45
Intentional Advising to Strengthen Student Development and Outcomes Rebecca Goosen, President, NADE [email protected]

Intentional Advising to Strengthen Student Development and Outcomes Rebecca Goosen, President, NADE [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Intentional Advising to Strengthen Student

Development and Outcomes

Rebecca Goosen, President, NADE

[email protected]

Welcome

Can you please tell us a little about yourselves?

• What is your title (administrator, faculty, staff, etc.)?

• What is your primary area of interest?• What type of institution are you from

(2 yr., 4 yr. private, public)?

Developmental Education in the Spotlight

• National, 60% of students need developmental education

• 20% of students referred to developmental mathematics and 33 % referred to developmental reading never enrolled (AtD data)

Developmental Education in the Spotlight

• Only 44% of referred reading and 31% referred math ever complete the full sequence (AtD data)

• 14% of community college students do not complete a singe credit in the first term (AtD data)

Developmental Education in the Spotlight

• For every 10 freshmen seeking an associate degree: 5 require DE and fewer than 1 graduate in 3 years (Complete College America)

• Only a quarter of part time students finish a degree (Complete College America)

• Economically disadvantaged students struggle the most (Complete College America)

Developmental Education in the Spotlight

• Minorities access higher education often through community colleges and are over represented in developmental education (Complete College America)

• Too many exit points along the continuum for students

Are they lost in our systems?

Traditional Pathway for Students in College

• Sign up on line, take what students think they need

• Maybe see a counselor

• Some colleges assess with one measure

• Many colleges do not have mandatory assessment and placement

Traditional Pathway for Students in College

• Enroll in what looks good

• Not all colleges have mechanisms to identify struggling students

• Fail, drop out, accumulate large financial aid issues

Students Don’t Do Optional

Students Often Take the Perceived Easiest Route• But is it?• How many times do they repeat the

same course?• What is their GPA?• What skills are they lacking?• How are the external variables (life)

affecting them?• Have they committed to their education?

What Does Research and Data Tell Us About

Students?

• Students that fail to enroll in developmental course sequences do not persist

• Students that fail to pass courses in the sequence do not persist

• There are many national initiatives hopeful to increase student successful completion of Developmental Education

• Women students have higher chance of passing

• African American males are at higher risk

• Full time students have higher rates of completion

Many Exit Points

82% enroll 57% pass 25% do not complete

Of the 57% that pass

41% enroll 29% pass 12% do not complete

Of the 29% that pass

22% enroll 16% pass 6% do not complete

3 levels below college ready

2 levels below college ready

1 level below college ready

Systematic Program• Assessment of Skills–Cognitive and non cognitive–Assessment of social situation–Assessment of career goals

• Mandatory Advising –On entry–Throughout the semester–Number of “touch points”

Systematic Program

• Student Success Course– Focused on building self actualization and

accountability– Financial aid component

• Available Tutoring– On line– In person– Trained tutors (para-professional or peer

tutors)

Systematic Program• Student Centered Instruction– Active learning situations– Students are engaged

• Facilities On Campus For Learning Support– Departmental labs– Centralized campus learning support

centers• Location

• Sharing resources (Boylan, 2002)

Rules for Success

• Develop strong relationships between academic support and instructional units on campus

• Develop plans for establishing pathways for student success

• Train each other • Share information regularly• Experience each other’s roles intimately– If instructor, learn to advise – If student development, teach a student

success class

Steps to Developing Intentional Pathways

Analyze Data

Determine best chance for progression

Limit options

Mandate

Guide students through terrain

Analyze DataWhat is working?

• Short term & long term data• Enrollment patterns• Look at trend lines (5 year past history)• Provide data to individual faculty members as well

as department data• Use several data points

CompletersWho withdrew/why?How many A-C’s?How did they do in the first transfer level

course after DE?

Analyze Data

What is successful?

• What is their demographic?• What do they look like?• What is their academic history at the

institution?• What was their pre-college pathway?• What is their goal?

Analyze Data

What mechanism is contributing to those students succeeding?

There is no silver bulletBut a lot of silver buckshot

• Not one answer but rather multi-variables• Identify likely variables that led to some students

succeeding• Example: College ready in reading, maturity by age or

selection of major, timeline to graduation

• What needs to happen to support more of your students?

• What variables have the strongest impact?

