22
April 2018 Investment Policy

Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

April 2018

Investment Policy

Page 2: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

Tactical positioning

• We remain cautious in fixed income favoring short to medium maturities due to a very unattractive combination ofrisk and return in longer maturities. We have maintained High Yield and subordinated debt exposure as we thinkthat the current economic cycle will be further elongated. High quality bonds in the US – particularly corporateinvestment grade – remain attractive in relative terms, and Treasury bonds could protect the portfolios from aslowdown in growth, although the latter is now less likely. We also have a significant position in inflation-linked USTreasury bonds (TIPS) to get protection against an increase in inflation as a consequence of reflationary policies.Finally, we have also maintained our allocation to convertible bonds, as way to further diversify our portfolios

• Equity valuations in the US remain very high, mostly supported by low interest rates, tax reform andderegulation. Combined with positive macro data from other main developed markets, we see a greater chance of areacceleration in global economic growth. However, with the Fed potentially normalizing interest rates at afaster pace, there is a risk of returning to lower valuation multiples. Therefore, we recommend to take equityexposure in a non-directional way. From a relative valuation perspective, we favor European, Japanese andemerging markets equities, quality growth stocks, biotechnology and listed real estate

• Our diversified commodities and gold allocations, further help us to increase diversification and to position theportfolios for a scenario of rising inflation

• Alternative investments offer a much needed source of diversification. Besides cat bonds and private equity, wehave recently increased the allocation to hedge-funds, by investing into liquid and low cost multi-manager/multi-strategy fund of funds

• We have reduced our cash allocation as negative interest rates have been introduced in some of our referencecurrencies. We have also reduced the allocation to short-term high quality bonds that we held as an alternative tocash and increased credit exposure instead, with the aim of increasing the yield of the portfolio

2

Page 3: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

-800,000

-700,000

-600,000

-500,000

-400,000

-300,000

-200,000

-100,000

0

100,000

200,000

1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

China Japan Mexico EU South/Central America OPEC Total

It is about China

3

• US trade deficit is far from being in troubling zone. Its absolute level is close to that of 2003, when US GDP was 40%smaller than the current one

• It is mostly against China that the deficit has consistently widened, whilst against other major trading partners the trendhas been stable and even reverted. Hence, we deem very unlikely that the US will engage in a full-blown global tradewar, and will sought instead to get concessions from China

Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

Page 4: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

Risk of financial transmission channels

4

• Should trade tensions escalate, there is a risk that trading partners will shun away from US Treasuries, which theyusually hold to recycle their trade surpluses

• Lower demand for US Treasuries would cause their yield to increase, inducing a tightening of financial conditions thatwould feed into asset valuations and economic activity – as a reference, the Fed holds about $12.5 trillion in USTreasuries after the successive QE programs

Source: Bloomberg

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

US Treasury Holdings - China US Treasury Holdings - Japan US Treasury Holdings - Saudi Arabia

Page 5: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

At a time the US will have to borrow record amounts

5

• The US is embarking into a sort of economic experiment with a late-cycle fiscal expansion whose impact in theeconomy is difficult to predict

• What is certain is that in the short-run the fiscal deficit will worsen, and that the US Treasury will have to issue recordamounts of debt to finance it

Source: Bloomberg

-12.0%

-10.0%

-8.0%

-6.0%

-4.0%

-2.0%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 20132%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

11%

12%

US Unemployment (lhs) Federal Surplus or Deficit as %GDP (rhs)

Page 6: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

And would probably cause an appreciation of the USD

6

• All things being equal, current account deficits are historically associated with a weak dollar, as they increase thedemand for foreign currencies

• Protectionist measures would cause the deficit to narrow, hence putting upward pressure on the dollar over themedium term

Source: Bloomberg

-7.0%

-6.0%

-5.0%

-4.0%

-3.0%

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 201860

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

Trade-Weighted Dollar Index Major Currencies (lhs) US Current Account Balance %GDP (rhs)

Page 7: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

Synchronized global growth put at risk

7

• In the current globalized economy, the most direct transmission channel of a trade war would be a decrease in overalllevel of economic activity, as there will be no winners in absolute terms

