Upload
others
View
1
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 1
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences
Volume 1| Issue 3
Review Article Open Access
Irradiation as a non-destructive method of food preservation
M. A. K. K. P. Perera 1 * 1 Food and Water Division, Department of Government Analyst's *Corresponding author: M. A. K. K. P. Perera, Food and Water Division, Department of Government Analyst's, No. 31,
Isuru Mawatha, Pelawatta, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka; Email: [email protected]
Citation: M. A. K. K. P. Perera (2017) Irradiation as a non-destructive method of food preservation: Nessa J Nutritional
Health Sci
Received: April 1st 2017, Accepted: May 9th 2017, Published: June 1st 2017
Copyright: © 2017 M. A. K. K. P. Perera. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Contamination of food with harmful bacteria can cause lethal food poisoning and spoilage. Despite substantial efforts
in avoidance of contamination, an upward trend in the number of outbreaks of foodborne illnesses caused by non-
soprengenic pathogenic bacteria are reported in many countries. Good hygienic practices can reduce the level of
contamination but most importance pathogens cannot be eliminated. Several decontamination methods exist but the
most versatile treatment among them is the processing with ionizing radiation. It may be considered as a second big
breakthrough after pasteurization. Irradiation of food is a process of exposing food to ionizing radiation such as
gamma rays emitted from the radio-isotope 60Co and 137Cs or high energy electrons or x-rays produced by machine
sources. The use of ionizing radiation to destroy harmful microorganisms in food a safe, efficient, environmentally
clean and energy efficient process. Depending on the absorbed dose of radiation, various preservative effects can be
achieved such as reduced storage losses, extended shelf-life and/or improved microbiological and parasitological
quality of foods. Irradiation is endorsed as a food safety process by independent health organization and regulatory
agencies round the world. Pasteurization or sterilization of food by irradiation can be used for all classes of food,
especially meat, poultry, spices, vegetable seasonings, dried and fresh fruits and vegetables, fish and fish products, egg
and egg products, mushrooms, herbs and spices etc. An extensive education is needed for broad public acceptance. A
strategic, multi-year, broad-scale education campaign, targeting both professional and lay audiences is necessary.
Labeling is necessary, so that people can freely choose whether to use this safe and wholesome processed food.
GC/MS, ESR, TL, PSL, DNA comet assay, DEFT/APC are reliable methods for the detection of irradiated food in
confirming compliance with regulations regarding food irradiation.
Keywords: food preservation, irradiation, decontamination, foodborne pathogens, consumer acceptance, detection.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 2
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Introduction
Food and its constant availability are among the basic human rights. Yet one person out of eight in the world population
today suffers from chronic malnourishment. Thus the problem become worse as the world's population is expected to be
double during the next thirty or forty years (van Kooij, 1981)
Foods are mainly composed of biochemical compounds which are derived from plants and animals. Carbohydrates,
proteins and fats are the major constituents of food. In addition, minor constituents such as minerals, vitamins, enzymes,
acids, antioxidants, pigments, flavors are present (Miller, 2005).
Foods can undergo various physical, chemical and biological deterioration processes. The major factors that are affected
to food spoilage or deterioration are identified as (1) growth and activities of microorganisms (bacteria, yeasts and molds),
(2) activities of food enzymes and other chemical reactions within food itself, (3) infestation by insects, rodents etc., (4)
Inappropriate temperature for a given food, (5) either the gain or loss of moisture, (6) reaction with oxygen and (7) light
(Rahman, 2007).
The vast majority of instances of food spoilage can be attributed to one of two major causes: attack by microorganisms
such as bacteria and mold, or oxidation that causes the destruction of essential biochemical compounds and/or the
destruction of plant and animal cells. As a result of these reactions, creates an adverse effect on appearance, flavor,
texture, color, consistence and/or nutritional quality of food (Miller, 2005).
Food safety is a global issue with paramount environmental and public health consequences if inadequately maintained
(Ashley et al, 2004). Contamination of foods, especially of that origin from animal with microorganisms, particularly
pathogenic non-spore forming bacteria, parasitic helminths and protozoa is an enormous public health problem suffering
all over the world (Farkas, 1998). According to the literatures, a large part of our harvested foods is loss due to various
kinds of wastage and spoilage (van Kooij, 1981).The potential for contamination is inherent at each step along the food
supply and preparation processes. That means losses take place at the post harvesting processes, storage and transportation
and it can also be happened through contaminated ingredients that are used to prepare foods such as spices, herbs, dried
vegetable seasonings, or contaminated raw materials such as meats, fish, or damaged/spoiled fruits or vegetables (Farkas,
1998; Ashley et al, 2004; Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010).
Thus, there is a strong need to find a method to reduce or eliminate one or the other (or both) of these causative agents.
These methods should prevent the growth of bacteria, fungi and other microorganisms as well as retarding the oxidation
of fats which causes foods to turn rancid and also inhibit the enzymes processes that cause a food to rapid ripening after it
is harvested (Farkas, 1998; Ashley et al, 2004; Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). All the preventive processes are
collectively called as food preservation.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 3
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Microbial safety and stability as well as sensory and nutritional quality of processed foods are based on the application of
traditional or emerging preservation factors. However, preservation techniques usually accomplish safety, stability and
quality objectives by combining of more than one factor (Leister and Gorris, 1995; Lopez-Maloand Palou, 2005). The
most important factors used in food preservation to control microbial growth are high or low temperature, water activity,
pH, antimicrobials and competitive flora (Leister and Gorris, 1995; Lopez-Malo and Palou, 2005).
Food preservation has become an increasingly important component in food industry as fewer people eat foods produced
on their lands and as consumers expect to be able to purchase and consume foods that are out of season. Preservation of
food is done during the months when food is available in large quantity and therefore at low cost. Food preservation
reduces the wastage of food that means excess food which would have otherwise been wasted. Food preservation adds
variety to the food. For example, mango is a summer fruit and grows in large quantities during the month of April to
August. Different varieties of mango are grown in different parts of the country. In the absence of fresh mango in other
months of the year, canned and dehydrated mango may be made use of and also they can reach areas where the food item
is not grown then decreases dietary inadequacies of the people living in those areas. Preserved food has long shelf life.
Preservation of foods usually reduces bulk and it makes their transportation and storage easier since it requires less space.
Methods of Food Preservation
The methods those can be used as preservation of foods should totally prevent, delay or otherwise reduce food spoilage.
The preservation can expand the shelf life of food and can lengthen the time long enough for it to be harvested, processed,
sold and kept in the consumer's home for a reasonable length of time (Farkas, 1998). Maintaining or creating nutritional
value, texture and flavor is an important aspect of food preservation, although some methods drastically altered the
character of food being preserved, in some cases these changes have now come to be seen as desirable qualities, as with
cheese, yogurt, pickled onions etc. There are many preservation methods are available. These methods consist of thermal
and chemical processes. Out of these the most versatile treatment is the processing with ionizing radiation (Krauss et al.,
1933; Tressler et al., 1957; Dieterich et al., 1967;Arsdel et al., 1968; Caric et al., 1987; Cook and DuMont, 1991; Farkas,
1998; Susana et al., 2006; Rahman, 2007); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethylene_oxide#Physiological_effects;
http://www.foodsafetysite.com/educators/competencies/general/foodprocessing/processing2.html;
http://wiki.zero-emissions.at/index.php?title=Sterilization_in_food_industry;
http://wiki.zero-emissions.at/index.php?title=Pasteurization_in_food_industry; http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-
ethylene-oxide-uses-safety-technology.html; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermentation_in_food_processing;
http://crees.org/resources/files/forms/25.pdf;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_additive; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preservative (Table 1)
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 4
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
In this article, attention is drawn to current applications of irradiation of foods as a non-destructive method of food
preservation.
The increasing global energy crisis has led a review of the efficiency of traditional methods of food preservation in term
of energy consumption. In addition, some wildly applied methods such as chemical preservation - curing and addition of
chemical preservatives and fumigation are now being questioned in term of biological safety, economics and possible
reduction of market quality of the products (van Kooij, 1981; Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). While the thermal
pasteurization of liquid foods is well established and satisfactory as a decontamination treatment of such commodities, it
does not suit for solid foods, dry ingredients and fresh foods whose raw characteristics must be maintained to fulfill
specific market requirements (Farkas, 1998; Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). The chemical sanitizing procedures (e.g.
fumigation) have inherent problems concerning residue which pose hazards for consumers as well as for workers in food
processing factories and environmental pollution (Farkas, 1998; van Kooij, 1981). Among the physical methods studied
and evaluated as techniques for microbial control, the application of heat is generally considered as the most effective
method available since it can result in the sterilization of foods (Lopez-Malo and Palou, 2005).
