28
JCAB and FAA Joint Paper IP/12 UPR and PACOTS Update

IP/12

  • Upload
    talisa

  • View
    70

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

IP/12. UPR and PACOTS Update. PACOTS Track F UPR Trial. Operational Trial began July 25, 2013, to allow Track F UPRs at least 50nm south of PACOTS Tracks C & E. Remain 50nm South of Track E and Normal UPR Guidelines. Guidelines published in KZAK NOTAM A3212/13 and Oakland Website. 2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: IP/12

JCAB and FAA Joint Paper

IP/12

UPR and PACOTS Update

Page 2: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

PACOTS Track F UPR Trial• Operational Trial began July 25, 2013, to

allow Track F UPRs at least 50nm south of PACOTS Tracks C & E.

• Remain 50nm South of Track E and Normal UPR Guidelines.

• Guidelines published in KZAK NOTAM A3212/13 and Oakland Website.

2

Page 3: IP/12

Federal AviationAdministration

Merging PACOTSTracks C and E

Page 4: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Operational Trial• March 13, 2013 began a 1 year

operational trial of Merging Tracks C and E when it provided an advantage.

4

Page 5: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Procedural Proposal• This operational trial was a hybrid of

different Pacific Oceanic Procedures.

• Allow the merging of PACOTS Tracks C and E in the Oakland or Anchorage FIRs when it provides a savings advantage.

• IPACG: Only merge PACOTS when there is at least a 200 lbs fuel savings.

5

Page 6: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Track Advisory• When PACOTS Tracks C and E are merged;

• Track Advisory is used to manage the merging traffic at the point where the routes converged.

• http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/enroute/oceanic/pacific_track_advisory

6

Page 7: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Track Advisory• When PACOTS Tracks C and E are not

merged:– Oceanic Gateway Fix is the Start of the PACOTS

Track as is currently done.• When PACOTS Tracks C and E are merged:

– Oceanic Gateway Fix is the Merge point of Tracks C and E

• If the merge point is a Waypoint, that will be the Gateway Fix.• If the merge point is a Lat/Long, the Gateway Fix for Track

Advisory will be coded.– 41W40 = 41N/140W

• The Latitude is always North and the leading 1 is dropped from the Longitude.

7

Page 8: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

•Implementing Merged Track C and E Tracks

• When Track C and E are merged, the TDM will have “RMK/MERGE USE (point) FOR TRK ADVISORY GRL”A0284/13 - (TDM TRK E 130122190001 1301221900 1301230800 BOXER FULMR FASEL 52N140W 55N150W 56N160W 56N170W ALDOZ ONEIL OPAKE OLCOT OPHET OGDEN OMOTO RTS/KSFO MOLEN BOXER KLAX RZS LIBBO BRINY BOARS BOXER OMOTO R580 OATIS RMK/MERGE USE ONEIL FOR TRK ADVISORY GRL).

8

Page 9: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

•Implementing Merged Track C and E Tracks

A0284/13 - (TDM TRK E 130122190001 1301221900 1301230800 BOXER FULMR FASEL 52N140W 55N150W 56N160W 56N170W ALDOZ ONEIL OPAKE OLCOT OPHET OGDEN OMOTO RTS/KSFO MOLEN BOXER KLAX RZS LIBBO BRINY BOARS BOXER OMOTO R580 OATIS RMK/MERGE USE 52W40 FOR TRK ADVISORY GRL).

9

Page 10: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Track Advisory• Operators flight planning a merged Track

C/E from the starting point would request a Gateway reservation (TKF) prior to 1650 UTC.

10

Page 11: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Merged Track C and E Operational Trial

11

•OF THE FIRST 38 DAYS OF THE OPERATIONAL TRIAL;

•TRACKS C & E MERGED 14 DAYS.

•AVERAGE FUEL SAVINGS PER FLIGHT WAS 1120 LBS (10 DAYS)

Page 12: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Merging Tracks C & E Difficulties• April 22-25, 2013 Oakland encountered

difficulties with merging traffic on PACOTS Tracks C and E.

• There were numerous traffic conflictions that required Oakland to negotiate with Japan and Anchorage for the use of Non-standard altitudes.

• If traffic did not permit the use on Non-standard altitudes in Anchorage or Fukuoka FIRs, altitude assignments would have been significantly affected

12

Page 13: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Merging Tracks C & E Difficulties• On April 26, 2013, Oakland suspended the

Operational Trial to merge PACOTS Tracks C and E.

