Upload
others
View
10
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Investigation of the Suitability of Pre-cast/Pre-
Fabricated Modular Bridges for Rural Roads in
Nepal – Pilot Study
Fabrication Report: Baugi Bridge, Parsa
Milan Kominek
Robin Workman
TRL
NEP2088A
December 2019
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report ii
Preferred citation: Kominek, M., Workman, R., TRL (2019). Investigation of the Suitability of Pre-cast/Pre-Fabricated Modular Bridges for Rural Roads in Nepal – Pilot Study , Fabrication of the Baugi River Modular Bridge, NEP2088A. London: ReCAP for DFID.
For further information, please contact: Robin Workman, [email protected]
ReCAP Project Management Unit Cardno Emerging Market (UK) Ltd Level 5, Clarendon Business Centre 42 Upper Berkeley Street, Marylebone London W1H 5PW United Kingdom
The views in this document are those of the authors and they do not necessarily reflect the views of the Research for Community Access Partnership (ReCAP) or Cardno Emerging Markets (UK) Ltd for whom the document was prepared
Cover photo: Milan Kominek, AF-CityPlan
Quality assurance and review table
Version Author(s) Reviewer(s) Date
1.0 Milan Kominek, Robin Workman Greg Morosiuk(TRL) M. Abedin (ReCAP PMU) N. Leta (ReCAP PMU)
20/12/2019 26/01/2020 30/01/2020
1.1 Milan Kominek, Robin Workman M. Abedin (ReCAP PMU) 11/02/2020
ReCAP Database Details : Investigation of the Suitability of Pre-cast/Pre-Fabricated Modular Bridges for Rural Roads in Nepal – Pilot Study
Reference No: NEP2088A Location Nepal
Source of Proposal TRL Procurement Method Competitive Bid
Theme Infrastructure Sub-Theme Bridges
Lead Implementation Organisation
DoLI Partner Organisation
LRBP
Total Approved Budget UK £ 299,566.98 Total Used Budget UK £ 111,286.91
Start Date 1/11/2016 End Date 30/5/2020
Report Due Date N/A Date Received 20/12/2019
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report iii
Contents
Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................... iv
Key words ................................................................................................................................................................... iv
Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................................... v
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... vi
1 Background ........................................................................................................................................................ 7
2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 7
3 Site Visits............................................................................................................................................................ 8
3.1 May 2019 Visit ....................................................................................................................................................... 8
3.2 November 2019 Visit to Bridge 1 ........................................................................................................................... 9
4 Summary ...........................................................................................................................................................10
4.1 Issues Identified ................................................................................................................................................... 10
4.2 Present Status ...................................................................................................................................................... 11
4.3 Next Steps ............................................................................................................................................................ 11
Annex 1 Meetings held on 27 & 28 May 2019 .....................................................................................................12
Annex 2 Selection and use of Form Release Agents ............................................................................................15
Annex 3 Form Release Agents ............................................................................................................................19
Annex 4 Form Release Agents ............................................................................................................................22
Annex 5 Pre-stressing cable ducts ......................................................................................................................25
Annex 6 Pictures of Formwork Manufacture ......................................................................................................26
Annex 7 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Results ........................................................................................28
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report iv
Abstract
This research has focused on defining and developing a new modular system of bridge construction for Nepal, which is
suitable for all environments. The motivation for this project came from DoLIDAR with their need to construct up to
2,000 new bridges to support the expansion of the rural road network. A modular bridge for Nepal has been designed
and is being trialled in two locations, one in Doti district (a hilly area in the far west of Nepal) and one in Parsa district
on the flat Terai area of Nepal, to the south west of Kathmandu. This report currently covers the fabrication of the
modules for Baugi Bridge in Parsa, on the Terai.
