Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Field of study:
Health and pure Sciences
Class:
Integrative project
Methodology
Work written by:
Malek Dhane (1450170)
Work presented to:
François Lemoine
Winter 2016
1
Table of contentIntroduction................................................................................................................................3
Literature review.........................................................................................................................3
Background information………………………………………………………………………………..…………..….3 Instrumental advancements:PCR.……………………………………………………………………………..……4 Testing……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 Nutrition…………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………7 Research………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8
Conclusion – data gathering.......................................................................................................9
References..................................................................................................................................9
2
Introduction
For my integrative project, I have chosen to take on the position of an observant intern at the
Montreal University Health Center (CHUM) within the biochemistry department. The reason for
my choosing of this internship is twofold. Firstly, I have always wanted to work in a hospital-like
setting. Secondly, I have a profound admiration and curiosity towards to the field of
biochemistry. This internship would therefore allow me to determine whether or not I would
enjoy a career in such a field.
Biochemistry is the study of chemical applications within and related to living organisms. In the
last few decades of the 20th century, biochemistry has gotten so at explaining life processes that
it currently overlaps with multiple areas of life sciences, such as nutrition, genetics and
molecular biology. Multiple hospitals employ biochemists in order to aid in patient care. From
researching new ways of testing to evaluating severe nutritious problems, biochemists work on
multiple facets of patient care. The goal of my internship project is to examine the various
applications of biochemistry for patient care. Biochemistry can generally be separated into
various sub-aspects such as conducting tests, evaluating a patient’s nutrition and research.
Literature review
Background information
The now refuted scientific principle that living beings are fundamentally different from non-
living entities was a science named vitalism. Most chemists believed, in the 18 th century, that
organic compounds could not be synthesised using non-organic compounds (Bechtel and
Richardson, 1998). However, this was disproved in 1828 when Friedrich Wohler synthesised
urea using ammonium cyanate (Lajos Kossuth University, 1996). Following this discovery, many
chemists shifted towards studying organic compounds in a chemical setting. Gradually, scientists
began discovering various molecules which led to the discovery of DNA and genes. The
discovering of these molecular units of hereditary became the corner stone to multiple
advances in biochemistry.
3
Instrumental advancements: PCR
In 1983, the biochemist Kary Mullis first replicated small chains of DNA. This was not the first
instrumental advancement in biochemistry, seeing as biochemists had been working on
spectroscopy and molecular dynamics for quite some time. However, the discovery of the
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is often viewed as a critical shift in biochemical and biomedical
prioritization towards hereditary material. The
polymerase chain reaction relies on the cyclic
repetition of a chain reaction which happens in
three steps. This allows for an expanding of the
quantity of DNA molecules in an exponential
fashion. The cycle begins with the heating of the
sample at about 94-98oC for 30 seconds in order
to denature the sample as can be seen in Figure 1.
What this does is separate the strands of DNA by
disrupting the hydrogen bonds between
complementary bases. Then, the sample is cooled
to about 50-65oC for 40 seconds to allow the
annealing of the primers to the single stranded
DNA template. Finally, a DNA polymerase
resistant to heat will add the complementary
nucleobases to the template in the 5’ to 3’
direction. Taq polymerase, an enzyme commonly
used in PCR, is optimal for temperatures in the
75-80oC range. This cycle is repeated for a few
hours until the enzyme is exhausted and no more
product accumulates. In order to separate the
mixed DNA, agarose gel electrophoresis is
sometimes used. This process, which separates the nucleic acids depending on their size and
electrical charge, is done by placing the sample in a hole of the extremity of the agarose gel. The
Figure 1 : Polymerace Chain reaction (Campbell and Reece, 2007)
4
agarose gel sits in a conducting liquid and a current passes through. The migration of the
molecules can then be viewed using UV light (Campbell and Reece, 2007).
It is important to note that the main goal of biochemical instrumental advancements is to
perfect testing. For example, the polymerase chain reaction is utilized in a number of tests such
as leukemia and lymphomas testing.
