14
26/11/2018 1 [email protected] Outcomes address the effects, not the process, of particular interventions’ (Hesketh & Sage, 1999) “ results or visible effects of interventions…. forms part of the quality cycle….. provides information on the impact of interventions…. identifies the effectiveness of practices….” (Enderby, John & Petheram, 2006)

Intro to TOM 2 - Community Therapists Network · 2020. 7. 29. · î ï X õ 9 í ñ X ñ 9 í õ X í 9 í ï X ò 9 î ó X ô 9 ð ð õ Z ] o v Á ] Z > v P µ P ] } ... Microsoft

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 26/11/2018

    1

    [email protected]

    Outcomes

    ‘address the effects, not the process, of particular interventions’ (Hesketh & Sage, 1999)

    “ results or visible effects of interventions…. forms part of the quality cycle….. provides information on the impact of interventions….identifies the effectiveness of practices….” (Enderby, John & Petheram, 2006)

  • 26/11/2018

    2

    Rehabilitation/Habilitation/Enablement

    • The process of trying to help people who have suffered some injury/disease or developmental delay to maximise psychological well being, functional ability and social integration (Wade, 1992)

    • An often complex process which enables individuals after impairment by illness, developmental delay or injury to regain as far as possible control over their own lives (King’s Fund, 1999) 3

    What For?

    • Impairment/disorder reduction

    • Improved Function

    • Psycho social gain

    • Wellbeing4

  • 26/11/2018

    3

    Therapy treatment goals

    • to identify and reduce the disorder/ dysfunction

    • to improve or maintain the function and ability

    • to assist to achieve potential or integration

    • and to alleviate anxiety or frustration.

    5

    Choosing an Outcome Measure

    • Relevance• Validity• Reliability

    Other considerations• Ease of use• Communication

    6

  • 26/11/2018

    4

    The Therapy Outcome Measure

    7

    Note

    Therapy Outcome Measures for Rehabilitation Professionals

    Pamela Enderby and Alexandra John (2015) ISBN 978-1-907826-29-0 PUBLISHED BY J&R

    8

  • 26/11/2018

    5

    End of episode of care

    Intervention

    Aim/Goal

    Referral /case history/ assessment

    9

    “So when do we do it?”

    What is the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF)?

    An international classification developed by the WHOof function and disability and its effects on the individual:

    • Classifies body structure and function• Classifies activity/independence• Classifies social participation• Classifies how the environment impacts upon the

    disabled individual

    We have added wellbeing as a domain10

  • 26/11/2018

    6

    Impairment

    Disease/Disorder/Developmental Delay

    Physical Mental/ cognitive

    An injury, illness, or congenital condition that causes or is likely to cause a loss or difference of physiological or psychological function as compared to those without such.

    Activity

    Limitation

    Abilities Person

    Difficulties an individual may have in the performance of activities/level of independence.

  • 26/11/2018

    7

    Participation

    Disadvantages

    Circumstances Society

    Disadvantages an individual may have in the manner or extent of involvement in life situations.

    Well-being

    Upset

    SatisfactionFeelings

    Degree of upset, distress, or satisfaction with status

    Incorporates frequency and severity

  • 26/11/2018

    8

    Carer Well-being

    Upset

    SatisfactionFeelings

    Emotional effect resulting in an upset, distress, or satisfaction with status

    THERAPY OUTCOME MEASURE (TOM)

    • Based on:World Health Organisation Classification –

    ICF.