The report details two visits that have been made to monitor and advise on the fabrication of the bridge modules. The
first visit in May 2019 included an assessment of the steel formwork manufactured for the bridge modules, and advice
on various issues regarding the casting of modules and how the formwork should be set up in the factory. The second
visit in November 2019 was a site visit to the Terai to see the modules being cast and to answer specific queries on the
casting and assembly of the modules.
Key words
Nepal, Modular Bridge, Design, Fabrication, Construction, Pre-stressing
Research for Community Access Partnership (ReCAP)
Safe and sustainable transport for rural communities
ReCAP is a research programme, funded by UK Aid, with the aim of promoting safe and sustainable transport for rural
communities in Africa and Asia. ReCAP comprises the Africa Community Access Partnership (AfCAP) and the Asia
Community Access Partnership (AsCAP). These partnerships support knowledge sharing between participating
countries in order to enhance the uptake of low cost, proven solutions for rural access that maximise the use of local
resources. The ReCAP programme is managed by Cardno Emerging Markets (UK) Ltd.
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report v
Acronyms
AsCAP Asia Community Access Partnership DFID Department For International Development DoLI Department of Local Infrastructure DoR Department of Roads GoN Government of Nepal LRBP Local Roads Bridge Programme LRBSU Local Roads Bridge Support Unit ReCAP Research for Community Access Partnership TRL Transport Research Laboratory ToR Terms of Reference UK United Kingdom (of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) UKAid United Kingdom Aid (Department for International Development, UK)
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report vi
Executive Summary
This project aims to provide a new design for modular bridges in Nepal, with one system being preferred for both
Terai and hilly areas. The project was kicked off in Kathmandu on 8th November 2016. A workshop was held soon
after, at which the design principles for the modular bridge were agreed. DoLI noted that they would prefer a design
that maximises the use of concrete, because this is more readily available in Nepal as a local resource whereas steel
has been found to be expensive and more difficult to maintain. A design for the bridge was produced by LRBP, with
the assistance of LRBSU and advice from the Bridge Expert (Milan Kominek).
The project is now at the fabrication stage. Modules for the first bridge have been successfully cast in a controlled
environment, on the Terai near to the bridge site. This report documents the advice and support provided to DoLI and
LRBSU to manufacture the formwork and cast the modules. This was achieved between May and November 2019.
Although the project is behind schedule, it is expected that both bridges can be completed before June 2020.
The Bridge Expert made two visits during this period, one in May 2019 to assess the steel formwork manufactured for
the bridge modules, and advise on various issues regarding the casting of modules and how the formwork should be
set up in the factory, and the second visit in November 2019 which included a site visit to the Terai to see the modules
being cast, and to answer specific queries on the casting and assembly of the modules.
A number of issues were identified by LRBSU and were resolved by the Bridge Expert either remotely, or during the
two visits. These issues are outlined in this report, and the contractor has been instructed on how to rectify these for
the fabrication and construction of the second bridge in the hills. The Bridge Expert is content that the bridge modules
cast are of adequate quality and strength for a modular bridge.
Given the limited time remaining on the project it has been recommended that the team meet with ReCAP to define
what will be possible to achieve during the remaining time in the project. It is likely that a re-scoping will be necessary.
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 7
1 Background
Nepal’s economy needs to grow fundamentally to solve the problem of limited transport infrastructure in the country.
Crucial to this aim is the development of roads and bridges. The Government of Nepal (GoN) is fully aware of this
problem and is committed to addressing this issue. GoN has given high priority to bridges and has rapidly increased the
bridge construction budget every year.
The motivation for this project came from DoLIDAR (now DoLI) and is borne out of their need to construct up to 2,000
new bridges to support the expansion of the rural road network. At present they use mainly reinforced in-situ concrete
bridges, which are slow to construct and pose particular challenges with quality control and transport of materials,
especially in hilly areas. The Department of Roads (DoR) also constructs up to 200 bridges per year on the strategic
network. The DoR is interested in learning about a modular system for bridges in Nepal, as many of their bridges in the
hills are short span. DoLI has the capacity to build more than 100 bridges per year. For such a high number of bridges,
it is essential that any solution for bridges in Nepal must be feasible, appropriate, flexible and durable. Given this
information it can be assumed that pre-cast/pre-fabricated modular bridges are a potential solution for bridges on rural
roads in Nepal.
