Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
TRIANGLE SOLUTION
AND
INEQUALITIES OF ALEXANDRU SZOROS
By Le Van
June MMXVI
Si rursus incipiens consilium sequerer Platonis incipere studiis mathematics.
Galilæus Galilæi
ABSTRACT
Trigonometric inequalities in triangles may not be a new topic in the world of mathematics, but its
problems have never been too old. Otherwise, they are created and challenged it day by day all
around the world, and so are the inequalities proposed by teacher Alexandru Szoros. And it is truly
my pleasure to represent in this article those problems, which I solved by using the triangle solution
method.
1. Introduction
In triangle π΄π΅πΆ
sinπ΄
2β€
πππ
(π β π)(π + π)(π + π)
(π
2)2
β₯ππππ + ππππ + ππππ
27β₯ π2
4π
πβ₯π
ππ+π
ππβ₯8π
π
Alexandru Szoros
In this article, I focus on solving these problems by using acknowledgements of triangle solution.
In lieu of representing theories and solutions separately, I would discuss on them in parallel
sections. The three problems proposed by Alexandru Szoros are represented in Section 2, Section
3, and Section 4, respectively. In Section 5, I represent more discussions of solving techniques and
tricks. And Section 6 contains the conclusion of this article.
2
2. A. Szorosβ Inequality I
Problem: Given triangle π΄π΅πΆ, prove that
sinπ΄
2β€
πππ
(π β π)(π + π)(π + π) (πΌ)
Solution: Note that, if we put
π(π; π; π) = πΏπ»π(πΌ)
π(π; π; π) = π π»π(πΌ) Then ππππ(π; π; π) = ππππ(π; π; π) = 0.
This notation reminds me to rewrite π π»π(πΌ) under trigonometric form. And fortunately,
the law of sine indicates that, in any triangle π΄π΅πΆ:
π
sin π΄=
π
sinπ΅=
π
sin πΆ= 2π
And this law results in a consequence, if
β(π; π; π) =π(π; π; π)
π(π; π; π)
where ππππ = ππππ = π, then
β(π; π; π) = β(sin π΄ ; sinπ΅ ; sin πΆ) Indeed
β(π; π; π) =(2π )ππ(sinπ΄ ; sinπ΅ ; sin πΆ)
(2π )ππ(sinπ΄ ; sinπ΅ ; sin πΆ)= β(sinπ΄ ; sinπ΅ ; sin πΆ)
Hence, we are able to rewrite π π»π(πΌ): πππ
(π β π)(π + π)(π + π)=
2πππ
(π + π β π)(π + π)(π + π)
=2 sinπ΄ sinπ΅ sin πΆ
(sinπ΅ + sin πΆ β sinπ΄)(sinπ΄ + sinπ΅)(sin π΄ + sin πΆ)
= (4 sin
π΄2 cos
π΄2
2 sinπ΅ + πΆ2
cosπ΅ β πΆ2
β 2 sinπ΄2cos
π΄2
)(2 sin
πΆ2 cos
πΆ2
2 sinπ΄ + π΅2
cosπ΄ β π΅2
)(2 sin
π΅2 cos
π΅2
2 sinπ΄ + πΆ2
cosπ΄ β πΆ2
)
= (2 sin
π΄2 cos
π΄2
cosπ΄2 cos
π΅ β πΆ2 β cos
π΅ + πΆ2 cos
π΄2
)(sin
πΆ2 cos
πΆ2
cosπΆ2 cos
π΄ β π΅2
)(sin
π΅2 cos
π΅2
cosπ΅2 cos
π΄ β πΆ2
)
=2 sin
π΄2sin
π΅2sin
πΆ2
cosπ΄ β π΅2 cos
π΄ β πΆ2 (cos
π΅ β πΆ2 β cos
π΅ + πΆ2 )
=2 sin
π΄2 sin
π΅2 sin
πΆ2
2 sinπ΅2 sin
πΆ2 cos
π΄ β π΅2 cos
π΄ β πΆ2
=sin
π΄2
cosπ΄ β π΅2 cos
π΄ β πΆ2
3
And obviously, since
cosπ΄ β π΅
2cos
π΄ β πΆ
2β€ 1
We get
π π»π(πΌ) β₯ sinπ΄
2β₯ πΏπ»π(πΌ)
QED. Equality holds when cosπ΄βπ΅
2cos
π΄βπΆ
2= 1, in other words, π΄ = π΅ = πΆ =
π
3. β
3. A. Szorosβ Inequality II
Problem: Given triangle π΄π΅πΆ, prove that
(π
2)2
β₯ππππ + ππππ + ππππ
27β₯ π2 (πΌπΌ)
3.1.About inradius and exradii of a triangle
In this subsection, I revise the calculation of inradius and exradii of a triangle.