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 5
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Table 1: physical and chemical methods of food preservation
PHYSICAL METHODS
SMOKING –Smoking is the process of flavoring, cooking or preserving food by exposing it to smoke from burning
or smoldering materials, most often wood. Meat and fish are the most common smoked foods, though cheeses,
vegetables and ingredients used to make beverages such as whisky, smoked beer etc. Smoke adds flavor and is both
an antimicrobial and antioxidant but it does not actually penetrate far into meat or fish is insufficient alone for
preserving food; it is thus typically combined with salt-curing or drying. There are two types of smoking such as cold
smoking and hot smoking.
Cold
smoking
Smokehouse temperatures for cold smoking are typically done between 20 and
300C. In this temperature range, food take on a smoked flavor, but remain
relatively moist. Cold smoking does not cook foods. Meat should be fully
cured before cold smoking. Cold smoking can be used as a flavor enhancer for
items such as chicken breasts, beef, pork chops, salmon etc. The item is hung
first to develop a pellicle, then can be cold smoked for just enough to give
some flavor. Other important thing should keep in mind, is cold smoked foods
should be cooked before consumption.
Hot
smoking
Hot smoking exposes the foods to smoke and heat in a controlled environment.
Hot smoking can be done in a kiln or smokehouse for a short period of time. It
preserves foods in three ways: (1) Heat kills microbes; (2) chemical found in
smoke including formaldehyde and alcohol act as preservatives; and (iii) the
food dries out so there is less moist area for bacteria to grow. Like cold
smoking, the item is hung first to develop pellicle, then smoked. Although
foods that have been hot smoked are often reheated or cooked, they are
typically safe to eat without further cooking. Hams and ham hocks are fully
cooked once they are properly smoked. Hot smoking occurs within the range
of 52 to 800C. Within this temperature range, foods are fully cooked, moist,
and flavorful. If the smoker is allowed to get hotter than 850C, the foods will
shrink excessively, buckle or even split. Smoking at high temperature also
reduce yield, as both moisture and fat are cooked away.
Meat hanging inside a
smokehouse
Racks with hot
smoked pacific halibut
DRYING - Drying is a natural technique for preventing food spoilage. Leaving foods out in the sun or wind to dry
out is probably one of the earliest forms of food preservation. Evidence of the drying of meats, fish, fruits and
vegetables also go back to the earliest recorded human history. There are four types of drying method such as
dehydration, vacuum drying, spray drying and freeze drying.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 6
Dehydrating -
sun drying
Drying food is a slow process. It is the right combination of warmth, low
humidity and air currents (or wind speed). It can be carried out in the sun or
wind under natural environment or in an oven or a food dehydrator under
controlled environments. In drying, a warm temperature allows the
moisture to evaporate. Air currents (or wind) and low humidity accelerate
the drying process by speeding up the movement of moisture from food to
air
Vacuum
drying
Vacuum drying is a process in which drying is carried out at reduced pressure, which lowers the
heat required for rapid drying. In vacuum drying food is placed in a large container from which air
is removed. Water vapor pressure within the food is greater than that outside of it, and water
evaporates more quickly than in a normal atmosphere. It is biologically desirable since some
enzyme that cause oxidation of foods become active during normal air drying.
Spray drying
Spray drying is a method of producing a dry powder from a liquid or slurry
by rapidly drying with a hot gas. This dried powder can be easily packed
and transported. The surface area of the original food is increased many
times, making dehydration much more efficiently such as production of
milk powder from liquid milk and coffee powder from concentrated
solution of coffee. This is the preferred method of drying of many
thermally sensitive materials such as foods and pharmaceuticals.
Freeze-drying
or
lyophilization
Freeze -drying is based on the dehydration by sublimation of a frozen food.
It is convert solid directly to the gaseous phase without first melting. Due
to the absence of liquid water and the low temperature requirement, stop
most of enzymatic and microbial reactions.
Vacuum
packing
Vacuum packing is a method of packaging that removes air from the
package prior to sealing. It reduces atmospheric oxygen, limiting the
growth of aerobic bacteria or fungi, and preventing the evaporation of
volatile components. Vacuum packing is commonly used to store dry foods
over a long period of time, such as cereals, nuts, cured meats, cheese,
smoked fish, coffee and potato chips. It is also used on short term basis, to
store fresh foods such as vegetables, meats, liquids because it inhibits
bacterial growth.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 7
SALTING - Salting is the preservation of food with dry edible salt. It is one of the oldest
methods of preserving food. Most bacteria, fungi and other potentially pathogenic organisms
cannot survive in a highly salty environment, due to the hypertonic nature of salt. Any living
cell in such an environment will become dehydrated through osmosis and die or temporally
inactivated. Examples for salting foods are salted fish (dried fish), salted meat (bacon) and
salted vegetables (cabbage and beans)
FREEZING - Freezing is an effective form of preservation because it does not require any added preservatives and
the pathogens that cause food spoilage are killed or inactivated when temperature of food is below -9.5 0C. At this
temperature liquid converted to solid (ice) and is therefore unavailable to bacteria. But it is not effective than thermal
techniques because the pathogens which deactivated (not killed) by freezing will become active when frozen food
thaws. During freezing the time factor is critical. Base on this factor freezing can be categorized into two types such
as slow freezing and quick freezing.
Slow
freezing
The slow freezing creates larger ice crystals. They have the tendency to cause
rupture of cells and the destruction of texture in meats, fish, vegetables and fruits.
Quick
freezing
In order to deal with above problem the technique of quick freezing has been
developed. In this method a food is cooled to or below its freezing point as
quickly as possible and forms smaller ice crystals, less tendency to change the
texture of the food
FERMENTATION - Fermentation in food processing is the process of converting
carbohydrates to alcohol or organic acids using microorganisms such as yeast or bacteria
under anaerobic conditions. The term fermentation sometimes refers especially to the
chemical conversion of sugars into ethanol, producing alcoholic drinks such as wine, beer
and cider. However, similar processes take place in the leavening of bread (CO2 produced by
yeast activity) and in the preservation of sour foods with the production of lactic acid, such
as sauerkraut and yogurt. Other widely consumed fermented foods include vinegar, olives
and cheese. Food fermentation serves five main purposes: to enrich the diet through
development of a diversity of flavors, aromas and textures in food substrates; to preserve
substantial amounts of food through lactic acid, alcohol, acetic acid and alkaline
fermentations; to enrich food substrates with protein, essential amino acids and vitamins; to
eliminate antinutrients; and to reduce cooking time and the associated use of fuel.
Fermented foods:
Bean-based - soya sauce, soya bean paste
Grain-based - beer, bread, sake, rice wine, malt whisky, grain whisky, idli, dosa, vodka
Vegetable-based - mixed pickle, sauerkraut, Indian pickle
Beer and bread, two
major uses of
fermentation in food
Fermented soya bean
food
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 8
Fruit-based - wine, vinegar, cider, perry, brandy, pickling, chocolate
Honey-based - mead, methrglin
Dairy-based - cheese, cultured milk products such as yogurt
Fish-based - fish sauce, shrimp paste
Meat-based - salami, saucisson
Tea-based - pu-erh tea, kombucha
Batter made from rice
and lentil (Vigna
mungo) prepared and
fermented for
baking idlis and dosa
Cheeses
THERMAL TREATMENT -Heating food is an effective way to preserving it, because the great majority of
pathogens are killed at temperatures close to the boiling point of water. The most common types of heat treatment
processes are pasteurization and sterilization.
Pasteurization
Pasteurization is a controlled heating process used to eliminate any
dangerous pathogens that may present in milk, fruit-based drink, some
meat products etc. to make food safe to eat and helped to reduce
transmission of diseases such as typhoid fever, tuberculosis, scarlet fever,
polio and dysentery. However, pasteurized foods are safe; it can be re-
contaminated unless it is not properly handled. For example, all pasteurized
foods must be refrigerated. The pasteurization inactivates most viable
vegetative form of microorganisms but not heat resistant spores. In
pasteurization, generally a heating temperature below 1000C is applied.
High-Temperature-Short-Time Treatment (HTST) pasteurization -
This process uses higher heat for less time to kill pathogen bacteria (e.g. for
milk - 720C or 1610F for 15 seconds).
Low-Temperature-Long-Time Treatment (LTLT) pasteurization -
This process uses lower heat for a longer time (e.g. for milk - 630C or
1450F for 30 minutes).
The temperatures and times depend on the type of food and the final results
one want to achieve such as retaining food nutrients, color texture and
flavor. There are three main types of pasteurization processes such as flash,
steam and irradiation.
Flash pasteurization - Involves a high temperature and short time
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 9
treatment (e.g. for pourable liquid - juices are heated for 3 to 15 seconds).
After heating, the product is cooled (about 40C) and packaged (e.g. boxes
and pouches) and as it allows extended unrefrigerated storage while
providing a safe product.
