26
Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC K. Senior, J. Ray U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) 2004 IGS Workshop & Symposium Bern, Switzerland

Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC

K. Senior, J. RayU.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL)

2004 IGS Workshop & SymposiumBern, Switzerland

Page 2: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

Status of IGS Clock Products

• Sat clocks+ orbits (Final & Rapid) provide autonomous PPP at few cm level

• Station clock comparisons show accuracies ranging from 120ps to ~ 1ns (Metrologia 2003)

• Finals densification much improved (e.g., CODE & GFZ + new MIT)

• Rapids were previously most robust; fragile due to USNO/CODE dropouts

• Estimates referenced to IGS timescales have shown to be useful for diagnosing station problems.

Page 3: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

Needed/Expected Improvements in IGS Clock Products

• Continued densification, now particularly with Rapids.– H-Masers + timing lab stations critical

• Timescale Improvements• Station operators could improve local clock performance

significantly in almost all cases – using clock estimates (referenced to IGS timescales) as

diagnostic tool, – thermally isolating receiver, phase-stabilized cabling, & other

known problems.

Page 4: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

Clock “Fiducial” Stations

YAR2 (Rb)

YAR1 (Cs),

YAKT (Cs),

WUHN (Cs),

WROC (Rb),

WHIT (Rb),

VILL (Cs),

TSKB (Cs),

TROM (Rb),

TNML (Rb),

THU3 (Rb),

THU2 (Rb),

THTI (Rb),

SYOG (Cs),

SUTM (Rb),

STR1 (Cs),

SCH2 (Rb),

RIOG (Rb),

QAQ1 (Rb),

PRDS (Cs),

PERT (Cs),

OBET (Cs),

MCM4 (Rb),

MAS1 (Cs),

MAR6 (Rb),

LPGS (Rb),

KOUR (Cs),

KIRU (Cs),

KERG (Cs),

JPLM (Rb),

JOZE (Rb),

JOZ2 (Rb),

HLFX (Rb),

HERS (Rb),

HARB (Cs),

GRAZ (Rb),

GMAS (Cs),

DWH1 (Cs),

DARW (Rb),

DAEJ (Cs),

CHUR (Rb),

CAGZ (Cs),

BAN2 (Rb),

BAHR (Cs),

AREQ (Rb),

YELL (HM)YEBE (HM),

WTZR*(HM),

WTZA*(HM),

WSRT (HM),

WES2 (HM),

USUD (HM),

USNO*(HM),

USN1*(HM),

TWTF*(Cs),

TLSE*(Cs),

TIDB (HM),

TID2 (HM),

TID1 (HM),

STJO (HM),

SPT0 (HM),

SFER*(Cs),

PTBB*(Cs),

PIE1 (HM),

OPMT*(HM),

ONSA (HM),

OBE2*(Rb),

NYAL (HM),

NYA1 (HM),

NRC1*(HM),

NPLD*(HM),

NNOR (HM),

NLIB (HM),

MIZU*(Cs),

METS (HM),

MEDI (HM),

MDVO (HM),

MDVJ*(HM),

MATE (HM),

MAT1 (HM),

MAD2 (HM),

KOKB (HM),

KHAJ (HM),

KGN0*(Cs),

IRKT (HM),

IRKJ (HM),

IENG*(Cs),

HOB2 (HM),

GOL2 (HM),

GODZ (HM),

GODE (HM),

FORT (HM),

FAIR (HM),

DRAO (HM),

BRUS*(HM),

BREW (HM),

BOR1*(Cs),

AMC2*(HM),

ALGO (HM),

Primary (Hm or timing lab) Secondary (Cs or Rb not at timing lab)

