28
Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions

Daniel Hickey15 Sept 2010

Page 2: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

IR of Academic Information1990• Print and electronic indexes• Libraries!

2010• Networked databases• Libraries?

Page 3: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

User-Centered PerspectiveKnowing which databases to use: We offer hundreds of different databases and tens of thousands of different ejournals. Does the user know which of these are the best for their research?

Duplication of effort:Even if the user knows which database to search, she still has to perform the same search in every database that's relevant to her topic.

Page 4: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

500+ Databases with…• Vastly different content• Vendor-side legacy systems• Competing metadata standards• License agreements and copyright restrictions

Page 5: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

THE ECONOMIST

Page 6: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Libraries are trying to meet the needs of 21st Century researchers with late 20th Century technology.

Page 7: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

What’s at stake?

Page 8: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

• Attrition and research integrity• Interdisciplinary research• Discoverability of– Data– Multimedia– Grey literature

What’s at Stake?

Page 9: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

(Elephant in the room)

Page 10: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

• Attrition and research integrity• Interdisciplinary research• Discoverability of– Data– Multimedia– Grey literature

What’s at Stake?

Page 11: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

• Attrition and research integrity• Interdisciplinary research• Discoverability of– Data– Multimedia– Grey literature

What’s at Stake?

Page 12: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010
Page 13: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Solutions: First Attempts• Database directories• Federated search• Link resolvers• Metadata standards

Page 14: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Directories

Page 15: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Solutions: First Attempts• Database directories• Federated search• Link resolvers• Metadata standards

Page 16: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Link Resolvers

Page 17: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Solutions: First Attempts• Database directories• Federated search• Link resolvers• Metadata standards

Page 18: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Solutions: 2010• Deep index

• Big Digital Machine

• Linked data

Page 19: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Deep Index: Summon

Page 20: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Summon Pitfalls• Prohibitively expensive• Not designed with new

needs in mind:– Datasets– Multimedia

• Vendor-controlled / SaaS

Page 21: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

The Big Digital Machine “aims to provide for the production, distribution, management, and preservation of the full range of scholarly products[…] To date there have been a number of good systems developed to do parts of this work, but these developments are separate, small-scale and not integrated.”

Page 22: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Or…

Page 23: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010
Page 24: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Big Digital MachinePro:• Apply successful model to

new “product”• Take control of academic

output / address the serials crisis directly

• Provide the elusive single entry point

Con:• Untested business model• Import of current publishing

system:– Industry– Peer Review / P&T

• Deus ex machina

Page 25: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Linked Data• Method “of exposing, sharing, and connecting

data via dereferenceable URIs on the Web”• Conceptual offshoot of the Semantic Web• Effectively untested in the academic

publishing environment

Page 27: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Linked DataTim Berners-Lee:

1. Use URIs as names for things2. Use HTTP URIs so that people can look up those names3. When someone looks up a URI, provide useful

information, using the standards (RDF/XML, SPARQL)4. Include links to other URIs so that they can discover more

things

Page 28: Information Retrieval in Libraries: Silos and (Tentative) Solutions Daniel Hickey 15 Sept 2010

Comments & Questions

[email protected]