Steam pasteurization - The methods commonly uses to control or reduce
microorganisms in beef. This system passes freshly-slaughtered beef that
are already inspected, washed and trimmed, through a chamber that
exposes the beef to pressurized stem (88 to 930C or 190 to 2000F) for about
6 to 8 seconds and cooled with a cold-water spray. This process has proven
to be successful in reducing pathogenic bacteria such as E.coli O157:H7,
Salmonella and Listeria without the use of any chemicals.
Irradiation pasteurization - Foods, such as poultry, red meat, spices and
fruits and vegetables are subjected to small amounts of gamma rays. This
process effectively controls vegetative bacteria and parasites foodborne
pathogens and increases the storage time of foods.
Sterilization
Sterilization is a controlled heating process used to completely eliminate
all living microorganisms including thermo resistant spores in milk and
other food. It is used to treat all types of food products. It can be achieved
by physical methods such as moist heat, dry heat, irradiation or chemical
methods.
Ultra-High Temperature (UHT) sterilization - It has a heat treatment of
over 1000C during very short times (e.g. about 1400C for a few seconds), it
is especially applicable to low viscous liquid products (milk, juices, cream,
wine, salad dressing), foods with discrete particles (baby foods, tomato
products, fruits and vegetable juices, soup) and larger particles (stews). The
basis of UHT is the sterilization of food before packaging, then filing into
pre-sterilized containers in a sterile atmosphere. There are two principal
methods of UHT treatment such as direct heating (injection and infusion)
and indirect heating.
Sterilization with moist heat - In this method, temperatures generally
ranging from 110 to 1300C with sterilizing times being from 20 to 40
minutes (e.g. canned foods - at about 1210C for 20 minutes). Higher
temperatures and shorter times may have similar effects (e.g. 1340C for 3
minutes) and lower temperatures and shorter times can also be applied (e.g.
with acid fruit juices, jam or desserts - heating to 80 - 1000C for 10
minutes).
Autoclaver
Injection and infusion
for direct heating in
UHT treatment
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 10
Sterilization with dry heat - In this method, longer exposure times (e.g.
up to 2 hours) and higher temperatures (e.g. 160 - 1800C) are required than
moist heat for killing bacteria end-spores.
Sterilization by ionizing radiation - X ray, gamma radiation is used to
sterilize food and other compact materials.
CHEMICAL MEHTODS
CHEMICAL ADDITIVES - Food additives are substances added to food to preserve flavor or enhance its taste,
appearance or other qualities. Some additives have been used for centuries; for example, preserving food by pickling
(with vinegar), and using sulfur dioxide (for wine). The chemical additives which are used to prevent or inhibit
spoilage of food due to fungi, bacteria and other microorganisms are called as antimicrobial preservatives; and which
are used to inhibit the oxidation of food constituents are known as antioxidants (e.g. oxygen absorber).
Preservatives
Antimicrobial preservatives - These prevent degradation of food by microbial growth. Common
antimicrobial preservatives are sodium benzoate, benzoic acid (used in acidic foods such as jams,
salad dressing, juices, pickles, carbonated drinks, soya sauce); calcium and sodium propionate and
propionic acid (for baked goods); and calcium, sodium, potassium sorbates and sorbic acid (used in
cheese, wine, baked goods); and sodium and potassium sulfite and sulfur dioxide (used in fruits);
nitrate and nitrite (used in meat).
Antioxidants - The oxidation process spoils most food, especially those with high fat content. Fats
quickly turn rancid when exposed to oxygen. Antioxidants prevent or inhibit the oxidation process.
The most common antioxidant additives are ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and calcium and sodium
ascorbates (used in oils, cheese and chips). Other antioxidants include the phenol derivatives such as
butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) (used in food packaging);
gallic acid and sodium gallate (used as oxygen scavenger) and sodium and potassium sulfite and
sulfur dioxide (used in beverages, wine).
FUMIGATION - Fumigation is one of the quickest and most effective ways to eliminate pests from processes food,
wood, large building and sometimes homes. The fumigation also use in quarantine. A substance that is used to
fumigation is called as fumigant. A fumigant is a pesticide that is a gas or forms a gas, when applied. In a high
enough concentration, a fumigant can kill insects and other pests. Fumigants may be odorless and usually cannot be
seen.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 11
Toxic gas
fumigation
Ethylene oxide (C2H4O), methyl bromide (CH3Br) and phosphine (PH3) are most
commonly used fumigants in the food industry.
Ethylene oxide (C2H4O) - It is a cyclic ether; a colorless and flammable gas at
room temperature with a faintly sweet odor. It is used to remove bacteria and
moulds from food products. The disinfectant effect of ethylene oxide is similar to
that of heat sterilization, but because of limited penetration, it affects only the
surface. This process can take up to 12 hours due its slow action upon
microorganisms, and lengthy processing and aeration time. The gas ethylene oxide
kills microbes through a reaction known as alkylation. This is a process whereby a
hydrogen atom is replaced by an alkyl group. Ethylene oxide is a sterilant,
meaning it is something that kills every living microbe, including bacterial spores
on an inanimate object or surface. It can be used to sterilize equipment that is heat-
sensitive.
Methyl bromide (CH3Br) - Methyl bromide is a colorless gas. At normal
concentrations, it is odorless, tasteless and has no irritating qualities to indicate its
presence. However, at concentrations higher than those used in fumigation it gives
off a sickly sweet odor. It is toxic to all stages of insect life. The gas is 3.3 times
heavier than air and tends to stratify, settling out the low places. Fans are needed
to ensure thorough mixing of gas with air. With fans, methyl bromide penetrates
most commodities very well.
Methyl bromide is used to control pests in processed food or feed. It is strictly for
the treatment of raw or processed commodities and some nonfood products. There
are several materials that should not be exposed to methyl bromide such as iodized
salt, full fat soya flour, Items that may contain reactive sulfur compounds (e.g.
some soap powder, some baking soda), sponge rubber, foam rubber (cushions and
mattresses), Leather goods, woolens, paper (writing paper cured by the sulfide
process, photographic materials used in dark rooms and cinder blocks.
Phosphine (PH3) - Phosphine is used to fumigate raw agricultural commodities
such as grains, seeds, cotton, wool and tobacco. Also it uses to treat animal feeds
and feed ingredients, processed foods and nonfood items. The fumigation process
is carried out in boxcars, containers, ships and other transport vehicles, bins, mills,
food processing plants and warehouses.
There are two main types of phosphine fumigants: aluminium phosphide and
magnesium phosphide. These "metal phosphides" are formulated as solids that
react with moisture in the air to produce "hydrogen phosphide" (phosphine gas).
Phosphine also comes as a bottled product (phosphine dissolved in liquid carbon
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 12
dioxide). Phosphine gas is colorless and highly toxic to all stages of insect and
animal life. It has a distinct garlic or carbide odor that is readily detectable at
levels below worker protection limits (0.3 ppm). The odor is due to an impurity
rather than phosphine gas itself. Aluminium phosphide is the main form used to
treat agricultural commodities. Magnesium phosphide is more reactive than
aluminium phosphide. It is preferred when rapid release is desired and treatment is
performed at lower temperature and humidities.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 13
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Due to these reasons and keeping mind the universality of the food spoilage, arising a need to develop emerging
technologies those can be used to achieve almost all the objectives of food preservation (Lopez-Malo and Palou, 2005
Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010;). This is where food irradiation and other alternatives come into the picture (Farkas,
1998; Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). The pasteurization or sterilization of food by irradiation is a technology useful for
all classes of food as well as this method can be used for preventing foodborne illness, preservation, control of insects,
delaying sprouting and ripening and sterilization of food of both liquid and solid by using different approved doses
(Acheson and steele, 2001; Akram and Kwon, 2010) (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Uses of ionizing radiation in food preservation
Irradiation of Food
The process of irradiation involves exposing the food to ionizing radiation so that a prescribed quantity is absorbed. These
ionizing radiation either gamma rays from the nuclides 60Co or 137Cs or x-ray generated from machine sources operated at
or below an energy level of 5MeV or electron beams generated from machine sources operated at an energy level of 10
MeV ((van Kooij, 1981; CAC/RCP 19-1979; WHO, 1994; Farkas, 1998; Acheson and Steele, 2001; CAC/CX-STAD 106-
1983, Rev.1, 2003; Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). These types of radiation are chosen because: they produce the
desired food preservative effects; they do not induce radioactivity to foods or packaging materials; and they are available
in quantities and at costs that allow commercial use of the irradiation process (Beaker, 1983; Farkas, 2004; Alam Khan
and Abrahem, 2010).
