Upload
kaylie-haswell
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Inverse Cyclotrons for Intense Muon Beams – Phase I
Kevin PaulTech-X Corporation
Don SummersUniversity of Mississippi
ABSTRACT:
I will summarize the progress on the current SBIR Phase I to begin investigating the feasibility of using inverse cyclotrons for intense muon beams. This Phase I is intended to focus on the physics within the core of the cyclotron, where the muons are captured and trapped. The main limitation is believed to be space charge. As such, this Phase I is intended to explore what fields are needed to trap 2 × 1012 muons in the core and what the beam looks like after ejection.
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 2
Phase I Main Objectives
• Demonstrate ejection from the cyclotron in vacuum with VORPAL– What are the space charge limitations?
• Investigate effects of material (ionization, muon capture, recombination) on ejection with VORPAL– Is space charge force mitigated?
– What are muon capture losses?
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 3
Phase I Tasks
• Implement one-body decay in VORPAL– Constant-weight (Monte Carlo)– Variable-weight (deterministic)
• Vacuum simulations of ejection with VORPAL– Vary confining fields
• Penning trap– Vary muon cloud density (number of muons)
• Ejection simulations with low-density gas– Comparison with vacuum simulations
• Improve algorithms for muon cooling simulations over full energy range– Necessary for full end-to-end simulations (Phase II)
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 4
Vacuum Simulations of the Core
• Trap Models– Pierce-Penning (presented here)
• Cylindrical hyperbolic surfaces
– Cylindrical Penning• Cylinder with end-caps
– Open Cylindrical Penning• Cylinder without end-caps
• Ejection Models– Simple “open door” models (presented here)
• Ramping one side of the trap voltage down
– External kicker models
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 5
The Penning-Pierce Trap
€
2z2 − r2 = 2z02
z0 = 75 mm
Upper/Lower End-caps:
€
2z2 − r2 = −r02
r0 = 2z0
Cylindrical Ring:
+V
+V
-V
zB0
For stability:
€
B0 >4mμV
ez02
Assuming positive muons…
r
€
Φ(r,z) =V2z2 − r2
2z02
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
• Need voltages necessary to hold 2 × 1012 muons
– Assumes a uniform magnetic field:
– For stability:
– To contain muons at a temperature of 10 keV:
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 6
Penning-Pierce Trap VORPAL Models
€
V ≈ 60 kV
€
B0 =1 T
€
V < 1197 kV
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 8
VORPAL Trap Simulation Results: Transverse (x-y) Dynamics
y
x
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 9
VORPAL Trap Simulation Results: Longitudinal (x-z) Dynamics
z
x
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 10
VORPAL Trap Simulation Results: Transverse (x) Spatial Distribution
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 11
VORPAL Trap Simulation Results: Transverse (x) Momentum Distribution
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 12
VORPAL Trap Simulation Results: Longitudinal (z) Spatial Distribution
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 13
VORPAL Trap Simulation Results: Longitudinal (z) Momentum Distribution
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 14
Ejection from the Trap
- Flip the voltage of the upper end-cap to -V
- Ramp the voltage of the ring electrode to 0
- Assume this takes a total time of 100 ns
- This produces ~0.1 G magnetic fields, which are ignored in the simulation
- Particles measured at z = ~16 cm
-V
+V
0
zB0
rE
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 15
VORPAL Ejection Simulation Results: Transverse (x) Spatial Distribution
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 16
VORPAL Ejection Simulation Results: Transverse (x) Momentum Distribution
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 17
VORPAL Ejection Simulation Results: Temporal (t) Distribution
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 18
VORPAL Ejection Simulation Results: Energy (KE) Distribution
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 19
Conclusions:
• Normalized Emittance after Ejection:– 1D Transverse Emittance: 380 mm-mrad
– Longitudinal Emittance: 1.2 mm-mrad
• Confining magnetic field keeps transverse distribution unchanged
• Longitudinal distribution determined by kicker speed (how fast you can swing the door open)
Tech-X Corporation - 2008 Muon Collider Design Workshop 20
Work yet to do…
• Consider effects of gas in the core– Ionization
– Muon capture (for negative muons)
– Muonium formation (for positive muons)
– Space-charge mitigation (???)
• Other trap fields– Cylindrical Penning Traps
• Easier to construct / inject / eject
• Requires larger voltages (especially for open traps)
– Paul Traps (AC Penning Traps)