• As a consequence, trade tensions are rising uncertainty at a time when we are starting to see signs of a decelerationin global growth momentum, which may put an end to the period of synchronized growth

Source: Bloomberg

2015 2016 2017-100%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Econ. Surprise US Econ. Surprise Eurozone Econ. Surprise EM

Page 8: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

Key technical levels being tested

8

• The market has entered into correction territory several times in 2018, following concerns about rising interest rates,technology stocks, and geopolitical tensions

• 10-year US Treasury yields have halted their rising trend towards 3%, but this has coincided with risk-offenvironments when their safe-haven status cause them to decrease. A good earnings season will be determinant forweathering future increases in interest rates

Source: Bloomberg

2.0%

2.1%

2.2%

2.3%

2.4%

2.5%

2.6%

2.7%

2.8%

2.9%

3.0%

2,200

2,300

2,400

2,500

2,600

2,700

2,800

2,900

Apr 17 May 17 Jun 17 Jul 17 Aug 17 Sep 17 Oct 17 Nov 17 Dec 17 Jan 18 Feb 18 Mar 18 Apr 18

S&P 500 200d Mov. Average 10Yr UST Yield (rhs)

Page 9: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

Model portfolio evolution

9

• A highly unusual month marked by wide dispersion within and across asset classes

Source: Bloomberg as of April 11, 2018* Fund publishes monthly NAV with a 1 month of delay

-8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8%

Partners Group Global Value*Plenum Cat Bond

Lyxor/WintonLyxor/AQR

Permal Alternative Income StrategiesFranklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund

Goldman Sachs Global Multi-Manager AlternativesAmura Absolute Return

iShares Gold (CH)iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS

Polar Capital Funds JapanT.Row Price Frontier Markets Equity Fund

Henderson Global Property EquitiesPolar Capital Biotechnology Fund

Pictet Indian EquitiesBNP Paribas TIER US 4% Index

Wellington Global Quality Growth PortfolioBonus Certificate SX5E

Schroder ISF - Global Convertible BondEllipsis European Convertible Fund

GAM Start Credit OpportunitiesNeuberger Berman Corporate Hybrid

Oddo Compass Euro Credit Short Duration USDhFranklin Floating Rate II

M&G Global Floating Rate High Yield FundMuzinich Short-Duration High Yield

iShares USD Short Duration Corporate BondiShares $ TIPS

iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF

Ytd Last Month

Page 10: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

Investment scenarios

10

Driv

ers

Mar

ket i

mpa

ctP

roba

bilit

y

• Global economic slowdown caused by political accidents or policy errors (Trade war with China, EU breakup, a too aggressive Fed, etc.)

• Deflationary scenario due to a combination of low growth and structural factors, although the rise of protectionism would be inflationary

• The Fed will have to reverse curse, which would be complicated if inflation is rising

Scenario 1Recession by political/policy accident

• Correction in credit due to a rise in defaults and a widening of corporate spreads

• Correction in equities due to lower projected earnings, though low rates will offer support

• Sovereign and IG credit to profit due to flight to quality and the continuation of an ultra-loose monetary policy globally

• USD neutral to weak as flight to quality is counterbalanced by low interest rates

• Commodities will fall

30% (+5%)

• The fiscal stimulus in the US provides a short-term impulse to the global economy, but not enough to attain a higher growth trajectory

• Inflation, particularly in the US will pick-up, but remains subdued globally due to structural factors (demographics, low aggregated demand, deleveraging)

• The Fed will continue its normalization path

Scenario 2Goldilocks

• Equities appreciate moderately, with Europe and Japan catching up with the US

• Credit spreads remain stable as the credit cycle is further elongated

• Sovereigns suffer as monetary policy is progressively normalized

• USD appreciate moderately due to higher interest rate differentials

• Commodity prices will rise in the short-term, normalizing once the impulse vanishes

40%

• Growth concerns dissipate, with economic activity accelerating in US, Europe and Japan

• Inflation in the US increases, as a consequence of president Trump’s fiscal stimulus, and pulls other developed economies off deflation

