Upload
elinor-henry
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Introduction
1
The importance of the factsMost cases are won or lost on the factsThe facts are not what you wish they were, or
what a disbelieved witness said they were but what has been proved by the evidence
Marshalling the facts in a persuasive and accurate manner is often the most time-consuming part of writing a factum
Complete accuracy and fairness is essential: face your difficulties
Try to tell a story, but remember you are not trying to write the great Canadian novel
2
Two approaches to the factsChronological
Every lawyer’s default settingLogical Helpful if how events relate to one another in
time is significantChallenge: not getting lost in the details of
timing: always ask if this date is important: why start a sentence with “On January 5, 2007, at 3:00 pm, Justice Bloggins delivered his ruling” if the date and time are not imporant?
A timeline may make a useful appendix to the factum
3
Two approaches (con’t)
ThematicAppropriate if timing of events not particularly
significantHelpful where the “story” is in fact a group of
smaller “stories”Challenge: making clear how the various
smaller stories relate to each other
4
Some tipsUse “overviews” throughout: Context before
detailStick to the relevant facts: Don’t worry about
mixing in some law if necessary for the reader to understand why certain facts are relevant
Tell a story: What is the story about? From whose point of view will you tell it? Where does it start? Where does it end? What is it about this story that makes the client’s position appealing?
On appeal – the facts are as found at trial absent a clear and determinative error
5
Some tips (con’t)Use of descriptive subheadings to help keep the
reader on trackUse charts to distill complicated information –
but remember they are to simplify not complicateA picture is worth 1000 wordsA schematic diagram may be an aid to
understandingDon’t avoid “bad” facts – address themEnsure all facts required for your legal
submissions are includedAlways give pinpoint references
6
The ”Why are you telling me this?” test
For every fact you set out, imagine the judge asking as s/he reads the factum, “Why are you telling me this?”
If you don’t have an answer, take out the fact.
If the answer isn’t obvious from what has gone before, revise the draft until it is.
7