Upload
dorothy-richard
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
1
Status Siemens AG
Dr. Michael Höge
25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
2
Function and system concept of the Generation 1 injector
two piezoelectric actuator
guiding cylinder
piston (1)
hydraulic chamber (1)
hydraulic chamber (2)piston (2)
needle
Advantage:high and robust needle lift
Disadvantage:production costsabrasion @ needle
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
3
Function and system concept of the Generation 2 injector
one piezoelectric actuator
guiding cylinder
piston (1)
hydraulic chamber (1)
hydraulic chamber (2)piston (2)
needle
Advantage:less production costshigher durability due to less abrasion @ needle
Disadvantage:needle lift is more sensibleagainst rail and combustion chamber pressure
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
4
Comparison of Gen1 to Gen2 injector
Gen2 injector
Gen1 injector
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
5
- 12 stroke amplifier with 3 different diameters of piston (5)
and
- 3 stroke amplifier with notches to reduce shear stresses
Best configuration will be used for Generation 2
Different configurations of Generation 2 injectors
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
6
Development of an optimized nozzle layout
Gen 1 ‘slotted’ needle Gen 2 ‘hollow’ needle
Larger guiding surface => less stresses => higher durability
A Gen1 top = 16mm² A Gen2 top = 60mm²
A Gen1 bottom = 50mm² A Gen2 bottom = 190mm²
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
7
Calculation of gas flow
Target is 10g/s
Calculation of theoretic gas flow @ CT
Politecnico di Torino: quantity and diameter of bores / exact quantity of gasflow
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
8
Comparison of the simulated (PT) and theoretically calculated mass flow rate
Actual Status @ Siemens CT
Boundary conditions @ PT:
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
9
Calculation of the simulated and theoretically calculated mass flow rate
Actual Status @ Siemens CT
TemperatureFEM => 30°C
PressureFEM => 17bar
=> 272um needle lift ~ 10 g/s
Next step => measurement of gas flow @ CT* FEM Results from Politecnico de Torino
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
10
Planning for next time @ Siemens CT
INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009INGAS meeting, Prague, 25-26 Mai 2009
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
11
Siemens CT
Dr. Michael HögeSiemens AGCorporate Research and TechnologiesPower & Sensor Systems / Actuators & ControlOtto-Hahn-Ring 6D-81730 Munich
Thank you for your attention!