Upload
max
View
25
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
HRPN-CT-2002-00292 E.U. Research Training Network Probe for New Physics. Inclusive Jet Production using the k T Algorithm at CDF. Régis Lefèvre Analysis done with Mario Martínez and Olga Norniella IFAE Barcelona. IMFP2006 XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Régis LefèvreAnalysis done with Mario Martínez and Olga Norniella
IFAE Barcelona
Inclusive Jet Production using the kT Algorithm at CDF
IMFP2006XXXIV International Meeting
on Fundamental Physics
April 2nd-7th 2006, Madrid, Spain
HRPN-CT-2002-00292
E.U. ResearchTraining Network
Probe for New Physics
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 2
• Proton-antiproton collisions
• s = 1.96 TeV
• 36 bunches: crossing time = 396 ns
• Peak luminosity ~ 1.2 1032 cm-2 s-1
The Tevatron in Run II
• Collecting ~ 20 pb-1 / week
• About 1.6 fb-1 delivered
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 3
CDF • Highly upgraded for Run II– New silicon tracking
– New drift chamber
– Upgraded muon chambers
– New plug calorimeters
– New TOF
• Data taking efficiency ~ 85 %
• About 1.3 fb-1 on tape – New results based on 1 fb-1
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 4
Motivations• Legacy from Run I
– Great interest on apparent excess at high ET
– SM explanation•Gluon PDF increased at high x•New PDFs from global fit include CDF and
D0 jet data from Run I (CTEQ6, MRST2001)
• Stringent test of pQCD– Over ~ 8 order of magnitudes
• Tail sensitive to New Physics– Probing distances ~ 10-19 m
• PDFs at high Q2 & high x
• Production enhanced at high pT
thanks to new s
Run I CDF Inclusive Jet Data(Statistical Errors Only)JetClu RCONE=0.7 0.1<||<0.7R=F=ET /2 RSEP=1.3
CTEQ4M PDFsCTEQ4HJ PDFs
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 5
Cone Jet Algorithms and pQCD
• Infrared and Collinear Safety– Fixed order pQCD contains not fully cancelled
infrared divergences• Inclusive jet cross section affected at NNLO
– Run I Cone Algorithm: JetClu• Neither infrared nor collinear safe
– Run II Cone Algorithm: Midpoint• Uses midpoints between pairs of proto-jets
as additional seeds
Infrared and collinear safety restored
• Merging/Splitting– NLO pQCD uses larger cone radius R’ = R RSEP
to emulate experimental merging/splitting• Arbitrary parameter RSEP: prescription RSEP = 1.3
(based on parton level approximate arguments)
below threshold(no jets)
above threshold(1 jet)
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 6
The kT Algorithm
• Inclusive kT algorithm– Merging pairs of nearby particles
in order of increasing relative pT
•
•
– D parameter controls merging termination and characterizes size of resulting jets
• pT classification inspired by pQCD gluon emissions
– Infrared and Collinear safeto all orders in pQCD
– No merging/splitting•No RSEP issue comparing to pQCD
2
222
D
ÄR)p,(pmind jT,iT,ij =
2iT,ii pd =
– Successfully used at LEP and HERA
– Relatively new in hadron-hadron collider• More difficult environment Underlying Event
Multiple Interactions per crossing (MI)
Results from ZEUS / D0 Run ID0 Run I
Disagreement at low pT
Suggests Underlying Event not properly accounted for
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 8
Framework / Related Topics
• Look first at central jets: 0.1 < |y| < 0.7– Where calorimeter simulation is best
– Use D = 0.5, 0.7 and 1.0•To make sure that Underlying Event and MI
contributions are well under control
• Data fully corrected to particle level– Requires a good simulation of the detector
– Monte-Carlo generator should be able to reproduce the Jet Shapes
•Jet fragmentation and parton cascades
• NLO pQCD corrected to hadron level– Parton level pQCD calculation corrected
for the Underlying Event and Hadronization •Requires a Monte-Carlo generator able to