Figure 1. Excircle (IA; ra) of triangle ABC
4
From Figure 1, we get
π = ππ΄π΅πΌπ΄ + ππ΄πΆπΌπ΄ β ππ΅πΆπΌπ΄
=1
2π΄π΅. πΌπ΄π +
1
2π΄πΆ. πΌπ΄π β
1
2π΅πΆ. πΌπ΄π
=1
2(π + π β π)ππ
= (π β π)ππ
And therefore
ππ =π
π β π=
2π
π + π β π
Totally similarly
ππ =π
π β π=
2π
π + π β π; ππ =
π
π β π=
2π
π + π β π
And additionally
π =π
π=
2π
π + π + π
3.2.Solution for A. Szorosβ Inequality II
Rewrite (πΌπΌ):
(π
2)2
β₯4π2
27β
1
(π + π β π)(π + π β π)β₯
4π2
(π + π + π)2
βΊ (π
2)2
β₯4π2(π + π + π)
27(π + π β π)(π + π β π)(π + π β π)β₯
4π2
(π + π + π)2
Firstly, I show the back part of this double-inequality, which could be rewritten as
(π + π + π)3 β₯ 27(π + π β π)(π + π β π)(π + π β π) Since π, π, and π are three sides of a triangle, there exist three positive numbers π₯, π¦,
and π§ such that
π = π₯ + π¦; π = π¦ + π§; π = π§ + π₯
Hence, the above inequality should be transformed to
8(π₯ + π¦ + π§)3 β₯ 216π₯π¦π§
βΊ (π₯ + π¦ + π§)3 β₯ 27π₯π¦π§
βΊ π₯ + π¦ + π₯ β₯ 3βπ₯π¦π§3
This is true due to the AM-GM inequality of three non-negative numbers.
Return to the front part, where we need to prove
(π
2)2
β₯ππ2
27(π β π)(π β π)(π β π)=π2
27
βΊ π
2β₯
π
3β3=π + π + π
6β3=π (sinπ΄ + sin π΅ + sin πΆ)
3β3
βΊ sinπ΄ + sin π΅ + sin πΆ β€3β3
2
5
This is also true in any triangle π΄π΅πΆ thanks to the proof of using Jensenβs inequality to
concave functions. However, here I represent an amazing way to prove this, which was
recommended by teacher Tran Phuong. Recall
π = sinπ΄ + sin π΅ + sin πΆ
= sinπ΄ + sinπ΅ + sin(π΄ + π΅)
= sinπ΄ + sinπ΅ + sinπ΄ cos π΅ + sinπ΅ cos π΄
=2
β3(β3
2sinπ΄ +
β3
2sin π΅) +
1
β3(β3 cos π΄ sinπ΅ + β3 cos π΅ sinπ΄)
Using AM-GM inequality from the geometric mean side, we get
π β€1
β3[3
4+ (sinπ΄)2 +
3
4+ (sinπ΅)2]
+1
2β3[3(cosπ΄)2 + (sinπ΅)2 + 3(cosπ΅)2 + (sin π΄)2] =
3β3
2
Both parts of inequality (πΌπΌ) are proven, QED. Equalities hold when π = π = π. β
In Section 5, I would demonstrate more about Tran Phuongβs recommendation.
