19
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL REHAN YOUSAF 8 TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “TUNNEL SAFETY & VENTILATION” GRAZ, 2016 APRIL 25 TH 2016

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

PROPOSED EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA

TUNNEL

REHAN YOUSAF

8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “TUNNEL SAFETY & VENTILATION” GRAZ, 2016APRIL 25TH 2016

Page 2: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Background

Ventilation

Aim & Objectives

Methodology

Investigated Scenarios

Results

Conclusions

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

2COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 3: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

Furka Summit Tunnel

Furka Base Tunnel

3

Swiss cantons of Uri and Wallis were

connected by Furka Summit Tunnel

(opened in 1926)

15.4 km long Furka base tunnel

replaces Furka Summit tunnel in 1982

Two cross junctions namely “Geren

(single track twin tube) ” and “Rotondo

(double track single tube)”

One access gallery “Bedretto” is

located mid way of tunnel

Bi-directional train traffic

Categorized “C” according to swiss

guide line “Sicherheitsanforderungen

für bestehende Eisenbahntunnel (10.

Aug 2009)”

“Update Furka” Tunnel refurbishment

project to be completed by 2022

BACKGROUND

Tunnel

Length

[m]

Single track tunnel Twin track tunnel

< 100

trains/

day

100 -

300

trains/

day

> 300

trains/

day

< 100

trains/

day

100 -

300

trains/

day

> 300

trains/

day

< 300 A A A A A A

300-1000 B B B B B B

1000-3000 B C C B C C

3000-10’000 C C C C D D

> 10’000 C D D C D D

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 4: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

4

VENTILATION: AIM

Ventilation aims at: Lower humidity level in tunnel

Constructional ventilation

Improve tunnel safety level in

case of fire emergency

A tunnel door and two axial fans

are located mid way of tunnel to

control ventilation

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 5: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

VENTILATION: CONCEPT

5

Emergency ventilation is activated only when an emergency train is stationary

Fire at front of train:

Fire at rear of train:

Fire location

unknown or at

middle of train:

Ventilation in direction of travel, escape opposite to direction of travel

Ventilation opposite to direction of travel, escape in direction of travel

Ventilation opposite to direction of travel, escape in direction of travel

No pre-defined direction of flow exist in tunnel

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 6: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

AIM & OBJECTIVES

6

Proof of the proper functionality of the proposed ventilation system

Highlight the short comings in the evacuation process in case of a fire

emergency

Evaluate the aero- thermodynamic conditions for the critical most scenario

using coupled 1- and 3-dimensional “Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)”

simulation

Provide recommendations for the detailed rescue planning

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 7: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

METHODOLOGY

7

Distance vs time plot for different events.

Analyse the flow for different operational

scenarios (1-D velocity course)

Plot distance vs time plot for smoke

propagation (1-D visibility contour)

Investigate 3-D smoke and thermal

stratification for critical situations

Tim

e [m

in]

Distance [m]

5.6 min

8 min 100°C2.5 m above walking surface

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Time [min]

Ve

loc

ity [

m/s

]

Page 8: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

8

Standard scenarios

Covers 83% operational conditions

Assumption of emergency in single track tunnel section

HGV fire on vehicle transport train

Scenario Geren (Low air flow)

Accidental stop of train in cross over junction “Geren” (smaller cross section tube)

Train downstream of emergency train but before the tunnel door

Should the door be closed and non burning train should wait for ventilation ?

Should the door be closed after the non burning train has passed through the door ?