• The Fed will have to step up the pace of rate increases and/or reduce balance sheet

Scenario 3New regime

• Impact on equities will depend on how much real economic growth is sustained, and how accommodative the Fed remains

• Sovereign and IG bonds will face steep losses due to higher rates, particularly if long-term inflation expectations rise

• Corporate credit will correct moderately if inflation comes together with higher growth

• The USD will appreciate, particularly against those currencies facing deflation

• Commodities will gain from higher inflation

30% (-5%)

Other risksTrade wars, Spread of populist political parties, China slowdown, Terrorism

Short-term catalyzersFiscal stimulus in the US, improvement in macro-data globally, lower geopolitical tensions

Page 11: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

MWM Investment Policy

• In the current environment holding cash is becoming costly. Hence, we prefer to invest in short-term high quality bonds as a substitute for cash

Cash

• Corporate debt and High Yield currently offer the best combination of risk and return. Treasuriescan benefit from a slowdown in growth – although this less likely with the expected fiscal stimulusin the US – whilst TIPS offer protection against rising inflation

• We avoid emerging markets until there is more clarity on trade policy by the new US administration

Fixed Income

• Fiscal reform in the US will accelerate growth and postpone the fear of deflation, which will besupportive for equities as the top line will increase. However, it remains to be seen to which extendthis comes along with an increase of interest rates, which will be a drag on valuations

• We favor investments in non-directional strategies, as well as in preferred companies and sectors

Equities

• Commodity prices have recently stabilized. Reflationary policies, and in particular a boost ininfrastructure spending, will further support energy and industrial metals

• Gold and precious metals will be dependent on the relative pace of increase in both inflation andinterest rates, but offer in any case good diversification for the portfolio

Commodities

• Alternative investments as a source of low volatility and uncorrelated returns are more attractivethan ever in the wake of the current latent risks in the market

• However, there is always a certain degree of correlation with traditional asset classes and doubledigit positive returns cannot be expected in the current environment

Alternative Investments

Strategic Asset Allocation

3%

5%

38%

43%

35%

38%

6%

4%

18%

10%

11

Page 12: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

MWM Model Portfolio Balanced (CH)

18%

6%Gold • iShares Gold 3%Commodities

3%Cash • Cash 3%Cash

38%

12

35%Equities • Wellington Global Quality Growth Portfolio 4%

Multi-Strategy• Permal Alternative Income Strategies 2%• Amura Absolute Return 2%

• Plenum CAT Bond Fund 3%• Partners Group Global Value 3%

Multi-Strategy

Cat BondsPrivate Equity

Alternative Investments

Multi-Strategy • Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund 2%

Fixed Income

US TIPS

High Yield US

Subordinated Debt

• iShares $ TIPS 5%

• Muzinich Short Duration High Yield 3%

• GAM Star Credit Opportunities 4%

Short-Term Corporate Bonds

• Neuberger Berman Corporate Hybrid 4%

• iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond 4%US Treasuries • iShares Treasury Bond 3-7yr 3%

• Lyxor Winton Fund 2%CTA, Diversified• Lyxor AQR Systematic Total Return 2%CTA, Diversified

Growth

Convertible Bonds • Ellipsis European Convertible Fund 3%

Diversified • iShares Diversified Commodity Swap 3%

• M&G Global Floating Rate High Yield Fund 3%High Yield Floating• Franklin Floating rate II 3%Leveraged Loans

High Yield Europe • Oddo Compass Euro Credit Short Duration 3%

Biotechnology • Polar Capital Biotechnology Fund 3%Real Estate • Henderson Global Property Equities 3%

• Goldman Sachs Global Multi-Manager Alternatives Portfolio 2%Multi-Strategy

• Schroder Global Convertible Bond 3%

Japan • Polar Capital Funds Japan 3%India • Pictet Indian Equities 3%

Frontier Markets • T.Row Price Frontier Markets Equity Fund 3%

• Reverse Convertibles on Blue Chips 8%

Volatility

• Bonus Certificate on Indices 8%

Page 13: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

MWM Model Portfolio Balanced (US)