4. A. Szorosβ Inequality III
Problem: Given triangle π΄π΅πΆ, prove that
4π
πβ₯π
ππ+π
ππβ₯8π
π (πΌπΌπΌ)
4.1.About angle bisectors of a triangle
Figure 2. Angle bisector AD and incenter I of triangle ABC
6
Lemma I. (where ππ is the length of π΄π·)
ππ =2ππ cos
π΄2
π + π
Proof. According to the angle bisectorβs property
π΅π·
π΄π΅=πΆπ·
π΄πΆ=π΅π· + πΆπ·
π΄π΅ + π΄πΆ=
π΅πΆ
π΄π΅ + π΄πΆ=
π
π + π
βΉ π΅π· =ππ
π + π; πΆπ· =
ππ
π + π
Using the law of cosine in triangles π΄π΅π· and π΄πΆπ·:
{π΅π·2 = π΄π΅2 + π΄π·2 β 2π΄π΅. π΄π· cosπ΅π΄οΏ½ΜοΏ½
πΆπ·2 = π΄πΆ2 + π΄π·2 β 2π΄πΆ. π΄π· cos πΆπ΄οΏ½ΜοΏ½
βΊ
{
(ππ
π + π)2
= π2 + ππ2 β 2πππ cos
π΄
2
(ππ
π + π)2
= π + ππ2 β 2πππ cos
π΄
2
βΉ π2(π2 β π2)
(π + π)2= π2 β π2 β 2(π β π)ππ cos
π΄
2
βΉ π2
π + π= π + π β 2ππ cos
π΄
2
(we might assume that π β π)
βΉ 2ππ cosπ΄
2= π + π β
π2
π + π=π2 + π2 β π2 + 2ππ
π + π=2ππ cosπ΄ + 2ππ
π + π
=2ππ(1 + cosπ΄)
π + π=4ππ (cos
π΄2)
2
π + π
βΉ ππ =2ππ cos
π΄2
π + π
If π = π, triangle π΄π΅πΆ becomes isosceles at vertex π΄, where ππ = βπ , and the Lemma is
clearly true since
2ππ cosπ΄2
π + π=2π2 cos
π΄2
2π= π cos
π΄
2= βπ
QED. β
Lemma II. (where ππ is the length of π΄π·)
ππ =2
π + πβπππ(π β π)
Proof. In Figure 2, I solve for π΄π· in triangle π΄π΅π·, of which π΄π΅, π΅π·, and cos π΅ are given.
π΄π·2 = π΄π΅2 + π΅π·2 β 2π΄π΅. π΅π· cos π΄π΅οΏ½ΜοΏ½
βΉ ππ2 = π2 + (
ππ
π + π)2
β 2π (ππ
π + π) (π2 + π2 β π2
2ππ)
7
ππ2 = π2 + (
ππ
π + π)2
βπ(π2 + π2 β π2)
π + π
=1
(π + π)2[π2π2 + π2(π + π)2 β π(π + π)(π2 + π2 β π2)]
=1
(π + π)2[π2π2 + π(π + π)(ππ + π2 β π2 β π2 + π2)]
=1
(π + π)2[π2π2 + (ππ + π2)(ππ β π2 + π2)]
=1
(π + π)2(π2π2 + π2π2 β π2ππ + π3π + ππ3 β π2π2 + π2π2)
=1
(π + π)2(π3π + 2π2π2 + ππ3 β π2ππ)
=ππ(π2 + 2ππ + π2 β π2)
(π + π)2
=ππ[(π + π)2 β π2]
(π + π)2
=ππ(π + π + π)(π + π β π)
(π + π)2
=4πππ(π β π)
(π + π)2
βΉ ππ =2
π + πβπππ(π β π)
QED. β
From the above lemmas, we could obtain
cosπ΄
2= β
π(π β π)
ππ
And in Figure 2, using the law of sine in triangle π΄π΅π·, we get
π΅π·
sinπ΄2
=π΄π·
sinπ΅
And therefore
sinπ΄
2=π΅π· sinπ΅
π΄π·=
(πππ + π
)π2π
2π + π
βπππ(π β π)=
πππ
4π βπππ(π β π)=
π
βπππ(π β π)
= β(π β π)(π β π)
ππ
These formulas allow us to find trigonometric functions of π΄
2 with three sides given.
Furthermore, I would represent one direct way to find any triangleβs incenter in plane ππ₯π¦.
