s disease.
Most are associated with the eyes, brain, heart, muscle, kidney or liver.
In addition, there are known mutations that accumulate with age and some mtDNA types seem to age slower (tend to provide a longer live span).
Across all human races there is a only 0.56% divergence. Between domestic cattle and bison the divergence rate is 6.2%, so consider the potential for problems with the wrong mtDNA (cattle) in a bison…
Is there a “biological” disadvantage in bison with Is there a “biological” disadvantage in bison with cattle mtDNA”…cattle mtDNA”…
(Weight as a indicator of energy conversion / efficiency(Weight as a indicator of energy conversion / efficiency))
Low nutrition study:– 98 total animals in the study (mixed sex and
age classes).• > 5 year old males with cattle mtDNA averaged 119
lbs lighter.
• > 5 year old females with cattle MtDNA averaged 50 lbs lighter
High nutrition study:– Same overall trend but the weight differences
were smaller.
MtDNA Conclusions
Information for over 10,000 animals now show that non-federal bison herds have an average of about 6% cattle mtDNA.However some herds have no cattle mtDNA and other herds have 100% cattle mtDNA.There appear to be biological / metabolic disadvantages when a bison has cattle mtDNA.
Nuclear Genome: Microsatellite Markers For Hybrid Detection
Determine the frequency of cattle chromosome regions in bison genomes using a set of 14 unlinked microsatellite markers with a statistical framework to determine the power of hybrid detection based on the frequency of cattle alleles and the number of animals examined.
Bison hybridization on Chromosome 1
SOD1M2
ARO9
BMS1928
INRA117
0.0
1.6
2.9
3.7
4.4
5.5
7.8
8.7
0.8
2.0
INRA212
TGLA49ARO24
BM6438
162M1AGLA17
POLL
Private 1
Private 2
All cattle alleles
All bison alleles
All bison alleles
Detecting nuclear introgression
These 14 microsatellite markers include bison specific alleles and domestic cattle specific alleles.
These “species diagnostic” markers are distributed throughout the bovine
genome.
Nuclear microsatellite markersfor detecting domestic cattle introgression in American bison
CSP
BNPCSPFN
TRNTRSNS
CSPGC
MGRNBRNS
MGRGC
CSP CSPBNP
CSPWM
Hypothetical distribution of introgressed fragments Based on 1% herd-wide introgression level
But not every individual in the herd harbors all fragments…
Individual B – no “detectable” introgression
All chromosomes contain at least one cattle chromosomal fragment.
A word on error rates…
Diagnosed hybrid populations with either mitochondrial DNA and/or nuclear markers clearly have a breeding history with cattle. What about introgression “free” populations?
– Probability of detection dependent on:• % cattle genome in hybrid founders• Level of ACTUAL introgression• Number of markers• Number of individuals evaluated
Halbert et.al 2005. Molecular Ecology.
Bison Hybridization SummaryBased on mitochondrial and microsatellite investigations, domestic cattle introgression is present in most US federal bison herds except possibly Yellowstone NP and Wind Cave NP or herds that directly descended from these populations.
The overall average amount of cattle nuclear genetics is low and estimated at 0.05% to 1.5% in the US federal herds with hybridization.
We did not have enough samples to estimate the status of Grand Teton National Park population and not enough animals in the original Sully’s Hill NGP herd to determine hybrid status. Nevertheless, both of these herds were founded with animals from herds with confirmed cattle introgression.
Bison Hybridization SummaryMost other bison herds have evidence of hybridization with cattle but the levels of cattle gene introgression varies greatly.
Some of these bison herds also have irreplaceable bison genetic diversity.
Herds with cattle introgression should be managed independently from herds with no evidence of hybridization.
Bison herds that represent a lineage that includes only one hybridization event should be managed in isolation from other hybrid herds.
Microsatellite technologies do have limitations regarding the
statistical power to identify introgression from small
samples sizes / populations and from individual animals.
We need more resolution.We need more resolution.
Illumina Bovine SNP50 Genotyping BeadChip
54,001 SNPs uniformly spanning the entire bovine genome (average spacing of 51.5kb).
Applications include:
– Comparative genetic studies.
– Fine mapping to identify ANY domestic cattle chromosomal regions in individual bison.
• This will provide the resolution to investigate animals in zoos and small private herds or possibly recover herds recently contaminated with domestic cattle genetics like the National Bison Range and many private herds.
The future of The future of introgression detection:introgression detection:
current microsatellite panel vs.
predicted diagnostic SNPs
Chromosome # microsatellites # diagnostic SNPs1 4 1072 1 913 814 865 2 596 917 718 809 74
10 1 6111 6712 5813 4814 1 5415 5216 5717 5418 1 3519 4420 5021 4122 3323 1 4924 1 3825 2526 1 2727 1 2628 3329 41X 15
Total 14 1648
SNP data from 8 unrelated bison
Of the 54,001 SNPs on the chipOf the 54,001 SNPs on the chip::
1,648 gave signal differences between bison and cattle. These are the SNPs that define the genomic differences between these species.
Power of detection, 0.5% genome-wide introgression
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Number of individuals
Pro
babi
lity
of d
etec
tion
14 markers
1648 markers
6.78% probability of detection, 1 individual
99.97% probability of detection, 1 individual
1
So, why care about this genetic integrity stuff?For bison, or any other For bison, or any other
species, for species, for their long-term long-term conservation and healthy conservation and healthy
production, a major production, a major consideration must be the consideration must be the
preservation of their preservation of their germplasm. germplasm.
If this germplasm is lost If this germplasm is lost through extinction, genetic through extinction, genetic
drift or diluted and drift or diluted and contaminated through contaminated through
extensive hybridization it extensive hybridization it can never be fully can never be fully
recovered.recovered.