Upload
kamryn-jeffs
View
221
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Lead Migration from Crystal Glassware: Developments from 12 Years of ICF TECs.
Richard LehmanProfessor of Materials Engineering
Rutgers UniversityNew Brunswick, New Jersey USA
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Outline of Presentation
Historical background Structure/durability relationships Effect of oxides Migration behavior of lead crystal
Phenomenological behaviorMigration levelsSurface films – formation and properties
Intrinsic Extrinsic
Other interesting effects
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Historical Perspective
Work by Thorpe and Mellor, circa 1900SiO2 forms the network
Covalently bonded Structural network of glass, promotes durability
Most other oxides modify the network Mostly ionically bonded Weak, promote migration and low durability
All other effects are secondary
5.0][ 2
32
SiOGenerallyoxidesacidicofMoles
OAlofMolesoxidesbasicofMoles
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Glass Networks and Modifiers
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Glass Structure via Volume Filling Model
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
6-member Rings Dominate Glass Structure
Network bonding issues:Each ring has 6 silicon participating in ring.Each silicon is also part of three other ringsEach ring has 6/4 = 1.5 equivalent whole
silicons Migration and diffusion issues:
Nonbridging oxygens provide diffusion transfer site.
One nonbridging oxygen is required per ring to produce continuous diffusion path.
Mole ratio of 1.0/1.5 = 0.67 is upper limit for a diffusion-stable structure.
Si
SiSi
Si Si
Si
O
O
O O
O
O
O
Na
Six-Member Silicate Ring Structurewith One Non-bridging Oxygen Linkage
nonbridging oxygen
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Chain Structure of Certain Silicate Glasses
Tetrahedral network structure of silicate glass
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Expert Perspective
“…we know practically nothing about…glasses” – W. H. Zachariasen, April 1932.
“Glass is a difficult material”– Michael J. Hynes, April 1992.
“I hope I die before I get old” – Pete Townshend, “My Generation”
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Lead Release from Silicate Glasses with Varying Mole Ratio of Modifier and Formers.
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20
Moles Modifier/Glass Former
Lea
d R
elea
se, 6
0 m
in, m
g/c
m2
PS
NPS
KNPS
CNPS
ACNPS
BCNPS
Linear (PS)
Linear (NPS)
Linear (CNPS)
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
General Effect of Oxides
Good OxidesAl2O3
TiO2
ZrO2
SiO2
SnO2
Important ParametersZ/R [charge to radius]Steric hindranceNetwork connectivity
Bad OxidesLi2ONa2OK2OB2O3
PbO
Medium OxidesCaOZnOMgOBaOPbO
Radius
Z/R
Steric Effects
Ch
emic
al D
ura
bil
ity
Overall Behavior
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Participation of Intermediatesin Silicate Glass Network
Pb in 2/4 fold-coordination
Al in 4 fold-coordination with
Na+ charge compensation
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Crystal Glass Compositions
1992 1992 1992 1992 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991
McGookin McGookin Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank Frank
Tradition Reform 1 Original #3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
MW Tyrone Tyrone Lenox Lenox Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht Nacht
SiO2 60.1 55.3 58.2 59.4 61.5 60.3 59.1 57.6 56.2 61.3 62.3 61.6 61 61.10 61 61.5 61.9 61.7 60.5
PbO 223 32.3 30.0 25.2 24.1 24.5 24.0 24.2 23.7 23.6 24.4 24.1 23.9 23.9 24.4 24.3 24.2 24.1 24.5
ZrO2 123 1.00
Al2O3 102 1 0.9
CaO 56 0.50 1 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5ZnO 81.4 0.37 2.1 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4BaO 153 1.10
B2O3 69.6 0.20 0.65 1.28 0.70 0.70 0.70 1.50 1.50 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.80 0.80 1.30 0.80
K2O 94 11.9 8.8 10.3 8.9 10.8 10.6 10.1 11 10 9.7 9.6 9.5 8.8 10.4 9.9 9.7 8.9 9.4
Na2O 62 2.1 3.9 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.9 3.2 3.2 2.4 2.4 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4
Li2O 30 0.15 0.5
As2O3 198 0.20 0.23 0.37 0.37 0.20 0.10 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.70 0.70 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.50
Sb2O3 291.6 0.16 0.16 0.30
Pb, ppm ISO 0.74 0.24 0.16 0.07 0.19 0.15 0.16 0.22 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.20 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04AS & Acid 0.12 0.07
Thorpe 0.299 0.281 0.305 0.276 0.290 0.317 0.348 0.368 0.282 0.256 0.272 0.284 0.292 0.280 0.275 0.270 0.275 0.285
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Effect of Thorpe Ratio
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
More Thorpe Ratio Data
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.24 0.26 0.28 0.3 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.38
Thorpe Ratio
Lea
d r
elea
se,
mg
/l
Tyrone
Lenox
Nachtman
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
The Problem: Water Molecules!