8
Property: Given triangle π΄π΅πΆ with incenter I, then
ππΌπ΄ββββ + ππΌπ΅ββββ + ππΌπΆββββ = 0β
Proof: In Figure 2, π΅πΌ is the angle bisector of π΄π΅οΏ½ΜοΏ½. Consider triangle π΄π΅π·:
πΌπ·
π΅π·=πΌπ΄
π΄π΅βΉ πΌπ΄ =
π΄π΅
π΅π·πΌπ· =
ππππ + π
πΌπ· =π + π
ππΌπ·
βΉ ππΌπ΄ββββ = β(π + π)πΌπ·ββββ And note that
π·π΅
π=π·πΆ
πβΉ ππ·π΅ββββββ = βππ·πΆββββ β
Hence
ππΌπ΄ββββ + ππΌπ΅ββββ + ππΌπΆββββ
= β(π + π)πΌπ·ββββ + ππΌπ΅ββββ + ππΌπΆββββ
= π(πΌπ΅ββββ β πΌπ·ββββ ) + π(πΌπΆββββ β πΌπ·ββββ )
= ππ·π΅ββββββ + ππ·πΆββββ β
= 0β QED. β
4.2.Solution for A. Szorosβ Inequality III
Rewrite (πΌπΌπΌ): 4π
πβ₯
π
2ππ cosπΆ2
π + π
+π
2ππ cosπ΅2
π + π
β₯8π
π
βΊ 4π β₯π + π
2 cosπΆ2
+π + π
2 cosπ΅2
β₯ 8π
βΊ 4π β₯2π (sinπ΄ + sinπ΅)
2 cosπΆ2
+2π (sinπ΄ + sin πΆ)
2 cosπ΅2
β₯ 8π
βΊ 4 β₯2sin
π΄ + π΅2 cos
π΄ β π΅2
sinπ΄ + π΅2
+2 sin
π΄ + πΆ2 cos
π΄ β πΆ2
sinπ΄ + πΆ2
β₯8π
π
βΊ 2 β₯ cosπ΄ β π΅
2+ cos
π΄ β πΆ
2β₯4π
π
The front part is obviously true since cos π β€ 1, βπ β β, so equality holds only when
π΄ = π΅ = πΆ =π
3.
However, to prove the back part of this double-inequality, I am supposed to return to
initial steps, with help from Lemma II. Rewrite the back part of (πΌπΌπΌ):
9
π(π + π)
2βπππ(π β π)+
π(π + π)
2βπππ(π β π)β₯8π
ππ
βΊ (π + π)βππ
2βπ β π+ (π + π)βππ
2βπ β πβ₯ 8β(π β π)(π β π)(π β π) (β)
Using AM-GM inequality, of which
π + π β₯ 2βππ; π + π β₯ 2βππ
πΏπ»π(β) β₯ππ
βπ β π+
ππ
βπ β πβ₯
2πβππ
β(π β π)(π β π)4
So it is enough to show that
πβππ β₯ 4β(π β π)(π β π)(π β π)β(π β π)(π β π)4
βΊ π2ππ β₯ 16(π β π)(π β π)(π β π)β(π β π)(π β π) (ββ)
Indeed, from geometric mean side to arithmetic mean side:
2β(π β π)(π β π) β€ π β π + π β π = π
2β(π β π)(π β π) β€ π
2β(π β π)(π β π) β€ π
2β(π β π)(π β π) β€ π
βΉ π π»π(ββ) β€ πΏπ»π(ββ) Equality holds when π = π = π. QED. β
5. More discussions
5.1.The relation between circumscribed radius and inradius of a triangle
From A. Szorosβ Inequalities II and III, we obtain π β₯ 2π. This is also consequently
resulted in from many triangle-trigonometric problems, and I would represent one
direct way of proving this:
π β₯ 2π βΊπππ
4πβ₯2π
πβΊ πππ β₯
8π2
π= 8(π β π)(π β π)(π β π)
This is due to a result in last subsection, where
2β(π β π)(π β π) β€ π
2β(π β π)(π β π) β€ π
2β(π β π)(π β π) β€ π
And the back part of (πΌπΌπΌ) leads to a nice problem:
cosπ΄ β π΅
2+ cos
π΄ β πΆ
2β₯4π
π
Or generally
10
cosπ΄ β π΅
2+ cos
π΅ β πΆ
2+ cos
πΆ β π΄
2β₯6π
π
5.2.Proving basic triangle-trigonometric inequalities
In triangle π΄π΅πΆ
π = sinπ΄ + sinπ΅ + sin πΆ β€3β3
2 (ππ£)
π = cos π΄ + cosπ΅ + cos πΆ β€3
2 (π£)
π = sinπ΄
2+ sin
π΅
2+ sin
πΆ
2β€3
2 (π£π)
π = cosπ΄
2+ cos
π΅
2+ cos
πΆ
2β€3β3
2 (π£ππ)
Except (π£), all (ππ£), (π£π), and (π£ππ) could be proven by using Jensenβs inequality to
concave functions. But I would represent a method proposed by Tran Phuong to prove
these inequalities, just like in subsection 4.2. Moreover, problem (π£) could be proven
by using the SOS method, a highly convenient way.
