In Re D Johnson Response

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/17/2019 In Re D Johnson Response

    1/7

    Medical Dental Development LLC v David Johnson Response to Order to Show Cause 1

    Law Offices of Orly Taitz

    29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100

    Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

     ph 949-683-5411 fax 9490766-7603

    Attorney for creditor Medical Dental

    Development LLC

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

    In Re David Johnson ) Case No.: SAC16-00398 JAK

    RESPONSE TO NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE 

    Case 8:16-cv-00398-JAK Document 8 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:103

  • 8/17/2019 In Re D Johnson Response

    2/7

    Medical Dental Development LLC v David Johnson Response to Order to Show Cause 2

    On 04.20.2016 Appellant, Medical Dental Development LLC, received an order to show cause in regards

    to deficiency of forms. 

    The appellant responds as follows:

    1. The only order that the Appellant received from the Bankruptcy Court, was an order for the

    appellant to file the designation of record by 03.11.2016, see below:

    02/26/2016

    41(4 pgs)

     Notice of Appeal and Statement of Election to United StatesDistrict Court.(Official Form 417A) . Fee Amount $298 Filed by Creditor Medical Dental Development LLC (RE: relateddocument(s)39 Order Denying Motion to Reopen WithPrejudice) (BNC-PDF)). Appellant Designation due by3/11/2016. (Bolte, Nickie) (Entered: 02/29/2016)

    2. Appellant promptly complied with the order and filed the designation of record on 03.03.2016,

    well before the given date of 03.12.2016:

    03/03/2016

    43(8 pgs)

    Appellant Designation of Record For Appeal To DistrictCourt Filed by Creditor Medical Dental Development LLC(RE: related document(s)41 Notice of Appeal and Statementof Election (Official Form 417A)). Appellee designation due by 3/17/2016. Transmission of Designation Due by 4/4/2016.(Bolte, Nickie) (Entered: 03/04/2016)

    3. Only after the District Court issued its’ order on 04.20.2016 to show cause regarding the

    deficiency, did the Bankruptcy Court sent the Appellant it’s order of deficiency. The order of

    deficiency from the Bankruptcy Court arrived by mail on 04.21.2016, and until then the Bankruptcy

    Court did not notify the Appellant of any deficiency.

    04/20/2016 

    47

    (1 pg) 

    Deficiency notice send to United States District Court: Please, be

    advised that the Statement of Issues and Notice of Transcript have

    not been filed as required by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy

    Procedure 8003 and 8009 - RE: USDC Case No. SACV16-00398-JAK

    (RE: related document(s)41 Notice of Appeal and Statement of

    Election (Official Form 417A) filed by Creditor Medical Dental

    Development LLC) (Bolte, Nickie) (Entered: 04/20/2016) 

    Case 8:16-cv-00398-JAK Document 8 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 4 Page ID #:104

    https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084805086https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084746313https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084869237https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084805086https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085438990https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084805086https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084805086https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085438990https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084805086https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084869237https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084746313https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084805086

  • 8/17/2019 In Re D Johnson Response

    3/7

    Medical Dental Development LLC v David Johnson Response to Order to Show Cause 3

    4. On 04.20.2016, when the order to show cause was issued, the attorney for the appellant was out

    of the country. She came back on Sunday, April 24th, and the next day, on April 25th, she filed the

    notice of transcript. The transcript was ordered and paid for. See docket entries below:

    04/25/2016 

    48

    (1 pg) 

    Transcript Order Form related to an Appeal, regarding Hearing Date

    3/7/16 Filed by Creditor Medical Dental Development LLC (RE:

    related document(s)37 Motion to Reopen Chapter 7 Case. Fee

    Amount $260). (Le, James) (Entered: 04/25/2016) 

    04/25/2016 

    49  Transcript Record Transmittal (Court transcript records have been

    uploaded to FDS). For Order Number: 16-MW-23. RE Hearing Date:

    3/7/16, [TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE PROVIDER: BRIGGS REPORTING

    CO., INC., Telephone number Ph: (310) 410-4151.] (RE: related

    document(s)48 Transcript Order Form (Public Request) filed by

    Debtor David A. Johnson) (Le, James) (Entered: 04/25/2016) 

    04/25/2016 

    51

    (1 pg) 

    Notice of transcripts: hearing date(s): 05/07/2012 - Filed by Creditor

    Medical Dental Development LLC (RE: related

    document(s)41 Notice of Appeal and Statement of Election (Official

    Form 417A)). (Bolte, Nickie) (Entered: 04/26/2016) 

    04/26/2016 

    50  Acknowledgement of Request for Transcript (RE: Appeal) Received

    on 4/25/2016. The Reporter Expects to Have the TranscriptCompleted by 5/23/2016. (RE: related document(s) 48 Transcript

    Order Form related to an Appeal, regarding Hearing Date 3/7/16

    Filed by Creditor Medical Dental Development LLC (RE: related

    document(s)37 Motion to Reopen Chapter 7 Case. Fee Amount

    $260).). (Martens, Holly) (Entered: 04/26/2016) 

    5. On April 26, 2016 she filed with the bankruptcy court the Statement of Issues. See attached as

    Exhibit 1 the Statement of Issues with the stamp of the Bankruptcy Court, dated April 26, 2016.