Water molecules on glass surface
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Stages of the Migration ProcessP
b m
igra
tion
time
2/11tMMM oshort
tKPLM linlong Mo
Three Stages:
Intercept – time independent extraction, corresponding to dissolution of surface deposits.
Parabolic – root time behavior. Fick’s law diffusion
Linear – Surface film formation rate = dissolution rate.
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Chemical Attack on Glass
Basic solutions attack glass network Linear time dependence Network and modifiers are dissolved
together
Acid solutions leach modifiers from silicate network Initial time independent dissolution of
surface lead Parabolic time dependence, Fick’s law
diffusion, as silica gel forms. Linear time dependence when diffusion
rate is less than silica get dissolution rate.
Original Glass Surface
Silica Surface Film
Bulk Glass
Original Glass Surface
Bulk Glass
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
December 1993 Pb Migration Status[Waterford, IR – John Kennedy]
Leaching kineticsParabolic Fickian behavior and intercept well recognizedLong-time linear and constant effects not documented
Methods to reduce migrationGlass composition
Alkali reduction and mixed alkali effect [Na/K ~ 0.8 – 1.0 mole ratio] Lead-free glass and low-lead glass compositions [Ba, Sr, Bi] “Good” and “Bad” oxides
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
1993 Pb Migration Status[…continued]
Surface TreatmentsPhysical
Rinse Cased gob [lead free lining] Polymer coating Sol-gel coatings Other coatings
Chemical Acid polish In-situ silica gel formation and condensation [preleach and cure] Ammonium sulfate fuming [modifier extraction from surface] Ion exchange [kaolin process – Al+3 exchange]
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Parabolic Migration Behavior in Lead Crystal Glassware
Pb, g/l
(time, h)0.5
100
500
1 h 24 h
Plain
Acid Polished
Pierre Ayral (Sep 92)
Pb m
igra
tion
t i m e
2/11 tMMM oshort
tKPLM linlong
M o
T h r e e S t a g e s : I n t e r c e p t , P a r a b o l i c , L i n e a r
Pb m
igra
tion
t i m e
2/11 tMMM oshort
tKPLM linlong
M o
T h r e e S t a g e s : I n t e r c e p t , P a r a b o l i c , L i n e a r
490
Typical 2002 ISO Value = 150 – 200 g/l
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Low Incremental Migration on Cyclic Exposure
High initial levels due to surface lead
Formation of surface film provides diffusion limited process at longer times.
Levels can increase with aging or annealing after leaching unless surface film is heat cured.
Pb, g/l
Cycles
100
300
5 20
Plain
Acid Polished
Pierre Ayral (Sep 92)
200
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Cyclical Behavior – many cycles
Pb
rele
ase,
fi
rst e
xpos
ure
= 1
.0
Cycles
1.0
40 120
P. Stanghellini (Sep 92)
800
~ Range
0.60
0.40
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Lead Release into Whiskey from Decanters
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Time, weeks, refilled weekly
Pb
re
lea
se
, ug
/l
B
D
A
E
C
ISO HAc DataDecanters
B = 320D = 472A = 223E = 189C = 126
ISO HAc DataStemware
B = 286D = 398A = 331E = 174C = 341
Kennedy 4/92
Whiskey
A, B, C, D, E are various manufacturers
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Four Years of Continuous LeachingP
b re
leas
e, u
g/l
Weeks
900
200
G. Boschi, F. Paloschi, P. Stanghellini, CALP (1996)
1000
Acetic Acid
500
Whiskey & Brandy
Lead release increases with time
~40% of 4 year value is achieved after 8 weeks
820
450
200
300
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Lead Crystal Stabilization with Alcohol
Lead concentration does not monotonically increase, but becomes constant after several months.Reported by Himpens in 1995 Possible passivation of the glass with
organic groups Blocking of silica gel interstices Greatly reduce solubility of silica gel, tetra ethyl
orthosilicate is immiscible with aqueous solutions.