Testing
The Ames test, which was discovered by the biochemist Bruce Ames and determines if a given
chemical or substance is mutagenic, is also one that came forward following the discovery of
genes and DNA. Scientists began to realize that cancer was caused by the over-abundant
replication of cells due to a change in their DNA. Essentially, this test uses Salmonella bacteria in
order to determine whether certain substances would affect DNA. More precisely, this test
verifies if the chemical compound can mutate the already mutant strain of Salmonella bacteria
back to normal. The Salmonella typhimurium bacteria is one that cannot synthesis histidine, and
yet it needs this amino acid for growth. The goal of this test is basically to see if its contact with
a substance could alter this. Once the bacteria is placed in contact with the substance,
numerous genetic analysis are performed to see how it has reacted. The strain is first tested for
histidine dependence. What this
means is that the bacteria are
placed across a GM agar plate
which contains an excess of
biotin. If the bacteria remain
intact, and due to the fact that
they are histidine dependant, no
growth on the plate would
indicate that the substance was
not mutagenic. This can be seen
in Figure 2. This same application
is then repeated only with the
biotin being replaced with Figrue 2 : Ames test (Biomedical PPT Toolkits, 2016) 5
histidine. Once again, no growth should be observed except for the strain TA102. This is then
finally repeated with both biotin and histidine which would cause the growth in all strains. This
technique has been widely regarded as the easiest and most cost-effective way to determine if
certain substances can cause cancer.. Some scientists chose to perform other follow-up tests on
the bacteria strain, such as rfa marker, ampicillin resistance and spontaneous mutant frequency,
in order to get a better understanding of the mutation caused (Tejs, 2008).
Over the years, scientists have been utilizing genetic testing to try and determine a person’s
likelihood of eventually developing diseases, specifically types of cancers, as opposed to the
causes of the diseases. This is very often done with patients at risk for breast and ovarian cancer
and is incredibly common in hospitals (National Cancer Institute, 2015). BRCA screening is a test
performed by biochemists in order to test for
mutations on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. These
mutations are often acquired hereditarily. BRCA
genes produce tumor suppressing proteins. A
predisposed malfunctioning of the gene would
mean the patient is predisposed to eventually
have a type of cancer. Often, doctors will ask for a
blood sample or a bit of saliva. Although there are
many types of genetic tests that can be used,
predictive genetic testing is most commonly used
for breast and ovarian cancer (Evans, 2007). After
multiplying the DNA sequences of the cells with a
variation of the PCR test, the sample is added to a
Biopulverizer H tube. The sample is then
homogenized and then transferred to a tube
using a syringe and a gauge-needle. The sample then goes on to be extracted and set on a 1%
agarose gel for analysis. The results of this test are often non-conclusive and can only give an
indication as to the patient’s eventual health. Its percent efficiency is somewhere between 30
and 70% (West et al., 2001).
(Martin, 2013)
6
When a patient’s test demonstrates that he or she is suffering from a disease, he or she will
sometimes be advised to consult a nutritional biochemist. Whether it is diabetes, dental
diseases or even cancer, nutrition will sometimes have an integral part to play in patient care.
Nutrition
The link between biochemistry and nutrition is somewhat of a blurred line in the sense that they
often overlap. Often, once the appropriate tests are completed and show positive responses,
biochemists will either relay the information to medical professionals or, if the disease has a
nutritional aspect, will take the patient in hand themselves (World Health Organization, 2002).
The most common nutrition follow-up after a biochemical test is for diabetes. Once a patient
tests positive for plasma glucose levels that are superior to the norm, biochemists will work with
nutritionists and biochemical nutritionists in order to help in disease management. Depending
on the extent, changes to the patient’s lifestyle, medication and sometimes even surgery is
advised (National Cancer Institute, 2016). During cancer treatment, nutritional therapy is often
conducted by biochemists in order to aid the patient in keeping up their body weight, to assure
the maintaining of tissue and in infection fighting. Eating habits that are ideal for patients with a
certain type of cancer can often be incredibly different from usual healthy eating guidelines.
Furthermore, certain biochemists specialize in evaluating the way certain tumors make
chemicals that will affect the way the body uses certain nutrients. When a patient is fighting
stomach or intestine cancer, his or her body’s use of proteins, carbohydrates and fat will
sometimes be effected. In these cases, chemical analysis is needed (Mayo Clinic, 2014).