It is understood from the ToR that a modular bridge is one that is formed, largely from pre-fabricated parts that are
manufactured off-site in a controlled environment. The parts are then transported to site and assembled. The modular
bridges designed on this project are of short to medium span and are capable of being assembled and placed without
the use of heavy equipment, maximizing the employment of local labour. Furthermore, the modular bridge system is
adaptable to the varied site and environmental conditions and situations found in Nepal and provides a practical
solution to a wide range of scenarios. The ToR further suggests that the bridge components should be fabricated in
Nepal as this will provide employment and develop local industry and capacity. It is also assumed that maximum use of
local materials will be made, hence the selection of concrete as the key material.
A desk study and literature review of the available technologies and systems of structures for modular bridge
construction from around the world was prepared at inception stage. Meetings with local experts were held, and
information and documents concerning the bridge issue and current state of roads and bridges development in Nepal
were received. Many interesting bridges have recently been completed or are under construction or design in Nepal.
The GoN focuses great attention on developing transport infrastructure, especially roads and bridges, as evidenced by
the various government programmes. An example of this commitment is the National Program for Motorable Bridges
on Local Roads – an assignment under the Local Road Bridge Programme (LRBP), completed in July 2014. The LRBP was
undertaken from February 2011 to July 2016 in Phase I, with Phase II and Phase III to follow. A concept paper on
adaptation of pre-stressed pre-cast modular bridges for Nepal was prepared for the Local Road Bridge Support Unit
(LRBSU) before this project commenced, so the idea of modular bridges in Nepal is not new.
Therefore, this ReCAP project in Nepal has the potential to be the start of important research into the impacts of
modular bridges from a developing country perspective.
2 Introduction
This report includes details on the supervision and advice provided during the formwork production and fabrication of
the bridge modules. Two visits to Nepal were made by the Bridge Expert:
• May 2019 – to check on the manufacturing of bridge formwork and to advise on any improvements necessary, both in making the formwork and in casting the concrete beams.
• November 2019 – to check on the progress of fabrication, including beam casting in a controlled environment and any ancillary measures that were necessary.
Remote advice has been provided throughout this period at the request of DoLI and LRBSU.
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 8
3 Site Visits
3.1 May 2019 Visit
The Bridge Expert visited Nepal in May 2019 to meet with stakeholders on the project, to gauge progress of
fabrication and to assess the quality of the formwork that was in manufacture. He was also able to advise on a range
of issues related to the formwork manufacture, as detailed below.
A meeting was held on 29 May 2019 at LRBSU. At this meeting it was agreed, amongst other things, that the assembly
of the modules on the temporary support would be carried out without any epoxy application to the joints, resulting
in dry joints produced by the match cast (positive negative) method. Therefore, visit report points 4 and 6 from 27th
May 2019 do not apply, and the assembly method described in visit report from 28th May 2019 is therefore confirmed
(Annex 1).
This visit summary was compiled on conclusion of the meetings in Kathmandu. It summarises the principle of the
modular design, which is essential for the production and assembly of the bridge modules.
• During fabrication each module should be cast one after another, in a series at the same time (Visit Report
Point 2 from 27th May: Annex 1) with (positive negative) match cast joints by the long-line method, which
should be based on a solid horizontal surface to form the long-line bed (approximately 22 m long for whole
girder). After casting of all the modules of a girder, they must be precisely positioned geometrically on the
formwork, especially the connection point of cable ducts.
• The technical supervision must check and accept the reinforcement of each module from the contractor. In
the support module (module A), typical spiral and other shear reinforcement must be fitted in the anchorage
area, according to the Freyssinet system. The grouting tube for injection must be fitted in the support and
middle modules (module A and module E) and lead to the top surface of the module.