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 14
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Because the irradiation does not heat the treated material, the food keeps its freshness (fruits, fish, vegetable) and its
physical state (frozen or dried commodities) as before the radiation treatment (van Kooij, 1981). Irradiation leads to the
destruction of pathogenic non-spore forming foodborne bacteria and parasitic organisms such as trichina. As a result of
this, consumers protect from microorganisms-related diseases such as salmonellosis, hemorrhagic, diarrhoea caused by
Escherichia coli or gastroenteritis from Vibrio vulnificus (Thayer et al., 1996). This destruction is mainly based on the
principle that ionizing radiation causes very effective disruption of DNA molecules in the nuclei of the cells rendering
them inactivated (Diehl, 1995; WHO, 1994). Therefore microorganisms, insect gametes and plant meristems are
prevented from their reproduction, which consequently results in various preservative effects as a function of the absorbed
radiation dose (Table 2), while chemical and other radiation induced changes are minimal (Thayer, 1990).
Table2: Dosage of radiation of various application of food irradiation (Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010)
Preservative Effects and Types of Application Dose Requirements
(kGy)
Killing and sterilizing insects (disinfestations of food) 0.2 - 0.8
Prevention of reproduction of foodborne parasites 0.1 - 3.0
Decreasing after-ripening and delaying senescence of some fruit and
vegetables; extension of shelf-life of food by reducing of microbial
populations
0.5 - 5.0
Elimination of viable non-spore forming pathogenic micro-organisms
(other than viruses) in fresh and frozen food 1.0 - 7.0
Reduction or elimination of microbial population in dry food ingredients 3.0 - 10.0
An important reason for the relatively high sensitivity of the DNA to the radiation is the fact that DNA molecules are
much larger than other molecular structures inside the cell. The damage is either direct caused by reactive oxygen-
centered radicals (.*OH) originating from the radiolysis of water or indirect. In the case of indirect, the damage to the
nucleic acids occurs when radiation ionizes an adjacent molecule, which in turn reacts with the genetic material. In view
of the fact that water is a major component of most foods and microbes, it is often the adjacent molecule that ends up
producing a lethal product (Grecz et al., 1983; Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). The very reactive hydroxyl radical (.*OH)
and are known to interfere with the bonds between nucleic acids within a single strand or between opposite strands. The
survival of a microorganism, after having sufficient ionizing radiation as gamma or electron beam depends upon its
enzymatic DNA repair system, the number of copies of given gene within the DNA and the given radiation dose (Molins,
2001; Akram and Kwon,
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 15
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
2010).Although biological systems have a capacity to repair both single stranded and double stranded breaks of DNA
backbone, the damage occurring from irradiation is random and extensive. Therefore, recovery
processes in bacteria after their radiation damage are unlikely to occur (Razskazovskiy et al., 2003; Alam Khan and
Abrahem, 2010). The differences of the sensitivity to radiation among microorganisms are related to the differences in
their chemical and physical structure and their ability to recover from the radiation injuries (Alam Khan and Abrahem,
2010). The amount of radiation required to controlling the microorganisms in food, therefore, depending on resistance of
the strand and the number of organisms present (Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). In addition to the their inherent
abilities, several environmental factors such as composition of the medium, moisture content, temperature during
radiation, presence or absence of oxygen and others, significantly influence their radiation resistance, particularly in
vegetative cells (Ashley et al, 2004).
The benefits of irradiation also include the fact that it causes only minimal temperature raise in the product and can be
applied through packaging materials as a terminal treatment, thus it eliminates the re-contamination or re-infestation of
product (Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). Radiation caninactivate organisms in food that are in the frozen state without
thawing them up (Farkas, 1998).
In fact, heating, drying, and cooking may cause higher nutritional losses. In addition to that certain carcinogenic aromatic
and heterocyclic compounds produced during the thermal treatment of food at high temperature were not identified in
food after irradiation (Becker, 1983; Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). According to Miller (2005), macro-nutrients such
as carbohydrates, proteins and lipids and micro-nutrients mainly water-soluble and fat-soluble vitamins are not
significantly affected by irradiation below 10 kGy radiation doses. However, with higher radiation doses (above 10 kGy),
structural properties of the fibrous carbohydrates can be degraded, and lipids in the presence of oxygen, can become lipid
hydro peroxides. This oxidation product can cause undesirable odours and flavours (rancidity). It is known that the
unsaturated fatty acids are more prone to develop rancidity (Miller, 2005; Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). Lipid
oxidation can be significantly reduced by freezing and/or removing of oxygen prior to irradiation (Miller, 2005; Alam
Khan and Abrahem, 2010). The micronutrient thiamine (e.g. pork) is relatively high sensitive to the effect of radiation
(Alam Khan and Abrahem, 2010). Minerals have been shown to remain stable (Diehl, 1995). In addition to nutritional and
sensory values, the wholesomeness (lack of mutagenicity, teragenicity and toxicity) of irradiated foods has been studied
extensively (Thayer, 1990). Long-term animal feeding studies have demonstrated that radiation-pasteurized or -sterilized
foods are safe and nutritious also for humans (Thayer et al., 1996). Toxicological and nutritional studies have confirmed
the safety of foods irradiated at doses below 10 kGy (Thayer, 1990; Smith and Pillai, 2004).
Based on a review of scientific evidence, various agencies from round the world such as World Health Organization
(WHO), the European Parliament, US Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) and the US Department of Agriculture
(USAD)
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 16
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
have made recommendations regarding the safety of irradiated food consumption and the wholesomeness of them (van
Kooij, 1981; Kader, 1986; Ashley et al, 2004). During the past decade several steps were taken by the Joint
FAO/IAEA Division or developed in close co-operation with the WHO, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Development and the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme, to promote international acceptance of irradiated food
(van Kooij, 1981; WHO-TR, 1981; Ashley et al, 2004). To aid harmonization of national laws the Codex Alimentanus
Commission has adopted a recommended international general standard for irradiated foods (CAC/RS 106-1979 and
CAC/RCP 19-1979).The 1980 Joint FAO/IAEA/WHO Expert Committees concluded that the irradiation of any food up
to an average dose of 10 kGy causes no toxicological hazard (WHO-TR, 1981; Kader, 1986; WHO, 1994).
However, irradiated foods are not widely available yet; approval for irradiation of food was given by US FDA since the
early 1990s. For meats, separate approval is required both from the FDA and USDA (Table 3).American astronauts have
eaten irradiated foods to prevent food-related sicknesses in space since the early 1970s. Patients with weakened immune
systems (e.g. AIDS patients) are fed irradiated foods to reduce the chance of life-treating infection (WHO, 1994). In
addition, irradiation is widely used to sterilize a variety of medical and household products, such as joint implants, band-
aid, baby pacifiers, cosmetic ingredients, wine and bottle corks and food packaging materials (Thayer et al., 1996; Farkas,
1998).United State Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved irradiation of pork, fruits, vegetables, spices and herbs
in 1986 and poultry in 1990 (WHO, 1994). During the 1990 scientists improved irradiation methods to destroy toxins and
bacteria, especially Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Shigella and Campylobacter in food (Farkas, 1998).
Table 3: FDA and USAD approval for food irradiation
(https://uw-food-irradiation.engr.wisc.edu/Facts.html; Lewis et al., 2002)
Approval Food Purpose
1963 Wheat flour Control of mold
1964 White potatoes Inhibit sprouting
1986 Pork Kill Trichina parasites
1986 Fruit and vegetables Insect control and Increase shelf life
1986 Herbs and spices Sterilization
1990 - FDA
1992 - USDA Poultry Bacterial pathogen reduction
1997 - FDA
1999 - USDA Meat - beef and lamb Bacterial pathogen reduction
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 17
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Food irradiation is now being commonly used in many countries, as people are becoming more aware of the role of food
irradiation in regards to food safety and product shelf-life extension. Labeling is necessary, so that people can freely
choose whether to use this safe and wholesome processed food (Akram and Kwon, 2010). Countries in North America,
Europe, Asia, Africa and Middle East accepted irradiation (WHO, 1994). The radura (Figure 2) is the international food
packaging symbol for irradiation (WHO, 1994; CAC/CX-STAN-001, Rev 2, 1999).
Figure 2: International food packaging symbol (radura) for irradiation
Foods Suitable for Irradiation
Food which are used for radiation decontamination are poultry meat, egg products, red meat, fishery products, spices,
mushrooms and other dry ingredients.
POULTRY
Pathogenic microorganisms such as Campylobacter, Salmonella and Escherichia coli 0157:H7 are normally found in the
intestinal tracts of food-producing animals. Raw meats and poultry products can become contaminated with these
pathogens during slaughtering and processing (Mead et al., 1999; Lewis et al., 2002). According to Lewis et al. (2002),
the irradiation doses of 1.0 and 1.8 kGy were sufficient to eliminating bacteria in the boneless, chicken breasts fillets.
They also carried out investigation on the effect of radiation at 1.0 to 1.8 kGy on the overall color of the products. Results
for the color determination are showed that irradiation of 1.0 and 1.8 kGy had no effect on color when compared to the
non-irradiated control (Lewis et al., 2002; Javanmarda et al., 2006). Recommended doses for radiation processing of
frozen poultry are 3-5 kGy and 1.5-2.5 kGy for chilled poultry (Lewis et al., 2002).