Nutritional biochemistry was the heart of biochemistry before discoveries pushed the field
towards testing and being diseased based. Originally, biochemists would work with patients with
certain basic nutritious deficiencies (Bauman College, 2003). However, many biochemists still
work hand-in-hand with nutritionists on basic nutritional diseases such as protein-energy
malnutrition, scurvy and anemia. Scurvy is an example of a disease that certain patients of the
CHUM do actually have. It is mainly caused by a deficiency in ascorbate, more commonly known
under the name Vitamin C. Ascorbate plays a key role in multiple chemical pathways such as the
synthesis of collagen. An important function of ascorbate is protein hydroxylation. Without the
ability to add a hydroxyl group to collagen, the molecule is incredibly unstable which results in 7
the common symptoms of scurvy. The main symptoms of scurvy is fatigue and general
discomfort. If it goes untreated, the possibility of bone pain is also present. It can be treated by
making sure that the patient eats more foods rich in vitamin C.
Seeing as every patient is different, the nutritional aspect of biochemistry is often specialized
work. Depending on the patient’s disease and needs, the analysis of his or her management
requires a personalized analysis and, in rare cases, in-depth research.
Research
In biochemistry, research has an integral part in discovering and perfecting testing, all the while
being implemented to perfect patient care. Most research is funded by universities and is often
used to try and perfect medical procedures. Often working in relation with biomedical
engineers, biochemists are often at the forefront of the procedures that doctors use in order to
treat patients.
Currently, stem cell research is an aspect of biochemistry that is being heavily developed and
further researched. These cells have the remarkable ability to develop into various specializing
cells all the while being able to divide themselves. Most of the research done on these cells is to
try and understand the reason why they can stay unspecialized (Yanes et al., 2010). The current
tests being run on these cells are looking to understand the genes implicated in their
specialization and the corresponding proteins that work towards the cells specialization. Stem
cell therapy is a form of therapy in which these cells are being used in order to prevent certain
conditions such as diabetes and Alzheimer’s
disease. Currently, bone marrow transplant is
the only form of stem cell therapy widely used
and accepted. It utilizes healthy bone marrow in
order to replace destroyed bone marrow (US
National Library of Medicine, 2016). This is often
performed on patients with leukemia, a type of
cancer which begins in the bone marrow and
effects the patient’s blood cell count, in order to (Cancer treatment centers of America, 2015)8
replace degraded cells in the patient’s bone marrow (Cancer treatment centers of America,
2015).
Conclusion or data gathering or integrative project objectives
The data gathering of this project will mostly be observatory. By being present with biochemists,
I will get to see firsthand their roles. More precisely, I will work in the laboratory, with patients
and in research. Within the laboratory, I will have the chance to conduct certain tests and to
gather data on how the CHUM conducts various tests. With the patients, I will get to see the
kinds of conditions that are referred to biochemists as well as the way they go about solving
problems. This is mainly where the nutrition aspect of biochemistry is present. Finally, my time
with researchers will allow me to see how current biochemists are working on future
applications, including stem cell research. All three aspects together allow for a thorough
understanding of the role of biochemistry in patient care.
I will have the possibility to talk to multiple biochemist, specifically with those working in
research. Hence, I will have the opportunity to ask about their opinions of future applications of
biochemistry such as gene therapy and even cloning. All the data obtained will finally be
compiled and presented in a scientific poster.
References
Campbell, Neil, Reece, Jane. 2007. Biologie, 7 ed. Pearson education France. [accessed 2015].
