INTERTANKO Activity€¦ · INTERTANKO Activity 9 February 2016 ... POST DRY-DOCK CHECKLIST . Leading the way; ... CHECKLIST Prior to Dock Trials (PDT)

Leading the way; making a difference

DNV GL Tanker Working Group

INTERTANKO Activity

9 February 2016

Hamburg

Dragos Rauta


MEMBERSHIP

BRIEF OF HISTORICAL MAJOR ACTIVITIES

VETTING

SOME CURRENT PROJECTS

TANKER MARKET

INDUSTRY COOPERATION


206 3672

268 307

International Association of Independent Tanker Owners

INTERTANKO International Association of

Independent Tanker Owners

Non-governmental organization

Established 1970

Strict membership criteria

206 Members/268 Associate

Members in 42 countries

Observer Status at IMO, IOPC,

UNFCCC, OECD, UNCTAD

Offices/representation in

Oslo - London - Washington

Singapore - Brussels


2015 Membership Profile

Nu

mb

er

of

Tan

kers

N

um

ber o

f mem

bers

12

17 18

38

54

63

0

14

28

42

56

70

0

220

440

660

880

1,100

50 and above 25-49 15-24 10-14 5-9 Below 5

No tankers

No members


2015 Membership Profile

Members % Members % DWT % Fleet Greece 54 27% 25% 20% Japan 10 5% 10% 9% Norway 12 6% 9% 7% Hong Kong 8 4% 6% 5% Canada 5 2% 6% 4% Singapore 10 5% 4% 5% Germany 12 6% 3% 5% UK 8 4% 3% 4% Denmark 6 3% 2% 5% Sweden 7 3% 1% 2% Italy 17 8% 2% 4% Turkey 6 3% 1% 1% India 5 2% 1% 1% Others 42 21% 26% 29%


Membership by Class

0 200 400 600 800

DNV

ABS

LR

NKK

BV

GL

RINA

CCS

KR

Dual/others

Number of tankers

25% share

14%

4%

0 25 50 75

DNV

ABS

LR

NKK

BV

GL

RINA

CCS

KR

Dual/others

m dwt

24% share

13%

5%

28%


Membership by type tanker

0 50 100 150

Crude

PT

CH/OIL

CH

Gas

by dwt

70% share

13%

13%

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200

Crude

PT

CH/OIL

CH

Gas

by number of tankers

36% share

19%

30%

10%


Average age INTERTANKO membership fleet

Years

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Members' fleet

World fleet


INTERTANKO membership “market share”

Rough estimate!

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

199

7

199

8

199

9

200

0

200

1

200

2

200

3

200

4

200

5

200

6

200

7

200

8

200

9

201

0

201

1

201

2

201

3

201

4


Entry of ALL Tank vessels into Membership

Classification Societies - All vessels entered with INTERTANKO are to

be classed by a Classification Society which is a full member of IACS.

Insurance Cover - All vessels entered with INTERTANKO are also to

be entered in an International Group P&I Club or are to have other

equivalent arrangements for third party liability insurance including

coverage for oil pollution liability.

Transparency - Every INTERTANKO member shall supply information

pertaining to the Owner(s) (or the Registered Owning Company (-

ies)), Commercial Manager(s) (if applicable) and Technical

Manager(s) of the member’s vessel(s), as well as notification as to

which of them holds the Company DOC.

Compliance with International and National Laws and Regulations

. . . . Repeated events that would reflect negatively on INTERTANKO

will be considered non-compatible with INTERTANKO membership.

Membership Criteria


1. Allocate sufficient budget resources

2. Report deficiencies to class

3. Pilotage in Danish waters

4. Correct entries in the Oil Record Book

5. Right whale avoidance

6. Cadet berthing

7. Lifeboat safety

8. Incident transparency

9. Contribute to benchmarking and databases

Suggestions to add

1. Certain TMSA items

2. Key Performance Indicators for some items

3. Item for training in excess of STCW

Membership Best Practices


HISTORICAL MAJOR ACTIVITES

INTERTANKO had two distinct activity periods

1970 – 1989: documentary, insurance, some technical

After 1990: design, technical, operational, communications, human element

Challenges in 1990 and after:

OPA 90, 13F & 13G; COFRs; Intact stability; Coatings . . . .