MUSHROOMS
Mushrooms are fleshly fungi, being used as food and medicinal purposes by human since time immemorial. However,
their short shelf-life and high initial microbial load are major problems regarding their easy distribution and self-
consumption. Mushrooms have a short-life due to post-harvest changes such as softening and browning process, stalk
elongation and cap opening (Patterson, 1990). Extended shelf life is a key factor for producers to develop the market over
great distances (Akram and Kwon, 2010). The irradiation of mushrooms can be a safe and cost effective method to
increase shelf-life as well as to ensure hygienic and sensory quality (Akram and Kwon, 2010). Different studies exhibited
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 18
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
great effect of irradiation at all dose levels on reducing microbial counts. The qualitative and quantitative changes in the
microflora of mushrooms by irradiation contribute to overall increase in the shelf life of fresh mushrooms without
changing the original appetence (Akram and Kwon, 2010). The recommended dose for extending the shelf life of fresh
mushroom in different countries is 1 - 3 kGy, while the recommended dose regarding the decontamination of dried
mushrooms used as seasonings is 10 - 50 kGy (ICGGI, 1999; Akram and Kwon, 2010). Irradiation of mushrooms at 0.06 -
0.5 kGy has been shown the inhibition of cap opening and stalk elongation, the reduction of surface molds and darkening
of the gills and the maintaining of the fresh appearance of mushrooms (Kader, 1986).
EGG PRODUCTS
Sensory and functional properties of eggs are relatively radiation sensitive. The Salmonella count in naturally
contaminated eggs are very low do not normally exceed 10 – 100 colony forming units (CFU)/mL) (Farkas, 1998). A
minimal dose of 0.5 kGy would be enough to eliminate Salmonella from the surface of whole eggs and a dose of 1.5 kGy
would be sufficient to eliminate the organism from whole shell eggs and liquid whole eggs without significant adverse
effects on the egg quality (Serrano et al., 1997). According to Ley et al. (1962), irradiation of 4 - 5 kGy does not affect the
quality of frozen whole egg or of food prepared with egg product. Salmonella are the principal microorganism in dried
egg products (ICMFS, 1980). The dosage 6 kGy is enough for radicidation of dried egg albumen without changing their
functional and organoleptic properties. However, irradiation under aerobic condition gives off-flavour (Farkas, 1998).
Irradiation of 2 kGy would result in 2 - 3 log-cycles reduction of Salmonella without changing sensory quality of the
product (Farkas, 1998). Irradiation of sensitive product in oxygen-free packaging would minimize oxidation; improve
flavour retention (Lebovics et al., 1994).
RED MEATS
Escherichia coli O157:H7 has been considering as leading causative agent in under-cooked hamburgers (Lee, 1994).
Organic acid spray proposed for sanitation can reduce entire pathogens but has limited efficiency particularly in
controlling E. coli O157:H7 (Brackett et al., 1994; Cutter and Siracus, 1994).Thus, irradiation of prepackaged meat
products such as ground beef, minced meat and hamburgers may help in controlling meat borne pathogens and parasites
(Cutter and Siracus, 1994). Pathogenic microorganisms and parasites in meat products which are commonly consumed
raw (e.g. filet american) are of particular importance. A dose as low as 1 kGy was effective in reducing Salmonella up to
approximately 2 log-cycles in 'filet americain" and Campylobacter jejuni and Y. enterocolitica more than4 log-cycles
(Kampelmacher, 1984).
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 19
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Relatively high doses, 4 to 6 kGy are required to kill foodborne parasites. Significant sensory changes would be induced
at these dose levels in raw foods which carry the parasites (Urbain, 1978). Gamma irradiation of Trichinella spiralis
infected pork with a dose of 0.15 - 0.30 kGy made the parasites sexually sterile and blocked the maturation of ingested
larvae in the hosts gut (Sivinski, 1985). The use of irradiation to control Trichinella spiralis in porkat a minimum dose f
0.3 kGy and not to exceed 1.0 kGy was approved by the US FDA (FDA, 1985).
FISHERY PRODUCTS
Crustaceans and molluscs originating from polluted environments, frequently harbour pathogenic microorganisms and
pose a public health hazard (Farkas, 1998). Radiation microbiology studies with fishery products indicated that irradiation
doses up to 4 kGy to control pathogens could be useful with frozen fishery products such as shrimps, prawns
(Nouchpramoul, 1985; Ito et al., 1989). D10 -values of Salmonella serovariants in artificially contaminated shrimps in
Thailand were found to range from 0.3 to 0.5 kGy for refrigerated samples and from 0.4 to 0.6 kGy for frozen samples
(Nouchpramoul, 1985). Vibrio parahaemolyticus has been considered as the leading causative agent of bacterial
gastroenteritis from eating fishery product in South-East Asia. Sixty percent of fresh fish obtained from local markets in
Bombay, India and eighty five percent of fresh or frozen shrimp in Thailand was reported as being contaminated with this
organism (Lewis, 1983; Nouchpramoul, 1985). A dose as low as 1 kGy is sufficient to eliminate Vibrio parahaemolyticus
in frozen sea-foods (Lewis, 1983).The maximum permissible dose of ionizing radiation for raw shrimps is approximately
9 kGy (Coleby and Shewan, 1965). A radiation dose of 1 kGy is sufficient to eliminate Vibrio vulnificus in oysters
(Mallett et al., 1991).
SPICES AND OTHER DRIED INGREDIENTS
A major concern of food processors is to assure that the microbial load in ingredients and processing aids does not
contribute to spoilage of food and does not diminish its microbial safety (Farkas, 1998). The radiation decontamination of
spices, herbs, enzyme preparation and other dried ingredients with doses of 3 - 10 kGy proved to be a reliable method for
improving microbiological safety of such products (Farkas, 1988). The black pepper is one of the most contaminated
spices. Spices often originate in developing countries where harvest and storage conditions are inadequately controlled
with respect to food hygiene are more prone to contaminate with micro-organisms and insects. Thus, they may have been
exposed to a high level of natural contamination by mesophylic, sporogenic and asporgenic bacteria, hyphomycetes and
fecal coli forms (Khan and Abrahem, 2010). Most spices are dried in the open air and can be contaminated by air and soil
borne bacteria, fungi and insects. Microorganisms adversely effect to public health such as Salmonella, Escherichia coli,
Clostridium perfringens, Bacillus cereuc and toxigenic moulds can also be present (Khan and Abrahem, 2010).
Contaminated dry plant ingredients cause serious problems to food processers. Therefore, they fumigate spices and other
dry plant ingredient with methyl bromide to eliminate insects or with ethylene oxide to remove bacteria and moulds
(Loaharanu, 1994). These chemicals cause serious damage to environment as well as public health. Many commercial
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 20
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
food processers are currently interested in the use of ionizing radiation to decontamination of spices, herbs and dried
vegetable seasonings. It is more effective against bacteria than the thermal treatment and does not leave chemical residues
in food products (Loaharanu, 1994; Thayer et al., 1996). There is no change in the composition of volatile oils between
thermally treated and irradiated black pepper samples. Gamma irradiation at the dose of 10 kGy (toxicologically and
nutritionally confirmed maximum safe does) can eliminate microbial in spices without causing any significant
organoleptic or chemical alterations (Khan and Abrahem, 2010). Irradiation treatment of ginger, turmeric, cayenne
pepper, onion and garlic powder at the dose of 30 kGy did not change their seasoning capacity (Lescano et al., 1991).
FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
Fresh fruits and vegetables are highly sensitive to various stresses such as those induced by - wounding, bruising or other
types of physical damage; exposure to higher or lower than the optimum temperature for each commodity; water loss;
exposure to oxygen and/or carbon dioxide levels beyond the concentration which are tolerated by each commodity
(Kader, 1986). During the irradiation free radicals are formed. These free radicals react with various food constituents and
may damage the cells. Since fresh fruits and vegetables contain eighty to ninety percent water and twenty percent of their
intercellular spaces contain oxygen, the most common free radicals are those formed from water and oxygen (Kader,
1986; Grecz et al., 1983). The formation of free radicals can be reduced by irradiating in nitrogen atmosphere and then
reduce possible injuries to the plant tissue (Kader, 1986). The effects of ionizing radiation at various doses on fresh fruits
and vegetables are shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Effects of ionizing radiation on fresh fruits and vegetables (Kader, 1986)
Dose (kGy) Observed Effects
0.05 - 0.15 Sprout inhibition in tuber, bulb and root vegetables; inhibition of growth in
asparagus and mushrooms
0.15 - 0.75 Insect disinfestations
0.25- 0.50 Delayed ripening of some tropical fruits such as banana, mango and papaya
> 1.75 Control of postharvest disease
1.00 - 3.00 Accelerated softening; development of off-flavours in some commodities
>3.00 Excessive softening; abnormal ripening; incidence of some physiological
disorders; impaired flavour
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 21
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
A large number of insects can be carried by fresh fruits and vegetables. Many of these insects (e.g. fruit flies) can
seriously effect to the trade among countries. Therefore, effective insect-disinfestations treatments (quarantine treatments)
which are not harmful to the consumer, the workers or the commodity are essential for allowing unrestricted distribution
of fresh fruit and vegetables (Kader, 1986). The currently approved quarantine treatments include certification of insect-
free areas and use of chemicals (methyl bromide, phosphine, and hydrogen cyanide), cold treatments, heat treatments and
some combination of these treatments. These methods are usable on a limited number of commodities due to phytotoxic
effects on others (Kader, 1986). Cold treatments can be used on commodities like apple, pear, grape, orange, kiwifruit,
and pomegranate; they are not usable for highly perishable commodities like strawberry, apricot, cherry or for chilling-
sensitive commodities like grapefruit, lemon, avocado, papaya, mango, tomato, and pepper. Thus, search continues for
alternative treatments. The possible use of ionizing radiation for insect disinfestations is one of the most promising
applications (Moy, 1985). Dosage below 1 kGy is an effective insect-disinfestations process against various fruit flies,
mango seed weevil, navel orange worm and other insect spices of quarantine significance in marketing fresh fruits and
vegetables. Most insect are sterilized at doses of 0.05 - 0.75 kGy. In general, eggs are the most sensitive to ionizing
radiation, followed by larvae, then pupae (Kader, 1986). The relative tolerance of fresh fruits and vegetables is shown in
Table 5. The position of the fruits and vegetables in this classification can be varied according to production area, season
and handling procedures (Moy, 1985).
Table 5: Relative Tolerance of fresh fruits and Vegetables to ionizing radiation stress at doses < 1 kGy (Kader, 1986)
Relative Tolerance Commodities
High Apple, cherry, date, guava, mango, papaya, peach, rambutan, raspberry,
strawberry, tomato, longan, muskmelon, nectarine, tamarilio
Moderate Apricot, banana, grapefruit, orange, cherimoya, fig, kumquat, loquat, lychee,
passion fruit, pear, pineapple, plum, tangelo, tangerine
Low Avocado, cucumber, grape, green bean, lemon, lime, olive, pepper, sapodilla,
soursop, summer squash, leafy vegetables, broccoli, cauliflower
The effectiveness of radiation as a fungicidal and/or fungi static treatment depends on the pathogen, its stage of growth
and the number of viable fungal cells on or within the tissue. Generally, a minimum dose of 1.75 kGy is required for
effective inhibition of post-harvest fungi (Kader, 1986).
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 22
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Consumer Acceptance of Irradiated Food
Food irradiation is being promoted as a simple process that can be used to effectively and significantly reduce foodborne
illnesses around the world (Ashley et al., 2004). Despite the obvious benefits of the application of gamma-radiation on
food this technology remains vastly underestimated in the food industry. The hindering factors in the way of commercial
implementation of food irradiation process are politics and consumer advocacy (Khan and Abrahem, 2010). The use of
any treatment as a commercial food process depends on its acceptance by consumers. The attitudes of the consumer
toward food irradiation vary according to country, national traditions and political climate and the major concerns of
consumer included safety, nutrition, detection, labeling of irradiated foods (Broad, 1991). There are fears that the process
would be used to up-grade low-quality products (Khan and Abrahem, 2010). The people who oppose to food irradiation
are carried out picketing, making inflammatory demands and pressuring legislation (Satin, 1993). In a joint International
Organization of Consumers Unions (IOCU)/ International Consultative Group on Food Irradiation (ICGFI) seminar on
food irradiation and consumers, a number of recommendations were agreed on the areas including application, trade,
environmental implications, regulation and enforcement, consumer acceptance and labeling (IAEA, 1993). It has not been
widely accepted and adopted yet, is often linked to the fear and confusion about radiation itself and the lack of
understanding of the process. Providing science-based information on food irradiation leads to positive consumer attitude
(Fox, 2002). Increasing the acceptance of consumers reflect the level of awareness and quality of information provided.
This is emphasized the importance of educating the public on the technology and the benefits of irradiation (Nayga et al.,
2004). The key issue with the consumers is the labeling of irradiated foods that means informative labeling. The labeling
to provide identification is not sufficient. The information that describes the purpose of the treatment promotes consumer
acceptance, e.g. instead of "irradiated chicken", the words "treated by irradiation to control Salmonella and other food-
borne bacteria" (Pszczola, 1993; CAC/CX-STAN 106-1983, Rev 1, 2013; CAC/CX-STAN-001, Rev 2, 1999). Another
group of people proposed the labeling statements "cold pasteurization" and "electronic pasteurization" instead of
"irradiated foods" that is misleading the consumers (Ashley et al., 2004). Some people claim, based on false or poor
understanding of this process, that it can make food radioactive or can produce some very dangerous substances.
However, researches over many decades have proven that food irradiation is as safe as other common food preservation
techniques. Various authentic studies have concluded that food irradiation can be considered as radiologically,
microbiologically and toxicologically safe type of technology (Ehlermann, 2005). To promote the world-wide
introduction of food irradiation, it is necessary to develop national legislation and regulatory procedures that will enhance
confidence among trading nations that foods, irradiated in one country and offered for sale in another, have been subjected
to commonly acceptable standards of wholesomeness, hygienic practice and irradiation treatment control. To aid
harmonization of national laws the Codex Alimentanus Commission has been adopted a recommended international
general standards for irradiated foods (CAC, CAC/RS 106-1979, CAC/RCP 19-1979; CAC/CX-STAN 106-1983, Rev.1,
2013).
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 23
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Detection Methods for Irradiated Foods
Irradiation is used in food to eliminate pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms. However, irradiation is not fully
accepted by all consumers (Broad, 1991). Also food irradiation is approved in some countries but only on specific
products (Ashley et al., 2004). There is a need for methods to identify irradiated foods to check compliance with existing
regulations; to give consumers the opportunity to choose; and facilitate international trade of foods. Simple and reliable
methods are required to identify irradiated foodstuffs as different countries have different legislative requirements for
irradiated foods (Delincee, 1991). The irradiation detection methods in foods can be classified in three basic groups such
as chemical, physical and biological methods. The methods have different degrees of development such that some are
already approved and some are in the research phase (Delincee, 1991). The general methods for detection of irradiated
foods were adopted by the 24th session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in 2001 and revised by its 26th session in
2003 are shown in Table 6.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 24
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Table 6: General methods for the detection of irradiated foods (CAC/CX - STAN 231 - 2001, Rev. 2003)
Provision Commodity Method Principle
Detection of
irradiated
food
Food containing fat (raw chicken, pork, beef,
avocado, mango, papaya, cheese, eggs and foods
containing eggs)
EN
1784:1996
Gas chromatographic analysis of
hydrocarbons
Food containing fat (raw chicken, pork and liquid
whole egg)
EN
1785:1996
Gas chromatographic/
spectrophotometric analysis of 2-
alkylcyclobutanones
Food containing bone (Poultry, meat, fish) EN
1786:1996
Electron Spin Resonance (ERS)
spectroscopy
Food containing cellulose (pistachio nut shells and
paprika powder )
EN
1787:2000
Electron Spin Resonance (ERS)
spectroscopy
Food containing silicate minerals (herbs, spices,
their mixture and shrimps)
EN
1788:2001 Thermo-luminescence
Food containing silicate minerals (herbs, spices
and seasonings, crustacean and shellfish)
EN 13751:
2002 Photo-stimulated luminescence
Food containing crystalline sugar (dried mango
and dried fig)
EN 13708:
2001
Electron Spin Resonance (ERS)
spectroscopy
Herbs, spices, and raw minced meat
EN
13783:2001
NMKL
137 (2002)
Direct Epifluorescent Filter
Technique/ Aerobic Plate Count
(DEFT/APC) (screening method)
Food containing DNA (frozen chicken and pork) EN 13784:
2001
Micro-gel electrophoresis - DNA
comet assay (screening method)
Gas chromatographic analysis of hydrocarbons - Irradiated lipids are cleaved in the alpha and beta C-C bond forming
Cn-1 and Cn-2 alkanes, alkenes and alka-polyenes. Although hydrocarbons are also formed by heat, the radiolytic
hydrocarbons have a unique pattern of distribution. This method involves the isolation of fat, separation of hydrocarbon
fraction by adsorption chromatography (florisil) and characterization of hydrocarbons is performed using gas
chromatography with a flame ionization detector or a mass spectrometer. This method is applicable to all irradiated foods
contain lipids even though they are present at low concentrations (EN 1784, 1996).