Bauman College. 2003. Nutritional Biochemistry. [accessed 2016].http://sondrabarrett.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/barrett-biochem-chapter.pdf
Bechtel, William, Richardson, Robert. 1998. Vitalism. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [accessed 2016].https://mechanism.ucsd.edu/teaching/philbio/vitalism.htm
Biomedical Powerpoint toolkits. 2016. Using the Ames test. [accessed 2016].http://www.motifolio.com/1021147.html
Cancer treatment centers of America. 2015. Stem cell transplantation for leukemia. [accessed 2016].http://www.cancercenter.com/leukemia/stem-cell-transplantation/
9
Evans, James, Burke, Wylie, Skrzynia, Cecile. 2001. The complexities of predictive genetic testing. [accessed 2016].http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1120190/
Lajos Kossuth University.1996. A demonstration of Wohler’s experiment: preparation of urea from ammonium chloride and potassium cyanate. [accessed 2016].http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed073p539.2
Martin, Nina. 2013. The BRCA1 gene mutation. Public Health United. [accessed 2016].http://www.publichealthunited.org/category/cancer-2/
Mayo Clinic. 2014. Diabetes management: How lifestyle, daily routine affect blood sugar. [accessed 2016]http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/diabetes/in-depth/diabetes-management/art-20047963
National Cancer Institute. 2016. Nutrition in Cancer Care-Patient version: Overview of nutrition in Cancer Care. [accessed 2016]http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/side-effects/appetite-loss/nutrition-pdq
National Cancer Institute. 2015. BRCA1 and BRCA2: Cancer risk and genetic testing. [accessed 2016].http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/genetics/brca-fact-sheet
Tejs, Sebastian. 2008. The Ames test: a methodological short review. Environmental biotechnology. [accessed 2016].http://environmentalbiotechnology.pl/eb_dzialy/eb_online/2008/vol4_1/ms035stejs.pdf
US national library of medicine. 2016. Bone marrow transplant. [accessed 2016]. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003009.ht
West, Mike, et al. 2001. Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles. [accessed 2016].http://www2.stat.duke.edu/~mw/.downloads/pnas01.pdf
World Health Organization (WHO). 2002. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of the joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. [accessed 2016]http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/trs916/summary/en/
10
Yanes, Oscar, et al. 2010. Metabolic oxidation regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation. [accessed 2015].http://www.natureasia.com/en/research/highlight/735
11
Evaluation Grid for the Methodology of the Integrative Project (10%, due March 9th, 2016)360-200-SA, Integrative Project, Winter 2016
Name: . Total: /25
* NOTE: the “Material” box will not apply to all projects. Projects for which it doesn’t apply will have 6 marks on literature review.
Topic Very satisfying Satisfying Unsatisfying Very unsatisfying
Research Question or Goal
/3
The question or goal is clearly identified. It is realistic. It is clearly linked to the internship.
3
The question or goal is identified but could be more specific. It is clearly linked to the internship.
2
The question or goal is unclear OR it is unrealistic OR it is not linked to the internship.
1
The question or goal is absent, OR unclear AND and it is not linked to the internship.
0
Explanation
/5
There is a clear, 1 paragraph-long explanation of the question. It says what the main aspects of the question are.5
There is an explanation of the question but it is incomplete or there is extra, useless information.
3-4
There is a text following the question but it hardly explains anything about it.
2
There is no very little or no explanation.
1-0
Literature review There are 3 (or 5*) sources identified. They are all reliable and all relevant.
There are 3 (or 5*) sources identified; 1 of them is not completely reliable OR not completely relevant.
There are 3 (or 5*) sources, several of them are unreliable or irrelevant.
There are fewer than 3 (or 5*) sources.
/6 6 5-4 2-3 0
Variables to measure or information to gather
/5
All important variables (or information to gather) have been clearly identified.
5
Most important variables have been clearly identified.
3-4
Some important variables have been identified, but many missing.
2
None or next to none of the important variables have been identified.
1-0
How will the data or the information be gathered (protocol OR observation grids OR questionnaires)/5
All the main steps to be taken have been identified. The order in which they are presented is logical.
5
Most of the main steps to be taken have been identified. The order in which they are presented is logical. There might be some missing steps.
3-4
Some steps are given but: so many steps are missing that it will not be possible to gather data that way OR there is no logic in the order in which they are presented.
2
No steps are given, or steps given are unrelated to the data to be taken
1-0
Partitioning of time between internship and media production/1
Time partitioning is indicated and adds up to a minimum of 120 hrs.
1
Time partitioning is not indicated, or does not add up to a minimum of 120 hrs.
0