Accidents:

Sea Empress, Braer; Erica; Castor; Ievoli Sun; Prestige;

Our responses:

Active involvement at regulatory level

Develop Membership Quality Criteria

Improve the communication with media

Launching Ports and Terminals Study

Wining a historic US Supreme Court Case against Washington State

Pushing for stricter regulatoty regime on:

Quality of Survey (origin to the total revision of the ESP)

Quality of new Buildings (leading to the IACS CSR)

Mandatory standards for coating selection and coating application

Working close with OCIMF, particularly on Vetting Scheme

INTERTANKO Goals Zero fatalities

Zero pollution

Zero detentions


Safety Seafarers Environment Operations Commercial

Sustainability

Tanker design/ construction - Enforcement of CSR - Classification standards

Machinery/ equipment - Lifesaving appliances - Classification standards

Fuel - Quality - Sampling - Switching operations - LNG, Biofuels - Alternate fuels

Cargo - Properties - Safe tank entry - Gas detection - Inert gas - Biofuels

Fair treatment - Criminalization - Shore access/visas - Medical treatment Crew competence - Training requ’mnts (ECDIS, BWM) - Tanker Officer Training Standards (TOTS) - Officer matrix Seafarer welfare - Accomm’n. space - Cadet berths - Fatigue/rest hours

Emissions to water - Ballast water - Reception facilities & waste minimization - Hull fouling man’t

Emissions to air - SOx, NOx, VOC MARPOL Annex VI - Greenhouse gas emissions - Energy efficiency - Monitoring, Reporting & Verification (MRV)

Ship Recycling

EPA VGP - Recordkeeping - Monitoring

Vetting & Risk Assessment

Ports - Port state control - Ports & Terminals - Offshore Ops

Maritime Security - Piracy - Sanctions

Safe navigation - ECDIS - Pilotage - eNavigation

Chemical tanker ops

Gas tanker ops

Refugees

Payment performance Charter party terms & Documentation Worldscale Insurance - Compensation - Liability limits - Reinsurance Anti-corruption

Main Focus Areas


Our committees


Tanker operators ticket to trade

OCIMF Ship Inspection Report (SIRE) system

How it is meant to work:

• One inspection

• All share

• All trust

• Open and transparent

Operation of the OCIMF SIRE system • Much better coordination OCIMF

• Reduction in impact on crew

But…Charter party clauses requiring charterers inspections

outside SIRE

VETTING


Top ten deficiencies – SIRE inspections

1. Mooring

2. Condition of Class

3. Navigation equipment

4. Hours of rest

5. General condition

6. Sampling segregated ballast

7. Statutory certificates in date

8. ECDIS

9. Fuel quality testing

10. Oil record books

VETTING


Steps taken by INTERTANKO

• INTERTANKO Vetting Committee

• Detailed advice to members

• Target those top ten areas

• Reduce repeated observations

• Joint OCIMF SIRE/INTERTANKO

Vetting Committee Focus Group

• One to one with oil companies

VETTING


50% discount for members - order your copy through

www.witherbyseamanship.com

* Members Only

50% Discount* 50% Discount*

http://www.witherbyseamanship.com/


Work with OCIMF


Work with OCIMF

Meetings with SIRE FG

• Accident Database

• Incident Reporting

• Management of Change Guidelines

• ECDIS

Revision of TMSA2

Revision Of MEG Guide

Revision of SIRE - VIQ 6

• Amendments to questions and guidance notes


• HAZID paper for fuel switchover operation - concluded

• Secondary means of venting paper - concluded

• Personnel transfer by crane (certification for new cranes and standard procedures for existing cranes) - concluded

• White paper on scrubbers (present the options and highlight the challenges) – final draft

• Critical spare parts (risk based principles for ships to assess the critical spare parts) - under consideration

• VOC emissions white paper - under consideration

• Best practices – integrated bilge tank systems (IBTS) – final draft

• Best practices – boiler wash-down water – potential

Other Work Areas with OCIMF


POST DRY-DOCK CHECKLIST


Vessel Name:

Vessel Type:

IMO Number:

Class (including Notations):

Repair (Build) yard:

Repair commencement (Steel cutting) date:

Delivery date:

Item per category VIQ item

No Done by Timing

Verified by

REMARKS

1 General Information 2 Certification and Documentation

2.1

New certificates/test records/receipts issued during DD period verified to be onboard.