13

18%

6%• iShares Gold Trust 3%Commodities

38%

35%Equities High Dividend Yield

• MFS Meridian Global Concentrated Fund 5%

• Reverse Convertibles on Blue Chips 10%Volatility

Multi-Strategy

• Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund 5%

• Blackrock Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund 5%

• iShares Listed Private Equity 4%

Multi-Strategy

Private Equity

Alternative Investments

Fixed Income

US TIPS

Subordinated Debt

• PIMCO Global Real Return Fund USD 5%

• GAM Star Credit opportunities 8%

Short-Term Corporate Bonds

• Carmignac Portfolio - Global Bond 3%Global Investment Grade

• Blackrock US Dollar Short Duration Bond Fund Class 4%

• Schroder Global Dividend Maximizer 5%

US Treasuries • MFS Meridian - U.S. Government Bond Fund 3%

• Permal Alternative Income Strategies 4%CTA, Diversified

Growth

Convertible Bonds • Calamos Global Convertibles 6%

Diversified • iShares Diversified Commodity Swap 3%

3%Cash Cash • Cash 3%

High Yield US • Lord Abbett High Yield Fund 3%

Gold

• Franklin Floating rate II 3%Leveraged Loans

Biotechnology • Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund 3%

High Yield Europe • Aberdeen Global - Select Euro High Yield Bond 3%

Real Estate • Henderson Global Property Equities 3%

Frontier Markets • Templeton Frontier Markets 3%

Japan • GAM Star Japan Equity Fund 3%India • Franklin India Fund 3%

• Bonus Certificate on Indices 10%

Page 14: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

MWM Investment Profiles

Strategic Asset Allocation

AlternativeInvestments

Commodities

Equities

FixedIncome

Cash

Conservative

5%

5%

56%

64%

24%

23%

4%

2%

12%

5%

Balanced

3%

5%

38%

43%

38%

35%

6%

4%

18%

10%

Growth

1%

5%

19%

22%

49%

52%

8%

6%

23%

15%

14

Page 15: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Dec

-14

Feb-

15

Apr-

15

Jun-

15

Aug-

15

Oct

-15

Dec

-15

Feb-

16

Apr-

16

Jun-

16

Aug-

16

Oct

-16

Dec

-16

Feb-

17

Apr-

17

Jun-

17

Aug-

17

Oct

-17

Dec

-17

Feb-

18

Apr-

18

Cash Fixed Income Equities Commodities Alternatives

MWM Model Portfolio – Asset Allocation evolution

15

Page 16: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Dec

-14

Feb-

15

Apr-

15

Jun-

15

Aug-

15

Oct

-15

Dec

-15

Feb-

16

Apr-

16

Jun-

16

Aug-

16

Oct

-16

Dec

-16

Feb-

17

Apr-

17

Jun-

17

Aug-

17

Oct

-17

Dec

-17

Feb-

18

Apr-

18

Treasury US TIPS Inv. Grade US Global High Yield US High Yield EU

High Yield L/S Lev. Loans Hybrids EM - Latam EM - IG Corp. Convertibles

MWM Model Portfolio – Fixed Income evolution

16

Page 17: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

MWM Model Portfolio – VaR evolution

17

• The VaR of the portfolio remains contained, despite the recent rise in volatility, reflecting the conservative positioning ofour portfolio

5% 7% 9% 11% 13% 15% 17% 19% 21%

2014

2015

2016

2017

1Y VaR 99% CVaR

Page 18: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

MWM Model Portfolio - Peer comparison

18

• Total Return (Ytd1): 3rd out of 15• Standard Deviation (1 year1): 1st out of 15• Downside Risk (1 year1): 1st out of 15• Sharp Ratio (1 year1): 4th out of 15

1 As of April 3, 2018Source: Bloomberg

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

Dec 17 Jan 18 Mar 18Janus Balanced Fund Invesco Balanced Risk Allocation Fund Investec Global Strategic Managed FundTempleton Global Income Fund UBS Global Allocation PIMCO Global Multi-Asset FundUBAM Multifunds Allocation 50 Julius Baer Strategy Balanced BlackRock Global Allocation FundNordea Stable Return Fund Schroder Global Multi-Asset Flexible BNY Mellon Global Real Return FundJPMorgan Global Balanced Fund Carmignac Patrimoine MWM Balanced USD

