FROM G-fl l -ML

M IN O R EX52N04SW0136 2.4112 FA l DI IE TIUD -- — —RLIE TWP 010

INTER-DFFICE MEMUKANUUivi

From: Keith Peden K E C E l V E DDate: l o July 1981 Exploration Geologist-Red Lake

SEP-31981To: Denis Bray

Senior Exploration Geologist M|N(NG LANDS SECTION-

^^^MARTIN BAY CLAIM GROUP________________________________________^

INTRODUCTION

The Martin Bay Claim Group consists of 3 unpatented mining claims

numbered KRL 502922, 502925, and 502932. These claims were staked by

Minorex Limited on September 18, 1978.

The claims, on the north shore of Martin Bay of Red Lake, are

easily accessible by boat.

Geological mapping by the author, assissted by Mr. C. Morgan, was

conducted from June 20, 1981 to June 27, 1981 inclusive. A VLF electro

magnetic survey was also conducted during this period by Mr. B. Foster.

Ground reference was made through the use of cut lines spaced at 400'

intervals.

Forest cover is mainly open deciduous and exposure is adequate.

Stripping of outcrop is difficult because of thin moss cover and the

rubbly surface of the outcrops.

STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY

The entire property is underlain by a thick sequence of mafic to

intermediate flows. The only other rock type exposed was feldspar por

phyritic intrusives.

The andesitic volcanicswere seen as homogenous flows, pillowed flows

and coarse grained flow centres. Tops were to the north.

The feldspar porphyritic dikes were sen at several attitudes cross

cutting the mafic flows.

A/ Feldspar Porphyritic Dikes

The dikes are narrow, from 10 cm to 1.5 m. Being intermediate in

composition, the weathered surface is buff to grey while the fresh

MINOREX LIMITED

LOCATION MAP

Martin Bay Claim Group

- 2 -

..arface is dark and chloritic. Mineralogy is about J Ofo white anhedral

plagioclase phenocrysts, up to 6mm, in a grey, fine grained intermediate

to mafic matrix.

Some dikes contained barren laddered quartz, veins.

B/ Andesite Flows

These rocks are fine to medium grained and green in colour. Gener

ally massive to weakly foliated, only some zones show strong shearing,

particularly along the lake shore at the south edge of the property.

The pillowed flows are well packed, contain very little inter-

pillow sediment and reach sizes exceeding 2 m. Pipe amygdules were noted

on occasion. The pillows are not elongated with a preferred orientation.

Pyrite was seen in most outcrops from trace amounts up to 5^ dis

seminated euhedrons

Alteration in the form of carbonatization and silicification was

recorded at varying intensities from nil to pervasive across the prop

erty. This cannot be used to define stratigraphy at present. A weak

epidote alteration was also seen on occasion.

Quartz carbonate injections occur as irregular veins and blebs with

thicknesses from 3 to 20 cm. Strike length rarely exceeds 2 m.

A flow breccia with subround elliptical and ribbon fragments (30x

10 cm) in a foliated matrix was recorded at 27E 200S

A 20 cm shear zone with an 8 cm central quartz vein was located at

20E BL.

The flow centres are coarse grained, granular, massive and homogenous

They resemble chloritic diorite.

A fault/shear zone, up to 2 m wide, located on the lakeshore east

of the claim group, strikes on to the property. The mineralization on

the lakeshore ( 50?a pyrite) was not detected on the claim group.

METAMORPHISM AND STRUCTURE

Metamorphic grade on the andesite flows is greenschist facies.

A large fault traverses the north edge of the group. This was exposed by diamond drilling conducted by Minorex Limited in 1979-

Geophysical patterns indicate the fault continues to the east and west

of the property.

Shearing along the lakeshore at the south edge of the property

and topographic expression suggest a second,even larger,fault passes to

the south of the group. Offshoots of these major faults may be repre

sented by the shear zones within the claim group.