2 PDT

2.2 Confirm Certificates / Endorsements are correct (forward copies to Office ASAP).

2 PDT

2.3

V.G.P. requirements have been complied with / documentation in order.

2 PDT

2.4 All Finished Drawings I special tools ship property returned on board.

2 PS

3 Crew Management

3.1 All ship personnel are adequately rested before departure.

3.2 3.3 PS

4 Navigation

4.1 Navigation I Communication/intercom Equipment/lnstruments Operation test

4.10 PDT

4.2 Dead man alarm system, navigation bridge alarm system tested/ activated

4.10 DDT

4.3 Echo Sounder and Doppler Transducers correct functioning.

4.10 DDT

4.4 All Navigational equipment tested 4.5, 4.10 DST

4.5

Temporary notices, Navtex, weather information received and passage plan prepared

4.25, 4.29 PS

4.6 E/R alarm /monitoring & extension system, dead man alarm system tested

4.10 DDT

4.7

Charts and publications, latest NTMS available onboard and ready to use for voyage

4.18 PS

4.8 Navigational, Security plan, Suez canal search lights, tested during dock trials

4.25 DDT

4.9 All heavy objects have been secured /Iashed for open sea passage.

4 DDT

POST - DD

CHECKLIST

Prior to Dock Trials (PDT)

During Dock Trials (DDT)

During Sea Trials (DST)

Prior Sailing (PS)


SURVEY OF CONDITION OF

COTs


VIQ explicit in the failures to monitor and mitigate with its inspection regime.

• Structural deterioration and failure;

• Extent of corrosion, pitting and wastage;

• Extent of deterioration of any coating;

• Any leakages in bulkheads or pipework;

• The condition of cargo handling and monitoring equipment;

• Extent of sediment build-up.

CARGO OIL TANKS INSPECTION - VIQ




Hazard category - High Consequence Level 0-1year (warranty period)

1-5 years

5-15 years 15-25 years

Structural deterioration and failure

3 - Design faults

-Excessive corrosion

Extent of corrosion, pitting and wastage 3 -Pitting

Extent of deterioration of any coating 3 -Coating failure

Any leakages in bulkheads or pipework

The condition of cargo handling and

monitoring equipment 2

Extent of sediment build-up

Crude Oil Tankers – Risk Matrix results

The records of failures monitoring from ClassNK and DNV-GL, together with the risk

assessment of our study may lead us to conclude that:

- inspection frequency of cargo tanks for crude oil tankers above 50,000DWT could be

reviewed and possibly extended from 2.5 to 5 years interval, at least for tankers up

to 10 years of age

- alternatively, the inspection frequency of 2.5 years should only apply to cargo tanks

with a defect history as assessed by the company’s risk assessment



GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTION


GHG Emission Reduction

• IMO - EEDI (new buildings) & SEEMP (all ships) - enforced

• SEEMP - no target for GHG emissions reduction

• Amend MARPOL Annex VI - additional technical & operational

measures aimed to improve efficiency of ships in operations

The Concept: Three step phase-in legislation

• Phase I – data monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV)

• Phase II – trial period for verification of enforceability of the set target

• Phase III – enforcement

Phase I:

• IMO (adopted by October 2016 ?)