List updated daily at https://timescales.nrl.navy.mil/

Page 5: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

Wettzell, Germany H-maser AOA SNR-8000 ACT IFAGWTZR

Wettzell, Germany H-maser Ashtech Z-XII3T IFAGWTZA

Washington, DC, USA H-maser AOA SNR-12 ACT USNO * USNO

Taoyuan, Taiwan cesium Ashtech Z-XII3T TL * TWTF

Toulouse, France cesium AOA TurboRogueCNESTLSE

Boras, Sweden cesium JPS Legacy SP SPT0

San Fernando, Spain cesium Trimble 4000SSI ROA * SFER

Braunschweig, Germany H-maser AOA TurboRoguePTB * PTBB

Penc, Hungary rubidium Trimble 4000SSE SGOPENC

Paris, France H-maser Ashtech Z-XII3T OPOPMT

Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany rubidium AOA SNR-8000 ACT DLR OBE2

Ottawa, Canada H-maser AOA SNR-8100 ACT NRC * NRC2

Ottawa, Canada H-maser AOA SNR-12 ACT NRC * NRC1

Teddington, UK H-maser Ashtech Z-XII3T NPL * NPLD

Mizusawa, Japan cesium AOA Benchmark NAOMIZU

Mendeleevo, Russia H-maser Trimble 4000SSE VNIIMMDVJ

Koganei, Japan cesium Ashtech Z-XII3 CRL * KGN0

Torino, Italy Cesium Ashtech Z-XII3T IEN IENG

Brussels, Belgium H-maser Ashtech Z-XII3T ORB BRUS

Borowiec, Poland cesium AOA TurboRogueAOSBOR1

Colorado Springs, CO, USA H-maser AOA SNR-12 ACT AMC * AMC2

CityFreq. Std.GPS ReceiverTime LabIGS Site

IGS Stations Co-located at Timing Labs

Page 6: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

IGS Time Scale• Internal IGS time scale implemented using a weighted

combination of included frequency standards

• 1 d stability improved from ~2 x 10-14 (when aligned to GPS time before) to ~1 x 10-15 now

• Steered to GPS time in the long term (~30 to 40 d)

• But longer term drifts can reach ~50 ns w.r.t. UTC

Page 7: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark
Page 8: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark
Page 9: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

Station Calibration Bias

iiiB UTC-CLK=

( )( ) ( )

T TIGS

T IGS

CLK GPST (UTC GPST) (UTC UTC )

CLK UTC GPST GPSTGPST

i i i

i i

i

B

B

′ = − − − + −

= − + −

= + ∆

STATION CALIBRATION BIAS: includes internal GPS receiver/antenna calibration bias & intra-lab offset to UTCi

CLKi = GPS geodetic clock estimates at lab iUTCi = local realization of UTC for lab i

To relate IGS time scale to UTC, need to know prediction of (UTCi – UTC) and station timing bias:

From IGS clock products & BIPM Circular T, can compute:

small corrections due to different methods of observing GPS time

Page 10: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

New Steering Reference

(UTC-IGSTu) = Σwi(CLKi – IGSTu) - Bi] + (UTC-UTCi)

Using LQG alg., steer to zero the quanity:

Must predictOutput of existing timescale algorithm

Can be determined provided bias is stable

3-state LQG currently used, but 2-state may suffice

Page 11: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

AMC2 ( )B t′

Page 12: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

BOR1( )B t′

Page 13: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

BRUS( )B t′

Page 14: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

KGN0 ( )B t′

Page 15: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

NPLD ( )B t′

Page 16: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

TWTF ( )B t′

Page 17: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

USN1( )B t′

Page 18: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark
Page 19: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark
Page 20: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

