Integrated Well Engineering & Project · PDF fileIntegrated Well Engineering & Project Management - Early Collaboration Delivering Well Integrity and Drilling Reliability Adalberto

Integrated Well Engineering & Project Management

- Early Collaboration Delivering Well Integrity and Drilling Reliability

Adalberto Dell’aglio – Drilling and Evaluation Advisor

Richard Snyders-Blok – Global Wells Team Lead

2 © 2013 Weatherford. All rights reserved.

Complex

Environments

• Exploration

• Field

Development

• Mature fields

• Ultra ERD /

Unconventional

• Deepwater

• HP/HT

Key Operator Concerns

• Meeting AFE targets

• Meeting regulatory &

environment

requirements

• Risk mitigation

Definitions: ERD (extended reach drilling), HP/HT (high-pressure/high-temperature)

Overburden

Pressure

Dep

th

Current Industry Trends

Today’s Drilling Landscape : – Drilling Risk Reduction/Management

© 2013 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


Identifying

drilling

challenges

Planning

the well Constructing

the well

Optimize drilling

programs through

early

collaboration

• Risk / economic

uncertainty

• Understanding

technical limits

• Well Plan

Alternatives

• Contingency

plans

• Cost

uncertainty

reduction

• Identifying and

designing out

NPT, RLT &

ILT

• Casing seat

optimization &

telescoped well

• Kicks / Losses

• Poor wellbore

integrity

• NPT

• Imprecise mud

programs

Definitions: NPT (non-productive time), RLT (Removable Lost time), ILT (Invisible Lost time)

Phase 1:

Concept

Phase 2:

Assess / Select

Alternatives

Phase 3:

Design Phase 4:

Execute

Phase 5:

Operate

Well Construction Process

Typical point of service

provider engagement Point of engagement bring

greatest value



Added Value Through Early Collaboration


Responsible Well Construction

Reducing well construction costs

and lengthening productive life by

Zero loss of containment across field development life-cycle

improving drilling reliability

and

with an application-based suite

of integrated products and services.

Mitigating risk and

driving efficiencies

from surface to

total depth

assuring well integrity


Assuring Well Integrity

Technologies

Top-Drive Casing Running Systems

Drilling w/ Casing-Liners

Liner Systems

Cementation

Swellables

Friction Reduction

Borehole Enlargement

Wellbore Cleanout

Product Line Experts &

Applications Engineers

Benefits

Hazard Identification and Mitigation

Casing Seat Optimization

High Integrity Casing Strings

Casing Seat Selection

Casing to Designed Depth

Wellbore Stability

Effective Zonal Isolation

Process Safety

Well Engineering &

Project Management

Zero loss of containment across field

development life-cycle


Interdependency of Well Integrity & Process Safety

7

Offshore Rig

Contractor Rig HSE

Case

WCID

WCID WCID

Process Safety

&

Well Integrity

HSE and

Operating

Procedures

Safety &

Environment

Mgmt. Sys.

Operator

WCID = Well Construction Interface Document

Technology / Service

Provider


Improving Drilling Reliability

Technologies

Managed Pressure Drilling Systems

Rotating Control Devices

Early Kick and Loss Detection

Technology

DDV Downhole Deployment Valves

GC Tracer System

Continuous Flow Systems

Drilling Services

Product Line Experts &

Applications Engineers

Benefits

Drilling Optimization

Drilling through losses

Identify and mitigate kicks

Navigate narrow drilling windows

Reduce NPT and ILT

Eliminate PP/FG uncertainty

Avoid Wellbore Ballooning

Well Engineering &

Project Management

Mitigating risk and driving efficiencies from

surface to total depth


Collaborative Well Construction

Collaborative Provider


Collaboration between Operators and Technology Providers to better understand the well objectives and challenges.

Design an optimized well by combining local well knowledge /expertise and well engineering utilizing a broad well construction portfolio.

Product Manage a well delivery team and drilling solution technologies to ensure consistent service delivery.

Engagement Model

10

EXPLORE the opportunities

ENGINEER the well

EXECUTE the project


Project Lifecycle

11

• Project Feasibility

− Opportunity Id.

− Opportunity Qual.

− Engineering Eval.

