19
1 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Introduction To Restructuring Mid-Tier Shipyard By Developing Rough Layout Concept Rafael Callamand

Introduction To Restructuring Mid-Tier Shipyard By ...m120.emship.eu/Documents/MasterThesis/2013/Rafael Callamand.pdf · Introduction To Restructuring Mid-Tier Shipyard By Developing

  • Upload
    hakhanh

  • View
    231

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

Introduction To Restructuring

Mid-Tier Shipyard By Developing Rough Layout Concept

Rafael Callamand

2 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

AGENDA

► Introduction

► Objectives

► Approach

► Theoretical Foundation

– Ship Production Processes

– Simulation in Shipbuilding Industry

– Description of Mid-tier shipyard

► Data Collection

► Experimental Procedure

► Conclusions

3 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

INTRODUCTION

► Shipyards facing the crisis

– Change in their strategies

► Optimization of shipbuilding processes

– Reducing delivery time/cost

► Simulation as tool for shipbuilding industry

– Simulation of very complex systems

4 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

OBJECTIVES

DES model for production process

Coarse layout method

Data requirement

what if scenarios

5 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

APPROACH

DES model for production process

DES simulation tool

Coarse layout method

Long –term capacity planning

Data requirement Information derived

from real project

what if scenarios

Assessment of new scenarios

6 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

THEORETICAL FOUNDATION

► Ship Production Process

– Product Work Breakdown Structure – PWBS

• Hull Block Construction Method – HBCM

• Zone Outfitting Method – ZOFM

• Zone Painting Method – ZPTM

• Pipe Piece Family Manufacturing (PPFM)

7 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

THEORETICAL FOUNDATION

► Simulation in Shipbuilding

– Monte Carlo Simulation

• Time unnecessary

– Continuous Simulation

• Mathematical models

– Discrete Event Simulation

• Event occur at an instant

8 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

THEORETICAL FOUNDATION

► Description of Mid-tier Shipyard

– Capacities

– Classification as mid-tier shipyard

http://desarrolloydefensa.blogspot.de/2008/08/cotecmar-excelencia-en-astilleros.html

9 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

DATA COLLECTION

► Product data

– Project’s information

► Production data

– Performance (m/h)

– Elements 1 ton-steel

► Structural data

– Schedule

10 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

► Simulation Tool Description

– Objects represented by icons

– Hierarchically structured

– Graphical representation

https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/products/tecnomatix/plant_design/plant_simulation.shtml#lightview-close

11 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

► Current scenario

– Hull weight distribution

– Workflow

PLATESTORAGE180%

STORAGECUTTINGPLATES80%

PLATESTORAGE(HANGAR)

STORAGEPROFILES

WORKINGSPACEFLATPANELS

WORKINGSPACEFLATPANELS

CURVEPANELFORMATION37%

PRE-ASSEMBLY

BLOCK-ASSEMBLYSTERN(14%)

MID(78%)BOW(8%)

RINGASSEMBLY100%

HULLERECTION&PAINTINGZONE

100%

2DBENDINGPLATEMACHINE

PRE-ASSEMBLY

CUTTINGPLATEM

BENDINGPROFILESM

STORAGEPROFILES

WORKSHOP1

WORKSHOP2

WORKSHOP3

7%

20% 80%

7%

7%

30%

50%

31,5%

31,5% 25%

25%

6,5

%

12 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

► Current scenario

– Unidirectional workflow

– Stations

13 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

► Scenario 1. Welding Robot in the production line

http://cfnewsads.thomasnet.com/images/large/515/515802.jpg

14 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

► Scenario 2. Restructuration of the Current Layout

Current Layout Restructured Layout

15 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

STATION CURRENT SCENARIO Welding Robot Scenario Restructuration of the current layout

Processing Time Set-up Time Processing Time Set-up Time Processing Time Set-up Time

Warehouse 2h:30m 2h:30m 2h:30m

Plate Storage 1h:00m --- 1h:00m --- 1h:00m ---

Profile Storage 1h:00m --- 1h:00m --- 1h:00m ---

Cutting Machine 1h30m 00h:45m 1h30m 00h:45m 1h30m 00h:30m

Bending Workshop 7h:00m 2h:00m 7h:00m 2h:00m 7h:00m 00h:45m

Flat pre-assembly workshop 3h:30m 1h:30m 1h:30m 1h:30m 3h:30m 00h:45m

Flat assembly workshop 3h:30m 2h:00m 3h:30m 2h:00m 3h:30m 3h:30m

Curve pre-assembly workshop 6h:00m 2h:00m 6h:00m 2h:00m 6h:00m 6h:00m

Curve assembly workshop 6h:00m 2h:00m 6h:00m 2h:00m 6h:00m 6h:00m

Aft-bow assembly blocks ws 4h:00m 1h:30m 4h:00m 1h:30m 4h:00m 4h:00m

mid-ship assembly blocks ws 3h:00m 1h:30m 3h:00m 1h:30m 3h:00m 3h:00m

16 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

100%

95%

107%

97%

Real Process Current Scenario Welding Robot Scenario Change Layout Scenario

17 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

STATION CURRENT SCENARIO Welding Robot Scenario Restructuration of the current layout

Processing Time Set-up Time Processing Time Set-up Time Processing Time Set-up Time

Warehouse --- 2h:30m 2h:30m --- 2h:30m

Plate Storage 1h:00m --- 1h:00m --- 1h:00m ---

Profile Storage 1h:00m --- 1h:00m --- 1h:00m ---

Cutting Machine 1h30m 00h:45m 1h30m 00h:45m 1h30m 00h:30m

Bending Workshop 7h:00m 2h:00m 7h:00m 2h:00m 7h:00m 00h:45m

Flat pre-assembly workshop 3h:30m 1h:30m 1h:30m 1h:30m 3h:30m 00h:45m

Flat assembly workshop 3h:30m 2h:00m 3h:30m 2h:00m 3h:30m 2h:00m

Curve pre-assembly workshop 6h:00m 2h:00m 6h:00m 2h:00m 6h:00m 2h:00m

Curve assembly workshop 6h:00m 2h:00m 6h:00m 2h:00m 6h:00m 2h:00m

Aft-bow assembly blocks ws 4h:00m 1h:30m 4h:00m 1h:30m 4h:00m 1h:30m

mid-ship assembly blocks ws 3h:00m 1h:30m 3h:00m 1h:30m 3h:00m 1h:30m

THROUGHPUT 474 tons 532 tons 483 tons

18 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

RECOMMENDATIONS

► Develop very fine simulation model

► Evaluate impact of new machinery before investment

► Include all the processes related with shipbuilding

19 University of Rostock | Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering February 2013

CONCLUSIONS

DES model for production

process

DES simulation

tool

DES tool shown

capabilities

Coarse layout

method

Long –term capacity planning

Rough layout concept as useful tool

Data requirement

Information derived from real project

Analysis of the information gathered

what if scenarios

Assessment of new scenarios

Evaluation of current and two new scenarios