2.693.33639.59639.9218718552532-52729

1.561.6285287.1985287.1516415952360-52529

1.381.555.895.91807452260-52339

1.932.24-68.83-69.07737252180-52256

2.362.27-157.72-157.25282652131-52158

3.973.25619.53619.04616152069-52129

2.522.43-69.69-69.71656051922-51986USNO

1.892.241.650.76309552467-52729USN1

9.057.69289.84288.4516616052563-52729

3.664.64381243.81381242.55796852483-52562

6.134.91298.93298.87344152400-52453

7.34294.7016052316-52347TWTF

3.332.82-8075.78-8075.9011237652133-52569NPLD

2.683.44-29.26-28.9510316852421-52729KGN0

2.422.59586.15585.8323829252420-52729

0.303.46452.77454.83413652213-52374BRUS

2.182.63-25.60-25.63313252693-52724

3.513.98121.23120.79605652611-52678

2.623.3131.1531.72282652504-52531

2.022.75-352.91-353.05453452251-52296

12.6811.94-2955.26-2955.91546051854-52020BOR1

2.602.694.262.7123024752480-52729

1.472.87-452.38-451.404229952117-52437AMC2

FinalRapidFinalRapidFinalRapidRANGE

B'i WRMSB'i# ValuesMJDSTATI

ON

Page 21: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

Determining ∆GPST

average difference in BIPM & IGS measurement of GPS time due to different satellite antenna offset values ~ -1 ns (-0.92 to -1.3 ns over last few years)

day-to-day variations in IGS clock alignment to GPS time & differences in satellites used by IGS & BIPM each day

• ∆GPST(t) causes common-mode variations in Bi' which can be used to estimate effect when multiple labs are available

lab-specific errors in local calibration & time transfer to BIPM

• Can separate ∆GPST into time-varying & quasi-static components:

GPSTGPST( ) GPST ...

i i

i

B BB t

′= − ∆

′= − ∆ − ∆ +

Page 22: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark
Page 23: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark
Page 24: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

∆GPST Adjustments

Page 25: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

1.222.01641.72641.592.693.33639.59639.9218718552532-52729

1.390.8385288.6885288.651.561.6285287.1985287.1516415952360-52529

1.010.456.757.241.381.555.895.91807452260-52339

1.620.91-67.80-68.301.932.24-68.83-69.07737252180-52256

2.240.30-156.46-155.082.362.27-157.72-157.25282652131-52158

3.973.25620.53620.043.973.25619.53619.04616152069-52129

2.392.15-68.85-68.782.522.43-69.69-69.71656051922-51986USNO

1.030.763.041.401.892.241.650.76309552467-52729USN1

8.607.42290.12288.279.057.69289.84288.4516616052563-52729

3.474.15381246.48381245.163.664.64381243.81381242.55796852483-52562

5.354.91301.33301.346.134.91298.93298.87344152400-52453

7.11294.607.34294.7016052316-52347TWTF

2.331.35-8074.25-8074.743.332.82-8075.78-8075.9011237652133-52569NPLD

2.442.64-28.31-27.922.683.44-29.26-28.9510316852421-52729KGN0

1.431.24586.89585.812.422.59586.15585.8323829252420-52729

0.061.31453.68454.420.303.46452.77454.83413652213-52374BRUS

1.771.55-25.73-25.692.182.63-25.60-25.63313252693-52724

1.721.92121.26120.323.513.98121.23120.79605652611-52678

2.332.8833.7734.402.623.3131.1531.72282652504-52531

0.981.49-353.19-353.192.022.75-352.91-353.05453452251-52296

12.5911.77-2954.49-2955.0012.6811.94-2955.26-2955.91546051854-52020BOR1

1.411.395.104.192.602.694.262.7123024752480-52729

0.751.93-452.02-450.721.472.87-452.38-451.404229952117-52437AMC2

FinalRapidFinalRapidFinalRapidRANGE

Bi WRMSBiB'i WRMSB'i# ValuesMJDSTATI

ON

Page 26: Improving IGS Timescale Stability and Tracking of UTC · NRC1 NRC * AOA SNR-12 ACT H-maser Ottawa, Canada NPLD NPL * Ashtech Z-XII3T H-maser Teddington, UK MIZU NAO AOA Benchmark

Conclusions• Demonstrated an in situ method to transfer lab calibration to co-

located IGS geodetic receiver system– Requires no cable, connector, or configuration changes– Precision (RMS) good to ~1 ns– IGS Rapid & Final results consistent to <~1 ns

• Accuracy compared to absolute instrumental calibration:– AMC2 differences -- +4.2 ns (Rapids), +5.1 ns (Finals)– USN1 differences -- +1.4 ns (Rapids), +3.0 ns (Finals)

• Technique can be applied to continuously monitor intra-lab calibration stability

• Being used to improve steering of IGS time scales w.r.t. UTC (~EFTF April, 2004)