Analyze Data

Concentrate on the positive

• Look for why some students succeed rather than why students fail

• Do more of “what works”• Begin with the low hanging fruit

Determine Best Chance Progression

• Examine all the modes of delivery and determine the three that are showing the most success

• Limit offerings to only those• Limit exceptions to the rule• Ensure faculty are trained in instruction

and advising personnel understand the different modalities

• Develop a placement matrix

Placement Matrix-MathTraditional Lecture

Emporium Model Accelerated DE/College Algebra

Reading Level Any level College level College level

Math Level Any level Any level Any level

Motivation/Maturity Level

Any level High level High level

Distance to Graduation

Not a factor Close to graduation

Close to graduation

Employed Not a factor May require more time on task

Do they have extra time?

Outside Commitment

Not a factor Family, etc. computer access?

Family, etc. could be issue

Supports Needed

Ensure faculty are trained to deliver new instruction

Professional development is essential

Advising personnel understand the different modalities and pathways offered

Joint instructional and student development regular meetings

Supports Needed

Educate students concerning optionsMandatory orientationAnd/or First Year ExperienceAnd/or Student Success Class

All FTIC students should have an educational plan by the end of the first semester

Limit options

Students do not do optional

• Limit options• Prepare data to support options• Share with students• Engage them in planning their education

Advising sessionsEducational planning sessionsOrientation

Mandate• All students should be assessed

DiagnosticsCognitive/Non-cognitiveCareer exploration

• No late registration

• Students should be placed according to their needsIs it wise to delay taking math?Is reading at college level important?

Mandate

• Determine which pathways are optimum for your students based on your data– Are students delaying taking math and that

effects program completion?– Are technical students in need of skill

development?• Do they know how to be a student?–What are the students’ expectations of

college?– Do they need help in learning to be a

student?• Mandate Orientation

Guide Students Through The Terrain

• Educational plans should be completed by end of first semester

• Mandatory advising

• Provide pre set pathways for first two semesters

• Establish connections Peers Institution Faculty

On Ramps• Traditional

Enroll Course Work DegreeEmployment

• On Ramps

Enroll Course Work Certificate Employment

Course Work Associates Employment

Course Work Bachelors Employment

Course Work Masters Employment

Faculty As Advisors

• Share the workload

• Many models of how this works

• Training is essential

Faculty As Advisors• Advantages

– Bridges the gap between instruction and student development

– Faculty develop a deeper understanding of their students beyond content

– Students have greater access to information– Can be incorporated with a course– May free up counselors time to do other types of student

support

• Disadvantages– May increase faculty load– May confuse students – Faculty may be confused as to when to hand off to student

development

Things To Think About• Students need to be assessed

• Pathways should not be left up to chance

• Use data to guide decision making

• Provide comprehensive student success services

Things To Think About

• Coordinate instructional and student development services

• Consider present staff and what the staffing needs may be

• Provide professional development for all staff

What limits your ability today to design an

intentional pathway for students?

Questions?

Developmental Education Initiatives

• Achieving the Dream http://www.achievingthedream.org

• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation http://www.deionline.org

• Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching http://www.carnegiefoundaiton.org/problem-solving/developmental-math

• Complete College America-Time is the Enemy www.completecollege.org

• Getting Past Go http://gettingpastgo.org• The National Center for Academic

Transformation http://www.thencat.org/whatwedo.html

• Jobs for the Future http://www.jff.org• Pathways to College Network

http://www.pathwaystocolldege.net• California Basic Skills Initiative

http://strategicplan.cccco.edu http://www.cccbsi.org

• Tennessee Developmental Studies Redesign Initiative http://www.tnredesign.org

• Washington’s Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training (I-BEST) http://www.sbctc.ctc.edu/college/_eibestresojurces.aspx

Resources• Boylan, H. (2002). What works: Research-based best

practices in developmental education. Boone, NC: continuous Quality Improvement Network/National Center for Developmental Education.

• Boylan, H., & Saxon, D.P. (2012). Attaining Excellence in Developmental Education: Research-based recommendations for administrators. Boone, NC: National Center for Developmental Education.

• Kuh,G., Kinzie,J., Schuh,J., & Whitt,E. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

• McCabe,R. (2000). No one to waste: a report to public decision makers and community college leaders. Washington, DC: Community College Press.

• Upcraft, M., & Gardner, J. (1989). The freshman year experience. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

• Valdes, G., & Gifford, B. (2012). Final report on developmental mathematics and language project. Retrieved on March 29, 2012 from: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/stites/default/files/elibrary/dev_math_report.pdf

Thank you for attending!

Rebecca Goosen, MS, Ed.S., Ed.D.President, NADE

Associate Vice Chancellor for College PreparatorySan Jacinto College

4624 Fairmont Pkwy, Suite 203Pasadena, TX 77504

[email protected]