• During module production there must be the possibility to use suitable external vibrators and the formwork
must be robust enough to cope with these vibrations. Use of immersion vibrators only may not be enough to
ensure the quality of concrete in the bottom flanges. Testing by probe pour of two sample modules is
strongly recommended.
• During module production a quality Form Release Agent must be used. TRL Bridge Expert sent to LRBSU
(Shakil Manandhar) on 29th May 2019 information on choosing and using Form Release Agents (Annex 2) and
other information about suitable materials that could be used and available in India and Nepal (Annexes 3
and 4). Only products of declared quality and suitability can be used and testing is strongly recommended.
• During both the manufacturing and assembly of modules, the fixed axis must be maintained to retain the
correct longitudinal geometry of the whole girder.
• During the manufacture of modules, the contractor is responsible for the quality of the concrete and
geometry of the beams, and should perform control tests.
• During manufacture, the longitudinal axis of the whole girder must be straight. To achieve the final shape on
the bridge the girders can be inclined to the desired slope to facilitate drainage of the bridge surface. There is
no camber in the pre-stressed girder.
• When assembling modules on the bridge, it is necessary to ensure that an assembled module is sufficiently
pressed against the previous one, which is already firmly installed and fixed. The correct installation of each
new module should be carefully checked, so that there is no fundamental problem of pre-stressing, and
concentrated compressive stress is avoided.
• Great care must be taken to ensure the correct and exact position of the cable ducts in the joints of the
modules to ensure continuity of the cable (Annex 5). Cable ducts must be precisely aligned at the module
joints. Suitable demountable inserts can help to ensure in locating the position (e.g. a pressured rubber
hose).
• On the construction site, especially during assembly and pre-stressing of modules, permanent strict technical
supervision is highly recommended.
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 9
• During the whole construction process, photographic documentation must be carried out by the contractor
and the technical supervisor.
• The possibility of grout being squeezed from the joints and the cable ducts between the modules must be
eliminated. TRL Bridge Expert sent to LRBSU (Shakil Manandhar) information relating to duct couplers
LIASEAL as an option by email on 28 May 2019 (see Annex 5). Other suitable tight couplers are available and
would be options.
This visit was preceded by email correspondence and consultations on progress and problems that arose on the
construction site. On 18 November 2019, Shakil Manandhar sent a message to the Bridge Expert proposing a site visit
the following week. The Bridge Expert was available on 25 November 2019 in Kathmandu and a meeting at LRBSU
took place that Monday between Shakil Manandhar and Ranjan Manandhar of LRBSU, Bishnu Shah and the Bridge
Expert.
There was a discussion on the current progress of construction and a summary of the known state of work activities
carried out at the site. Preparations for the site visit were also made.
The formwork has been manufactured in steel in a controlled environment, at the contractor’s premises in
Kathmandu, as proposed in the design report. The formwork was inspected by the Bridge Expert in May 2019. Upon
inspection the formwork modules were found to be well made and adequate for the purpose of forming modular
sections of reinforced concrete bridge. The fabricated sections of formwork can be seen in Annex 6.
3.2 November 2019 Visit to Bridge 1
This visit was made to Baugi Bridge in Parsa, Bridge 1.
3.2.1 Planning
The Bridge Expert made a visit to Nepal from 25 to 29 November 2019 as requested by DoLI and LRBSU. The visit was
initiated by email correspondence from Shakil Manandhar of LRBSU on 18 November 2019, to consult over progress
and problems that had arisen on the fabrication site. LRBSU proposed a site visit for the following week as the issues
encountered on site were holding up progress. The Bridge Expert indicated that he was available to visit Nepal from
25 November 2019.
Subsequently on 18 November 2019, LRBSU sent materials for testing and analysis to confirm the quality of
construction on site. The results can be seen in Annex 7 of this report, and show that the concrete is of adequate
strength. Following an assessment of the issues raised, it was agreed that a site visit was essential, firstly to experience
the issues first hand and secondly to provide reassurance and confidence to DoLI to proceed with the fabrication and
construction process.