    CONCLUSION

    As explained above, the moment appellant was notified by the Bankruptcy Court of deficiency, of

    two missing forms, those forms were immediately filed and the deficiency was cured. As such, the

    appeal should proceed as scheduled.

    Case 8:16-cv-00398-JAK Document 8 Filed 04/27/16 Page 3 of 4 Page ID #:105

    https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085495343https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084562008https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085495343https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085513112https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084805086https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085495343https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084562008https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084562008https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085495343https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084805086https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085513112https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085495343https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973084562008https://ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov/doc1/973085495343

  • 8/17/2019 In Re D Johnson Response

    4/7

    Medical Dental Development LLC v David Johnson Response to Order to Show Cause 4

    Respectfully submitted

    /s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

    04.26. 2016

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I, Orly Taitz, attest that attached pleadings were served on the appellee on 04.27.2016 via ECF and

    first class mail

    Signed

    /s/ Orly Taitz

    Case 8:16-cv-00398-JAK Document 8 Filed 04/27/16 Page 4 of 4 Page ID #:106

  • 8/17/2019 In Re D Johnson Response

    5/7

    Law

    Offices

    of

    Orly

    Taitz

    zgS3gSanta

    Marg

    arttaPKWY,

    ste

    100

    Rancho

    Santa

    Margartta

    CA

    92688

    ph

    949-683-5411

    fax

    949-766-7643

    ATTORI{EY

    FOR CREDITOR

    MEDICAL

    DENTAL

    DEVELOPMENTLLC

    UNITED

    STATES

    BANKRUPTCY

    COURT

    CENTRAL

    DISTRICT

    OF

    CALIFORNIA

    In Re David

    Johnson

    )

    Case

    No.:

    11-bk*20423

    STATEMENT

    OF

    ISSUES ON

    APPEAL

    1.

    Bankruptcy

    court

    erred

    and

    abused

    its

    discretion

    in

    refusing

    to

    reopen

    bankruptcy

    of

    the debtor

    after

    creditor

    provided the

    bankruptcy

    court

    with

    new

    information

    received

    from

    the

    partner

    of the debtor.

    New

    information

    states that

    the debtor

    did

    not

    disclose

    to

    the bankruptcy

    court

    inheritance

    that

    he

    received

    from

    his

    father.

    Additionally,

    debtor

    placed

    the

    value

    of his

    chiropractic

    office

    as

    nominal,

    while

    in reality

    it

    can

    be

    as

    much

    as

    300,000.

    The

    debt

    that

    is

    owed

    to

    the

    creditor

    is

    290,000.

    The

    court

    abused

    its'

    discretion

    not only

    in not

    reopening

    the

    bankruptcy,

    but

    in

    refusing

    to

    even

    hold

    a

    hearing

    on

    the

    matter.

    Aforementioned

    information

    is not

    only

    a

    justification

    for reopening

    the

    bankruptcy,

    but

    also

    for

    the court

    to

    forward

    this

    information

    to

    the

    US

    Attorney's

    office

    for

    prosecution

    of

    the debtor under

    18

    USC

    152.

    FILED

    APR

    26

    2016

    CLERK

    U,S.

    BAITKRUPTCY

    COURT

    CEWN.AL DISTRICT OF CALIFORHIA

    BY:

    DoPutY

    Clsrk

    Case 8:16-cv-00398-JAK Document 8-1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:107

  • 8/17/2019 In Re D Johnson Response

    6/7

    2.In

    its'refusal

    to

    reopen

    bankruptcy

    without

    as much as

    a hearing,

    Judge

    Wallace

    stated

    that

    there

    was

    a

    hearing

    previously.

    However,

    during

    the

    prior

    hearing

    that

    was

    held

    on

    05.02.2012

    the

    creditor

    stated that

    the creditor

    did

    not

    receive

    the

    bankruptcy notice

    and

    asked

    to

    reopen

    &e

    bankruptcy on that

    basis.

    At

    the

    time

    of

    05.07.2012

    hearing

    the only

    finding

    that

    was

    made

    by

    the

    Bankruptcy

    court,

    was

    the

    decision

    that

    since

    the

    notice

    was

    sent,

    the

    court

    assumed

    that

    it was received.

    The

    court

    did not

    make

    any

    findings

    on the

    merits.

    Additionally,

    at the time

    the

    creditor

    did

    not

    even

    know

    about

    the

    inheritance

    as the

    partner

    of the

    debtor

    contacted

    the

    creditor

    only

    recently.

    Based

    on the

    aboveo

    the Dishict

    court

    should

    reverse

    the decision

    of the

    Bankruptcy

    court

    and

    reopen

    the

    bankruptcy

    Respectfully

    submitted,

    Orly

    Taitz,

    ESQ

    Attorney

    for

    the Creditor

    Medical

    Dental

    44.25.20L6

    I)evelopment

    LLC

    Case 8:16-cv-00398-JAK Document 8-1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:108

  • 8/17/2019 In Re D Johnson Response

    7/7

    Certificate of

    Semce

    I,

    Orly

    Taitz,

    served attached

    pleadings

    on

    the

    debtor

    via first

    class

    mail

    and

    ECF

    on

    04.26.2016

    Signed

    lsl

    Orly

    Taitz,

    Attorney for

    Creditor

    Medical-Dental

    Development

    LLC

    Case 8:16-cv-00398-JAK Document 8-1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:109