1
Ionization versus displacement damage effects in proton irradiated CMOS sensors manufactured in deep submicron process V. Goiffon 1 ([email protected]) P. Magnan 1 , O. Saint-pé 2 , F. Bernard 3 , G. Rolland 3 1 Université de Toulouse, ISAE, 2 EADS Astrium, 3 CNES Test chip : 0.18 μm CMOS CIS technology Dedicated photodiode doping profiles Shallow trench isolations (STI) 128 x 128 pixel array, 3T, 10μm pitch Larges photodiodes (>10 4 μm²) Other test structures (MOSFETs, Gated-diodes…) Proton irradiation : Facilities : KVI, UCL, Isotron Energies : 7.4 to 200 MeV Fluences : 5 x 10 9 to 3 x 10 11 H + /cm² 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Diode perimeter (μm) Reverse current at 2.4V (fA) Peripheral dark current IC1, 8.8×10 9 H + /cm 2 , 50MeV IC2, 1.5×10 10 H + /cm 2 , 100MeV IC3, 2.4×10 10 H + /cm 2 , 184MeV IC1 no irrad. IC2 no irrad. IC3 no irrad. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 50 100 150 200 Reverse voltage (V) Reverse current (fA) 2000x5μm 2 photodiode dark currents IC1, 8.8×10 9 H + /cm 2 , 50MeV IC2, 1.5×10 10 H + /cm 2 , 100MeV IC3, 2.4×10 10 H + /cm 2 , 184MeV IC1 no irrad. IC2 no irrad. IC3 no irrad. A + Proton irradiations only induce large dark current increasesdominated by the perimeter contribution… …due to ionizing dose induced STI trapped charges and interface states. Effects on large photodiodes Overview Experimental Effects on CMOS sensors Perspectives No photoresponse degradation, no voltage shift, no gain reduction No sign of electric field enhancement at the Si-STI interface Displacement damages still play a significant role in uniformity degradation Photodiode hardened against ion- izing dose effect could conse- quently reduce proton irradiation effects In-pixel gated photodiode (B. Hancock, Proc. SPIE 4306, 2001) seems promising Multi level random telegraph signals will be studied in detail 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 x 10 -15 Time (s) Dark current (A) Proton induced RTS 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Dark current (fA) Activation energy (eV) Activation energies after 50 MeV 8.8×10 9 H + /cm 2 pixel value mean value Displacement damages effects on mean dark current are negligible… … in front of ionizing dose : peripheral STI is responsible Goal : Study of proton irradiation effects on CMOS sensors manufactured in a deep submicron technology dedicated to imaging applications Test structures : pixel array + isolated large photodiodes Main result : Proton irradiations mainly induce dark current increases due to ionizing interactions 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 -16 10 -15 10 -14 Displacement damage dose (TeV/g) Dark current increase (A) Dark current increase vs. displacement damage dose Measurement Computed displacement contribution 10 1 10 2 10 -16 10 -15 10 -14 Ionizing dose (Gy) Dark current increase (A) Dark current increase vs. ionizing dose Proton irrad. Proton irrad. without hot pixels 60 Co irrad. (worst case) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Dark current (fA) Pixel count 50 MeV 8.8x10 9 H + /cm 2 Measurements Ionizing dose estimation

Ionization versus displacement damage effects in proton irradiated

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Ionization versus displacement damage effects in proton irradiated CMOS sensors manufactured in deep submicron processV. Goiffon1 ([email protected])P. Magnan1, O. Saint-pé2, F. Bernard3, G. Rolland31 Université de Toulouse, ISAE, 2 EADS Astrium, 3 CNES

Test chip :• 0.18 µm CMOS CIS technology• Dedicated photodiode doping profiles• Shallow trench isolations (STI)• 128 x 128 pixel array, 3T, 10µm pitch• Larges photodiodes (>104 µm²)• Other test structures (MOSFETs, Gated-diodes…)Proton irradiation :• Facilities : KVI, UCL, Isotron• Energies : 7.4 to 200 MeV• Fluences : 5 x 109 to 3 x 1011 H+/cm²

0 1000 2000 3000 40000

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Diode perimeter (µm)

Rev

erse

cur

rent

at 2

.4V

(fA

)

Peripheral dark current

IC1, 8.8×109 H+/cm2, 50MeV

IC2, 1.5×1010 H+/cm2, 100MeV

IC3, 2.4×1010 H+/cm2, 184MeVIC1 no irrad.IC2 no irrad.IC3 no irrad.

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

50

100

150

200

Reverse voltage (V)

Rev

erse

cur

rent

(fA

)

2000x5µm2 photodiode dark currents

IC1, 8.8×109 H+/cm2, 50MeV

IC2, 1.5×1010 H+/cm2, 100MeV

IC3, 2.4×1010 H+/cm2, 184MeVIC1 no irrad.IC2 no irrad.IC3 no irrad. A

+

Proton irradiations only induce large dark current increases … …dominated by the perimeter contribution…

…due to ionizing dose induced STI trapped charges and

interface states.

Effects on large photodiodes

Overview

Experimental

Effects on CMOS sensors Perspectives

• No photoresponse degradation , no voltage shift, no gain reduction

No sign of electric field enhancement at the Si-STI interface

Displacement damages still play a significant role in uniformity

degradation

• Photodiode hardened against ion-izing dose effect could conse-quently reduce proton irradiation effects

• In-pixel gated photodiode (B. Hancock, Proc. SPIE 4306, 2001) seems promising

• Multi level random telegraph signals will be studied in detail

0 10 20 30 40 50 601

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4x 10

-15

Time (s)

Dar

k cu

rren

t (A

)

Proton induced RTS

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Dark current (fA)

Act

ivat

ion

ener

gy (

eV)

Activation energies after 50 MeV 8.8×109 H+/cm2

pixel valuemean value

Displacement damages effects on mean dark current are negligible…

… in front of ionizing dose : peripheral STI is responsible

Goal : Study of proton irradiation effects on CMOS sensorsmanufactured in a deep submicron technology dedicated to imaging applications

Test structures : pixel array + isolated large photodiodes

Main result : Proton irradiations mainly induce dark current increases due to ionizing interactions

101

102

103

10-16

10-15

10-14

Displacement damage dose (TeV/g)

Dar

k cu

rren

t inc

reas

e (A

)

Dark current increase vs. displacement damage dose

MeasurementComputed displacement contribution

101

102

10-16

10-15

10-14

Ionizing dose (Gy)

Dar

k cu

rren

t inc

reas

e (A

)

Dark current increase vs. ionizing dose

Proton irrad.Proton irrad. without hot pixels60Co irrad. (worst case)

0 1 2 3 4 5 610

0

101

102

103

Dark current (fA)

Pix

el c

ount

50 MeV 8.8x109 H+/cm2

MeasurementsIonizing dose estimation