Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ingot Cleanliness Improvements Using SprueExtensions Beyond The Mold Outlet
Ryan VanderMeulen
ArcelorMittal Coatesville
April 11, 2012
2
Steelton
Coatesville
Conshohocken
Burns Harbor Cleveland
Lackawanna
Hennepin
Columbus Coatings
Riverdale
Indiana Harbor
Steelmaking and processing facilities
Processing facilities
Research center
Research Center
Weirton
Georgetown
ArcelorMittal USA Locations
Newton
3
ArcelorMittal USAPlate Production Locations
Steelmaking, Rolling, Heat Treating:Burns Harbor, Coatesville
Rolling & Heat Treating:Conshohocken, Gary
Steelmaking:Indiana Harbor,Cleveland, Riverdale
CoatesvilleConshohocken
BurnsHarbor,Gary
ClevelandIndiana Harbor
Riverdale
4
Plate Mills Production Focus
• Burns Harbor– 160” – larger, TMCP, Q&T, precise weight
– 110” – commodity to 1”
– 160” @ Gary – commodity to 1.5”, Q&T
• Conshohocken– 110” - commodity, thin, Q&T
• Coatesville –– 140” - heavy, varied chemistries, Q&T
– 206” - very wide and heavy, Q&T
5
Production Focus
• EastClad, Flamecut, ConversionMost alloy and Q&TVery clean steelVery wide or heavy plateLight thickness plateSmall special orders
• WestControl rolledPrecise weightSpecial surface requirementsVery large ordersHeat Treated Commodity
6
ArcelorMittal USA OperationsCoatesville Steelmaking Process Plan
Ladle
Argon Stirring
Electrodes
Wire Feed
Argon Stirring
AutomaticAlloys
Ladle Furnace
Electric Arc Furnace
ContinuousCast Slabs
Ladle Degasser
BottomPoured Ingots
AutomaticAlloys
7
Ingot CastingCoatesville
• Bottom pouring
• Hot topping
• Argon shrouding
• Maximum sizeplate 50 tons (45 Mt)
8
Bottom Poured, Ingot Casting
Ladle
ArgonShroud
Argon Inlet
CenterRunner
RunnerBrick
MoltenSteel
Mold
CastingPowder
Hot Top
9
Products Produced From Ingots
• Thick plates, 3/1 reduction for PVQ; structural grades2/1; military 4/1
• Heavy plates over ~13.5 sTon
• Difficult chemistries– High sulfur free machining grades
– Tool steels
– Certain military grades
– Some unique customer requirements (prequalification)
• Grades covering wide thickness range with limitedproduction
10
High Strength Q&T Steels
• A514 family and T-1®
Steels, Hardwear®
• High strength orabrasion resistance
• Flatness requirements
1/2 commercial
• Fabrication guidelines
11
A514 Steels
• A514A - to 1-1/4” N-A-Xtra,National
• A514B * T-1A® to 1-1/4”
• A514E - to 6” ex-Armco
• A514F* T-1® to 2-1/2”
• A514H* T-1B® to 2”
• A514Q* T-1C® to 6” basis for gearrack grades
* PWHT cracking concerns
12
API Offshore Steels
• 2H42 and 50 (N)
• 2Y50 and 50T (QT)
• 2MT1 (CR, AC)
• 2Y60 (QT)
• Burns Harbor
– AC, N, QT
• Coatesville
– N, QT
– Special Chemistry (Pcm)
– Heavy plate, ingot
– RP 2Z prequalified Ingot to 3”
13
Pressure Vessel Steels
• Shipped to ASTM A20requirements
• Fabricators export theirvessels
• Plate export opportunities
• Most popular grades A516,A387 - 11/22, A353/553, Clad,A203E, A537, A299
14
A516
• C-Mn steels to 15” (380 mm) thick and 100,000pounds (45,000 kg) weight
• -50oC to +300oC temperature pressure vesselapplications, Grades 55, 60, 65 and 70
• Carbon equivalent controls and HIC - testing
• Available normalized or Q&T
• Similar behavior of A299 steels
15
A387
• Cr-Mo steels to 12” (305 mm) thick and 100,000pounds (45,000 kg) weight
• Grades 11 (1-1/4 Cr - 1/2 Mo) and 22 (2-1/4 Cr - 1Mo) most popular; other grades to 9% Cr
• Elevated temperature pressure vessel applications
• Temper embrittlement resistance
• Post weld heat treatment (stress relief)
• Available N&T or Q&T
16
Roll-Bonded Clad
• Composite of economical “Backing Steel” and high performancealloy
– examples: A516/304L, A387/410S, A36/C276
• Assembly of a “Clad Pack”
• Cost advantages
• Fabrication procedures - forming and welding
• Pressure vessels, FGD systems, pulp and paper equipmentSpacer bars
Nickel LayerBacking Steel
Alloy Inserts Parting Compound
17
Military Armor
• Navy Armor Steels - HY-80 & 100,HSLA-80 & 100 - surface shipsand submarines
• Army Armor Steels - moderateand high hardness grades - M-1tanks, other vehicles
• Require Q&T and Fineline®
• Special testing - first article,ballistic
• Plates from ingots usedparticularly in Carriers
18
AISI Alloy and Mold Steels
• Chemistry only grades
• Most popular 4140, 4142, 4130,
8620, 4340
• All vacuum degassed, some may
be Clean-Cut or Fineline
• Thermal cutting and quench
cracking concerns
• Used in variety of tooling
applications, including MTD steels
19
MTD® Steels
• Mold, tool and die pre-hardened steels for plasticinjection molds and holder blocks, 262-321HB*
• MTD #1 - N&T 4142 used to 6-1/2” thick
• MTD #2 - Q&T 4130 used to 12” thick
• MTD #3 - Q&T .30% carbon, Fineline quality to12” thick; ingot only for internal quality, BEUwhere possible
• MTD #4 - N&T 4150 used to 6-1/2” thick
• MTD #1, #2, #4 may be Clean-Cut quality
* MTD #1 and #4, to 3”: 241-320 over 3 - 6-1/2”
20
Free Machining Grades
• Higher sulfur levels for improved machinability
• Clean-Cut® 20 and 45, .06/.12 sulfur, twocarbon levels, calcium treated to 15” thick
• C1119 mod. and C1144 mod., .24/.33 and.20/.33 sulfur levels always ingot
• Clean-Cut® Alloy Steels, .02/.04 sulfur, calciumtreatment available in 4140, 4142, 4150, 8620,MTD #1, #2 and #4
21
Tool Steels
• Cold work tool steels - A2, 01, S7, S5, D2, A8 mod.