Presence of multiple trains in system

Fire at mid of train or unknown location

INVESTIGATED SCENARIOS

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 9: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

9

RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V1”

20

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Tim

e f

rom

fir

e ig

nitio

n [m

in]

2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000

Distance [m]

Oberwald → Realp (A2466)

HGV Fire at front

Emergency stop in section HU

Ventilation → Realp

1 axial fan in operation

200 Pa. adverse portal pressure

(opposing fan flow direction)

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 10: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

10

RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V2”

Oberwald → Realp (A2466)

HGV Fire at front

Emergency stop in section HU

Ventilation → Realp

1 axial fan in operation

200 Pa. assisting portal pressure

(pressure in fan flow direction)

20

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Tim

e f

rom

fir

e ig

nitio

n [m

in]

2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000

Distance [m]

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 11: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

11

RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V3”

Oberwald → Realp (A2466)

HGV Fire at front

Realp → Oberwald (A2467)

Emergency stop in section HU

Ventilation → Realp

1 axial fan in operation

200 Pa. adverse portal pressure

(opposing fan flow direction)

20

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Tim

e f

rom

fir

e ig

nitio

n [m

in]

2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000

Distance [m]

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 12: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

12

RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V4”

Oberwald → Realp (A2466)

HGV Fire at rear

Realp → Oberwald (A2467)

Emergency stop in section HU

Ventilation → Oberwald

1 axial fan in operation

200 Pa. adverse portal pressure

(opposing fan flow direction)

20

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Tim

e f

rom

fir

e ignitio

n [m

in]

2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000

Distance [m]

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 13: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

13

RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V5”

20

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Tim

e f

rom

fir

e ignitio

n [m

in]

2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000

Distance [m]

Similar to variation 3 with following

operational changes:

Immediate contact with control

centre as soon as train comes to a

stop

Immediate STOP command (within

30 seconds) from control centre for

all trains in the tunnel network

Simultaneous closing of doors and

starting of ventilation fans

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 14: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

14

RESULTS: SCENARIO GEREN

Oberwald → Realp (A2466)

HGV Fire at rear

Realp → Oberwald (A2467)

Emergency stop in section GE

Ventilation → Oberwald

2 axial fan in operation

200 Pa. adverse portal pressure

(opposing fan flow direction)

3-D CFD was used to see smoke

propagation and extent of back-layering

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

Page 15: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

15

RESULTS: SCENARIO GEREN

Fire

A2467

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

2 minutes after fire ignition

Emergency train is stopped

A2467 moving towards OW

Fire power 12 MW

Ventilation not started

Page 16: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

16

RESULTS: SCENARIO GEREN

Fire

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

A2467

6 minutes after fire ignition

Emergency train is stopped

A2467 moving towards RA

Fire power 30 MW

Ventilation 100%

Page 17: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

17

RESULTS: SCENARIO GEREN

Fire

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

20 minutes after fire ignition

Emergency train is stopped

A2467 left the tunnel

Fire power 30 MW

Ventilation 100%

Page 18: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

18

CONCLUSIONS

Effect of adverse portal pressure on the

ventilation system

Operational measures:

Early stop signal

Simultaneous closing of doors and starting of

ventilation fans

Non-emergency trains should evacuate after

stabilized flow conditions occur in tunnel

Ventilation system should be kept simple

and reliable

A calculated risk has to be considered for

certain extreme cases (e.g. “Geren”)

Emergency ventilation should run at its full

capacity

Ventilation control in its current

implementation improves the escape

conditions for Furka tunnel

20

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Tim

e f

rom

fir

e ig

nitio

n [m

in]

2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000

Distance [m]

Fan adverse portal

pressure (V1)

Fan assisting

portal pressure

(V2)

20

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Tim

e f

rom

fir

e ig

nitio

n [m

in]

2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000

Distance [m]

Without operational

measures

With operational

measures

INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY

VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL

8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

6 minutes after fire ignition

- Emergency train is stopped

- A2467 moving towards RA

- Fire power 30 MW

- Ventilation 100%

Fire

Initial direction of

travel

A2467

Page 19: INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE

Consulting. Engineering. Projects. Operations. www.poyry.com

CONTACT:

REHAN YOUSAF

SENIOR ENGINEER

[email protected]

+41 76 356 20 68

THANK YOU