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 25
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
Gas chromatographic/ spectrophotometric analysis of 2-alkylcyclobutanones - Cyclobutanones are thought to be
radiation specific. The detection involves Soxhlet extraction of homogenized sample with hexane, florisil
chromatography, followed by gas chromatography/ mass spectrometer (EN 1785, 1996).
Electron Spin Resonance (ERS) spectroscopy - The method detects radiation-specific radicals produced upon
irradiation of food. Free radicals are usually transient species. However, in rigid and dry matrices their lifetime extends.
Unpaired electrons in free radicals are negatively charged that possesses an intrinsic and magnetic moment. The energy
difference between the two electron spin states is called Zeeman splitting. When an external magnetic field is applied to a
magnetic particle it attempts to align with the field and some electron try to flip. However, they need energy to overcome
the transition (Zeeman splitting). When an electromagnetic wave is applied to the electron and its frequency is equal to the
electron spin frequency (induced by external magnetic field), resonance condition is achieved and flipping occurs. The
flipping causes energy from the electromagnetic wave to be absorbed. The ESR equipment detects this absorption and
draws a curve. This technique is non-destructive, very sensitive, specific and combines simplicity with rapid
measurement. The two most significant drawbacks of ESR spectroscopy are the cost of the spectrometer and the special
technical skills required to operate it (EN 1786, 1996; EN 1787, 2000; EN 13708, 2001).
Luminescence - When ionizing radiation interacts with an insulating crystal lattice (silicate mineral in food sample), net
redistribution of electronic charge takes place. Electrons are stripped from the outer shells of atoms and though most
return immediately, proportion escape and become trapped at 'meta-stable' sites within the lattice. In order to release these
trapped electrons, more energy is required. When the necessary energy is applied, these electrons return from the excited
state to the electronic ground state by losing part of their excess energy as a photon. This phenomenon is called
luminescence. The emission of trapped energy as light may be induced.
Thermally - Thermo-luminescence (TL) - The TL apparatus consist of a metal planchet on which a disk with sample
powder is heated by high frequency current. The TL chamber is tightly closed and can be evacuated and flushed with inert
gas before measurement. The TL glow is measured by a photomultiplier tube. The second TL measurement of the same
sample after exposure to a known dose of radiation is necessary. Salt may also serve as a TL-sensitive irradiation
indicator. This method mostly enables an unequivocal classification of irradiated and un-irradiated samples. The TL
technique is laborious, since the minerals have to be prepared free of organic material. There is a small amount of mineral
product on food surface; there is natural TL of some materials; stringent quality assurance procedures are necessary. The
equipment is costly and a radiation source is needed (EN 1788:2001).
Micro-gel electrophoresis - DNA comet assay (screening method) - DNA is a large molecule and easy target for
ionizing radiation. Upon irradiation DNA molecules suffer denaturation, base modification and fragmentation either by
single or double-bond strand breaks. These changes in DNA can be used to identify irradiated foods. DNA comet assay
detects fragmentation of DNA using the micro-gel electrophoresis of single cells or nuclei. These are embedded in
agarose on microscope slides, lyses for disruption of membranes using detergent and electrophoreses at a set voltage.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 26
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
DNA fragments will stretch or migrate out of the cells forming a tail in the direction of the anode. Irradiated cells will
show considerably larger comets (more fragmentation) than un-irradiated cells, which will appear nearly circular. The
DNA comet assay is a relatively simple and rapid screening test that makes use of low-cost equipments and can be used in
all foods containing DNA. However, this method is not radiation specific because there are other treatments that also
induce DNA fragmentation. Suspicious sample may need to be confirmed by an officially validated method (EN 13784:
2001).
Conclusions
Irradiation of food has been proved as a safe and effective process in controlling microbial contamination without adverse
side effects and chemical residues that can be used to improve the integrity and safety of our food supply. Scientific
research has also determined that food irradiation does not make food 'radioactive' at low and medium doses (up to 10
kGy doses - maximum dosage used for most commercial applications). Scientists have also studied the creation of
radiolytic products, including 'free radicals', by food irradiation. There is broad agreement among renowned researchers,
health organization and agencies that radiolytic products formed during irradiation pose no danger to humans. An
extensive review of science related to microbiological safety indicates that irradiation is an effective solution to the
problem of microbial contamination. Under good manufacturing practices assuring proper handling of product, irradiation
eliminates harmful bacteria that can cause lethal food poisoning and spoilage. Irradiation is endorsed as a food safety
process by independent health organization and regulatory agencies round the world. Food irradiation is now being
commonly used in many countries, as people are becoming more aware of food safety and products shelf-life extension.
An extensive education is needed for broad public acceptance. A strategic, multi-year, broad-scale education campaign,
targeting both professional and by audiences is necessary. Labeling is necessary, so that people can freely choose whether
to use this safe and wholesome processed food. Reliable methods for the detection of irradiation food (food irradiation)
are now available and are effective in confirming compliance with regulations regarding food irradiation.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 27
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
References
1. Acheson, D. and Steele, J.H. (2001) Food irradiation: A Public Health Challenge for the 21st Centaury Clin. infect.
Dis. 33(3): 376 - 377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/321899.
2. Akram K. and Kwon J. H. (2010) Food Irradiation for Mushrooms: A Review J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem.
53(3), 257-265 doi:10.3839/jksabc.2010.041.
3. Alam Khan, K. and Abrahem, M. (2010) Review Article - Effect of irradiation on quality of spices International
Food Research Journal 17: 825-836
4. Arsdel, Wallace, B. Van, Michael, J Copley, and Robert, L. Olson (1968) Quality and Stability of Frozen Foods:
Time-Temperature Tolerance and its Significance. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons,INC, , 67-69.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frozen_food#cite_ref-16.
5. Ashley, B.C., Birchfield, P.T., Chamberlain, B.V., Kotwal, R.S., McClollan, S.F., Moynihan, S. et al., (2004)
Health Concerns Regarding Consumption of Irradiated Food In.Jour. of Hyg. and Envir. Health.
6. Becker, R.L. (1983) In: Elias, P.S. and Cohen, A.J. (eds) Recent Advances in Food Irradiated, Elsevier Biomedical
Press, Amaterdam, New York 285.
7. Board, R. (1991) Consumer acceptance of irradiated foods in the United State. In: Thorne, S. (ed.): Food
Irradiation. Elsevier Applied Science, London, New York: 61-86.
8. Bracket, R.E., Hao, Y.Y., Doyle, M.P. (1994) Ineffectiveness of hot acid sprays to decontaminate Escherichia coli
O157:H2 on beef. J. Food Protect. 57, 198-203.
9. CAC (Codex Alimentarius Commission) (2003) Codex General Standard for Irradiated Foods, CODEX STAN
106-1983, Rev. 1 - 2003.
10. Caric, M. and Kalab, M. (1987) "Effects of Drying Techniques on Milk Powders Quality and Microstructure: A
Review," Food Structure: Vol. 6: No. 2, Article 9. Available at:
http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/foodmicrostructure/vol6/iss2/9
11. Coleby, B. and Shewan, J.M. (1965) The radiation preservation of fish In: Borgstrom, G. (Ed.), Fish as Food.
Academic Press, New York, Vol. 4, 419.
12. Cook, E.M, and DuMont, H.D. (1991) Process Drying Practice, McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN 0-07- 012462-0
13. Cutter, C.N. and Siracus, G.R. (1994) Efficiency of organic acids against Escherichia coli O157:H2 attached to
beef carcass tissue using a pilot scale carcass washer. J. Food Protect. 57, 97-103.
14. Delincee, H. (1991) In Analytical detection methods for irradiated foods - A review of the current literature IAEA-
TECDOC-587, Vienna, Austria.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 28
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
15. Diehl, J.F. (1995) Safety of Irradiated Foods, Second ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc.,New York: 310-454.
16. Dieterich W.H., Mayr G., Hild K., Sullivan J.B., Murphy J. (1967) Hydrogen phosphide as a fumigant for foods,
feeds and processed food products. In: Gunther F.A. (eds) Residue Reviews/Rückstandsberichte. Residue
Reviews/Rückstandsberichte, vol 19. Springer, New York, NY.
17. Ehlermann, D.A.E. (2005) Four Decades in food irradiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 73, 346-347.
18. EN 1784, (1996) European Standard, Detection of irradiated food containing fat-Gas chromatographic analysis of
hydrocarbons. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
19. EN 1785, (1996) European Standard, Detection of irradiated food containing fat-Gas chromatographic/mass
spectrometric analysis of 2-alkylcyclobutanones. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
20. EN 1786, (1996) European Standard, Detection of irradiated food containing bone- Methods by ESR spectroscopy.
European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
21. EN 1787, (2000) European Standard, Determination of irradiated food containing cellulose: Method by ESR
spectroscopy. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
22. EN 1788, (2001) European Standard, Thermo luminescence detection of irradiated food from whichsilicate
minerals can be isolated - Method by Thermo luminescence. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
23. EN 13708, (2001) European Standard, Detection of irradiated food containing crystalline sugar by ESR
spectroscopy. European Committee for Standardiation, Brussels.