Mineralization and Alteration

Visible mineralization in outcrop within the claim group is rest

ricted to minor amounts of pyrite. Mineralization within the shear zones

has interesting assay values, however, the occurence as seen in the drill

core, is in the matrix making it secondary to stratigraphy.

All the significant veins have been sampled.

Varying amounts of alteration suggest a yet undiscovered trend to

the source. This may, in fact be fault controlled alteration,as opposed

to primary stratigraphic alteration.

GEOPHYSICS

A VLF electromagnetic survey, totalling 11,600 feet of readings

was completed. A Crone Radem unit was employed taking readings at 50

foot intervals along cut lines spaced 400 feet apart.

A single anomaly outlining the northern fault was delineated. Two

other very small (2 point) anomalies of unknown origin appeared on L^-E

250S and L8E 350N.

CONCLUSIONS

No new areas of mineralization were uncovered. All existing miner

alization as shown by geophysics and drilling is fault controlled and

not stratiform. Gold mineralization that might have been associated

with the fault activity should have appeared in the drill hole assays.

Having failed to return any encouraging values, the secondary hydro

thermal mineralization potential of the property seems limited.

The presence of a distal facies (sphalerite rich) volcanogenic

massive sulphide body is a dim possibility. This could have a very weak

geophysical response. No evidence for submarine exhalative activity was

detected in the field, making this unlikely.

Ontario

Ministry of N

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOL( TECHNICAL D; 52N84SW8136 2.4112 FAIRLIE TWP 300

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) Geological and VLF E.M. geophysics Township or Area Fairlie Township_____________

Claim HolHer(s) Minorex Limited—-——————.———-——-P.O.Box 1111. Red Lake. Ontario FOY 2MO

Survey fVimpny same———————.——————————.——.—-Author of Report Keith Peden__________________

Address of AnthoiP.O. Box 1111, Red Lake, Ont.——— Covering Dates of Survey 20 June to 2? July 1981

(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut ————^—————.———-—-——————

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer_—Radiometric———Other——————

DAYSper claim

20

Geological. 20

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

nATR.27 July 1981Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications .y1 . L ! u B OPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

___r y___wjv-'-J'

KRL

.SBIi...............isC....5.Q25J^.ir......

TOTAL CLAIMS-

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations ______1 ^ u__________________Number of Readings ———— Station int^i 100 feet Readings @ 50 feet T,np Taring ^00 feet

Profile scale _____I!——————————————————————————————————————————————

Contour interval -——-

Coil configuration ZO

di O

N

O cu

UJ

Instrument N/A

Accuracy — Scale constant

Diurnal correction method

Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value ———.

Instrument ___Crone Radem VLF receiver

Coil separation ____~~~——-——- Accuracy————+A ? decree

Method: ~~~ CH Fixed transmitter d Shoot back d In line EH Parallel line Frequency_______Seattle, Washington—-———————————————————

(specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured Dip angle measured from the horizontal of the directionof the resultant VLF field

Instrument ___________________N/A——-—-——-—-—-^-—-——-—-—-^-—-—-——-—-^———-—-Scale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

N/A Instrument _______________________Method Q Time Domain C Frequency Domain

P Parameters — On time ____________________________ Frequency _____

— Off time ____________________________ Range .

— Delay time -——.———————————.——-^-—.

— Integration time -————-^——-^-—-^—^-^—^.——--r. Power

D Electrode array.d

Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

GRAVES TWP (M-2166)WP

42MI6 SOCE

KHL l Kftl x. URL i KRL

660837 |6f,08}8i ^ ll l T KRL 'KRI~

' ' l

t~ "K RT l ~KRi" f K til \ l l

I6608jo*b2fil fOl 626 l 89 l 526 l 6

^| KRL j KHL i KRL "^"~ "~i ! '••••- ^j i

' , KRL~ "l VRL i KRL 1l l | KRL | KR l

803003/1802914 j , , 54'06| 4 b l 5406451 540644l 160887

i"** — ~ KRL V KRi ' J '

::--^- ^Lt^--r... j:" jN.rr••'^" i TQI , .D. IKRL KRL TKRLS*^*

6406S6|- -k - - -U

I406S9 1 S40654 IS406555406901540687540683

|540708,0" 3?

