28
Intervention in household saving decisions Symposium on Retirement Income Policy Retirement Policy and Research Centre Trinh Le – 16 April 2008

Intervention in household saving decisions

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Intervention in household saving decisions. Symposium on Retirement Income Policy Retirement Policy and Research Centre. Trinh Le – 16 April 2008. Outline. Household saving behaviour before KiwiSaver Effects of KiwiSaver – initial evidence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Intervention in household saving decisions

Symposium on Retirement Income PolicyRetirement Policy and Research Centre

Trinh Le – 16 April 2008

2

Outline

► Household saving behaviour before KiwiSaver► Effects of KiwiSaver – initial evidence► How will KiwiSaver affect New Zealanders’ future

decisions?

3

Was there a saving problem?

► KiwiSaver: an interventionist policy to correct a market failure

► The failure: before KiwiSaver kiwis did not save► The average NZ household spent $1.15 for

every dollar earned (Finance Minister Michael Cullen, Budget 2007)

► True, see data from the Institutional Sector Accounts

4

Household saving: aggregate evidence

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005

Household saving as % of household disposable income

Source: Household Income and Outlay Accounts

5

More on saving evidence

-20

-10

0

10

1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005

Household Income and Outlay Accounts

Household Economic Survey

Household saving as % of household disposable income

6

More on saving evidence

Source: Trinh Le, Does New Zealand have a household saving crisis?NZIER working paper 2007/01

-50

0

50

100

1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006

Household Income and Outlay Accounts

Household Economic Survey

Reserve Bank of New Zealand

Household saving as % of household disposable income

7

Was there a saving problem?

► Different data tell different stories► NZ doesn’t have a saving problem as much as a

saving data problem► The data that are used to support the claim that

NZ households are bad savers are unreliable► Careful analysis shows little support for that

claim

8

Micro evidence

► Even when error free, aggregate data on saving not as helpful as one might think

► Aggregate saving tends to 0Some borrowSome saveSome dissave

► Have to look at micro evidence to judge whether people are adequately prepared for retirement

9

Modelling adequacy of retirement saving

► Life cycle model► Objective: consumption smoothing

Given their current income, assets, liabilities, age and life expectancy at retirement, how much should a single person/ couple save so that when they retire, they will have a standard of living that is similar to their current standard of living?

► Used unit-record data from the Household Savings Survey (2001)

► Found on average, people already saved more than “prescribed” by the model

10

Saving adequacy

Sample: Couples born 1940-1949

Prescribed saving rate

%

Actual saving rate %

Actual saving rate %: durables as consumption

Mean 7.2 26.6

Median 16.0 27.0

11

Saving adequacy

Source: Grant Scobie, John Gibson & Trinh Le (2005) Household wealth in New Zealand

Prescribed saving rate

%

Actual saving rate %

Actual saving rate %: durables as consumption

Mean 7.2 26.6 21.4

Median 16.0 27.0 22.7

12

Modelling adequacy of retirement saving

► Analysis repeated on a larger, newer data (Survey of Family, Income and Employment, wave 2, conducted 2003-04)

► Found most were saving enough► Under relatively conservation assumptions► Significant proportions

have saved so much they shouldn’t save morehave such low incomes that they shouldn’t save given

that NZ Super is very high compared to their current income

13

Bad savers?

% saving inadequately

Non-partnered individuals

Ages 45-54 18

Ages 55-64 9

Couples

Ages 45-54 26

Ages 55-64 13

Source: Trinh Le, Grant Scobie & John Gibson (2007) Are kiwis saving enough for retirement?

14

‘Too good’ savers

% prescribed with negative saving rate

Non-partnered individuals

Ages 45-54 58

Ages 55-64 63

Couples

Ages 45-54 32

Ages 55-64 37

Note: % of people who, given their current income and wealth, have saved enough for retirement and shouldn’t save more

15

Inertia – behavioural economics

► A key argument for KiwiSaver is that people are myopic, they don’t plan for a distant future, they often procrastinate saving until too late

► Auto-enrolment was believed to overcome the power of inertia

► In fact, far more people have joined KiwiSaver through direct enrolment than auto-enrolment

16

KiwiSaver enrolments

Source: Inland Revenue, as at 29 Oct 07, Total membership: 251,736

Auto enrolled25%

Opted in75%

17

Does KiwiSaver mean more saving?

► As of April 2008, over 500,000 kiwis have joined KiwiSaver

► The first six-monthly evaluation report did not evaluate the very question it should evaluate: Does KiwiSaver increase saving?

► Gibson and Le (2008) made the first attempt and found KiwiSaver a money-go-round game

18

Composition of KiwiSaver balances

Note: Upper bound estimate of new saving

Taxpayers51%

Employers9%

Self (reshuffle)21%

Self (new saving)19%

19

Composition of KiwiSaver balances

Taxpayers50%

Employers9%

Self (reshuffle)32%

Self (new saving)9%

Source: John Gibson & Trinh Le, How much new saving will KiwiSaver produce? University of Waikato Economics Department working paper 2008/03

20

How much KiwiSaver saving is “new”?

► 9-19% of KiwiSaver balances ► Not enough to cover deadweight costs of

taxationwhich Treasury conservatively estimates to be 20% of

the amount of taxes raised

► Let alone administration and compliance costs► Net of these costs, the impact of KiwiSaver on

national saving most likely negative► These findings are consistent with…

21

International evidence

Scheme New saving

Engen & Sholz (1994) IRA -14% to 2%

Engen, Gale & Scholz (1994) IRA 4%

Attanasio & DeLeire (2002) IRA 9%

Engen & Gale (2000) 401(k) 0–30%

Benjamin (2003) 401(k) 25%

Note: Excl. deadweight costs of taxation and administration and compliance costs

22

Back to macro data

► NZ’s large current account deficit (CAD) is often used as evidence of a (household) saving problem

► Australia’s compulsory saving scheme often used as “role model” for NZ

23

Household saving & Balance of payments

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005

Household saving rate

Current account balance as % of GDP

Source: Statistics New Zealand

24

Back to macro data

► Australia had falling household saving rates and widening CAD in the 1970s and 1980s

► A compulsory workplace saving scheme (Superannuation Guarantee) was introduced in 1992

► Both household saving and CAD have worsened since

► Trends in household saving and CAD in Australia are very similar to those in NZ, despite a compulsory saving scheme

25

Australia

-5

0

5

10

15

20

1970 1980 1992: Super Guarantee 2000 2005

Household saving rate

Current account balance as % of GDP

Source: OECD Economic Outlook

26

Back to macro data

► Similar patterns for US, despite long established saving schemes like Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and 401(k)

27

USA

-5

0

5

10

1970 1981: 401(k) 1990 2000 2005

Household saving rate

Current account balance as % of GDP

Source: OECD Economic Outlook

28

Summary

► Household saving behaviour before KiwiSaverRetirement saving: most saved enoughAggregate saving: no reliable evidence of a saving

crisis

► Initial effects of KiwiSaverSome impact on household savingNegative impact on national saving

► Expected future effects of KiwiSaver