-0.19%

Page 19: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

MWM Model Portfolio - Ytd performance

19

• Total Return (Ytd1): 0.47% vs. 0.85% Benchmark2

• Standard Deviation (Ytd1): 3.35% vs. 6.05% Benchmark2

• Downside Risk (Ytd1): 2.71% vs. 4.80% Benchmark2

• Sharpe Ratio (Ytd1): 0.05 vs. 0.27 Benchmark2

1 As of April 11, 20182 Benchmark = 5% Fed Funds + 43% JPM Global Aggregate Bond Index + 38% MSCI World + 4% S&P GSCI + 10% HFRI FoHF

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

Dec 17 Jan 18 Mar 18 Apr 18

MWM Balanced USD Benchmark

Page 20: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

MWM Model Portfolio - Historical performance (1)

20

• Total Return (1 year1): 4.55% vs. 9.87% Benchmark2

• Total Return (3 year1): 2.23% vs. 14.74% Benchmark2

• Total Return (Since Jan 121): 27.19% vs. 39.49% Benchmark2

1 As of April 11, 20182 Benchmark = 5% Fed Funds + 43% JPM Global Aggregate Bond Index + 38% MSCI World + 4% S&P GSCI + 10% HFRI FoHF

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Dec

11

Mar

12

Jun

12

Sep

12

Dec

12

Mar

13

Jun

13

Sep

13

Dec

13

Mar

14

Jun

14

Sep

14

Dec

14

Mar

15

Jun

15

Sep

15

Dec

15

Mar

16

Jun

16

Sep

16

Dec

16

Mar

17

Jun

17

Sep

17

Dec

17

Mar

18

MWM Balanced USD Benchmark Difference

Page 21: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

MWM Model Portfolio - Historical performance (2)

21

• Standard Deviation (1 year1): 2.21% vs. 4.02% Benchmark2

• Downside Risk (1 year1): 1.73% vs. 3.10% Benchmark2

• Sharpe Ratio (1 year1): 1.53 vs. 2.18 Benchmark2

• Var 95% - 1day (1 year1): -0.19% vs. -0.37% Benchmark2

1 As of April 11, 20182 Benchmark = 5% Fed Funds + 43% JPM Global Aggregate Bond Index + 38% MSCI World + 4% S&P GSCI + 10% HFRI FoHF

-5.00%

-4.00%

-3.00%

-2.00%

-1.00%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

Jan

12

Apr

12

Jul 1

2

Oct

12

Jan

13

Apr

13

Jul 1

3

Oct

13

Jan

14

Apr

14

Jul 1

4

Oct

14

Jan

15

Apr

15

Jul 1

5

Oct

15

Jan

16

Apr

16

Jul 1

6

Oct

16

Jan

17

Apr

17

Jul 1

7

Oct

17

Jan

18

MWM Balanced USD Benchmark

Page 22: Investment Policy · 2011 2013 2015 2017 China Japan Mexico EU. South/Central America. OPEC Total. It is about China. 3 • US trade deficit. is far from being in troubling zone

c/ de l’Aigüeta, 3AD500 Andorra la VellaPrincipat d’Andorrawww.morabanc.ad

22www.morawealth.com

This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute, and may not be construed as, a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities and/or assets mentioned herein. Nor may the information contained herein be considered as definitive, because it is subject to unforeseeable changes and amendments.

Past performance does not guarantee future performance, and none of the information is intended to suggest that any of the returns set forth herein will be obtained in the future.

The fact that MWM can provide information regarding the status, development, evaluation, etc. in relation to markets or specific assets cannot be construed as a commitment or guarantee of performance; and MWM does not assume any liability for the performance of these assets or markets.

Data on investment stocks, their yields and other characteristics are based on or derived from information from reliable sources, which are generally available to the general public, and do not represent a commitment, warranty or liability of MWM.