• EU Regulation


EU MRV Regulation

Data to be reported annually:

- total fuel consumption

- distance

- time at sea / in port

- cargo (or proxy)

- efficiency in operations, e.g. fuel/distance, fuel/transport work

Enforcement

Ships develop Monitoring Plans (MPs) (submitted for approval before 31st August 2017)

MPs approved by Verifiers (accredited by EU Member States’ National Accreditation Bodies (NAB))

Monitoring - first annual reporting period 1st Jan – 31st Dec 2018

Reporting - 30th April 2019 ship/company issues the Annual Emissions Report (AER)

Verification - 30th June 2019 Verifiers issue a “MRV DoC” valid for 18 months

Process repeats itself every year


EU MRV Regulation

EC/Industry two groups to consider the following items:

• MONITORING & REPORTING – additional technical rules defining the calculation of cargo

– possible amendments to the monitoring methods & efficiency assessment

– feedback/recommendations on templates for MPs & AERs

– best practices on monitoring and reporting compendium

• VERIFICATION & ACCREDITATION – further define procedures regarding the assessment of MPs

– further define procedures for the verification of emissions reports

– define procedures related to accreditation

INTERTANKO represented in these groups


MRV – INTERTANKO Objectives

• contribute to developments of guidelines and templates for MPs & AERs

• assess impact of the MRV regulation with data provided by members

• study data from sister ships

• submit to IMO/EC study results and assessments

• keep members updated on these activities


2.80%

2.90% 2.70%

2.30% 2.40%

2.20%

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

INT. SHIPPING CONTRIBUTIONS TO GLOBAL CO2

Source: IMO 3rd GHG Study (2014)

Ships reduce GHG emissions

at a higher rate than land

72.77%

62.24%

52.80%

2.20%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

top 10 top 5 top 5 - EU Shipping


ECA & FUEL SWITCH


Loss of Power Events - Pilot Reports

“Slow” and even “Erratic” responses from ships at low load – US

& British Columbia Pilots

Cannot be due to fuel change over

Other reasons (or a combination of reasons)

Events reported on newer designs with large propellers

Possible causes:

• propeller position in water (totally submerged or not)

• small clearance between propeller and hull

• misfit between new MEs and propellers leading to smaller

power/thrust effect at low load of the engine

Action:

• test the ship’s behaviour at low load using ULSFO

• do a risk assessment and look for corrective actions if needed


TANKER MARKET

PAYMENT PERFORMANCE SYSTEM

(PPS)


Problem – Contractual obligations between

charterer and tanker operator

Freight

Charter party – payable on completion of discharge

Pilot study – Typical 5-10 days

Demurrage

Charter party – payable on receipt of owner’s invoice

Pilot study – Typical > 90 days



• Focus: improve situation of late payment of

freight and demurrage

• Need: database of specific payment

information from members

• Why? to be able to prove trends on late

payments by charterers

• Security: through data encryption

• Database satisfies anti-trust criteria



What users get …

Best payment performers

Average delays in freight payments

Average delays in negotiating demurrage claims

Average delays in payment of agreed demurrage

claims

Average delays in submitting demurrage claims



Payments Performance System


• Over 5,600 data points

• 40+ members contributing already or preparing

data for initial upload

• Average freight payment 9-10 days (6-7 for

chemical tankers)

• Average demurrage settlement 80-90 days (no

demurrage data yet for chemical tankers)

• Cost to members of late freight & demurrage

payments - $2.37m



Best 3 freight payers

• Mansel (1 day)

• CEPSA (2 days)

• Noble Group (2 days)

Best 3 demurrage payers

• PBF Energy (14 days)

• Petron (24 days)

• Citgo (30 days)



Worst freight and demurrage payers?

• For legal reasons, we cannot provide a list of

worst payment performers

• However, INTERTANKO knows who they are

and can approach them individually to make

them aware of their performance based upon

real data and not anecdotal information



Activities – Round Table Associations

Piracy

GHG

BWM

MARPOL Annex VI

Fair Treatment (& Criminalisation)

Places of Refuge

Reception Facilities

Corruption (& PSC)

Documents

INTERTANKO Activity€¦ · INTERTANKO Activity 9 February 2016 ... POST DRY-DOCK CHECKLIST . Leading the way; ... CHECKLIST Prior to Dock Trials (PDT)