Pb,
arb
itra
ry
time, months2 months
Not Polished
Acid Polished
4% Acetic Acid
Whiskey, Bells
48 months
Original Glass Surface
Silica Surface Film
Bulk Glass
Si(OC2H5)4 layer, immiscible with
water?
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Calculated Extraction Depth[24% PbO Crystal]
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Extraction Depth, nm
ug
/l in
ISO
Ex
tra
cti
on
One liter vessel:Diameter =9.47 cmHeight = 14.2 cm
10 nm extraction depth yields 329 ppb.
Original Glass Surface
Silica Surface Film
Bulk Glass
10 nm
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Lead Near the Glass Surface
A B A 1 F
G L A S S
G L A S SS U R F A C E
S iO 2 R IC HP R O T E C T IV EL A Y E R
E A S IL YR E M O V A B L EP b o P b + + . . . .
F O R M E D A N D S T O R E D
H A N DW A S H E D
4 % H A c F R A C T U R E
E. Guadagnino, M. Verità (1999 -2000)
Model derived from surface
analysis results using XPS and EDS [EMPA]
Elemental lead [Pbo], possibly due to flaming, was found in one study, but not in a subsequent study]
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Alternative Approaches to Limiting Pb Migration
Surface Treatments Ammonium sulfate fume
Remove surface alkali and lead Inexpensive and easy Better long term behavior than acid treatment
x Requires high temperature
x Deformation of stemware
Sol-gel Ion exchange – Al+3 from kaolin -- ~30 - 100 g/l [6-60 months in HAc] Preleach Preleach with silica gel condensation – 448 g/l 50, 300 autodish cycles Polymer coating – 60 g/l from wine
Waterford (1991)Lenox (1992)Rutgers (1995)
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Alternative Approaches to Limiting Pb Migration
Batch formula changes Reduced alkali – but need to substitute to retain working properties 1% phosphate addition – effect shown in very high lead glass only Reduced PbO [w/o Polish: 24% (240 g/l ); 18% (30 g/l ); 12% (50 g/l )]
Others Leadless glass liner – cased gob -- <20 g/l Leadless crystal – SiO2 [56.1%], (Na,K)2O [10.4], BaO [26.1], Ca,Zn [2.4]
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Non-Lead Crystal
Aimed initially to replace category 3 glass [5% PbO]
Has evolved for all typesCategory 1: 30% PbO, >1.545, >3.0 g/cm3
Category 2: 24% PbO, >2.9 g/cm3
Category 3: 5% PbO, >1.52, >2.45 g/cm3
Bo Jonson (1996)
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Effect of PbO Level in Glass and Repeated Extractions
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Lead in glass, weight percent
Lea
d r
elea
se,
ISO
, u
g/l
First exposure
Second & third
exposure
E. Guadagnino (1997)
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Atlantis Batching Changes[1986 – 1994]
1986 1992 1993 1994 MgO Test Min Max Range
SiO2 51.89 53.61 53.42 53.2 53.11 51.89 53.61 1.72
PbO 31.2 30.96 30.85 30.53 30.61 30.53 31.2 0.67ZnO 0.79 0 0 0 0BaO 0 0.83 1.25 1.1 1.1 0 1.25 1.25MgO 0.2
B2O3 0.77 0 0.26 0.58 0.52 0 0.77 0.77
K2O 12.24 12.58 12.17 11.96 12.08 11.96 12.58 0.62
Na2O 2.8 1.78 1.78 2.2 2.2 1.78 2.8 1.02
As2O3 0.065 0 0 0 0
Sb2O3 0.158 0.21 0.24 0.38 0.28 0.158 0.38 0.222
Minor changes: SiO2 slightly up PbO slightly down Zinc removed, barium added, MgO tested
And: B2O3 returning towards 1986 levels Antimony replaces Arsenic
[Cardeira, 1995]
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
1995 Leach Data -- Atlantis
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Salad Bowl
Whiskey Decanter
Goblet, Zephir
Red Wine Chartres
Cry
sta
l Gla
ss
Sh
ap
e
Pb, ISO test, ug/l
Vol = 2680
Vol = 210
Vol = 240
Vol = 950
217
105
418
370
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Surface Treatments: Acid Pretreatment & Cure
Acid rinse to remove surface modifiers
Cure to condense silicic acid surface film.
0.05 ug/cm2 = 25 ug/l for 1 liter round cylinder with h/r = 3.