• Drilling Hazard Analysis

Proposal

• FEED Proposal

• Drilling Hazard Study

• FEED Study

− Form Project Team

− Drlg. Eng. / Modeling

− Customer Collaboration

• FEED Study Delivered

Engineering

• Business Case

− Value to Operator &

Technology Provider

− Operational Capability

• Project Portfolio Fit

• Identify Project Resources −Operational

− Engineering

− Client

• Kick-off Project’s Oper. Phase

Operations

• Execution Project Team Formed −Operational

− Engineering

− Client

• Detailed Implementation Plan

• Project Plan Executed −Technology Solution(s)Staged

− WEPM-Client Project Team Mobilized

− Technology Solutions Installed

− Well Operations Monitored

• Project Closure −End of Well Report

• Client Review

• Knowledge Management


12

Drilling margins defined by actual events bounded by the low margin

(green curve) and high margins (blue curve) overlays

Losses at ~5000’ with 13 PPG EMW

Hole Instability: High Torque at 8950’ TVD with 13.5 PPG

EMW

Ballooning @ 13200’ TVD with 16.6 PPG EMW;

decrease EMW to 16.3

Typical complex well’s

narrow margin PP/FG curve:

margins defined by

instability events.


Offshore Multi-Well Re-Entry Project – Latin America

Offshore S. America Field – Tender Assist

● Drilling Challenge

» Re-entry Project with well slimming

challenges and multiple hole sections with

unstable and loss zones

● Drilling Solution

» Drilling Hazard Engineering Study

» Casing Seat Optimization

» Through Collaborative Environment

– Performed a FEED Study

– Engineered MPD solution to drill

unstable and loss zones

– Engineered Reaming casing in trouble

zones to ensure casing seats

– Engineered Solid Exp. contingencies

– Delivered two hole sections

● Value to Client

» Successfully Drilled and completing wells

reducing NPT by 50%

14

Latin America Team

North America Team

Well Engineering

RCD Operational

Personnel

Operational Base

Liner Hanger

Personnel

Liner Hanger Equip.

Well Engineering

Project Management

SDS Operational

Personnel

SDS Equipment

RwL Personnel

RwL Equipment

Well Engineering

DHM Engineering

Project Management

Project Scheduling

Global WEPM

Team

Drilling Engineering

Geology

Geophysical

Completion Engineering

Reservoir Engineering

Project Management

Operator Engineering

Re-Entry / New Well: Field Development Program


Project Delivery Team (Engineering)

WEPM Project Mgr

Said Boutalbi

WEPM Project Director

Pat York

WEPM Engineering

Director

Said Boutalbi

WEPM ProjectONE & FTP

Site Lead

Paul Hackett

MPD – Engineering

Phase

Danilo Morales

Total Depth –

Engineering Phase

Tracy Cummins

RCD - Andrew Barry

MFCS – Todd Cooper

Project Engr – Danilo

Morales

Ops Engr – Luis Daniel

Giral

Ops Engr – Joshua

Bozarth

Proj Engr – Akram

Almazaqei US PLM – Steve

Rosenberg

DwL/RwL Ops

App Engr Cementing

Ivan Barannikow

LAO PLM – Antonio

Flores

DwL/RwL Ops

BD Mgr - TRS

Tracy Cummins

US Team LAO TeamGlobal Team

App Engr Liner Hangers

Tim Dunn

App Engr Torque/Drag &

Csg Wear

Melissa Frilot

App Engr Surge/Swab

Ming Zo Tan

Operator

Drilling Engineer

Operator

Wells Team Lead

Operator

Drlg. Eng. Team Leader


Project Delivery Team (Execution)

WEO Project Manager

Said Boutalbi

Operations Manager – TT

Jason Pulchan

Country Manager – TT

Cesar Granados

QHSE Manager – TT

Trinidad – Rene Balwant

LAO Business Unit Mgr.

– CPD & TS

German Castiblanco

Engineering Support

Team

Operations Manager – US

Roy Callison

NAM Business Unit Mgr.

– CPD

Iain Cook

BP-TT Bus. Dev. Focal Pt.