    11 point ordinal scale with 6 defined points

    16

  • 26/11/2018

    9

    The Core SCale

    17

    adapTed SCaleS1. Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa-scale under development2. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)3. Autistic Spectrum Disorder4. Cardiac Rehabilitation5. Cerebral Palsy6. Child Language Impairment7. Challenging Behaviour and Forensic Mental Health8. Chronic Pain9. Cleft Lip and Palate10.Cognition11.Complex and Multiple Difficulty12.Dementia13.Diabetes14.Dietetic Intervention for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease15.Dietetic intervention for Enteral Feeding – Paediatrics

  • 26/11/2018

    10

    adapTed SCaleS 216.Dietetic intervention for Home Enteral Feeding – Adult17.Dietetic intervention for Irritable Bowel Syndrome18.Dietetic intervention for Obesity – Paediatric19.Dietetic intervention for Obesity – Adult20.Dietetic intervention for Undernutrition – Paediatrics21.Dietetic intervention for Undernutrition – Adults22.Dysarthria23.Dysfluency24.Dysphagia25.Dysphasia26.Dysphonia27.Dyspraxia –Developmental Co-Ordination Difficulties28.Equipment Services29.Head Injury30.Hearing Therapy/ Aural Rehabilitation

    adapTed SCaleS 332. Laryngectomy33. Learning Disability – Communication34. Mental Health35. Mental Health – Anxiety36. Multi-Factorial Conditions37. Musculo-Skeletal38. Neurological Disorders (Inc Progressive Neuro Disorders)39. Palliative Care40. Phonological Disorder41. Podiatric Conditions - scale under development42. Post Natal Depression43. Respiratory Care- (COPD)44. Schizophrenia45. Stroke46. Tracheostomy47. Wound Care

  • 26/11/2018

    11

    Scales in Development• ADHD• Selective Mutism• Erratum for AAC• Acquired Apraxia• Paediatric Dysphagia• Sensory Processing Disorder• Paediatric Podiatry• Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ME• Selective Mutism• Prefeeding/ parent infant engagement• Oral Hygiene• Oral Aversion• Orthopaedic -Hip and knee surgery • Transgender – Communication• Trismus• Cognitive Impairment-- Communication Disorder• Velopharyngeal Dysfunction• Vocal Tract Discomfort• Auditory impairment /deafness/ partially hearing• Acute Enteral Feeding-

    21

    Normal limits0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    MildProfound Severe Severe/ Moderate Moderate

    Therapy Outcome Measure

    Ordinal Rating Scale

    22

  • 26/11/2018

    12

    23

    24

    Impairment Mrs PR has had multiple sclerosis for 15 years. She is severely ataxic and has increased tone in all limbs. Her sitting balance is poor.

    Activity Mrs PR uses an adapted wheelchair and all aids and appliances in the home effectively. She is in an adapted accommodation and can get to the local shops. She is able to care for the house, provide meals for the family and communicate effectively.

    Participation Mrs PR plays an active social role: she is a school governor as well as a volunteer for a local charity. She enjoys her garden and wheelchair dancing.

    Wellbeing/distress Mrs PR is a determined, resourceful lady who, not surprisingly, becomes concerned and frustrated on occasion, but is generally positive and uses good emotional support strategies.

  • 26/11/2018

    13

    Mrs PR

    • Summary Mrs PR has a severe level of impairment but overcomes most functional restrictions by being resourceful and using appropriate aids. Thus, she is only partially limited in activity and is not socially disadvantaged in any specific way.

    25

    All Data from One Service

    All Scales and Diagnosis

    Total number of clients

    Total number of episodes of care

    Positive change in zero domains of the TOMs

    Positive change in one domain of the TOMs

    Positive change in two domains of the TOMs

    Positive change in three domains of the TOMs

    Positive change in four domains of the TOMs

    Numbers of subjects 1611 12529

    2995 1945 2399 1705 3485

    23.9% 15.5% 19.1% 13.6% 27.8%

  • 26/11/2018

    14

    449 Children with Language DisorderHaving received speech and language therapy

    Impairment Activity Participation Wellbeing

    Down 0.4% 0.4% 1.1% 1.1%Same 9.3% 11.8% 19.7% 21.7%Up 90.2% 87.8% 79.1% 77.1%

    Does a good wedding predict a good marriage?

    28