Durable film,
withstands 300
autodish cycles
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Mathematical relationships for surface film formation
Incorporate measured activation energy for lead migration with Fick’s law.
Use to predict migration results.
D DQ
RT
~ ~
exp
0
24 0
20ln ln
~
MQ
RT
C D t
M CDt
2 0
~
SiOPbOSi s H O sol SiOH s Pb sol H O sol( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2 2 232
2
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Polishing and (NH4)2SO4 Examples
SC-1 SC-3 SC-4
SiO2 58.56 60.84 60.71
PbO 24.59 24.00 24.15ZnO 0.00 0.21 0.14
B2O3 0.28 0.97 0.49
K2O 13.58 8.04 7.71
Na2O 2.16 5.00 5.74
Whiskey Decanter Item Wine glass [FV=150 ml]
Champagne Flute
[FV=185 ml] [FV=547 ml]
[FV=710 ml]
Unpolished 1135 790 SC-1
Polished 242 210
Unpolished 270
Polished 38 40 42
SC-3
Sulfate treated
18
Unpolished 271
Polished 100 42
SC-4
Sulfate treated
11
Hande Sengel, Sisecam (1997)
Polishing gives ~75% reduction in lead release.
Sulfate treatment gives an additional ~33% reduction.
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Aging Increases Lead Release
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Weeks of weathering
Pb
, IS
O, u
g/l
Non-polished glass
Bo Jonson (1997)
Also:
Glass forming deposits Pb, Na, K modifier on surface
Aging brings same modifiers to surface.
E. Guadagnino (2000)
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Summary Lead glasses follow generally well-identified acid leaching behaviors
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Summary Lead glasses follow generally well-identified acid leaching behaviors Large body of early work collected data for specific compositions and
leachates Varied crystal compositions Varied solutions, esp. alcohol Patterns of use identified to match migration with ingestion
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Summary Lead glasses follow generally well-identified acid leaching behaviors Large body of early work collected data for specific compositions and
leachates Varied crystal compositions Varied solutions, esp. alcohol Patterns of use identified to match migration with ingestion
Focus on composition changes, good and bad oxides
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Summary Lead glasses follow generally well-identified acid leaching behaviors Large body of early work collected data for specific compositions and
leachates Varied crystal compositions Varied solutions, esp. alcohol Patterns of use identified to match migration with ingestion
Focus on composition changes, good and bad oxides Surface modification technologies and characterization have had
dominant role over past ~5 - 7 years Claddings, Coatings, Treatments, Advanced surface analysis Some inexpensive, others not, all require an additional step BUT, decouples migration behavior from most other glass requirements End-use specific assessments, e.g. dishwasher performance
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Summary Lead glasses follow generally well-identified acid leaching behaviors Large body of early work collected data for specific compositions and leachates
Varied crystal compositions Varied solutions, esp. alcohol Patterns of use identified to match migration with ingestion
Focus on composition changes, good and bad oxides Surface modification technologies and characterization have had dominant role over
past ~5 - 7 years Claddings, Coatings, Treatments Some inexpensive, others not, all require an additional step BUT, decouples migration behavior from most other glass requirements End-use specific assessments, e.g. dishwasher performance
General observations Migration levels are well below ISO limits Durability, in combination with other required properties and economic considerations, may
be nearly optimized within traditional lead crystal glassware definitions. Environmental issues will continue to be important Lead workplace issues will continue to impact lead use in glassware.
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Future Opportunities
Glass CompositionCombinatorial assessment of non-linear composition spaceRole of minor constituents to improve durability
Surface TreatmentsSurface film formation/modification below optical limitsChemical complexing agents to bond surface.
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
RUTGERS
International Crystal Federation Technical Exchange ConferenceWaterford, Ireland 12 – 14 October 2002
Partial List of Acknowledgements
Atlantis: Carlos Fonseca CALP: Paulo Barducci, Pietro Stanghellini, Fabio Paloschi FFC: Pierre Ayral Glafo: Bo Jonson, Stellan Persson Inst. Chem. Tech.: Miroslav Rada Lalique: Paul Cordie Lenox: John Potts Nachtmann: Walter Frank Orrefors, Glasma: Arne Fransson Sisecam: Hande Sengel St. Georges Crystal: Robert Gonze, Jerry Kynik Staz. Sperimentale del Vetro: Emanuel Guadagnino Tyrone: Colin McGookin Verrerie Cristallerie D’Arques/JG Durand: Etienne Himpens Waterford: John Kennedy