Robert Bernard

US Team LAO TeamGlobal Team

Total Depth Operations

Steve Rosenberg

Liner Hanger Supervisor

Devanan Lalgee

Liner Hanger Supervisor

Charles Prather

Day Tower Night Tower

SDS Field Operations

SDS Well Site Supervisor

MFC System Specialist

Craig Thompson

RCD Operator

G. Ramon

MFC System Specialist

Alex Montgomery

RCD Operator

John Caro

Day Tower Night Tower

SDS Field Operations

Field Engineer

Operator

Drilling Engineer

Operator

Wells Team Lead

Operator

Drlg. Eng. Team Leader

DwL/RwL Supervisor

James Fredricks

DwL/RwL Supervisor

Randy Hutchins


Best Composite Time - Example

Time required to complete each phase - days - NPT & unplanned time included

Phases Amal 109 P Amal 110 I Amal 111 P Amal 112 I Amal 113 P Amal 114 P Amal 115 P Amal 116 P Amal 117 P Amal 118 I Amal 119 I Amal 120 Ob Amal 121 BCT

Rig move 1.24 6.65 1.50 1.14 0.73 0.50 0.54 0.60 0.92 0.58 0.60 0.84 0.73 0.50

Drill 12 1/4" section 7.54 5.00 4.33 3.97 2.90 3.40 2.44 3.09 2.14 2.55 2.65 2.01 3.00 2.01

Run & cement 9 5/8" casing 1.29 0.96 1.05 0.85 0.69 0.60 0.99 0.70 0.70 0.73 0.97 0.63 1.46 0.60

N/U, P/T CHH & BOP 0.75 0.42 0.49 0.47 0.29 0.19 0.33 0.22 0.18 0.20 0.24 0.43 0.19 0.18

Drill 8 1/2" section 3.52 3.08 2.71 2.14 2.07 1.60 1.75 1.82 3.05 1.51 2.16 2.09 1.59 1.51

Logging (+MDT for injectors) 0.27 3.13 0.26 0.60 0.30 0.24 0.16 0.18 0.26 0.88 0.30 2.99 0.30 0.16

Run & cmt 7" casing 1.67 1.42 0.82 0.65 0.79 0.59 0.79 0.50 0.56 1.41 0.75 3.82 0.89 0.50

WOC 0.40 0.31 0.23 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

N/D BOP - Release well 0.21 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.04 0.10 0.03 0.03

Well total time 16.89 21.06 11.52 9.98 7.92 7.19 7.06 7.15 7.85 7.98 7.71 12.91 8.19 5.49

NPT & unplanned time per well 3.82 8.78 0.99 0.69 0.04 0.86 0.67 0.30 1.78 0.67 0.75 2.34 1.24

PDO RIG 82 Performance

Total time16.89

Total time21.06

Total time11.52

Total time9.98

Total time7.92

Total time7.19

Total time7.07

Total time7.15

Total time7.85

Total time

Total time 12.91

Total time 8.19

BCT = Best Composite Time

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

Amal 109 P Amal 110 I Amal 111 P Amal 112 I Amal 113 P Amal 114 P Amal 115 P Amal 116 P Amal 117 P Amal 118 I Amal 119 P Amal 120 Ob Amal 121 BCT

13.0712.28

10.539.29

7.88

6.32 6.40 6.846.07

7.31 6.96

10.57

6.95

5.49

3.82

8.78

0.99

0.69

0.04

0.86 0.67

0.30

1.780.67

0.75

2.34

1.24

Da

ys


Integrated Contract Drilling

Integrated Project Middle East


Drilling Hazard Understanding – It’s about the Well

Monobore Extension ?

16” Contingency ?

Generic Pore Pressures

-5000

-4500

-4000

-3500

-3000

-2500

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Pressure PPG

Dep

th

Hi side PP Hi side Sand Frac Hi side Shale Frac Overburden Lo side PP Lo side Sand Frac Lo side Shale Frac

Mud Line

Top Formation A

Top Formation B

Bottom Formation B

Base

Design

16”

13-5/8”

11-3/4”

9-7/8”

17-7/8”

Possible Trouble Zone

Top Formation C

Bottom Formation C

Possible Trouble Zone

Thank You ~

Questions?

21

Documents

Integrated Well Engineering & Project · PDF fileIntegrated Well Engineering & Project Management - Early Collaboration Delivering Well Integrity and Drilling Reliability Adalberto