Following consultation with TRL and ReCAP, preparation for the Nepal site visit continued between 19-22 November
2019 in the Prague office of AFCityPlan, as well as ongoing consultations with LRBSU in Kathmandu.
3.2.2 Purpose
This is the first bridge built to a completely new technology in Nepal (Nepal has produced prestressed bridges before,
but only single beams cast in-situ, not as a modular technology), and therefore there is a high probability of problems
occurring as there is no experience of the technology in-country. Bridge 1 at Baugi River in Parsa is located reasonably
close to industrial areas of Birgunj (15 km) and Hetauda (35 km) on the Terai, so it was relatively easy for the
contractor to find a place to fabricate the bridge modules. The location of the fabrication of modules was
approximately 20 km from the bridge site, and the completed modules were transported to the bridge site. Bridge 2 is
much more remote, so the nearest place to find an existing controlled environment would again likely to be on the
Terai, which is the closest industrial area. This would be in excess of 130 km from the bridge site. The problems need
to be identified and addressed as they appear. So far this has happened with the good cooperation of all partners.
The main purpose of this visit to Bridge 1 was:
• To assess the fabrication issues being experienced on site by the contractor, DoLI and LRBSU (see Section 4.1).
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 10
• To advise on potential solutions and/or remedial actions as necessary.
• To support the contractor, DoLI and LRBSU to deal with the issues and to give them confidence to proceed with the fabrication and construction.
3.2.3 Visit schedule
The following schedule was undertaken during the visit to Nepal:
• 24 November: The Bridge Expert arrived in Kathmandu and carried out preparations for the site visit meeting at the LRBSU.
• 25 November: Meeting with Shakil Manandhar, Ranjan Manandhar, Bishnu Shah and the Bridge Expert in Kathmandu. There was a discussion on the current progress of construction and a summary of the known state of the work activities at the site. Preparations for the site visit were finalised.
• 26/27 November: The team travelled to the bridge fabrication site. The team included:
➢ Contractor: Anil Silval (ECC/K.M./JBNS – JV)
➢ Designer: Ranjan Manandhar (LRBSU)
➢ Technical supervisor
➢ Bridge Expert: Milan Kominek (TRL team)
• 28 November: Following their return to Kathmandu, further consultations took place at the LRBSU regarding the construction site contract. Feedback from the site confirmed that two more girders had been successfully pre-stressed. Pre-stressing of the bridge structure was therefore completed. This will be covered in the forthcoming Construction Report.
• 29 November: Cable grouting was started on site, following established procedures as advised by the Bridge Expert. This will be covered in the forthcoming Construction Report.
• 30 November: Reporting was continued and processed based on incoming news from the construction site. This will be covered in the forthcoming Construction Report.
• A final site visit report was completed after the Bridge Expert´s return to Prague.
4 Summary
4.1 Issues Identified
Issues were noticed during the assembly and pre-stressing of the bridge. These will be covered in detail in the
construction report, but indicated that:
• There were problems with the girder geometry, including inaccuracies in the production of modules. It was found that the formwork was not precise in its construction. This has been fed back to the contractor and supervisors, and instructions have been given for this to be adjusted before Bridge 2 is cast.
• There was insufficient slip (or sliding) on the platform (construction issue).
• There was insufficient compression strength between modules when assembling modules together on the bridge platform (construction issue).
These issues are important to address for the long-term quality control of modular bridges. Issues such as this are to be expected on a pilot bridge of a new technology, and although they were overcome in this instance and the impact was minimal, they can be prevented in the future through good practice and experience. It is important that the contractor and supervisors embrace the advice given and apply it to the forthcoming construction of Bridge 2. The contractor has been instructed in how to resolve these issues and LRBSU are competent to supervise their implementation.