• Oakland discovered several irregularities with the Track Advisory requested reservations:

13

Page 14: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

4/22-25 Track Advisory Issues

14

Page 15: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Moving Forward C/E Trial

15

• Operators must be better at meeting their Gateway Fix reservation times.

• Merging C/E requires the use of Non-Standard Altitudes.– Not an issue for NOPAC– Mix of Aircraft types– Gateway time errors

Page 16: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Moving Forward C/E Trial

16

• When the PACOTS Tracks C and E would merge, Oakland will coordinate with the next facility for the use of Non-Standard Altitudes for the next day.

• If approval for the use of the necessary Non-Standard altitudes can be obtained, the tracks will be published with a merge.

• If approval for the use of the necessary Non-Standard altitudes cannot be obtained, the tracks will be published without a merge in the Oakland FIR.

Page 17: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation

17

ATOP

ADS-C D50 30/30FDP20

00

NO ADS-C D50 30/30

Current Status

ATOP

ADS-C D50 30/30

Page 18: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation

18

ATOP

ADS-C D50 30/30Most Tfc

Most Tfc

Low Tfc

Page 19: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation

19

Island/Asia TfcPACOTS

Low Tfc

Page 20: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation

20

ATOP

ADS-C D50 30/30D50 & 30/30 D50 & 30/30

Planned

Page 21: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Moving Forward C/E Trial

21

• Tentative Resume Date 02/19/2014

Page 22: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014 22

ASIA PTRO UPRs

JAPAN Australia UPRs

ASIA NZ/NC UPRs

Page 23: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014 23

Westbound PACOTS

Track BTrack B

Track ATrack A

Track KTrack KTrack J

Track JTrack ITrack ITrack HTrack H

Track F

Track F

Track ETrack ETrack C

Track C

IPACG HAWAII JAPAN PACOTS UPRs

IPACG TRACK K UPRs

IPACG TRACK H/I UPRs

IPACG TRACK F UPRs

Page 24: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014 24

PACOTS TRACK C/E MERGETrack ETrack E

Track CTrack C

Page 25: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014 25

Track JTrack J

Eastbound PACOTSTrack 1

Track 1

Track 2

Track 2

Track 3

Track 3

Track 14

Track 14

Track 15

Track 15

Track 11Track 11Track 12

Track 12

IPACG JAPAN HAWAII PACOTS UPRs

IPACG PACOT TRACK 14/15 UPRs

IPACG PACOT TRACK 3 UPRs

IPACG PACOT TRACK 1 UPRs

Track 2

Track 2

Page 26: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Moving Forward C/E Trial

26

ZOA ATOP Data

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

Jan-04

Apr-04

Jul-04

Oct-04

Jan-05

Apr-05

Jul-05

Oct-05

Jan-06

Apr-06

Jul-06

Oct-06

Jan-07

Apr-07

Jul-07

Oct-07

Jan-08

Apr-08

Jul-08

Oct-08

Jan-09

Apr-09

Jul-09

Oct-09

Jan-10

Apr-10

Jul-10

Oct-10

Jan-11

Apr-11

Jul-11

Oct-11

Jan-12

Apr-12

Jul-12

Oct-12

Jan-13

Apr-13

Jul-13

Oct-13

Aver

age N

o. o

f Flig

hts p

er D

ay

.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Page 27: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014

Tahiti

Auckland Nadi

Brisbane Moresby

Ujung

Manila

Fukuoka

Anchorage Vancouver

Seattle

Oakland

Los Angeles

Mexico

California –South Pacific

Hawaii –South Pacific

Asia–New Zealand/

Caledonia

RJAA–Australia

California Singapore

Hawaii – PGUM/RPLL

Asia - Hawaii

Far East - California

California – RTE

Entry Pts.

California – Hawaii

(North of CEP)

1.09M. Kg An.

1017Kg Flight

9.61M Kg An

???? Kg An.

2.09M. Kg An.

2.88M. Kg An.

.266M. Kg An.

1.09 Kg An.

???? Kg An.

2.88M. Kg An.

Over 32.8 Mil Kg Fuel Savings Annually

UPRsTrack 1 UPRs

10M. Kg An.

27

Page 28: IP/12

IPACG 38 MeetingFebruary 5-6, 2014