reproduce the Underlying Event
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 9
Underlying Event• Everything but the hard scattering process
– Initial state soft radiations
– Beam-beam remnants
– Multiple Parton Interactions (MPI)
• Studied in the transverse region– Leading jet sample
– Back-to-back sample
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 10
Energy Flow Inside Jets
(1-)
∑=jets T
T
jets R)(0,P
r)(0,P
N
1Ø(r)
Jet shapes governed by multi-gluon emission from primary parton
– Test of parton shower models
– Sensitive to underlying event structure
– Sensitive to quark and gluon mixture in the final state Phys. Rev. D
71 112002 (2005)
37 < pT < 380 GeV/c
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 11
Calorimeter Response to Jets• (First set electromagnetic scale using Z e+e-)• Absolute jet energy scale
– E/p of isolated tracks used to tune the showering simulation (G-Flash)•Residual discrepancies taken as systematic errors
– Induced uncertainty on jet energy scale between 1 and 3%•Reasonable simulation of the pT spectrum of the particles within a jet by PYTHIA
and HERWIG fragmentation models (fundamental as non-compensated calorimeters) – Induced difference on jet energy scale < 1%
– Photon-jet balance•Data and Simulation agree
at 1% to 2% level
• Non uniformity versus – Dijet balance
•Relative response known to 0.5% level
• Resolution– Bisector method
•Jet energy resolutions known within relative uncertainties of few %
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 12
Theoretical Predictions
• NLO pQCD: JETRAD
– Scale: R = F = max (PTJET) / 2
– PDFs: CTEQ6.1M package
– Main uncertainty comes from PDFs
•Gluon PDF at high x
• CHAD = parton-to-hadron correction factor– Accounts for non perturbative contributions
•Underlying Event (U.E.)
•Hadronization
– PYTHIA-Tune A used as nominal
•HERWIG used for uncertainty
(parton level no U.E.)
(hadron level with U.E.)CHAD =
PDF uncertainty
CHAD
D=0.7 and 0.1 < |y| < 0.7
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 13
Published Results
Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 122001 (2006)
D = 0.70.1 < |y| < 0.7
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 14
kT Jets vs. D (0.1 < |y| < 0.7)
D = 0.5 D = 1.0
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 15
Forward Jets
• Essentials to pin down PDFs vs. eventual New Physicsat higher Q2 in central region– DGLAP gives Q2 evolution
• Expend x range toward low x
High-x Low-x
“Rutherford type” parton backscattering
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 16
New Results
• D = 0.7
• 5 rapidity regions up to |y| = 2.1– |y| < 0.1
– 0.1 < |y| < 0.7
– 0.7 < |y| < 1.1
– 1.1 < |y| < 1.6
– 1.6 < |y| < 2.1
L ~ 1 fb-1
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 17
Data / Theory
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 18
Conclusion
• Good agreement with NLO
– Stringent test of pQCD over ~ 8 orders of magnitude
•pT reach extended by ~ 150 GeV/c with respect to Run I
• Careful treatment of non perturbative effects
– Underlying Event well under control
• To be used in future PDF global fits in orderto better constrain the gluon PDF at high x
– Forward jets essentials
• Prospect
– cos * vs. dijet invariant mass
•Limit on contact interactions
Backup Slides
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 20
kT Algorithm Step-by-Step
jet
jet
jet
jet jet
jet jet
jet
2
222
D
ÄR)p,(pmind jT,iT,ij =
2iT,ii pd =
Longitudinally invariant kT algorithm (Ellis-Soper inclusive mode)
Régis Lefèvre, IMFP 2006, April 6th 2006, El Escorial, Madrid , Spain 21
PT//
PTPERP
PERP axis
// axis (bisector)
Transverse Plan
PTJET2
PTJET1
Bisector Method
// ISR
PERP ISR Detector Resolution
• Assuming ISR democratic in D = (2
PERP - 2//) / 2 Detector Resolution
0.1 < |y| < 0.7