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 11
4.2 Present Status
Fabrication of the first bridge modules for the Baugi River Bridge is now 100% completed. Casting and assembly of
modules, pre-stressing and grouting is ongoing and concreting of the composite interacting deck slab is due to
commence on site during December 2019. This will complete the superstructure of the bridge.
The concrete quality of the bridge modules at M45 was achieved without any issues.
Overall the quality of production was deemed by the Bridge Expert to be adequate for local conditions and was
deemed to be successful with the cooperation of all stakeholders. Production of the concrete modules at the end of
the rainy season and assembly during the dry season showed the advantage of this proposed technology in terms of
year-round construction scheduling.
The current course of this research project, including its implementation, has shown the suitability of the proposed
new bridge construction technology in Nepal. The objective of this research project was to find a suitable method for
the construction of modular bridges in Nepal. On the basis of extensive analysis of the problem, taking into account
the specific conditions in Nepal, and after intensive consultation and cooperation with Nepalese experts, the method
of prefabrication of prestressed concrete girders was chosen.The designs were found to be appropriate and fulfil the
requirements identified at the beginning of the project; concrete was the preferred material because it is available
locally, the design of limited weight and length prefabricated sections was selected to facilitate transport to remote
locations and prefabrication in a controlled environment negated the influence of the monsoon season. The suitability
of this method is demonstrated by the implementation of the trial bridges, so no substantial changes are needed.
4.3 Next Steps
Load testing of the first bridge will need to be carried out after completion of assembly, pre-stressing of the beams
and curing of the deck slab. This will be supervised by the Bridge Expert and the results included in the Construction
Report.
Fabrication for the second bridge at Golmagad Khola in Doti has commenced. The formwork has been transferred to
this site and to date seven modules have been fabricated. There have been some access issues due to the poor
condition of the access road; the contractor has requested the responsible person of the municipality to improve the
road, but they have yet to respond to this request.
The contractor has requested DoLI for permission to cast the modules on site rather than in his production yard due to
the poor condition of the access road and the perceived difficulties in transporting modules to the bridge site. The
research team has no objection to this course of action, as communicated by email to stakeholders on 12 December
2019. Essential conditions are set out in the email, including the quality of concrete, the manufacturing accuracy and
preparation of the sliding bed for production and assembly of the modules, and final cable pre-stressing (including
temporary fastening and pressing the modules together). The Bridge Expert also stressed that lessons learned during
the first bridge fabrication should be implemented for the second. Feedback from site so far is that there have been
some issues with equipment, which takes time to fix as the nearest maintenance facility is a round trip of almost
250km. This highlights the importance of fabricating in a controlled environment with good facilities, where possible.
The construction of the first bridge was completed in early January 2020, and the second bridge is expected to be
completed by the end of April 2020.
It should be noted that it was agreed TRL would support one bridge with active inputs, such as site visits. It is
therefore recommended that a re-scoping meeting is held with TRL, client and subcontractor to formally plan the
remaining 5 months of the project and agree on what can be achieved, including the manual, training courses and cost
benefit analysis. The second bridge will be supported remotely, mainly by the Bridge Expert.
When this report is approved it will be forwarded to DoLI and stakeholders for response.
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 12
Annex 1 Meetings held on 27 & 28 May 2019
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 13
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 14
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 15
Annex 2 Selection and use of Form Release Agents
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 16
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 17
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 18
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 19
Annex 3 Form Release Agents
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 20
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 21
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 22
Annex 4 Form Release Agents
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 23
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 24
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 25
Annex 5 Pre-stressing cable ducts
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 26
Annex 6 Pictures of Formwork Manufacture
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 27
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 28
Annex 7 Concrete Compressive Strength Test Results
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 29
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 30
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 31
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 32
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 33
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 34
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 35
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 36
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 37
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 38
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 39
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 40
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 41
ReCAP | Nepal Modular Bridge Fabrication Report 42