54U684I 565633 ' 56B93Il '

b4dbai 4070^4| 94070J) 54069Bi l

KRL i KRL ~ V BI l VDI '

k 705540 7 Oh 540096 54069^' 540689KRL IKRL KRL l KRL

54O674 540675KRL KRL l KRL503137 |60Sl38 54O 693, 4 8 17-i? '

--^-——'540677 '8406T8 154071040706

IKRL KRL i KRL5^0711

603I40|S03I39

i 540 70S, 540698 | 5406941

KRL i L AKEJ? 1 448393

^. THE CORPORATION OF THE54IOS4 'J\ 5 4149 A 5^41495

KRL 'J343673l 3 4367

KHt-^

TOWNSHI!p"L.mQ p 1540733 l540730|77' 54-^1474! —•*" , - ~"

^-^ l ^-A ff I -KRU K R

SO98i2 |S0986ll 5098BO l

BAIRD TWR (M.-2I38)

52Ne4bW81.16 e 4 lid KA IBI IE TWP 200

THE TOWNSHIP OF

FAIRLIEDISTRICT OF

KENORA(PATRICIA PORTION)

RED LAKE MINING DIVISION

t

SCALE:HNChN4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED

NOTES400' surface nghls reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers

PLAN NO 2158ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

N', * f

o o

LLJ

O O

LU

O O CO

LLJ O O

LUO Oto

LUO O O Csl

LUO O•^(N

01o oCD (N

O) Oo

LU Oo00 CO

BASELINE

LEGEND

1 MAFIC METAVOLCANICSA FLOWSB COARSE GRAINED FLOWSP PILLOWED FLOWS

7 FELSIC TO INTERMEDIATE INTRUSIVES A FELDSPAR PORPHYRY

75

MARTIN BAY OF RED LAKE

600 800

KP

MINOREX LIMITEDMARTIN BAY CLAIM GROUP

FAIRLIE TOWNSHIP. RED LAKE, ONTARIO

GEOLOGYBY K. PEDEN ; C. MORGAN

t*

JUNE 1981 1 =200

aio

N

LU

l . f'NB46W*l36 ? 41 IJ FAIRLIC

UN

SA*J wo

/J

t*)

JAJ

75

'05

liN

-17

502932

2S0

i 5.

/os;145

to

-2

Iff*

1}N

ilM

6*0

lu

li

) 15

45

55

?^

MS—————— "Srtt"

4*V-

f\ f^^~~-~*V

—— - i,W")l Lj^M

—— ~~~AlW

l?M

I3A*

HA)

4/ui/u|AJ

0

1;

)5l?i175

KS

^5

— . . ^ _ ^5

-7--17

-11--10

-•C--f

-J--1--IS

H' — -- -" ~.~ — —— - -

Hfc ^ __

feS^tt ——— -'hr--^j

-20 1i

: " 1•"-i 1

:|"' 1" i11

-d l

:" j

:!

- '^^^-

-it

jjjL ___ __ _^-~-r—-V5IZ. —— - - — —

502925

-u

se

I6A) ISN

MARTIN BAY OF RED LAKf

SEATTLE

600 800

KP

LEGEND

UNDER O

O - 20

20

AO 60

OVER 60

MINOREX LIMITEDMARTIN BAY CLAIM GROUP

FAIRLIE TOWNSHIP. RED LAKE, ONTARIO

VLF ELECTROMAGNETICINSTRUMENT' CRONE RADEM

READINGS FRASER FILTERED

OPERATOR: B FOST^-jR

JUNE 1981f j "- 200'