24. EN 13783, (2001) European Standard, Detection of irradiated food using Direct Epifluoresent Filter
Technique/Aerobic Plate Count (DEFT/APC) - Screening method. European Committee for Standardization,
Brussels.
25. EN 13784, (2001) European Standard. DNA comet assay for the detection of irradiated foodstuffs - Screening
method. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
26. EN 13751, (2002) European Standard, Detection of irradiated food using photo-stimulated luminescence.
European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
27. Farkas, J. (1988) Irradiation of Dry Food Ingredients. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 153.
28. Farkas J. (1998) Irradiation as a method for decontaminating food - A review International Journal of Food
Microbiology 44 189–204.
http://www.reocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/8929/Seminars/2009_04_Food_Irradiation.pdf.
29. Farkas, J. (2004) Charged particles interactions with matter. In: Mozumder, A.: Food Irradiation Marcel Dekker,
New York: 805 - 812.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 29
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
30. F.D.A. (1985) Irradiation in the production, processing and handling of food. Federal Register. 50(14), (21 CFR
Part 179). 29658-29659.
31. Fox, J.A. (2002) Influence on purchase of irradiated foods. Food T/echnology 56(11): 34-37.
32. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethylene_oxide#Physiological_effects
33. http://www.foodsafetysite.com/educators/competencies/general/foodprocessing/processing2.html
34. http://wiki.zero-emissions.at/index.php?title=Sterilization_in_food_industry
35. http://wiki.zero-emissions.at/index.php?title=Pasteurization_in_food_industry
36. http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-ethylene-oxide-uses-safety-technology.html
37. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermentation_in_food_processing
38. http://crees.org/resources/files/forms/25.pdf
39. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_additive
40. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preservative
41. Gracz, N., Rowley, D.B. and Matsuyama, A. (1983) The action of irradiation on bacteria and viruses. In:
Preservation of Food by Radiation, Vol 2, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
https://uw-food-irradiation.engr.wisc.edu/Facts.html.
42. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (1993) Report of the ICGFI/IOCU Seminar on Food Irradiation and
Consumers. The Netherlands, Sept, 1993.
43. International Consultative Group on Food Irradiation (ICGFI) (1999) In Facts about Food Irradiation.
Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom.
44. Ito, H., Adulyatham, P., Sangthong, N., Ishigaki, I. (1989) Effect of Gamma irradiation on frezen shrimps to
reduce micribial contamination. Radit. Phys Chem. 34, 1009-1011.
45. Kampelmacher, E.H. (1984) Irradiation of Food: a new technology for preserving and ensuring the hygiene of
food. Fleisch-wirtschaft. 64, 322-327.
46. Khetarpaul, N. (2015) Food Processing and Preservation. Daya Publishing House, Astral International (P) Ltd,
New Delhi.
47. Krauss, W. E., Erb, J. H. and Washburn, R.G., (1933) Studies on the nutritive value of milk, II. The effect of
pasteurization on some of the nutritive properties of milk," Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 518, 30.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 30
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
48. Lebovics, V., Gaal, O., Farkas, J., Somogyi, L. (1994) Influence of packaging atmosphere on the formation of
cholesterol oxides in gamma-irradiated egg-powder. J. Sci. Food Agri. 66, 71-73.
49. Lee, P.R. (1994) Irradiation to prevent food borne illness. From Assistant Secretary for Health U.S. Public Service.
J. Med. Assoc. 272(4), 261.
50. Leistner, L., and Gorris, G.M., (1995) Food preservation by hurdle tecnology Trend in Food Science &
Technology 06, 41-46.
51. Lescano, G., Narvaiz, P. and Kairiyama, E. (1991) Sterilization of spices and vegetable seasoning by gamma
radiation. Acta Alimentaria 20: 233-242.
52. Lewis, N.F. (1983) Development of radiation processes for destrction of enteric pathogens viz Salmonella,
staphylococci and Vibrio spp. in fresh and frozen seafoods. Food Irradiat. Newsl. 7 (1), 8.
53. Lewis, S. J., Vela´squez, A.. Cuppett, S. L., and McKee, S. R. (2002) PROCESSING AND PRODUCTS Effect of
Electron Beam Irradiation on Poultry Meat Safety and Quality. Poultry Science 81:896–903.
54. Ley, F.J., Glew, G., Cornford, S.J. (1962) The effect of gamma radiation on the quality of frozen whole eggs. In:
Proceedings First International Congress on Food Science and Technology, London, September 1962.
55. Loaharanu, P. and Murrell, D. (1994) A role for irradiation in the control of food borne parasites. Trends Food Sci.
Technol. 5, 190-195.
56. Lo´pez-Malo, A. and Palou E. 18 Ultraviolet Light and Food Preservation Universidad de as Ame´ricas-Puebla,
Santa Catarina Ma´rtir, Cholula, Puebla, Mexico.
57. Mallett, J.C., Beghiam, L.E., Metcalf, T.G., Kaylor, J.D. (1991) Potential of iradiation technology for improved
shellfish sanitation. J. Food Safety. 11, 231-
245.http://cst.ur.ac.rw/library/Food%20Science%20books/batch2/Novel%20Food%20Processing%20Technologie
s/dk1128ch18.pdf
58. Miller, R.B. (2007) In: Electronic Radiation of Foods. Springer Science+Bullers Media,Inc.,New York: 8-11.
59. Molins, R,A. (2001) In Food Irradiation: Principles and Applications: Wiley - Inter Science, New York, NY, USA.
60. Moy, J.H. (1985) Radiation Disinfestations of Food and Agricultural Products. Univ. of Hawaii, HonoluluNayga,
R.M. Jr., Poghosyan, A. and Nchols, J. (2004) Will consumer accept irradiated food products? International
Journal of Consumer Etudies. 28:178-185.
61. Nouchpramoul, K. (1985) Elimination of Salmonella in frozen shrimp by radiation treatment. Food Irradiat.
Newsl. 8 (1), 14-15.
Nessa Publishers| www.nessapublishers.com Page 31
Journal of Nutritional Health Sciences Volume 1| Issue 3
62. Pazczola, D. (1993) Irradiated poultry makes US debut in Midwest and Florida markets. Food /technology 47
(11):89-96.
63. Rahman, M.S., Handbook of food Perservation book.google.com.
64. Razskazovskiy, Y., Debije, M.G., Howerton, S.B., Williams, L.D. and Bernhard, W.A. (2003) Strand breaks in x-
irradiated crystalline DNA: Alternating CG Olgomers, Radiation Resistance Research. 160: 334-339.
65. Recommended international general standard for irradiated foods and recommended international code of practice
for the operation radiation facilities for the treatment of Food Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Codex
Alimentarius Commission, CAC/RS 106-1979, CAC/RCP 19-1979.
66. Serrano, L.E., Murano, E.A., Shenoy, K., Olson, D.G., (1997) D values of Salmonella enteritidisisolates and
quality attributes of shell eggs and liquid whole eggs treated with irradiation. Poultry Sci. 76, 202–206.
67. Sivinski,J.S.(1985) Control of trichinosis by low-dose irradiation of pork, Food Irradiat.Newsl. 9(2),8.
68. Stain, M. (1993) Food Irradiation: a Guidebook. Technomic Publ. Co., Lancaster: 125-151.
69. Susana Rodrı´guez Couto A, B. Ma A´ ngeles Sanroma´n a, (2006) Application of solid-state fermentation to food
industry—A review Journal of Food Engineering 76 291–302
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260877405003584
70. Thayer, D.W., Josephson, E.S., Brynjolfsson, A. and Giddings, G.G. (1996) Radiation Pasterurizatin of Food,
Issue paper no. 7 Council for agricultural Science and Technology - CAST. Ames. IA.USA April 1996:10pp.
71. Thayer, D.W. (1990) Food Irradiation: Benefits and Concerns. Jour. Food Quality 13: 147-169.
72. Tressler, D. K., and Clifford F. E. (1957) The Freezing Preservation of Foods. 3rd ed. 1st volume. Westport, CT:
The AVI Publishing Company, INC., 976-978.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frozen_food#cite_ref-16.
73. Urbain, W.M. (1978) Food irradiation. In: chichester, C.O., Mrak, E.M., Stewart, G.F. (Eds.) Advances in Food
Research. Academic Press. New York, Vol 24, 115-227.
74. van Kooij (1981) Ch: Food preservation by irradiation in IAEA BULLETIN. Radiation and agriculture VOL. 23,
no.3, 33-36 https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/magazines/bulletin/bull23- 3/23305783336.pdfJ
75. WHO (1994) Safety and nutritional adequacy of irradiated food.
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/39463/4/9241561629-eng.pdf