Indeed:
π π»π(π£) β πΏπ»π(π£) = 1 β cos π΄ β (cosπ΅ + cos πΆ) +1
2
= 2(sinπ΄
2)2
β 2 cosπ΅ + πΆ
2cos
π΅ β πΆ
2+1
2(cos
π΅ β πΆ
2)2
+1
2(sin
π΅ β πΆ
2)2
= 2(sinπ΄
2)2
β 2 sinπ΄
2cos
π΅ β πΆ
2+1
2(cos
π΅ β πΆ
2)2
+1
2(sin
π΅ β πΆ
2)2
=1
2(2 sin
π΄
2β cos
π΅ β πΆ
2)2
+1
2(sin
π΅ β πΆ
2)2
β₯ 0
QED. Equality holds when π΄ = π΅ = πΆ =π
3. β
Tran Phuongβs recommendation:
Proof of (π£), assuming πΆ = max(0; π)
{π΄; π΅; πΆ}:
π = cos π΄ + cosπ΅ + cosπΆ = cosπ΄ + cosπ΅ β cos(π΄ + π΅) = 1(cosπ΄ + cosπ΅) β cos π΄ cos π΅ + sin π΄ sinπ΅
Using AM-GM inequality:
π β€1
2[1 + (cos π΄ + cosπ΅)2] β cos π΄ cos π΅ +
1
2[(sin π΄)2 + (sinπ΅)2] =
3
2
Proof of (π£π):
π = sinπ΄
2+ sin
π΅
2+ sin
πΆ
2= sin
π΄
2+ sin
π΅
2+ cos
π΄ + π΅
2
= 1(sinπ΄
2+ sin
π΅
2) + cos
π΄
2cos
π΅
2β sin
π΄
2sin
π΅
2
Using AM-GM inequality:
11
π β€1
2[1 + (sin
π΄
2+ sin
π΅
2)2
] β sinπ΄
2sin
π΅
2+1
2[(cos
π΄
2)2
+ (cosπ΅
2)2
] =3
2
Proof of (π£ππ):
π = cosπ΄
2+ cos
π΅
2+ cos
πΆ
2= cos
π΄
2+ cos
π΅
2+ sin
π΄ + π΅
2
= cosπ΄
2+ cos
π΅
2+ sin
π΄
2cos
π΅
2+ sin
π΅
2cos
π΄
2
=2
β3(β3
2cos
π΄
2+β3
2cos
π΅
2) +
1
β3(β3 sin
π΄
2cos
π΅
2+ β3 sin
π΅
2cos
π΄
2)
Using AM-GM inequality:
π β€1
β3[3
4+ (cos
π΄
2)2
+3
4+ (cos
π΅
2)2
]
+1
2β3[3 (sin
π΄
2)2
+ (cosπ΄
2)2
+ 3(sinπ΅
2)2
+ (cosπ΅
2)2
] =3β3
2
QED. To all of these problems, equalities hold when triangle π΄π΅πΆ is equilateral. β
5.3.About A. Szorosβ Inequality I
sinπ΄
2= β
(π β π)(π β π)
ππ
Using this formula, then (πΌ) becomes
πππ
(π β π)(π + π)(π + π)β₯ β
(π β π)(π β π)
ππ
βΊ πππβππ β₯ (π β π)(π + π)(π + π)β(π β π)(π β π) (π£πππ)
Like I mentioned above:
2β(π β π)(π β π) β€ π
2β(π β π)(π β π) β€ π
βΉ ππ β₯ 4(π β π)β(π β π)(π β π)
So it would be enough were it possible to show that
πβππ β₯(π + π)(π + π)
4
However, this is totally not true, since
π + π β₯ 2βππ; π + π β₯ 2βππ
Therefore, problem (π£πππ) could be an unpleasant challenge in any contest.
6. Conclusion
Solving Alexandru Szorosβ Inequalities about triangle and trigonometric factors brought
me three lessons. First, transform expressions from complicated to simple forms. Second,
try to find common factors of both sides. And final, basic methods with classical
inequalities should be approached initially, there must be a key to clinch the problems.