• Mostly ingot produced at Coatesville, some meltedoff-site– D2 ingot from outside source
– S5 can be strand cast
• Long processing cycles
• Produce full sized plates that customers can cut intobars
• Flatness tolerances are critical for cutting andmachining
22
Bridge Steels
• Industry push to use ASTMA709
• Grades 36 through 100 ksiyield
• Three zones for determiningCVN impact requirements,also fracture-critical membercriteria
• New HPS 50W/70W/100W
• Ingots used in thick, wide&/or long plates
23
Flame-Cut Products
• Oxygen-fuel or plasma cuttingof all grades, thicknesses andweights of plate we can roll
• Beveling of edge detail/weldpreparation to drawingspecifications
• Plates/parts can be pressflattened to meet tolerances
• Finished pieces used instructural and sub-assembly,forming, fabrication andmachining applications
24
Common Ingot Quality Issues
• Cracks
– Rate of Rise
– Mold Centering
• Hot Top Fins
– Board Fit in Molds
• End/Side Laminations
– Solidification
– Rolling
• Pipe/Burst/UT Failure
– Solidification
– Cooling
– Trapped Junk
25
Potential Sources of Trapped Junk
• Foreign debris including cardboard
• Damaged Refractory Brick
• Nalcosil
• Runner Sand
• Fluxes/Powders – most common HT2
26
Ladle Sand
• Prevents steel from escaping through the outlet
• Protects opening of ladle from damage
• Allows for better flow of steel
27
Refractory Brick
• Can be easily fractured or crack
• Uneven plates cause bricks to be misaligned
28
The‘Trap’
29
The ‘Trap’
Sprue Cap
14” Double MaleStraights
9” Slotted Outlet
30
Picture of Sprue
31
End of Sprue
32
Diagram of Sprue
Note: A, B, C, D, E are all ½”
13”
OUTLET
.5”0 2”1” 2.5” 6.5” 7” 13.5”
END A B C D E
Distance from the End to Outlet
1” 4” 6”
33
End Pieces
• Where most junk was found
• Not fully circular
C0082 C0086Melt No.-Position C0192-1 C0192-3
34
Definition of Junk
• All non-metallics
• Material on edge of piece extending deep into the surface
• For air bubbles, only parts that appeared to have been non-steel material
35
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Distance from End to Outlet (inches)
Per
cen
tIn
clu
sio
n
C0082
C0086
Trapped Inclusions for C0082/C0086
36
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Distance from End to Outlet (inches)
Per
cen
tIn
clu
sio
n
C0192-1
C0192-3
Trapped Inclusions for C0192
37
Percent Inclusion by Piece
Piece C0082 C0086 C0192-1 C0192-3
A 3.8% 3.6% 13.3% 15.8%
B 1.2% 0.59% 9.8% 6.5%
C 0.17% 0.08% 3.9% 6.0%
D 0.17% 0% 2.8% 7.6%
E 0.12% 0% 0%
Total % Inclusion 0.42% 0.25% 3.3% 5.5%
38
Indication of Swirling Motion
C0086A
C0086B
C0192-1D
C0192-3D
39
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Middle % 6.7% 2.2% 27.3% 25.1%
Outer % 93.3% 97.8% 72.7% 74.9%
C0082 C0086 C0192-1 C0192-3
Location of JunkOutside
Middle
1.5”
1.06”50% ofArea
40
Flow Model
CenterRunner
Mold
Sprue
‘Trap’
41
Flow Video
42
Cost
• Refractory cost increase per ingot of ~3%.
• Worst-case yield loss of ~0.1%.
• Total cost increase under $1.00/ton.
• One trapped junk rejection = $5,000+ depending on size andgrade. Can be over $20,000 for large armor ingots.
43
Follow-Up Work
• Work with vendor to develop a standard “trap brick”
• Integrate trap usage into all special heats to start
• Make traps standard for all heats
44
Conclusion
• Demonstrated ‘Trap’ is capable of catching junk
• Minimal cost and yield loss
• Potential to produce cleaner ingots and reduce the number ofrejections
45
Questions?