10
Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Introduction to Research Design

Threats to Internal ValidityOne Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Page 2: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

  O   X   O

• Campbell & Stanley “pre-experimental.”• Wuensch “experimental.”• OK design if can achieve “experimental

isolation,” as in the chemistry lab.• Correlated samples t test or nonparametric

equivalent.

Page 3: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

History

Events other than X between pretest and posttest

• Pre = subjects’ energy consumption.• X = Education on importance of

conserving resources.• Post = subjects’ energy consumption.• History = price of energy increases 50%

between pre and post.

Page 4: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Maturation

Processes that normally cause subjects to change across time.

• Subjects = newly hired employees• Pre = Test of morale• X = Six month program to elevate morale• Post = Test of morale• Maturation = end of honeymoon effect

Page 5: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Testing

Pretesting subjects can change them.• Pre = frequency of conservation behaviors

– have you installed a low-flow shower head?– et cetera

• X = Education on importance of conserving resources

• Post = frequency of conservation behaviors• Testing = just (pre) asking them about

certain behaviors might cause them to try them.

Page 6: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Instrumentation

The measuring instrument changes across time.

• The $1.99 scale for our fishing experiment.– AM versus PM weight of our catch– Spring stretched

• The human observer as instrument– effect of treatment on number of problems in

computer lab– changes in observers from pre to post

Page 7: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Statistical Regression

When scores have an error component, both high and low scores regress towards the mean upon retesting.

• My ESP demo in PSYC 2101• Educational research at Miami Univ.

– mean IQ in school district = 102– mean of selected students = 80– how much regression is expected?

Page 8: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Percent of regression towards the mean, PRM = 100(1 – ρ).

• If pretest-posttest corr = .8,• PRM = 100(1 - .8) = 20%.• Expect regression (up) of .2(102 - 80) =

4.4 points.• That may be enough to get significant pre-

post change.

Page 9: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

Mortality

Subjects who drop out of the experiment may differ from those who stay in.

• Subjects = patients with wasting disease• Pre, Post = body weight, X = New drug• 20 patients at pre, 10 at post• Pre mean weight = 97 lb, post = 125.• Was the drug effective?

Page 10: Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity One Group Pretest-Posttest Design

• Perhaps the sickest (and lightest) 10 dropped out.

• Maybe positive effect from some, who stay in, negative for others, who drop out.

• Correct by computing means only for those who complete study.– creating a problem of external validity.